Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.01 
    0.009557184 = product of:
  0.038228735 = sum of:
    0.038228735 = product of:
      0.07645747 = sum of:
        0.07645747 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07645747 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
  2. Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982) 0.01 
    0.009557184 = product of:
  0.038228735 = sum of:
    0.038228735 = product of:
      0.07645747 = sum of:
        0.07645747 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07645747 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:49:22
  3. Anderson, J.D.: Catalog file display principles and the new filing rules (1981) 0.01 
    0.005152073 = product of:
  0.020608293 = sum of:
    0.020608293 = weight(_text_:to in 278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020608293 = score(doc=278,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04702661 = queryNorm
        0.24104178 = fieldWeight in 278, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=278)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    File display-the way in which catalog records are arranged for display-is a principal determinant of access to printed library catalogs, whether they be on cards, on microform, or in book form. In 1980, both the American Library Association and the Library of Congress published new sets of filing rules which represent significant departures from traditional library catalog arrangement in North America. These new rules are analyzed and compared with each other and with their predecessors, the 1956 LC and the 1968 ALA filing rules, on the basis of fundamental attributes of files and filing: (1) the symbols considered in arranging records together with the filing values assigned to them, and (2) the underlying basis of filing-symbols or concepts. Numerous examples of the very different sequences which result in the application of these codes are provided and discussed. The purpose of this paper is to help clarify filing options and thereby to help librarians make more informed choices for the display of their own catalog files.
  4. Broadbent, E.: ¬The online catalog : dictionary, classified, or both? (1989) 0.00 
    0.0044618268 = product of:
  0.017847307 = sum of:
    0.017847307 = weight(_text_:to in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017847307 = score(doc=457,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04702661 = queryNorm
        0.20874833 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The main purpose of the study was to determine if the online catalog can function both as a dictionary and classified catalog without requiring additional time or intellectual effort on the part of the cataloger. A total of 1842 MARC bibliographic records listed in the 370-379 classified section of American Book Publishing Record were studied. These records displayed 2735 subject headings. Of these, 1491 (55%) had a Library of Congress classification number linked to them. An alphabetical and classified index was created using primary subjects and their related classification numbers. While such an index could be a useful browsing device if integrated into an online catalog, creating a bona fide classified catalog would require assigning classification numbers to the secondary subject headings.
  5. Burger, R.H.: Conversion of catalog records to machine-readable form : major projects, continuing problems, and future prospects (1983) 0.00 
    0.0042933947 = product of:
  0.017173579 = sum of:
    0.017173579 = weight(_text_:to in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017173579 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04702661 = queryNorm
        0.20086816 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  6. Williamson, N.J.: Is there a catalog in your future? : Access to information in the year 2006 (1982) 0.00 
    0.0042933947 = product of:
  0.017173579 = sum of:
    0.017173579 = weight(_text_:to in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017173579 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04702661 = queryNorm
        0.20086816 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  7. Packer, K.H.; Michaud, J.M.: ¬The use and users of COM catalogues at the University of Toronto and the Mississauga Library System (1983) 0.00 
    0.004250244 = product of:
  0.017000975 = sum of:
    0.017000975 = weight(_text_:to in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017000975 = score(doc=296,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04702661 = queryNorm
        0.19884932 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Three studies were made of the use of COM catalogues at the University of Toronto and the Mississauga Library System: unobtrusive observations, structured interviews, and a timed-search experiment in reel, fiche and card catalogues. The reel catalogue was found to be the overwhelming favourite, almost as popular in the public library as in the academic library, where 82% of the users reported it to be their preferred form of catalogue. However, for nearly all test questions and searcher types in the timed-search experiment, successful searches required less time in the card catalogue than in either form of the COM catalogues.
  8. Hurowitz, R.; Kalinsky, K.; McDonald, D.R.; Deventer, B.V.: Future catalogs and bibliographic links at Stanford University Libraries (1981) 0.00 
    0.0034347156 = product of:
  0.013738862 = sum of:
    0.013738862 = weight(_text_:to in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013738862 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04702661 = queryNorm
        0.16069452 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The decision by many libraries to adopt AACR2, freeze their catalogs, and initiate new catalogs raises several questions regarding connections of links between the catalogs. This paper examines the intended goal of catalogs, how the existence of more than one catalog affects such goals, and alternative methods of linking catalogs for names, subjects, and titles. In addition, recommendations are presented regarding the optimal method of linking catalogs and changes in organization, staffing, and costs are investigated.

Authors

Languages

Themes