Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0014848317 = product of:
  0.023014892 = sum of:
    0.011507446 = weight(_text_:und in 5998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011507446 = score(doc=5998,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 5998, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5998)
    0.011507446 = weight(_text_:und in 5998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011507446 = score(doc=5998,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 5998, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5998)
  0.06451613 = coord(2/31)

Abstract

Der Arbeitsbericht konzentriert sich zunächst auf Integrationsmöglichkeiten des Dreiländerkatalogs (DLK), der prototypisch für fachübergreifende Bibliothekskataloge (Allgemeinzugang) in vascoda steht. Der Bericht geht auf interne Designvarianten ein, welche Grundüberlegungen zum sogenannten Allgemeinzugang bebildern. Abschnitt 2 befasst sich mit Vorschlägen zur Erweiterung der Suchtypologie von vascoda. Eine Änderung der fachgebietsorientierten Grundkonzeption von vascoda lässt sich weder aus der Literatursichtung noch aus der vascoda-internen Diskussion anlässlich der Contentintegration von DLK und der Einführung der FAST-Suchmaschinentechnologie für vascoda-Teilmengen ableiten.

6.799566E-4 = product of:
  0.010539327 = sum of:
    0.007152131 = weight(_text_:20 in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007152131 = score(doc=5013,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.12148187 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
    0.0033871958 = weight(_text_:e in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033871958 = score(doc=5013,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.11002572 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
  0.06451613 = coord(2/31)

Abstract

The destabilizing influences of the Web, widespread ownership of personal computers, and rising computer literacy have created an era of discontinuous change in research libraries a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. The library catalog is such an asset. Today, a large and growing number of students and scholars routinely bypass library catalogs in favor of other discovery tools, and the catalog represents a shrinking proportion of the universe of scholarly information. The catalog is in decline, its processes and structures are unsustainable, and change needs to be swift. At the same time, books and serials are not dead, and they are not yet digital. Notwithstanding widespread expansion of digitization projects, ubiquitous e-journals, and a market that seems poised to move to e-books, the role of catalog records in discovery and retrieval of the world's library collections seems likely to continue for at least a couple of decades and probably longer. This report, commissioned by the Library of Congress (LC), offers an analysis of the current situation, options for revitalizing research library catalogs, a feasibility assessment, a vision for change, and a blueprint for action. Library decision makers are the primary audience for this report, whose aim is to elicit support, dialogue, collaboration, and movement toward solutions. Readers from the business community, particularly those that directly serve libraries, may find the report helpful for defining research and development efforts. The same is true for readers from membership organizations such as OCLC Online Computer Library Center, the Research Libraries Group, the Association for Research Libraries, the Council on Library and Information Resources, the Coalition for Networked Information, and the Digital Library Federation. Library managers and practitioners from all functional groups are likely to take an interest in the interview findings and in specific actions laid out in the blueprint.

Date

20. 5.2006 19:17:50

Language

e

7.885476E-5 = product of:
  0.0024444978 = sum of:
    0.0024444978 = weight(_text_:e in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024444978 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
  0.032258064 = coord(1/31)

Language

e

4.7312857E-5 = product of:
  0.0014666986 = sum of:
    0.0014666986 = weight(_text_:e in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0014666986 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02141793 = queryNorm
        0.04764253 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
  0.032258064 = coord(1/31)

Language

e