Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Panchyshyn, R.S.; Park, A.L.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) database enrichment : the path to a hybridized catalog (2015) 0.12 
    0.12095396 = product of:
  0.3225439 = sum of:
    0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049064454 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
    0.031475607 = product of:
      0.062951215 = sum of:
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.1011396 = weight(_text_:anglo in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1011396 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.49371263 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
    0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028848568 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
    0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049064454 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
    0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062951215 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
  0.375 = coord(6/16)
    Abstract
    This article examines the benefits of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) enrichment project for libraries. Enrichment projects "hybridize", or enrich legacy Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second Edition (AACR2) bibliographic records with RDA data. Until a replacement for MARC is developed, bibliographic data will continue to be encoded in MARC 21 in many integrated library systems. Library catalogs contain records coded under both AACR2 and RDA standards. RDA enrichment projects benefit the patron experience because the data is cleaner and more consistent for patron use and display, cataloging staff workflows are simplified, and the consistency of the data is advantageous for system development and data exchange with other communities
  2. Tillett, B.B.: RDA, or, The long journey of the catalog to the digital age (2016) 0.12 
    0.12095396 = product of:
  0.3225439 = sum of:
    0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049064454 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
    0.031475607 = product of:
      0.062951215 = sum of:
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.1011396 = weight(_text_:anglo in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1011396 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.49371263 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
    0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028848568 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
    0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049064454 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
    0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062951215 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
  0.375 = coord(6/16)
    Abstract
    RDA was created in response to complaints about the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, especially the call for a more international, principle-based content standard that takes the perspective of the conceptual models of FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) and FRAD (Functional Requirements for Authority Data). The past and ongoing process for continuous improvement to RDA is through the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (known as the JSC, but recently renamed the RDA Steering Committee - RSC) to make RDA even more international and principle-based.
  3. Dobreski, B.: Authority and universalism : conventional values in descriptive catalog codes (2017) 0.04 
    0.03564185 = product of:
  0.19008985 = sum of:
    0.10898263 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10898263 = score(doc=3876,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.60633284 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
    0.057794057 = weight(_text_:anglo in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057794057 = score(doc=3876,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.2821215 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
    0.023313163 = weight(_text_:american in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023313163 = score(doc=3876,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.21308492 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Every standard embodies a particular set of values. Some aspects are privileged while others are masked. Values embedded within knowledge organization standards have special import in that they are further perpetuated by the data they are used to generate. Within libraries, descriptive catalog codes serve as prominent knowledge organization standards, guiding the creation of resource representations. Though the historical and functional aspects of these standards have received significant attention, less focus has been placed on the values associated with such codes. In this study, a critical, historical analysis of ten Anglo-American descriptive catalog codes and surrounding discourse was conducted as an initial step towards uncovering key values associated with this lineage of standards. Two values in particular were found to be highly significant: authority and universalism. Authority is closely tied to notions of power and control, particularly over practice or belief. Increasing control over resources, identities, and viewpoints are all manifestations of the value of authority within descriptive codes. Universalism has guided the widening coverage of descriptive codes in regards to settings and materials, such as the extension of bibliographic standards to non-book resources. Together, authority and universalism represent conventional values focused on facilitating orderly social exchanges. A comparative lack of emphasis on values concerning human welfare and empowerment may be unsurprising, but raises questions concerning the role of human values in knowledge organization standards. Further attention to the values associated with descriptive codes and other knowledge organization standards is important as libraries and other institutions seek to share their resource representation data more widely
    Content
    Beitrag bei: NASKO 2017: Visualizing Knowledge Organization: Bringing Focus to Abstract Realities. The sixth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2017), June 15-16, 2017, in Champaign, IL, USA.
  4. Han, M.-J.: New discovery services and library bibliographic control (2012) 0.02 
    0.023509596 = product of:
  0.18807676 = sum of:
    0.09403838 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09403838 = score(doc=5569,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.65907574 = fieldWeight in 5569, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5569)
    0.09403838 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09403838 = score(doc=5569,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.65907574 = fieldWeight in 5569, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5569)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    To improve resource discovery and retrieval, libraries have implemented new discovery services, such as next generation catalogues, federated search, and Web-scale discovery, in addition to their traditional integrated library systems. These new discovery services greatly improve the user experience by utilizing existing cataloguing records housed within the library system or in combination with metadata from other sources, both in and outside of libraries. However, to maximize the functionality of these discovery services, libraries must reexamine current cataloguing practices and the way libraries control the bibliographic description to better serve the user's needs. This report discusses how new discovery services use the cataloguing records and the challenges that libraries encounter in bibliographic control to work with new discovery services, including the quality of cataloguing records, granular levels of bibliographic description, and integration of user-generated metadata into the cataloguing records. Each of these aspects requires further discussion.
  5. Schultz-Jones, B.; Snow, K.; Miksa, S.; Hasenyager Jr., R.L.: Historical and current implications of cataloguing quality for next-generation catalogues (2012) 0.02 
    0.02124553 = product of:
  0.16996424 = sum of:
    0.08498212 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08498212 = score(doc=5558,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.5956042 = fieldWeight in 5558, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5558)
    0.08498212 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08498212 = score(doc=5558,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.5956042 = fieldWeight in 5558, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5558)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Discussions of quality in library cataloguing are traced from early library science literature to current debates. Three studies that examine dimensions of quality cataloguing in academic libraries, public libraries, and school libraries and a review of vendor processes update the issues surrounding a definition of bibliographic record quality and quality assurance processes. The implications of perceptions of bibliographic record quality on next-generation catalogues are presented with emphasis on the shift in the cataloguer's judgment from rigid standards for transcription to meeting the requirement for more metadata that matches the user need of find-ability.
  6. Altenhöner, R.; Frodl, C.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Pfeifer, B.; Oehlschläger, S.; Svensson, L.G.: Libraries beyond libraries : Integration, Innovation and Information for all Aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen Bibliografie, Katalogisierung, Klassifikation und Indexierung, Knowledge Management und Informationstechnologie sowie der Core Activity ICADS der IFLA Division III (Library Services) beim Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 77. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in San Juan, Puerto Rico (2011) 0.01 
    0.012266113 = product of:
  0.09812891 = sum of:
    0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049064454 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
    0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049064454 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Darin u.a. Bericht über 'Cataloguing Section' (S.871), 'ISBD Review Group' (S.872-873), 'FRBR Review Group' (S.873-874), 'Virtual International authoriy File (VIAF)' (S.875-876), 'Satellite conference on RDA' (S.876-879), 'Classification and Indexing Section' (S.879-882).
  7. Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017) 0.01 
    0.011510316 = product of:
  0.09208253 = sum of:
    0.07147641 = weight(_text_:author in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07147641 = score(doc=3871,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.46164837 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
    0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02060612 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    This study presents preliminary themes surfaced from an ongoing ethnographic study. The research question is: how and where do cultures influence the cataloging practices of using U.S. standards to catalog Chinese materials? The author applies warrant as a lens for evaluating knowledge representation systems, and extends the application from examining classificatory decisions to cataloging decisions. Semantic warrant as a conceptual tool allows us to recognize and name the various rationales behind cataloging decisions, grants us explanatory power, and the language to "visualize" and reflect on the conflicting priorities in cataloging practices. Through participatory observation, the author recorded the cataloging practices of two Chinese catalogers working on the same cataloging project. One of the catalogers is U.S. trained, and another cataloger is a professor of Library and Information Science from China, who is also a subject expert and a cataloger of Chinese special collections. The study shows how the catalogers describe Chinese special collections using many U.S. cataloging and classification standards but from different approaches. The author presents particular cases derived from the fieldwork, with an emphasis on the many layers presented by cultures, principles, standards, and practices of different scope, each of which may represent conflicting warrants. From this, it is made clear that the conflicts of warrants influence cataloging practice. We may view the conflicting warrants as an interpretation of the tension between different semantic warrants and the globalization and localization of cataloging standards.
    Content
    Beitrag bei: NASKO 2017: Visualizing Knowledge Organization: Bringing Focus to Abstract Realities. The sixth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2017), June 15-16, 2017, in Champaign, IL, USA.
  8. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬A turning point for catalogs : Ranganathan's possible point of view (2015) 0.01 
    0.01011716 = product of:
  0.08093728 = sum of:
    0.026979093 = product of:
      0.053958185 = sum of:
        0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 2006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053958185 = score(doc=2006,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 2006, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2006)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 2006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053958185 = score(doc=2006,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 2006, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2006)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Since the end of the last century, catalogs have been changing more and more quickly. This change is following a recognizable course, beginning with the publication of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, passing through the reorganization of international cataloging principles, the revision of international standards of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (International Standard for Bibliographic Description), and the foundation of new cataloging codes, such as Resource Description and Access. While principles, models, and rules are well established, bibliographic formats seem to be a bottleneck and users seem far from libraries. This article aims to present an overview of current changes, potential convergences, developments, and weak points from Ranganathan's point of view.
  9. Bourdenet, P.: ¬The catalog resisting the Web : an historical perspective (2012) 0.01 
    0.008761509 = product of:
  0.070092075 = sum of:
    0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035046037 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
    0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035046037 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Libraries are currently seeking to restructure their services and develop new cataloguing standards to position themselves on the web, which has become the main source of information and documents. The current upheaval within the profession is accompanied by the belief that libraries have a major role to play in identifying and supplying content due to their extensive high quality databases, which remain untapped despite efforts to increase catalog performance. They continue to rely on a strategy that has been proven successful since the mid-nineteenth century while seeking other models for their data. Today, they aim to exploit changes brought about by the web to improve content identification. The current intense debate on RDA implementation mirrors this desire for change. The debate is rooted in past efforts and yet tries to incite radical changes as it provides for interoperability from the creation of records through an object modeling in line with web standards and innovations. These innovations are presented through an historical perspective inspired by writings by librarians who are entrusted with helping in the development of bibliographic description standards.
  10. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.01 
    0.008338703 = product of:
  0.06670962 = sum of:
    0.055840094 = weight(_text_:2nd in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055840094 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.31004354 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
    0.010869532 = product of:
      0.021739064 = sum of:
        0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021739064 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_f.pdf.
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  11. Maurer, M.B.; McCutcheon, S.; Schwing, T.: Who's doing what? : findability and author-supplied ETD metadata in the library catalog (2011) 0.00 
    0.0036108557 = product of:
  0.05777369 = sum of:
    0.05777369 = weight(_text_:author in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05777369 = score(doc=1891,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.3731459 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
  12. Sparber, S.: What's the frequency, Kenneth? : eine (queer)feministische Kritik an Sexismen und Rassismen im Schlagwortkatalog (2016) 0.00 
    0.0031267276 = product of:
  0.050027642 = sum of:
    0.050027642 = weight(_text_:26 in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050027642 = score(doc=3142,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.44144046 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Date
    5. 6.2016 17:23:26
    18.10.2016 11:26:07
  13. Meßmer, G.; Müller, M.: Standards in der Formalerschließung gedruckter und elektronischer Ressourcen (2015) 0.00 
    0.0027636627 = product of:
  0.044218604 = sum of:
    0.044218604 = weight(_text_:26 in 1143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044218604 = score(doc=1143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.3901819 = fieldWeight in 1143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1143)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Date
    26. 8.2015 10:16:35
  14. Majors, R.: Comparative user experiences of next-generation catalogue interfaces (2012) 0.00 
    0.0025791824 = product of:
  0.04126692 = sum of:
    0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 5571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04126692 = score(doc=5571,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 5571, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5571)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    One of the presumed advantages of next-generation library catalogue interfaces is that the user experience is improved-that it is both richer and more intuitive. Often the interfaces come with little or no user-facing documentation or imbedded "help" for patrons based on an assumption of ease of use and familiarity of the experience, having followed best practices in use on the Web. While there has been much gray literature (published on library Web sites, etc.) interrogating these implicit claims and contrasting the new interfaces to traditional Web-based catalogues, this article details a consistent and formal comparison of whether users can actually accomplish common library tasks, unassisted, using these interfaces. The author has undertaken a task-based usability test of vendor-provided next-generation catalogue interfaces and Web-scale discovery tools (Encore Synergy, Summon, WorldCat Local, Primo Central, EBSCO Discovery Service). Testing was done with undergraduates across all academic disciplines. The resulting qualitative data, noting any demonstrated trouble using the software as well as feedback or suggested improvements that the users may have about the software, will assist academic libraries in making or validating purchase and subscription decisions for these interfaces as well as help vendors make data-driven decisions about interface and experience enhancements.
  15. Howarth, L.C.: "Is there a catalog in your future?" : Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor (2010) 0.00 
    0.0022109302 = product of:
  0.035374884 = sum of:
    0.035374884 = weight(_text_:26 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035374884 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Content
    Bezugnahme auf: Williamson, N.J.: Is there a catalog in your future?: Access to information in the year 2006. In: Library resources and technical services. 26(1982), S.122-135.
  16. Stumpf, G.: Sacherschließung und Kataloganreicherung (2015) 0.00 
    0.0022109302 = product of:
  0.035374884 = sum of:
    0.035374884 = weight(_text_:26 in 2168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035374884 = score(doc=2168,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 2168, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2168)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Date
    26. 8.2015 10:11:15
  17. Mönnich, M.; Dierolf, U.: 20 Jahre Karlsruher virtueller Katalog (KVK) (2016) 0.00 
    0.0022109302 = product of:
  0.035374884 = sum of:
    0.035374884 = weight(_text_:26 in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035374884 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Vor 20 Jahren, genau gesagt am 26. Juli 1996, erblickte die Literatursuchmaschine "KVK" das Licht der Internet-Welt. Seit damals wurden mehrere Milliarden Suchanfragen von Karlsruhe aus an andere Web-Kataloge von Bibliotheken und Verbünden geschickt, Trefferlisten ausgewertet und den Nutzern in einheitlicher Form präsentiert. Dieser Beitrag erklärt, warum der KVK entwickelt wurde und warum es diesen "Internet-Dino" auch heute noch gibt und beschreibt den aktuellen Stand.
  18. Zechner, R.: Zwischen Anspruch und Möglichkeit : Frauen*solidarität: ein Beispiel aus der Beschlagwortung (2016) 0.00 
    0.0022109302 = product of:
  0.035374884 = sum of:
    0.035374884 = weight(_text_:26 in 3908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035374884 = score(doc=3908,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 3908, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3908)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Date
    5. 6.2016 17:23:26
  19. Hauser, M.; Zierold, M.: ¬Der Meta-Katalog des I.D.A.-Dachverbandes <meta-katalog.eu> (2016) 0.00 
    0.001934564 = product of:
  0.030953024 = sum of:
    0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 3140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030953024 = score(doc=3140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 3140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3140)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Date
    5. 6.2016 17:23:26
  20. Pfeifenberger, R.: ¬Der Opac im Handyformat : Mobile Online-Kataloge sichern die Zukunft von Bibliotheken als zentrale Informationsquellen der Gesellschaft (2010) 0.00 
    0.0015454589 = product of:
  0.024727343 = sum of:
    0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 3245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024727343 = score(doc=3245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 3245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3245)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Mobilen Technologien wird von Bibliotheken bisher kaum Beachtung geschenkt. Und das, obwohl keine Technologie jemals zuvor so schnell und in so großem Umfang angenommen wurde wie die mobile Kommunikation. Weltweit existieren mittlerweile fast vier Milliarden Mobiltelefonverträge. Allein in Deutschland sind etwa 100 Millionen Mobiltelefone im Umlauf; das sind über 15 Prozent mehr Mobiltelefone als die Anzahl der Einwohner Deutschlands. Schon heute gibt es weltweit mehr internetfähige Mobiltelefone als Computer mit Internetanschluss. In Deutschland nutzen derzeit bereits 35 Prozent der vom Bundesverband Digitale Wirtschaft (BVDW) Befragten regelmäßig das mobile Internet, weitere 21 Prozent möchten es innerhalb des nächsten Jahres nutzen. Prognosen erwarten bis zum Jahr 2015 eine Steigerung von 300 Prozent. The Pew Internet & American Life Project geht im Bericht »The Future of the Internet III« sogar davon aus, dass im Jahr 2020 das Internet weltweit hauptsächlich über das Mobiltelefon genutzt und zugänglich sein wird. Regina Pfeifenberger hat sich in ihrer Masterarbeit mit dem Thema mobile Opacs beschäftigt und fasst im Folgenden ihre Ergebnisse zusammen.

Authors

Languages

  • e 16
  • d 9

Themes