Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Stelzenmüller, C.: Mashups in Bibliotheken : Untersuchung der Verbreitung von Mashups auf Webseiten wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken und Erstellung eines praktischen Beispiels (2008) 0.01 
    0.005063698 = product of:
  0.052324884 = sum of:
    0.018598842 = weight(_text_:und in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018598842 = score(doc=3069,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
    0.015127198 = weight(_text_:im in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015127198 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.060543913 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
    0.018598842 = weight(_text_:und in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018598842 = score(doc=3069,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
  0.09677419 = coord(3/31)
    Abstract
    Mashups können durch die Kombination von Daten einen Mehrwert gegenüber den ursprünglichen Informationsquellen bieten. Diese Arbeit stellt Mashups vor und zeigt, wie Bibliotheken Mashups bislang für sich nutzen. Des weiteren wird untersucht, wie verbreitet sie auf ausgewählten Websites wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken sind. Abschließend wird anhand eines einfachen, praktischen Beispiels erläutert, wie ein Mashup realisiert werden kann, und welche Schritte dafür notwendig sind.
    Footnote
    Bachelor-Arbeit im Studiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement an der Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart.
  2. Eversberg, B.: Was sollen Bibliothekskataloge? (2002) 0.00 
    0.004895715 = product of:
  0.050589055 = sum of:
    0.013949131 = weight(_text_:und in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013949131 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
    0.022690795 = weight(_text_:im in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022690795 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.060543913 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.37478244 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
    0.013949131 = weight(_text_:und in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013949131 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
  0.09677419 = coord(3/31)
    Abstract
    Ein Beitrag zur Frage nach dem Sinn von Katalogen und Erschließung im Umfeld der Debatte RAK - AACR, MAB - MARC
  3. Eversberg, B.: Zur Zukunft der Katalogisierung : ... jenseits RAK und AACR (2004) 0.00 
    0.0029696634 = product of:
  0.046029784 = sum of:
    0.023014892 = weight(_text_:und in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023014892 = score(doc=3632,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
    0.023014892 = weight(_text_:und in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023014892 = score(doc=3632,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
  0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
    Abstract
    "Katalogisierung" klingt in manchen Ohren altmodisch. Man redet heute von "Metadaten"! Gemeint ist aber nichts völlig anderes. Es gibt nur viele neue Formen, Praktiken und Nutzungen, während sich früher Katalogdaten fast nur in Katalogen und Bibliographien befanden. "Metadaten" ist nur ein neuer Oberbegriff, aber in einer Katalogdatenbank haben wir längst mehr und andersartige Datenelemente und Funktionen als in Zettelkatalogen. Es ist notwendig, weiter auszugreifen als es die klassischen Regelwerke, RAK und AACR, getan haben, und deren hergebrachte Konzepte zu überdenken.
    Footnote
    Präsentation zum Vortrag "Zur Zukunft der Katalogisierung" während des Österreichischen Bibliothekartages in Linz 22.09.2004, Themenkreis: Google und die Zukunft der bibliothekarischen Erschließung. - Zuletzt aktualisiert: 15.07.2008.
  4. Wissen, D.: Ist der OPAC von morgen heute schon möglich? (2009) 0.00 
    0.002163196 = product of:
  0.03352954 = sum of:
    0.01676477 = weight(_text_:und in 4426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01676477 = score(doc=4426,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.3531656 = fieldWeight in 4426, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4426)
    0.01676477 = weight(_text_:und in 4426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01676477 = score(doc=4426,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.3531656 = fieldWeight in 4426, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4426)
  0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
    Abstract
    Wissen Sie, wie sich zukünftig Bibliografien, Kataloge und OPACs bedienen lassen? Wenn wir über die Zukunft von Bibliografien, Katalogen und OPACs nachdenken, denken wir dann zunächst an Medien verzeichnisse oder an offene, kommunikative Webportale, die es jedem ermöglichen, sich nach Art des Web 2.0 an der Erfassung der bibliografischen Daten zu beteiligen? Wenn wir mediale Internet angebote des Web 2.0 genauer betrachtet, bieten diese meh als lediglich die Verzeichnung von Medien. Es zeigt sich, dass angesichts aktueller Entwicklungen in Richtung Web 2.0 die Frage neu gestellt werden sollte, in welcher Form zukünftig mediografische Portale ihren Nutzen haben könnten. Beispielsweise könnte ein OPAC 2.0 jedem Interessenten einen individuellen Zugang zu einem Informationsraum offerieren, der sich funktionell ganz den eigenen Bedürfnissen und Wünschen des Bibliotheksnutzers anpasst und nicht nur Zugang zu Informationen ermöglicht, sondern auch vollmedialen Zugriff, inhaltliche Verweisfunktionen, erweiterten Service sowie Kommunikationsfunktionen. Die Antwort lautet also, dass Archive und Bibliotheken mehr über mediografische Portale nachden ken sollten und nicht über Bibliografien, Kataloge und OPACs! Eine darauf folgend wichtige Frage ist, ob diese Portale sowohl inhaltlich als auch funktionell nicht nur unseren Archiv und Bibliotheksnutzern mehr Service bieten, sondern auch einen höheren Zweck für Archive und Bibliotheken selbst darstellen? Die Online Techniken des Web 2.0 und dessen Portale offerieren virtuelle Welten und neue Möglichkeiten zum Aktiv und Produktivsein, also insgesamt zum Proaktivsein unserer Nutzer. Die Betrachtung solcher Internetangebote zeigt, dass sich mediografische Angebote bereits in einer Entwicklung befinden. Doch wenn es eine solche Entwicklung gibt, muss überlegt werden, wie Archive und Bibliotheken sich hierbei einbringen können. Somit zeichnet sich bei diesem Thema eine Brisanz ab. Denn zu bedenken ist, dass mediografische Daten bereits in Rechercheergebnissen bei Online-Datenbanken, Internet Suchmaschinen, Online Enzyklopädien oder anderen Angeboten eine Rolle spielen.
  5. Hider, P.: ¬The bibliographic advantages of a centralised union catalogue for ILL and resource sharing (2003) 0.00 
    0.0017627863 = product of:
  0.027323188 = sum of:
    0.021456394 = weight(_text_:20 in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021456394 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.36444563 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
    0.0058667944 = weight(_text_:e in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0058667944 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
  0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
    Date
    16.11.2003 14:20:44
    Language
    e
  6. Eversberg, B.: Navigare necesse est : oder: Wie knüpft man die richtigen Beziehungen? (2006) 0.00 
    0.0011999252 = product of:
  0.018598842 = sum of:
    0.009299421 = weight(_text_:und in 1948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009299421 = score(doc=1948,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 1948, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1948)
    0.009299421 = weight(_text_:und in 1948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009299421 = score(doc=1948,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 1948, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1948)
  0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
    Abstract
    Zu den heute geforderten Funktionen von Katalogsystemen gehört das Navigieren. Auch wer dieses Wort nicht kennt, navigiert täglich, und zwar bei jedem Klick auf einen Hyperlink. Es tut somit not, dem Nutzer Hyperlinks zu präsentieren - damit er zu "Ressourcen" surfen kann, die mit dem vorher gefundenen Dokument irgendwie zusammenhängen. Hyperlinks machen sich nicht von selbst, es muß etwas dahinterstecken, am besten ein Konzept, das die Beziehungen zwischen den Dokumenten in praktikabler, plausibler Weise abbildet. Wer keine oder die falschen Beziehungen hat, den bestraft das Leben - in Katalogen ist das nicht anders.
  7. Mann, T.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools. Final report. March 17, 2006. Prepared for the Library of Congress by Karen Calhoun : A critical review (2006) 0.00 
    8.8139315E-4 = product of:
  0.013661594 = sum of:
    0.010728197 = weight(_text_:20 in 5012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010728197 = score(doc=5012,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 5012, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5012)
    0.0029333972 = weight(_text_:e in 5012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0029333972 = score(doc=5012,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5012, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5012)
  0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
    Date
    20. 5.2006 19:17:50
    Language
    e
  8. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2005) 0.00 
    8.8139315E-4 = product of:
  0.013661594 = sum of:
    0.010728197 = weight(_text_:20 in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010728197 = score(doc=1086,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
    0.0029333972 = weight(_text_:e in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0029333972 = score(doc=1086,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
  0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
    Date
    7. 3.2005 20:15:47
    Language
    e
  9. Coyle, K.: ¬The virtual union catalog : a comparative study (2000) 0.00 
    8.8139315E-4 = product of:
  0.013661594 = sum of:
    0.010728197 = weight(_text_:20 in 1230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010728197 = score(doc=1230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 1230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1230)
    0.0029333972 = weight(_text_:e in 1230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0029333972 = score(doc=1230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1230)
  0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:02:20
    Language
    e
  10. Calhoun, K.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools : Prepared for the Library of Congress (2006) 0.00 
    6.799566E-4 = product of:
  0.010539327 = sum of:
    0.007152131 = weight(_text_:20 in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007152131 = score(doc=5013,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.12148187 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
    0.0033871958 = weight(_text_:e in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033871958 = score(doc=5013,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.11002572 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
  0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
    Abstract
    The destabilizing influences of the Web, widespread ownership of personal computers, and rising computer literacy have created an era of discontinuous change in research libraries a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. The library catalog is such an asset. Today, a large and growing number of students and scholars routinely bypass library catalogs in favor of other discovery tools, and the catalog represents a shrinking proportion of the universe of scholarly information. The catalog is in decline, its processes and structures are unsustainable, and change needs to be swift. At the same time, books and serials are not dead, and they are not yet digital. Notwithstanding widespread expansion of digitization projects, ubiquitous e-journals, and a market that seems poised to move to e-books, the role of catalog records in discovery and retrieval of the world's library collections seems likely to continue for at least a couple of decades and probably longer. This report, commissioned by the Library of Congress (LC), offers an analysis of the current situation, options for revitalizing research library catalogs, a feasibility assessment, a vision for change, and a blueprint for action. Library decision makers are the primary audience for this report, whose aim is to elicit support, dialogue, collaboration, and movement toward solutions. Readers from the business community, particularly those that directly serve libraries, may find the report helpful for defining research and development efforts. The same is true for readers from membership organizations such as OCLC Online Computer Library Center, the Research Libraries Group, the Association for Research Libraries, the Council on Library and Information Resources, the Coalition for Networked Information, and the Digital Library Federation. Library managers and practitioners from all functional groups are likely to take an interest in the interview findings and in specific actions laid out in the blueprint.
    Date
    20. 5.2006 19:17:50
    Language
    e
  11. Cathro, W.: New frameworks for resource discovery and delivery : the changing role of the catalogue (2006) 0.00 
    2.883924E-4 = product of:
  0.008940164 = sum of:
    0.008940164 = weight(_text_:20 in 6107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008940164 = score(doc=6107,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.15185234 = fieldWeight in 6107, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6107)
  0.032258064 = coord(1/31)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich der 72ND IFLA General Conference and Council, 20-24 August 2006, Seoul, Korea
  12. Danskin, A.: "Tomorrow never knows" : the end of cataloguing? (2006) 0.00 
    2.307139E-4 = product of:
  0.007152131 = sum of:
    0.007152131 = weight(_text_:20 in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007152131 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.12148187 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
  0.032258064 = coord(1/31)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich der 72ND IFLA General Conference and Council, 20-24 August 2006, Seoul, Korea
  13. Whitney , C.; Schiff, L.: ¬The Melvyl Recommender Project : developing library recommendation services (2006) 0.00 
    1.3382098E-4 = product of:
  0.0041484507 = sum of:
    0.0041484507 = weight(_text_:e in 1173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041484507 = score(doc=1173,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 1173, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1173)
  0.032258064 = coord(1/31)
    Abstract
    Popular commercial on-line services such as Google, e-Bay, Amazon, and Netflix have evolved quickly over the last decade to help people find what they want, developing information retrieval strategies such as usefully ranked results, spelling correction, and recommender systems. Online library catalogs (OPACs), in contrast, have changed little and are notoriously difficult for patrons to use (University of California Libraries, 2005). Over the past year (June 2005 to the present), the Melvyl Recommender Project (California Digital Library, 2005) has been exploring methods and feasibility of closing the gap between features that library patrons want and have come to expect from information retrieval systems and what libraries are currently equipped to deliver. The project team conducted exploratory work in five topic areas: relevance ranking, auto-correction, use of a text-based discovery system, user interface strategies, and recommending. This article focuses specifically on the recommending portion of the project and potential extensions to that work.
    Language
    e
  14. Byrd, J.; Charbonneau, G.; Charbonneau, M.; Courtney, A.; Johnson, E.; Leonard, K.; Morrison, A.; Mudge, S.; O'Bryan, A.; Opasik, S.; Riley, J.; Turchyn, S.: ¬A white paper on the future of cataloging at Indiana University (2006) 0.00 
    1.11517475E-4 = product of:
  0.003457042 = sum of:
    0.003457042 = weight(_text_:e in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003457042 = score(doc=3225,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
  0.032258064 = coord(1/31)
    Language
    e
  15. Coyle, K.; Hillmann, D.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) : cataloging rules for the 20th century (2007) 0.00 
    7.885476E-5 = product of:
  0.0024444978 = sum of:
    0.0024444978 = weight(_text_:e in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024444978 = score(doc=2525,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
  0.032258064 = coord(1/31)
    Language
    e
  16. Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007) 0.00 
    5.5198336E-5 = product of:
  0.0017111484 = sum of:
    0.0017111484 = weight(_text_:e in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017111484 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.05558295 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
  0.032258064 = coord(1/31)
    Language
    e
  17. Report on the future of bibliographic control : draft for public comment (2007) 0.00 
    4.7312857E-5 = product of:
  0.0014666986 = sum of:
    0.0014666986 = weight(_text_:e in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0014666986 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.04764253 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
  0.032258064 = coord(1/31)
    Language
    e

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes