Search (527 results, page 1 of 27)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  1. Becker, H.-G.; Lemanski, T.; Ziebarth, T.: Web 1.0 - 4.0 : Zwischen Reparaturbetrieb und ferner Vision (2008) 0.20 
    0.20113836 = product of:
  0.40227672 = sum of:
    0.40227672 = sum of:
      0.3458844 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.3458844 = score(doc=1940,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          1.0029888 = fieldWeight in 1940, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1940)
      0.056392316 = weight(_text_:22 in 1940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056392316 = score(doc=1940,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1940, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1940)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die 10. InetBib-Tagung fand vom 9. bis 11. April in den Räumlichkeiten der neuen Universität in Würzburg und damit zum ersten Mal in Bayern statt. Über 450 Teilnehmer und rund 40 Vorträge bedeuteten eine neue Rekordbeteiligung. InetBib 2.0 - der Name der Tagung war Programm: Diskutiert wurden die Web-2.0-Technologien und deren Einsatz in Bibliotheken sowie ihr Mehrwert für Nutzer und Mitarbeiter. Neben diesen Themen, die auch das Second Life, die Bibliothek 2.0, den Katalog 2.0 sowie den Bibliothekar 2.0 berührten, wurden ebenfalls eher praktische Fragen aus dem Alltag behandelt, wie zum Beispiel das neue Urheberrecht und seine Konsequenzen für den Kopien­versand, die Anforderungen virtueller Studiengänge an Bibliotheken und die Möglichkeiten, Benutzern eBooks anzubieten.
    Date
    22. 6.2008 17:20:09
  2. Schneider, R.: Bibliothek 1.0, 2.0 oder 3.0? (2008) 0.16 
    0.16215661 = product of:
  0.32431322 = sum of:
    0.32431322 = sum of:
      0.2679209 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2679209 = score(doc=6122,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.7769118 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
      0.056392316 = weight(_text_:22 in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056392316 = score(doc=6122,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Noch ist nicht entschieden mit welcher Vehemenz das sogenannte Web 2.0 die Bibliotheken verändern wird. Allerdings wird hier und da bereits mit Bezugnahme auf das sogenannte Semantic Web von einer dritten und mancherorts von einer vierten Generation des Web gesprochen. Der Vortrag hinterfragt kritisch, welche Konzepte sich hinter diesen Bezeichnungen verbergen und geht der Frage nach, welche Herausforderungen eine Übernahme dieser Konzepte für die Bibliothekswelt mit sich bringen würde. Vgl. insbes. Folie 22 mit einer Darstellung von der Entwicklung vom Web 1.0 zum Web 4.0
    Object
    Web 2.0
  3. Wesch, M.: Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us (2006) 0.16 
    0.15722789 = product of:
  0.31445578 = sum of:
    0.31445578 = sum of:
      0.25000742 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25000742 = score(doc=3478,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.72496665 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
      0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064448364 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Web 2.0 in just under 5 minutes.
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  4. Social Media und Web Science : das Web als Lebensraum, Düsseldorf, 22. - 23. März 2012, Proceedings, hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld, Isabella Peters und Katrin Weller. DGI, Frankfurt am Main 2012 (2012) 0.14 
    0.13757442 = product of:
  0.27514884 = sum of:
    0.27514884 = sum of:
      0.21875651 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21875651 = score(doc=1517,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.6343458 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
      0.056392316 = weight(_text_:22 in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056392316 = score(doc=1517,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    RSWK
    Soziale Software / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Düsseldorf <2012>
    Subject
    Soziale Software / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Düsseldorf <2012>
  5. Joint, N.: Web 2.0 and the library : a transformational technology? (2010) 0.13 
    0.13304237 = product of:
  0.26608473 = sum of:
    0.26608473 = sum of:
      0.23386054 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23386054 = score(doc=4202,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.6781442 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
      0.032224182 = weight(_text_:22 in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032224182 = score(doc=4202,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper is the final one in a series which has tried to give an overview of so-called transformational areas of digital library technology. The aim has been to assess how much real transformation these applications can bring about, in terms of creating genuine user benefit and also changing everyday library practice. Design/methodology/approach - The paper provides a summary of some of the legal and ethical issues associated with web 2.0 applications in libraries, associated with a brief retrospective view of some relevant literature. Findings - Although web 2.0 innovations have had a massive impact on the larger World Wide Web, the practical impact on library service delivery has been limited to date. What probably can be termed transformational in the effect of web 2.0 developments on library and information work is their effect on some underlying principles of professional practice. Research limitations/implications - The legal and ethical challenges of incorporating web 2.0 platforms into mainstream institutional service delivery need to be subject to further research, so that the risks associated with these innovations are better understood at the strategic and policy-making level. Practical implications - This paper makes some recommendations about new principles of library and information practice which will help practitioners make better sense of these innovations in their overall information environment. Social implications - The paper puts in context some of the more problematic social impacts of web 2.0 innovations, without denying the undeniable positive contribution of social networking to the sphere of human interactivity. Originality/value - This paper raises some cautionary points about web 2.0 applications without adopting a precautionary approach of total prohibition. However, none of the suggestions or analysis in this piece should be considered to constitute legal advice. If such advice is required, the reader should consult appropriate legal professionals.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 17:54:04
  6. Keen, A.: ¬Die Stunde der Stümper : wie wir im Internet unsere Kultur zerstören (2008) 0.12 
    0.124368474 = product of:
  0.24873695 = sum of:
    0.24873695 = sum of:
      0.21651277 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21651277 = score(doc=2667,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.6278395 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
      0.032224182 = weight(_text_:22 in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032224182 = score(doc=2667,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Das Internet und besonders das Web 2.0 sind ein Segen für die Meinungsfreiheit, so heißt es: Endlich können alle bestimmen, worüber diskutiert wird - nicht nur wenige Experten, Top-Journalisten und wortgewaltige Autoren, die das Meinungsmonopol für sich beanspruchen. Doch was haben wir uns da eingehandelt? Forumsbeiträge, die vor Dummheit und falschen Fakten strotzen, und an Idiotie kaum zu überbietende Videoclips bei YouTube. Es kommt noch schlimmer: - Politische Splitterparteien und verschrobene Wirrköpfe maskieren sich immer häufiger als harmlose Blogger, um demokratiefeindliche Hetzkampagnen zu verbreiten. Betroffene können sich kaum dagegen wehren. - Unternehmen betreiben auf subtile Weise "virales Marketing", um ihre Produkte von vermeintlich begeisterten Kunden empfehlen zu lassen. - Clevere Lobbyisten mischen sich unter falscher Identität in Diskussionen ein, um ihre fragwürdigen Interessen durchzusetzen. Wir befinden uns auf einem gefährlichen Irrweg, sagt Andrew Keen: Wo Halbwissen und blanke Lügen herrschen statt verlässlicher Information, da fehlt auch die Basis für vernünftige und tragfähige politische Entscheidungen, da ist unsere Kultur in ihren Grundfesten erschüttert. Ein scharf formuliertes Plädoyer gegen die absurden Auswüchse der großen Verdummungsmaschine, die sich Internet nennt.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 12:33:37
    Footnote
    Rez. in: FR, Nr.289 vom 10.12.2008, S.36: "Das Internet: Unser Fluch? - Schon Internet-Pionier Nicholas Negroponte erklärte das World Wide Web zu einem riesigen Müllhaufen, und dieser Befund dürfte durch die Entwicklung des Netzes eher bestätigt worden sein. Aber wie das so ist mit dem Müll: Für die einen ist es Abfall, andere suchen und finden meistens etwas, das sich zur Wiederverwer- tung eignet. Das muss Andrew Keen entgangen sein, obwohl der IT-Unternehmer (audiocafe.com), sich in der Materie auskennt. Aber das hindert ihn nicht, sich mit geradezu pietistischem Eifer wider den neu-bösen Feind zu wenden: den Blogger. Keen sieht im durch soziale Netzwerke und demokratische Teilhabe geprägten Web 2.0 nicht nur den "Kult des Amateurs" (so der Originaltitel, korrekt übersetzt), sondern sogar die "Vernichtung unserer Kultur". So richtig der eine oder andere Befund sein mag - etwa die Selbstbezüglichkeit vieler Slogger - er wird nicht richtiger durch penetrante Wiederholung. Falsch aber ist eine Behauptung wie die, dass Einträge bei Wikipedia (noch ein Lieblingsfeind Keens) nicht redigiert würden. Da hat sich einer in sein Bedürfnis nach werbewirksamer Polemik verrannt". Vgl. auch: http://www.faz.net/s/Rub117C535CDF414415BB243B181B8B60AE/Doc~E7A6DAB48D2D745FC9054DBF8D9FD8C4F~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html.
    RSWK
    Informationsgesellschaft / Soziokultureller Wandel / Internet / World Wide Web 2.0 / User Generated Content / Geltungsbedürfnis
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Kritik (GBV)
    Subject
    Informationsgesellschaft / Soziokultureller Wandel / Internet / World Wide Web 2.0 / User Generated Content / Geltungsbedürfnis
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Kritik (GBV)
  7. Münnich, K.; Reichelt, D.: XML-Helfer : Acht XML-Werkzeuge im Vergleich (2003) 0.12 
    0.120615155 = product of:
  0.24123031 = sum of:
    0.24123031 = sum of:
      0.17678194 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17678194 = score(doc=1890,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 1890, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1890)
      0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 1890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064448364 = score(doc=1890,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1890, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1890)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    25.10.2003 18:22:41
    Object
    Oxygen XML Editor 2.0
  8. Maaß, C.; Pietsch, G.: Web 2.0 als Mythos, Symbol und Erwartung (2007) 0.11 
    0.109378256 = product of:
  0.21875651 = sum of:
    0.21875651 = product of:
      0.43751302 = sum of:
        0.43751302 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43751302 = score(doc=5037,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            1.2686917 = fieldWeight in 5037, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5037)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    Web 2.0
  9. Perez, M.: Web 2.0 im Einsatz für die Wissenschaft (2010) 0.11 
    0.109378256 = product of:
  0.21875651 = sum of:
    0.21875651 = product of:
      0.43751302 = sum of:
        0.43751302 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43751302 = score(doc=4848,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            1.2686917 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel geht es darum, was Web 2.0 für die Wissenschaft bedeutet und welchen Nutzen Web 2.0-Dienste für Wissenschaftler haben. Im Rahmen dieses Themas wird eine Studie vorgestellt, bei der Wissenschaftler unterschiedlicher Fachbereiche unter anderem gefragt wurden, welche Web 2.0-Dienste sie kennen und warum sie Web 2.0-Dienste nutzen. Nach einer kurzen Einleitung zu Web 2.0 und dem bisherigen Forschungsstand folgen die Ergebnisse der Studie, die zeigen werden, dass Web 2.0-Dienste bekannt sind und für private Zwecke und zur Unterhaltung genutzt werden, sie sich allerdings noch nicht als Werkzeuge für die Wissenschaft etabliert haben.
    Object
    Web 2.0
  10. Rogers, R.: Digital methods (2013) 0.11 
    0.10536158 = sum of:
  0.04285973 = product of:
    0.12857918 = sum of:
      0.12857918 = weight(_text_:objects in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12857918 = score(doc=2354,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.4068504 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.062501855 = product of:
    0.12500371 = sum of:
      0.12500371 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12500371 = score(doc=2354,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.36248332 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In Digital Methods, Richard Rogers proposes a methodological outlook for social and cultural scholarly research on the Web that seeks to move Internet research beyond the study of online culture. It is not a toolkit for Internet research, or operating instructions for a software package; it deals with broader questions. How can we study social media to learn something about society rather than about social media use? How can hyperlinks reveal not just the value of a Web site but the politics of association? Rogers proposes repurposing Web-native techniques for research into cultural change and societal conditions. We can learn to reapply such "methods of the medium" as crawling and crowd sourcing, PageRank and similar algorithms, tag clouds and other visualizations; we can learn how they handle hits, likes, tags, date stamps, and other Web-native objects. By "thinking along" with devices and the objects they handle, digital research methods can follow the evolving methods of the medium. Rogers uses this new methodological outlook to examine the findings of inquiries into 9/11 search results, the recognition of climate change skeptics by climate-change-related Web sites, the events surrounding the Srebrenica massacre according to Dutch, Serbian, Bosnian, and Croatian Wikipedias, presidential candidates' social media "friends," and the censorship of the Iranian Web. With Digital Methods, Rogers introduces a new vision and method for Internet research and at the same time applies them to the Web's objects of study, from tiny particles (hyperlinks) to large masses (social media).
    RSWK
    Internet / Recherche / World Wide Web 2.0
    Subject
    Internet / Recherche / World Wide Web 2.0
  11. Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998) 0.10 
    0.10221383 = sum of:
  0.069989644 = product of:
    0.20996892 = sum of:
      0.20996892 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20996892 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.032224182 = product of:
    0.064448364 = sum of:
      0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064448364 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  12. Dalip, D.H.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Cristo, M.; Calado, P.: ¬A general multiview framework for assessing the quality of collaboratively created content on web 2.0 (2017) 0.10 
    0.09826743 = product of:
  0.19653486 = sum of:
    0.19653486 = sum of:
      0.15625463 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15625463 = score(doc=3343,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
      0.040280227 = weight(_text_:22 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040280227 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:04:22
    Object
    Web 2.0
  13. DIALOG announces DialogSelect 2.0 (1998) 0.09 
    0.093752794 = product of:
  0.18750559 = sum of:
    0.18750559 = product of:
      0.37501118 = sum of:
        0.37501118 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37501118 = score(doc=25,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            1.08745 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The DIALOG Coorporation, CA, have annonced DialogSelect 2.0, a WWW based, guided search service with access to over 300 of the most popular DIALOG databases
  14. Joint, N.: ¬The Web 2.0 challenge to libraries (2009) 0.09 
    0.09161241 = product of:
  0.18322483 = sum of:
    0.18322483 = product of:
      0.36644965 = sum of:
        0.36644965 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36644965 = score(doc=2959,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            1.0626235 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to illustrate issues surrounding Web 2.0 technologies and their relevance to libraries by general discussion and examples from library practice. Design/methodology/approach - A broad narrative account of Web 2.0 developments combined with illustrations of how one library in particular reacted to these developments. Findings - It was found that all libraries need to evolve a Web 2.0 strategy to promote this aspect of their services, but that they will need to devise solutions to specific problems as part of this strategy. These include the range of Web 2.0 platforms that are on offer and the authentication and workload issues associated with this diversity. A single, unified library system-based approach to Web 2.0 is offered as a viable alternative to using disparate external services. Research limitations/implications - This paper does not resolve the difference between a multi-platform Web 2.0 strategy and the single, unified library system-based approach, although a preference for the systems-based approach is suggested. The relative strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches is worthy of further research. Practical implications - At the level of practice, this viewpoint article offers two alternative Web 2.0 strategies which can be applied quite readily in everyday library work. Originality/value - This paper tries to offer a clear range of options for librarians interested in pursuing Web 2.0 services, facilitating successful service enhancement in the working library.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Web 2.0 and gaming in libraries
    Object
    Web 2.0
  15. Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999) 0.09 
    0.08845773 = sum of:
  0.0642896 = product of:
    0.19286878 = sum of:
      0.19286878 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19286878 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.024168136 = product of:
    0.04833627 = sum of:
      0.04833627 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04833627 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
    Date
    21.10.2000 15:01:22
  16. Rudolph, ?: ¬Das große Buch zum NETSCAPE Navigator 2.0 (1996) 0.09 
    0.08839097 = product of:
  0.17678194 = sum of:
    0.17678194 = product of:
      0.35356387 = sum of:
        0.35356387 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35356387 = score(doc=4137,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            1.0252576 = fieldWeight in 4137, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4137)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  17. Chiang, I.-P.; Huang, C.-Y.; Huang, C.-W.: Characterizing Web users' degree of Web 2.0-ness (2009) 0.09 
    0.087349 = product of:
  0.174698 = sum of:
    0.174698 = product of:
      0.349396 = sum of:
        0.349396 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.349396 = score(doc=2935,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            1.0131717 = fieldWeight in 2935, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2935)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Though practitioners have seen discussions and debates surrounding the Web 2.0 concept for the last few years, we know little of Web users' heterogeneity in the usage of Web 2.0 applications, let alone the factors associated with such heterogeneity. In this article, we propose a Web user's degree of Web 2.0-ness to be measured by the weighted average of the degrees of Web 2.0-ness of the Web sites that he or she has visited. A Web site's degree of Web 2.0-ness in turn is evaluated through a series of binary criteria as to whether the site accommodates popular Web 2.0 applications. Utilizing clickstream data from an online panel coupled with expert scoring for the empirical analysis, we find that a Web user's degree of Web 2.0-ness is positively associated with his or her behavioral volume (measured by the number of page views), behavioral speed (measured by the duration of each page view), and behavioral concentration (measured by the Gini coefficient of page views the user made across Web sites). Furthermore, Web users who are younger and male are found to have a higher degree of Web 2.0-ness.
    Object
    Web 2.0
  18. Gorgeon, A.; Swanson, E.B.: Web 2.0 according to Wikipedia : capturing an organizing vision (2011) 0.08 
    0.081192285 = product of:
  0.16238457 = sum of:
    0.16238457 = product of:
      0.32476914 = sum of:
        0.32476914 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32476914 = score(doc=4766,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.9417592 = fieldWeight in 4766, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4766)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Is Web 2.0 more than a buzzword? In recent years, technologists and others have heatedly debated this question, even in Wikipedia, itself an example of Web 2.0. From the perspective of the present study, Web 2.0 may indeed be a buzzword, but more substantially it is also an example of an organizing vision that drives a community's discourse about certain new Information Technology (IT), serving to advance the technology's adoption and diffusion. Every organizing vision has a career that reflects its construction over time, and in the present study we examine Web 2.0's career as captured in its Wikipedia entry over a 5-year period, finding that it falls into three distinct periods termed Germination, Growth, and Maturation. The findings reveal how Wikipedia, as a discourse vehicle, treats new IT and its many buzzwords, and more broadly captures the careers of their organizing visions. Too, they further our understanding of Wikipedia as a new encyclopedic form, providing novel insights into its uses, its community of contributors, and their editing activities, as well as the dynamics of article construction.
    Object
    Web 2.0
  19. CARL releases CARLweb 2.0 (1998) 0.08 
    0.07812732 = product of:
  0.15625463 = sum of:
    0.15625463 = product of:
      0.31250927 = sum of:
        0.31250927 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31250927 = score(doc=2244,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.9062083 = fieldWeight in 2244, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    CARL Co. has released CARLweb 2.0, a new version of its WWW OPAC interface. Lists the range of features of the new version and notes development which will be available in future releases
  20. Alby, T.: Web 2.0 : Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologien; [ajax, api, atom, blog, folksonomy, feeds, long tail, mashup, permalink, podcast, rich user experience, rss, social software, tagging] (2007) 0.08 
    0.0777357 = product of:
  0.1554714 = sum of:
    0.1554714 = product of:
      0.3109428 = sum of:
        0.3109428 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3109428 = score(doc=296,freq=44.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.90166587 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
              6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
                44.0 = termFreq=44.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dem neuen Web mal auf die Finger geschaut -- Tom Alby hat sich bereits mit seinem Suchmaschinenoptimierung-Buch einen Namen gemacht und setzt dem Erfolg seines ersten Buches nun mit Web 2.0. Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologien noch einen drauf. Wie schon bei der Optimierung für Suchmaschinen geht er auch bei seinem Blick auf das Phänomen Web 2.0 ganzheitlich und umfassend an die Arbeit: Ideen, Technik, Umsetzungen, Beispiele, Erfolge, Probleme, Ausblicke und Interviews mit den Machern. Ein Blitzlichtfoto im dunklen Web-Dschungel. Endlich geht es dem Web wieder gut. Alle freuen sich. Die Verlierer werden die Sieger sein. Jetzt wird alles anders. Das Blablabla in den Medien klingt ähnlich wie schon zu Zeiten des Web 1.0. Und doch ist es anders. Was sich geändert hat, zeigt sich jedoch meist erst auf den zweiten Blick -- Alby hat diese Einblicke zusammen getragen und zeigt den aktuellen Stand. Ohne Wortblasen, an Beispielen mit Hintergrund. Nach einem Blick auf die Historie von der New Economy zum Web 2.0 stürzt sich Alby auf das bekannteste Web 2.0-Beispiel: den Blog. Alsdann durchleuchtet er Podcasts, Social Software wie FlickR oder Skype, Folksonomy (wo bleibt das Geld), die Plattformrepräsentanten wie Google, die Technik im Hintergrund von AJAX bis Ruby, Business-Modelle und der Blick Richtung 3.0. Zuletzt dann Interviews mit den Vorreitern der Szene: von Johnny Haeusler bis Jörg Petermann. In Web 2.0. Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologienkann man pieksen wie man will, es platzt nicht. Das fundierte Über- und Einblicksbuch ist jedem Journalisten, Manager, Trendforscher und Webaktivisten zu empfehlen, denn wer nicht weiß, was Alby weiß, sollte zum Thema Web 2.0 lieber schweigen.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 60(2007) H.3, S.85-86 (M. Buzinkay): "Ein aktuelles Thema der Informationsbranche ist Web 2.0. Für die einen Hype, für andere Web-Realität, ist das Web 2.0 seit wenigen Jahren das "neue Web". Der Autor, Tom Alby, versucht daher im ersten Kapitel auch einen Unterschied zum Vorgänger-Web aufzubauen: Was ist so anders im Web 2.0? In weiterer Folge handelt Alby alle Themen ab, die mit Web 2.0 in Verbindung gebracht werden: Blogging, Podcasting, Social Software, Folksonomies, das Web als Plattform und diverse Web 2.0 typische Technologien. Ein Ausblick auf das Web 3.0 darf auch nicht fehlen. Das Buch liefert hier die notwendigen Einführungen und "Brücken", um auch als Laie zumindest ansatzweise Verständnis für diese neuen Entwicklungen aufzubringen. Daher ist es nur konsequent und sehr passend, dass Alby neben seinem technischen Fachjargon auch leicht verständliche Einführungsbeispiele bereithält. Denn es geht Alby weniger um Technologie und Tools (diese werden aber auch behandelt, eben beispielhaft), sondern vor allem um Konzepte: Was will das Web 2.0 überhaupt und was macht seinen Erfolg aus? Das Buch ist einfach zu lesen, mit zahlreichen Illustrationen bebildert und listet eine Unmenge an online Quellen für eine weitere Vertiefung auf. Doch mit Büchern über das Web ist es genauso wie dem Web selbst: die Halbwertszeit ist sehr kurz. Das gilt insbesondere für die Technik und für mögliche Dienste. Alby hat diesen technischen Zweig der Web 2.0-Geschichte so umfangreich wie für das Verständnis nötig, aus Gründen der Aktualität aber so gering wie möglich ausfallen lassen. Und das ist gut so: dieses Buch können Sie getrost auch in drei Jahren in die Hand nehmen. Es wird zwar andere Dienste geben als im Buch angegeben, und manche Links werden vielleicht nicht mehr funktionieren, die Prinzipien des Web 2.0 bleiben aber dieselben. Sollten Sie sich geändert haben, dann haben wir schon Web 2.x oder gar Web 3.0. Aber das ist eine andere Geschichte, die uns vielleicht Tom Alby zur angemessenen Zeit weitergeben möchte. Ein Bonus, wie ich finde, sind die zahlreichen Interviews, die Tom Alby mit bekannten deutschen Web 2.0 Aushängeschildern geführt hat. Sie geben einen guten Einblick, welchen Stellenwert Web 2.0 in der Zwischenzeit gewonnen hat. Nicht nur in einer Nische von Web-Freaks, sondern in der Welt der Kommunikation. Und das sind wir."
    LCSH
    Web log / World Wide Web 2.0 / Podcasting / Soziale Software (GBV)
    Object
    Web 2.0
    RSWK
    World Wide Web 2.0
    Subject
    World Wide Web 2.0
    Web log / World Wide Web 2.0 / Podcasting / Soziale Software (GBV)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 259
  • e 257
  • f 7
  • el 1
  • nl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 442
  • m 57
  • el 19
  • s 19
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications