Search (90 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Biagetti, M.T.; Iacono, A.; Trombone, A.: Testing library catalog analysis as a bibliometric indicator for research evaluation in social sciences and humanities (2018) 0.02 
    0.02002317 = product of:
  0.050057925 = sum of:
    0.04011057 = weight(_text_:u in 4868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04011057 = score(doc=4868,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4868, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4868)
    0.009947354 = weight(_text_:a in 4868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009947354 = score(doc=4868,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4868, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4868)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Type
    a
  2. Mönnich, M.; Dierolf, U.: 20 Jahre Karlsruher virtueller Katalog (KVK) (2016) 0.02 
    0.018033698 = product of:
  0.045084246 = sum of:
    0.04011057 = weight(_text_:u in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04011057 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
    0.004973677 = weight(_text_:a in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004973677 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Type
    a
  3. Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017) 0.02 
    0.01662754 = product of:
  0.041568853 = sum of:
    0.033954494 = weight(_text_:w in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033954494 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
    0.0076143574 = weight(_text_:a in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0076143574 = score(doc=3871,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This study presents preliminary themes surfaced from an ongoing ethnographic study. The research question is: how and where do cultures influence the cataloging practices of using U.S. standards to catalog Chinese materials? The author applies warrant as a lens for evaluating knowledge representation systems, and extends the application from examining classificatory decisions to cataloging decisions. Semantic warrant as a conceptual tool allows us to recognize and name the various rationales behind cataloging decisions, grants us explanatory power, and the language to "visualize" and reflect on the conflicting priorities in cataloging practices. Through participatory observation, the author recorded the cataloging practices of two Chinese catalogers working on the same cataloging project. One of the catalogers is U.S. trained, and another cataloger is a professor of Library and Information Science from China, who is also a subject expert and a cataloger of Chinese special collections. The study shows how the catalogers describe Chinese special collections using many U.S. cataloging and classification standards but from different approaches. The author presents particular cases derived from the fieldwork, with an emphasis on the many layers presented by cultures, principles, standards, and practices of different scope, each of which may represent conflicting warrants. From this, it is made clear that the conflicts of warrants influence cataloging practice. We may view the conflicting warrants as an interpretation of the tension between different semantic warrants and the globalization and localization of cataloging standards.
    Type
    a
  4. Altenhöner, R.; Frodl, C.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Pfeifer, B.; Oehlschläger, S.; Svensson, L.G.: Libraries beyond libraries : Integration, Innovation and Information for all Aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen Bibliografie, Katalogisierung, Klassifikation und Indexierung, Knowledge Management und Informationstechnologie sowie der Core Activity ICADS der IFLA Division III (Library Services) beim Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 77. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in San Juan, Puerto Rico (2011) 0.02 
    0.016500546 = product of:
  0.04125136 = sum of:
    0.03509675 = weight(_text_:u in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03509675 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
    0.006154612 = weight(_text_:a in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006154612 = score(doc=174,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Type
    a
  5. Sunckel, B.; Reh, U.; Nienerza, H.: ¬Das HeBIS Discovery System : Kooperative Entwicklung einer neuen Rechercheoberfläche für HeBIS-Bibliotheken (2014) 0.02 
    0.015779486 = product of:
  0.039448716 = sum of:
    0.03509675 = weight(_text_:u in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03509675 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
    0.0043519675 = weight(_text_:a in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0043519675 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Type
    a
  6. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.01 
    0.011920598 = product of:
  0.029801495 = sum of:
    0.0097312955 = weight(_text_:a in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0097312955 = score(doc=1934,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
    0.0200702 = product of:
      0.0401404 = sum of:
        0.0401404 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0401404 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Creativity is now a core requirement for successful organizations. Libraries, like all organizations, need to produce and utilize new ideas to improve user service and experiences. With changes in cataloging such as Resource Description and Access (RDA), the opportunity to rethink cataloging practices is here now. Everyone has creative potential, although catalogers may have both a personality and work environment that make it more difficult. To be able to maximize creative capacity, catalogers need the proper work environment, support from their organization, and a plan for accomplishing creative goals. Given that environment, catalogers may create ideas that will shape the future. (RDA).
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
    Type
    a
  7. Clarke, R.I.: Cataloging research by design : a taxonomic approach to understanding research questions in cataloging (2018) 0.01 
    0.010217656 = product of:
  0.02554414 = sum of:
    0.008341111 = weight(_text_:a in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008341111 = score(doc=5188,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
    0.01720303 = product of:
      0.03440606 = sum of:
        0.03440606 = weight(_text_:22 in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03440606 = score(doc=5188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article asserts that many research questions (RQs) in cataloging reflect design-based RQs, rather than traditional scientific ones. To support this idea, a review of existing discussions of RQs is presented to identify prominent types of RQs, including design-based RQs. RQ types are then classified into a taxonomic framework and compared with RQs from the Everyday Cataloger Concerns project, which aimed to identify important areas of research from the perspective of practicing catalogers. This comparative method demonstrates the ways in which the research areas identified by cataloging practitioners reflect design RQs-and therefore require design approaches and methods to answer them.
    Date
    30. 5.2019 19:14:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Ethos of Care: A Festschrift for Dr. Allyson Carlyle at the Occasion of her Retirement'.
    Type
    a
  8. Hilberer, T.: Numerus currens und iPod : die Organisation von Information mittels Metadaten und die Aufgabe der Bibliotheken im digitalen Zeitalter oder Die Kraft der digitalen Ordnung (2011) 0.01 
    0.009768868 = product of:
  0.024422169 = sum of:
    0.0043519675 = weight(_text_:a in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0043519675 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
    0.0200702 = product of:
      0.0401404 = sum of:
        0.0401404 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0401404 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
    Type
    a
  9. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.01 
    0.008221182 = product of:
  0.020552954 = sum of:
    0.006217096 = weight(_text_:a in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006217096 = score(doc=420,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
    0.014335858 = product of:
      0.028671715 = sum of:
        0.028671715 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028671715 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The conflict between librarians' ethics and their responsibilities in the process of progressive collection management, which applies the principles of cost accounting to libraries, to call attention to the "bad books" in their collections that are compromised by age, error, abridgement, expurgation, plagiarism, copyright violation, libel, or fraud, is discussed. According to Charles Cutter, notes in catalog records should call attention to the best books but ignore the bad ones. Libraries that can afford to keep their "bad books," however, which often have a valuable second life, must call attention to their intellectual contexts in notes in the catalog records. Michael Bellesiles's Arming America, the most famous case of academic fraud at the turn of the twenty-first century, is used as a test case. Given the bias of content enhancement that automatically pulls content from the Web into library catalogs, catalog notes for "bad books" may be the only way for librarians to uphold their ethical principles regarding collection management while fulfilling their professional responsibilities to their users in calling attention to their "bad books."
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_f.pdf.
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
    Type
    a
  10. Julien, C.-A.; Guastavino, C.; Bouthillier, F.: Capitalizing on information organization and information visualization for a new-generation catalogue (2012) 0.00 
    0.0021536655 = product of:
  0.010768328 = sum of:
    0.010768328 = weight(_text_:a in 5567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010768328 = score(doc=5567,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 5567, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5567)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Subject searching is difficult with traditional text-based online public access library catalogues (OPACs), and the next-generation discovery layers are keyword searching and result filtering tools that offer little support for subject browsing. Next-generation OPACs ignore the rich network of relations offered by controlled subject vocabulary, which can facilitate subject browsing. A new generation of OPACs could leverage existing information-organization investments and offer online searchers a novel browsing and searching environment. This is a case study of the design and development of a virtual reality subject browsing and information retrieval tool. The functional prototype shows that the Library of Congress subject headings (LCSH) can be shaped into a useful and usable tree structure serving as a visual metaphor that contains a real world collection from the domain of science and engineering. Formative tests show that users can effectively browse the LCSH tree and carve it up based on their keyword search queries. This study uses a complex information-organization structure as a defining characteristic of an OPAC that goes beyond the standard keyword search model, toward the cutting edge of online search tools.
    Type
    a
  11. Clarke, R.I.: Breaking records : the history of bibliographic records and their influence in conceptualizing bibliographic data (2015) 0.00 
    0.00213202 = product of:
  0.0106601 = sum of:
    0.0106601 = weight(_text_:a in 1877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0106601 = score(doc=1877,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 1877, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1877)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    A bibliographic record is a conceptual whole that includes all bibliographic information about a resource together in one place. With the Semantic Web, individual data statements are linked across the web. This position article argues that the traditional conceptualization of bibliographic records affects the affordances and limitations of that data. A historical analysis of the development of bibliographic records contrasted with the Semantic Web model reveals how the "record" model shaped library cataloging and the implications on library catalogs today. Reification of the record model for bibliographic data hampers possibilities for innovation in cataloging, inspiring a reconceptualization of bibliographic description.
    Type
    a
  12. McGrath, K.; Kules, B.; Fitzpatrick, C.: FRBR and facets provide flexible, work-centric access to items in library collections (2011) 0.00 
    0.00213202 = product of:
  0.0106601 = sum of:
    0.0106601 = weight(_text_:a in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0106601 = score(doc=2430,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper explores a technique to improve searcher access to library collections by providing a faceted search interface built on a data model based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). The prototype provides a Workcentric view of a moving image collection that is integrated with bibliographic and holdings data. Two sets of facets address important user needs: "what do you want?" and "how/where do you want it?" enabling patrons to narrow, broaden and pivot across facet values instead of limiting them to the tree-structured hierarchy common with existing FRBR applications. The data model illustrates how FRBR is being adapted and applied beyond the traditional library catalog.
    Type
    a
  13. Howarth, L.C.: "Is there a catalog in your future?" : Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor (2010) 0.00 
    0.0019894708 = product of:
  0.009947354 = sum of:
    0.009947354 = weight(_text_:a in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009947354 = score(doc=3565,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Bezugnahme auf: Williamson, N.J.: Is there a catalog in your future?: Access to information in the year 2006. In: Library resources and technical services. 26(1982), S.122-135.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem special issue: Is there a catalog in your future? Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor
    Type
    a
  14. Weinheimer, J.: ¬A visual explanation of the areas defined by AACR2, RDA, ISBD, LC NAF, LC Classification, LC Subject Headings, Dewey Classification, MARC21 : plus a quick look at ISO2709, MARCXML and a version of BIBFRAME (2015) 0.00 
    0.0019738672 = product of:
  0.009869335 = sum of:
    0.009869335 = weight(_text_:a in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009869335 = score(doc=2882,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This short publication was made for two reasons. First, to provide a simple way to help people understand a bit more precisely what is defined by RDA, AACR2, MARC format, and so on. In this way, when someone says that MARC, or AARC2, or ISBD should change, they will have a better idea of what each term does and does not pertain to. One record has been chosen at random and analysed in various ways. This publication is far from complete and does not pretend to teach anything, it only demonstrates. When someone talks about, e.g. MARC, all the reader needs to do is look at the colored areas to get an idea of what that means.
    Source
    http://blog.jweinheimer.net/wp-content/Ebooks/A%20visual%20explanation%20of%20the%20are%20-%20James%20Weinheimer.pdf
  15. Walsh, L.: ¬The faceted catalog as a tool for searching monographic series : usability study of Lens (2012) 0.00 
    0.0019462592 = product of:
  0.0097312955 = sum of:
    0.0097312955 = weight(_text_:a in 1902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0097312955 = score(doc=1902,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1902, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1902)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This study explored the functionality of the University of Chicago's faceted catalog, Lens, in respect to monographic series. A user study was designed to evaluate the efficiency of Lens in searching for monographic series and also to determine whether controlled series access in the catalog record improves the search results. The results of the study indicate that while Lens could be considered an adequate tool for searching series that are known to be published under the same title, some changes would make it a better search engine for a series that changes series statements from one volume to another.
    Type
    a
  16. Zhang, Y.; Salaba, A.: What do users tell us about FRBR-based catalogs? (2012) 0.00 
    0.0019462592 = product of:
  0.0097312955 = sum of:
    0.0097312955 = weight(_text_:a in 1924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0097312955 = score(doc=1924,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1924, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1924)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    FRBR user research has been the least addressed area in FRBR research and development. This article addresses the research gap in evaluating and designing catalogs based on FRBR user research. It draws from three user studies concerning FRBR-based catalogs: (1) user evaluation of three FRBR-based catalogs, (2) user participatory design of a prototype catalog based on the FRBR model, and (3) user evaluation of the resulting FRBR prototype catalog. The major findings from the user studies are highlighted and discussed for future development of FRBR-based catalogs that support various user tasks.
    Content
    Contribution to a special issue "The FRBR family of conceptual models: toward a linked future"
    Type
    a
  17. Joseph, K.: Wikipedia knows the value of what the library catalog forgets (2019) 0.00 
    0.0019462592 = product of:
  0.0097312955 = sum of:
    0.0097312955 = weight(_text_:a in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0097312955 = score(doc=5277,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Shifting library catalogs from physical to digital has come at a cost. Catalog records no longer leave traces of their own evolution, which is a loss for librarianship. The subjective nature of information classification warrants self-examination, within which we may see the evolution of practice, debates over attribution and relevance, and how culture is reflected in the systems used to describe it. Wikipedia models what is possible: revision histories and discussion pages function as knowledge generators. A list of unanswerable questions for the modern catalog urges us to construct a new, forward-thinking bibliography that allows us to look backward.
    Type
    a
  18. Skinner, D.G.: ¬A comparison of searching functionality of a VuFind catalogue implementation and the traditional catalogue (2012) 0.00 
    0.0019462592 = product of:
  0.0097312955 = sum of:
    0.0097312955 = weight(_text_:a in 5568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0097312955 = score(doc=5568,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5568, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5568)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    As of spring semester 2010, Georgia Southern University began using a VuFind implementation as the default access to the library catalogue on the library Web page while maintaining a secondary link to the traditional Voyager "classic" catalogue. VuFind is an open-source product that has been adopted and adapted by all the state universities and colleges in the state of Georgia. For approximately ten years, Georgia libraries have used Voyager as their catalogue, and it remains available to users as the "classic" search option. This report examines the local VuFind implementation compared to the more traditional Voyager implementation, emphasizing the differences in the searching capabilities of each.
    Type
    a
  19. Lynema, E.; Lown, C.; Woodbury, D.: Virtual browse : designing user-oriented services for discovery of related resources (2012) 0.00 
    0.0019462592 = product of:
  0.0097312955 = sum of:
    0.0097312955 = weight(_text_:a in 5573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0097312955 = score(doc=5573,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5573, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5573)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Although academic libraries are increasingly converting stacks into collaborative spaces and physical books and journals are being replaced by their electronic counterparts, the concept of browsing as a means of discovery is seeing a resurgence in the world of search and discovery. While many users start their online research with electronic databases and library catalogues, interviews with North Carolina State University Libraries patrons provide evidence that physically browsing the shelves to find similar materials is still common. A growing awareness of the need to preserve this type of serendipitous discovery as a complement to keyword searching is inspiring the development of online virtual browsing tools that replace and enhance physical access to library stacks.
    Type
    a
  20. Wakeling, S.; Clough, P.; Connaway, L.S.; Sen, B.; Tomás, D.: Users and uses of a global union catalog : a mixed-methods study of WorldCat.org (2017) 0.00 
    0.001865129 = product of:
  0.009325645 = sum of:
    0.009325645 = weight(_text_:a in 3794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009325645 = score(doc=3794,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 3794, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3794)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper presents the first large-scale investigation of the users and uses of WorldCat.org, the world's largest bibliographic database and global union catalog. Using a mixed-methods approach involving focus group interviews with 120 participants, an online survey with 2,918 responses, and an analysis of transaction logs of approximately 15 million sessions from WorldCat.org, the study provides a new understanding of the context for global union catalog use. We find that WorldCat.org is accessed by a diverse population, with the three primary user groups being librarians, students, and academics. Use of the system is found to fall within three broad types of work-task (professional, academic, and leisure), and we also present an emergent taxonomy of search tasks that encompass known-item, unknown-item, and institutional information searches. Our results support the notion that union catalogs are primarily used for known-item searches, although the volume of traffic to WorldCat.org means that unknown-item searches nonetheless represent an estimated 250,000 sessions per month. Search engine referrals account for almost half of all traffic, but although WorldCat.org effectively connects users referred from institutional library catalogs to other libraries holding a sought item, users arriving from a search engine are less likely to connect to a library.
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

  • e 51
  • d 39

Types

  • a 85
  • el 13
  • m 2
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications