Search (444 results, page 1 of 23)

0.1401677 = sum of:
  0.042126756 = product of:
    0.12638026 = sum of:
      0.12638026 = weight(_text_:themes in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12638026 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35584334 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05534947 = queryNorm
          0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.098040946 = product of:
    0.19608189 = sum of:
      0.19608189 = weight(_text_:talking in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19608189 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.443239 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.008008 = idf(docFreq=39, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05534947 = queryNorm
          0.44238412 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.008008 = idf(docFreq=39, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - This research seeks to answer, "How do everyday Second Life users go about finding needed information?" as the primary research question. Design/methodology/approach - A virtual ethnographic approach couched in grounded theory was utilized to conduct semi-structured interviews with everyday users of Second Life, accompanied by participant observation. Findings - Information seeking behaviors within the virtual world of Second Life were found to be rich, complex interaction with multiple facets. Five themes emerged to illuminate how users seek information. Research limitations/implications - This research took place over a six-week period, although most enthographies last at least one year. Conclusions were drawn solely from interviews because participant observation did not penetrate a given community with enough depth to adequately address the research question. Practical implications - Virtual worlds offer the promise of becoming an integrated part of the information seeking landscape for an increasing number of users. Understanding the factors influencing information seeking behavior that are outlined in this article will equip librarians and information professionals to best utilize virtual worlds and continue to create innovative, user-focused services there. Originality/value - This article extends current scholarship by offering a practical, five-factor approach to understand how people seek information in virtual worlds. The literature is robust in description about library services and the nature of information in virtual worlds. Yet, investigation into information seeking behavior in this environment is in its nascent stages.

0.07843275 = product of:
  0.1568655 = sum of:
    0.1568655 = product of:
      0.313731 = sum of:
        0.313731 = weight(_text_:talking in 7052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.313731 = score(doc=7052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.443239 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.008008 = idf(docFreq=39, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.7078146 = fieldWeight in 7052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.008008 = idf(docFreq=39, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7052)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Internet, an electronic computer network that connects millions of computers around the world, has taken the international library community by strom. The library community is excited about the Internet because it offers a real, concrete step toward creating desktop access to information, the so-called 'electronic libraries' that librarians have been talking about for years. The momentum toward creating electronic libraries will accelerate with the introduction of initiatives to create 'information superhighways' capable of bringing tremendous amounts of information directly to the home. The most well-known initiative is NREN, the National Research and Education Network, in the United States

0.049020473 = product of:
  0.098040946 = sum of:
    0.098040946 = product of:
      0.19608189 = sum of:
        0.19608189 = weight(_text_:talking in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19608189 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.443239 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.008008 = idf(docFreq=39, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.44238412 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.008008 = idf(docFreq=39, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Kaye and Johnson are interested in the effect of interaction with the Internet on time spent with more traditional media by persons with a strong interest in politics, a topic on which previous research has provided conflicting results. They posted a survey on the Web requesting respondents from within the United States which was advertised in politically oriented newsgroups, political chat rooms, politically oriented web sites, and posted on 40 search services and which collected data from the responding convenience sample of 442 in 2000 and 307 in 1996. Respondents were asked about change in their time spent with traditional media, as well as their trust in government, self efficacy, interest in politics, reliance on traditional sources, reliance on the web, other internet based electronic information sources, and their demographic characteristics. Over the time period female respondents increased from one quarter to one third. The average age increased by 10.8 years, and those reporting a high level of trust in government increased from 11.9% to 35.2%. Reported high self efficacy rose from 44.7% to 74%. Internet users are spending significantly less time reading news magazines in the second survey, and while the difference in television viewing is not significantly different, the decrease in radio listening for political information is. Respondents also report spending significantly less time talking about politics in 2000. About one half the respondents report spending less time with traditional media while the other half claim the internet has not effected their use of these sources.

0.048699584 = sum of:
  0.033701405 = product of:
    0.10110421 = sum of:
      0.10110421 = weight(_text_:themes in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10110421 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35584334 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05534947 = queryNorm
          0.28412563 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.014998178 = product of:
    0.029996356 = sum of:
      0.029996356 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029996356 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05534947 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.

Date

21. 4.2002 10:22:31

0.042421255 = product of:
  0.08484251 = sum of:
    0.08484251 = product of:
      0.16968502 = sum of:
        0.16968502 = weight(_text_:22 in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16968502 = score(doc=6569,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.1997 19:50:29

Source

Cogito. 1997, H.1, S.22-23

0.039216377 = product of:
  0.07843275 = sum of:
    0.07843275 = product of:
      0.1568655 = sum of:
        0.1568655 = weight(_text_:talking in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1568655 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.443239 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.008008 = idf(docFreq=39, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.3539073 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.008008 = idf(docFreq=39, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Natural languages are both complex and dynamic. They are in part formalized through dictionaries and grammar. Dictionaries attempt to provide definitions and examples of various usages for all the words in a language. Grammar, on the other hand, is the system of rules that defines the structure of a language and is concerned with the correct use and application of the language in speaking or writing. The fact that these two mechanisms lag behind the language as currently used is not a serious problem for those living in a language culture and talking their native language. However, the correct choice of words, expressions, and word relationships is much more difficult when speaking or writing in a foreign language. The basics of the grammar of a language may have been learned in school decades ago, and even then there were always several choices for the correct expression for an idea, fact, opinion, or emotion. Although many different parts of speech and their relationships can make for difficult language decisions, prepositions tend to be problematic for nonnative speakers of English, and, in reality, prepositions are a major problem in most languages. Does a speaker or writer say "in the West Coast" or "on the West Coast," or perhaps "at the West Coast"? In Norwegian, we are "in" a city, but "at" a place. But the distinction between cities and places is vague. To be absolutely correct, one really has to learn the right preposition for every single place. A simplistic way of resolving these language issues is to ask a native speaker. But even native speakers may disagree about the right choice of words. If there is disagreement, then one will have to ask more than one native speaker, treat his/her response as a vote for a particular choice, and perhaps choose the majority choice as the best possible alternative. In real life, such a procedure may be impossible or impractical, but in the electronic world, as we shall see, this is quite easy to achieve. Using the vast text repository of the Web, we may get a significant voting base for even the most detailed and distinct phrases. We shall start by introducing a set of examples to present our idea of using the text repository an the Web to aid in making the best word selection, especially for the use of prepositions. Then we will present a more general discussion of the possibilities and limitations of using the Web as an aid for correct writing.

0.037495445 = product of:
  0.07499089 = sum of:
    0.07499089 = product of:
      0.14998178 = sum of:
        0.14998178 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14998178 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22

0.0371186 = product of:
  0.0742372 = sum of:
    0.0742372 = product of:
      0.1484744 = sum of:
        0.1484744 = weight(_text_:22 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1484744 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

5. 8.2001 12:22:47

Source

Information outlook. 3(1999) no.2, S.18-22

0.0371186 = product of:
  0.0742372 = sum of:
    0.0742372 = product of:
      0.1484744 = sum of:
        0.1484744 = weight(_text_:22 in 7131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1484744 = score(doc=7131,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 7131, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

18. 1.1997 12:15:22

Source

Kölner Stadtanzeiger. Nr.69 vom 22/23.3.1997, S.MZ7

0.0371186 = product of:
  0.0742372 = sum of:
    0.0742372 = product of:
      0.1484744 = sum of:
        0.1484744 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1484744 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

5. 9.1997 19:22:27

Source

Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193

0.03431433 = product of:
  0.06862866 = sum of:
    0.06862866 = product of:
      0.13725732 = sum of:
        0.13725732 = weight(_text_:talking in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13725732 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.443239 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.008008 = idf(docFreq=39, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.30966887 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.008008 = idf(docFreq=39, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Sie kamen, sie surften - und gingen zurück an den Strand", so überschrieb die British Virtual Society letzten September eine Analyse, die sich mit dem neuen Phänomen der "Web-Verweigerer" beschäftigt. Web-Verweigerer das sind die Leute, die für ein paar Tage oder Wochen ins Netz schauen und dann zu der Ansicht kommen: "Das ist nichts für mich." Für diese Entscheidung werden unterschiedliche Gründe genannt: zu teuer, zu zeitraubend und, immer wieder, zu technisch. Viele Menschen mögen einfach nicht mit Maschinen kommunizieren. Das gilt auch für diejenigen, die in den Statistiken als Internet-Anwender erscheinen. Sie versenden E-Mails, weil das zu ihrem Job gehört. Sie erledigen BankÜberweisungen am PC, weil sie wählend der Schalterstunden keine Gelegenheit dazu haben. Im äußersten Fall suchen sie bei www.bahn.de auch einmal, eine Zugverbindung. Für alles Weitere fehlen ihnen die Lust und die Erfahrung. Suchmaschinen - sofern sie sie überhaupt kennen - sind ihnen ein Graus. Der Anteil dieser Gruppe in der angeblich unaufhaltsam steigenden Anwenderzahl ist nicht bekannt. Schätzungen von einem Drittel und höher erscheinen jedoch realistisch. "Netzferne" in der Mehrheit - Zusammengerechnet bilden die, die keinen Zugang zum Netz haben oder, die Möglichkeiten der Technik nur unvollkommen oder widerstrebend nutzen, noch auf lange Zeit die Mehrheit der Bevölkerung. Und niemand, der von ECommerce spricht kann dieses Kundenpotential ignorieren. Auf die Bedürfnisse dieses "netzfernen", noch unerschlossenen Potentials ist das neue Angebot des Internet-Auskunftsdienstes zugeschnitten. Denn der Befund ist eindeutig: Weitaus mehr Mitglieder der Zielgruppe als erwartet sind entweder unwillig, die von der Technik gebotenen Möglichkeiten zu nutzen, oder sie verfügen nicht über die dazu erforderliche Erfahrung und Computerkompetenz. Die heftige Diskussion über die benutzerfreundliche Gestaltung von Websites ("usability") ist eine Reaktion darauf. Der "menschliche Faktor" ist ein anderer, neuer Lösungsansatz in der Überwindung des Mankos. "Web-Guides" heißen die Pfadfinder beim Hindernislauf durch den Internet-Dschungel, die nebenbei auch als Pioniere in einem neuen Beruf agieren. Idee und Konzept der WebGuides folgen der Einsicht, daß noch mehr Technik eben die Probleme nicht löst, die sich in dem verbreiteten Unbehagen im Umgang mit Technik äußern, Von Robots und intelligenter Software sollte man nicht mehr erwarten, als sie leisten können. Diese Lücke bietet die Chance für den menschlichen Faktor. Konkret heißt das: jedem, der Interesse an Informationen und Dienstleistungen aus- dem Internet hat, bietet beispielsweise die "AllesAuskunft" von talking. riet einen menschlichen Ansprechpartner als Vermittler oder Unterstützer. Und das nicht selten bei höchst persönlichen Fragen. Web-Guides verfügen nach einer eigens konzipierten Schulung über die NetKompetenz, die ungeübten oder auch nur ungeduldigen Netz-Anwendern abgeht. Web-Guides kennen Informationsangebote, Register und Suchmaschinen, und sie wissen, wie man am schnellsten Resultate erzielt. Sie sind die menschliche Clearingstelle zwischen den Informationsschätzen der Wissensgesellschaft und den ratlosen Schatzsuchern. Ein Telefon genügt fürs erste - In der ersten Ausbaustufe sind die WebGuides über Telefon oder E-Mail erreichbar. Schon hier können sie die große Stärke des unmittelbaren Kontakts ausspielen. Im persönlichen Gespräch, mit dem Anrufer klären sie, ob das, was er sagt auch das ist, was er sucht. Auf dieser Grundlage. werden einfache Auskünfte sofort erteilt, komplexerer Anfragen nach entsprechender Recherche durch einen Rückruf. Woher diese Auskünfte kommen - aus dem Internet, von der CD-ROM eines Verlages, aus der hauseigenen Datenbank - , spielt für den Anrufer keine Rolle. Was zählt, sind Qualität und Schnelligkeit

0.033701405 = product of:
  0.06740281 = sum of:
    0.06740281 = product of:
      0.20220841 = sum of:
        0.20220841 = weight(_text_:themes in 2183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20220841 = score(doc=2183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35584334 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.56825125 = fieldWeight in 2183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2183)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The conference considered 5 themes: metadata and the Internet and WWW; Internet tools; new library techniques; the overhaul of a library in Equador; and training present and future librarians

0.029996356 = product of:
  0.059992712 = sum of:
    0.059992712 = product of:
      0.119985424 = sum of:
        0.119985424 = weight(_text_:22 in 4122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119985424 = score(doc=4122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 4.1996 20:07:57

0.029996356 = product of:
  0.059992712 = sum of:
    0.059992712 = product of:
      0.119985424 = sum of:
        0.119985424 = weight(_text_:22 in 4514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119985424 = score(doc=4514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4514)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Audiovisual librarian. 22(1996) no.2, S.108-110

0.029996356 = product of:
  0.059992712 = sum of:
    0.059992712 = product of:
      0.119985424 = sum of:
        0.119985424 = weight(_text_:22 in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119985424 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

23. 8.1996 12:51:22

0.029996356 = product of:
  0.059992712 = sum of:
    0.059992712 = product of:
      0.119985424 = sum of:
        0.119985424 = weight(_text_:22 in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119985424 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 7.1996 9:33:22

0.029996356 = product of:
  0.059992712 = sum of:
    0.059992712 = product of:
      0.119985424 = sum of:
        0.119985424 = weight(_text_:22 in 5280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119985424 = score(doc=5280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

21. 9.1996 16:03:22

0.029996356 = product of:
  0.059992712 = sum of:
    0.059992712 = product of:
      0.119985424 = sum of:
        0.119985424 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119985424 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30.11.1996 13:22:37

0.029996356 = product of:
  0.059992712 = sum of:
    0.059992712 = product of:
      0.119985424 = sum of:
        0.119985424 = weight(_text_:22 in 7783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119985424 = score(doc=7783,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7783, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7783)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]

0.029996356 = product of:
  0.059992712 = sum of:
    0.059992712 = product of:
      0.119985424 = sum of:
        0.119985424 = weight(_text_:22 in 3911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119985424 = score(doc=3911,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3911, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3911)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 7.1996 9:33:22