Search (91 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Altenhöner, R.; Frodl, C.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Pfeifer, B.; Oehlschläger, S.; Svensson, L.G.: Libraries beyond libraries : Integration, Innovation and Information for all Aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen Bibliografie, Katalogisierung, Klassifikation und Indexierung, Knowledge Management und Informationstechnologie sowie der Core Activity ICADS der IFLA Division III (Library Services) beim Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 77. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in San Juan, Puerto Rico (2011) 0.03 
    0.032269284 = product of:
  0.070992425 = sum of:
    0.006345466 = product of:
      0.012690932 = sum of:
        0.012690932 = weight(_text_:h in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012690932 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.003865826 = weight(_text_:a in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003865826 = score(doc=174,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
    0.03186193 = weight(_text_:r in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03186193 = score(doc=174,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.3620595 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
    0.00687428 = weight(_text_:s in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00687428 = score(doc=174,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
    0.02204492 = weight(_text_:u in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02204492 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
  0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    Abstract
    Darin u.a. Bericht über 'Cataloguing Section' (S.871), 'ISBD Review Group' (S.872-873), 'FRBR Review Group' (S.873-874), 'Virtual International authoriy File (VIAF)' (S.875-876), 'Satellite conference on RDA' (S.876-879), 'Classification and Indexing Section' (S.879-882).
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 45(2011) H.10, S.868-893
    Type
    a
  2. Haake, E.; Blenkle, M.; Ellis, R.; Zillmann, H.: Nur die ersten Drei zählen! : Optimierung der Rankingverfahren über Popularitätsfaktoren bei der Elektronischen Bibliothek Bremen (E-LIB) (2015) 0.02 
    0.020391501 = product of:
  0.0448613 = sum of:
    0.0054389704 = product of:
      0.010877941 = sum of:
        0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 2150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010877941 = score(doc=2150,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2150, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2150)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 2150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0023430442 = score(doc=2150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2150)
    0.01568482 = product of:
      0.06273928 = sum of:
        0.06273928 = weight(_text_:o in 2150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06273928 = score(doc=2150,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.47037077 = fieldWeight in 2150, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2150)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 2150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019311246 = score(doc=2150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2150)
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 2150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=2150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2150)
  0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2015H2.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 2(2015) Nr.2, S.33-42
    Type
    a
  3. Zechner, R.: Zwischen Anspruch und Möglichkeit : Frauen*solidarität: ein Beispiel aus der Beschlagwortung (2016) 0.01 
    0.014616728 = product of:
  0.040196 = sum of:
    0.007251961 = product of:
      0.014503922 = sum of:
        0.014503922 = weight(_text_:h in 3908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014503922 = score(doc=3908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 3908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3908)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 3908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044180867 = score(doc=3908,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3908, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3908)
    0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 3908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025748327 = score(doc=3908,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 3908, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3908)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 3908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=3908,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3908, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3908)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Location
    A
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 69(2016) H.2, S.244-252
    Type
    a
  4. Mönnich, M.; Dierolf, U.: 20 Jahre Karlsruher virtueller Katalog (KVK) (2016) 0.01 
    0.01394467 = product of:
  0.03834784 = sum of:
    0.007251961 = product of:
      0.014503922 = sum of:
        0.014503922 = weight(_text_:h in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014503922 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031240587 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
    0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025194194 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Source
    B.I.T. Online. 19(2016) H.5, S.402-412
    Type
    a
  5. Sunckel, B.; Reh, U.; Nienerza, H.: ¬Das HeBIS Discovery System : Kooperative Entwicklung einer neuen Rechercheoberfläche für HeBIS-Bibliotheken (2014) 0.01 
    0.01315736 = product of:
  0.03618274 = sum of:
    0.008973843 = product of:
      0.017947687 = sum of:
        0.017947687 = weight(_text_:h in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017947687 = score(doc=2576,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027335514 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
    0.02204492 = weight(_text_:u in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02204492 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 48(2014) H.10, S.784-794
    Type
    a
  6. Bergman, O.; Gradovitch, N.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Beyth-Marom, R.: Folder versus tag preference in personal information management (2013) 0.01 
    0.011583204 = product of:
  0.03185381 = sum of:
    0.004782719 = weight(_text_:a in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004782719 = score(doc=1103,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
    0.00924237 = product of:
      0.03696948 = sum of:
        0.03696948 = weight(_text_:o in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03696948 = score(doc=1103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.27716863 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016092705 = score(doc=1103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=1103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Abstract
    Users' preferences for folders versus tags was studied in 2 working environments where both options were available to them. In the Gmail study, we informed 75 participants about both folder-labeling and tag-labeling, observed their storage behavior after 1 month, and asked them to estimate the proportions of different retrieval options in their behavior. In the Windows 7 study, we informed 23 participants about tags and asked them to tag all their files for 2 weeks, followed by a period of 5 weeks of free choice between the 2 methods. Their storage and retrieval habits were tested prior to the learning session and, after 7 weeks, using special classification recording software and a retrieval-habits questionnaire. A controlled retrieval task and an in-depth interview were conducted. Results of both studies show a strong preference for folders over tags for both storage and retrieval. In the minority of cases where tags were used for storage, participants typically used a single tag per information item. Moreover, when multiple classification was used for storage, it was only marginally used for retrieval. The controlled retrieval task showed lower success rates and slower retrieval speeds for tag use. Possible reasons for participants' preferences are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.10, S.1995-2012
    Type
    a
  7. Meßmer, G.; Müller, M.: Standards in der Formalerschließung gedruckter und elektronischer Ressourcen (2015) 0.01 
    0.010789777 = product of:
  0.039562516 = sum of:
    0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 1143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0039050733 = score(doc=1143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1143)
    0.03218541 = weight(_text_:r in 1143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03218541 = score(doc=1143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 1143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1143)
    0.0034720355 = weight(_text_:s in 1143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0034720355 = score(doc=1143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1143)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Pages
    S.341-356
    Source
    Praxishandbuch Bibliotheksmanagement. Hrsg.: R. Griebel, u.a. Bd.1
    Type
    a
  8. Pfeifenberger, R.: ¬Der Opac im Handyformat : Mobile Online-Kataloge sichern die Zukunft von Bibliotheken als zentrale Informationsquellen der Gesellschaft (2010) 0.01 
    0.01060963 = product of:
  0.029176481 = sum of:
    0.0054389704 = product of:
      0.010877941 = sum of:
        0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 3245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010877941 = score(doc=3245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 3245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3245)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 3245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0023430442 = score(doc=3245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3245)
    0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 3245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019311246 = score(doc=3245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3245)
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 3245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=3245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3245)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Source
    BuB. 62(2010) H.1, S.55-58
    Type
    a
  9. Kohl-Frey, O.: ¬Die Öffnung der digitalen Magazinbibliothek : Entwicklungen an der Universität Konstanz zwischen Summon und Hybrid Bookshelf (2014) 0.01 
    0.0101605235 = product of:
  0.02794144 = sum of:
    0.007251961 = product of:
      0.014503922 = sum of:
        0.014503922 = weight(_text_:h in 2575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014503922 = score(doc=2575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2575)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 2575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031240587 = score(doc=2575,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2575, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2575)
    0.01478779 = product of:
      0.05915116 = sum of:
        0.05915116 = weight(_text_:o in 2575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05915116 = score(doc=2575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.4434698 = fieldWeight in 2575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2575)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=2575,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2575, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2575)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 48(2014) H.10, S.807-815
    Type
    a
  10. Joseph, K.: Wikipedia knows the value of what the library catalog forgets (2019) 0.01 
    0.009475556 = product of:
  0.034743704 = sum of:
    0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006112407 = score(doc=5277,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=5277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
    0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02620087 = score(doc=5277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Shifting library catalogs from physical to digital has come at a cost. Catalog records no longer leave traces of their own evolution, which is a loss for librarianship. The subjective nature of information classification warrants self-examination, within which we may see the evolution of practice, debates over attribution and relevance, and how culture is reflected in the systems used to describe it. Wikipedia models what is possible: revision histories and discussion pages function as knowledge generators. A list of unanswerable questions for the modern catalog urges us to construct a new, forward-thinking bibliography that allows us to look backward.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 57(2019) no.2/3, S.166-183
    Type
    a
  11. Schultz-Jones, B.; Snow, K.; Miksa, S.; Hasenyager Jr., R.L.: Historical and current implications of cataloguing quality for next-generation catalogues (2012) 0.01 
    0.009374362 = product of:
  0.03437266 = sum of:
    0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 5558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0047346503 = score(doc=5558,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5558, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5558)
    0.00343714 = weight(_text_:s in 5558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00343714 = score(doc=5558,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 5558, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5558)
    0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 5558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02620087 = score(doc=5558,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 5558, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5558)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Discussions of quality in library cataloguing are traced from early library science literature to current debates. Three studies that examine dimensions of quality cataloguing in academic libraries, public libraries, and school libraries and a review of vendor processes update the issues surrounding a definition of bibliographic record quality and quality assurance processes. The implications of perceptions of bibliographic record quality on next-generation catalogues are presented with emphasis on the shift in the cataloguer's judgment from rigid standards for transcription to meeting the requirement for more metadata that matches the user need of find-ability.
    Source
    Library trends. 61(2012) no.1, S.49-82
    Type
    a
  12. Biagetti, M.T.; Iacono, A.; Trombone, A.: Testing library catalog analysis as a bibliometric indicator for research evaluation in social sciences and humanities (2018) 0.01 
    0.009332711 = product of:
  0.03421994 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 4868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=4868,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4868, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4868)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=4868,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4868, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4868)
    0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 4868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025194194 = score(doc=4868,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4868, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4868)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Pages
    S.892-899
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Type
    a
  13. Borie, J.; MacDonald, K.; Sze, E.: Asserting catalogers' place in the "Value of Libraries" conversation (2015) 0.01 
    0.009299563 = product of:
  0.034098398 = sum of:
    0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 1882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005467103 = score(doc=1882,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1882, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1882)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=1882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1882)
    0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 1882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02620087 = score(doc=1882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1882)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Catalogers have a unique challenge to overcome in demonstrating the value of their services: the better they are at performing their work--making collections accessible and enabling user discovery--the more invisible their efforts are to users and administrators. Catalogers must participate more actively in the broader discussion and demonstration of library value undertaken by their colleagues, but to do so requires a framework and a common vocabulary shared by non-catalogers.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.3/4, S.352-367
    Type
    a
  14. Stumpf, G.: Sacherschließung und Kataloganreicherung (2015) 0.01 
    0.008945603 = product of:
  0.032800544 = sum of:
    0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 2168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031240587 = score(doc=2168,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2168, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2168)
    0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 2168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025748327 = score(doc=2168,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 2168, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2168)
    0.00392816 = weight(_text_:s in 2168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00392816 = score(doc=2168,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 2168, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2168)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Content
    Kapitel 5.2. Gegliedert in die Abschnitte: (1) Definition und allgemeine Funktion im bibliothekarischen Dienstleistungsspektrum (2) Verbale Sacherschließung (3) Klassifikatorische Sacherschließung (4) Kataloganreicherung, Metadaten-Generierung aus Paratext und erweiterte Volltexterschließung (5) Bibliothekarische Inhaltserschließung im 21. Jahrhundert - Gesamtprobleme und Perspektiven. Man beachte die Aussage: "Die maschinelle Indexierung ordnet Schlagwörter bzw. Deskriptoren zu Dokumenten automatisch zu, d.h. mit Hilfe von Computerprogrammen und in der Regel von Wörterbüchern." (S.366), die nach wie vor ein problematische Verknüpfung zwischen intellektuellen Indexierungsergebnissen (Schlagwörter, Deskriptoren) und maschinellen Vorgehensweisen herstellt.
    Pages
    S.357-379
    Source
    Praxishandbuch Bibliotheksmanagement. Hrsg.: R. Griebel, u.a. Bd.1
    Type
    a
  15. Snow, K.: Defining, assessing, and rethinking quality cataloging (2017) 0.01 
    0.00855405 = product of:
  0.031364847 = sum of:
    0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 5155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027335514 = score(doc=5155,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5155, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5155)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 5155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=5155,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5155, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5155)
    0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 5155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02620087 = score(doc=5155,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 5155, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5155)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.7/8, S.438-455
    Type
    a
  16. Kühn-Ludewig, M.: Was fehlt: ein Gegengutachten : Kritische Anmerkungen zur Zukunft der Bibliotheksverbünde (2012) 0.01 
    0.006686244 = product of:
  0.024516229 = sum of:
    0.015700957 = product of:
      0.031401914 = sum of:
        0.031401914 = weight(_text_:h in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031401914 = score(doc=203,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.47544006 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0039050733 = score(doc=203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
    0.0049101994 = weight(_text_:s in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0049101994 = score(doc=203,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Footnote
    Leserbrief zu: Wiesenmüller, H.: Die Zukunft der Bibliotheksverbünde: Ein kritischer Blick auf die Empfehlungen des Wissenschaftsrates und der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. In: BuB. 63(2011) H.11/12, S.790-796.
    Source
    BuB. 64(2012) H.2, S.105-106
    Type
    a
  17. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.01 
    0.006042549 = product of:
  0.022156011 = sum of:
    0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006112407 = score(doc=1934,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
    0.00343714 = weight(_text_:s in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00343714 = score(doc=1934,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
    0.012606464 = product of:
      0.025212929 = sum of:
        0.025212929 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025212929 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Creativity is now a core requirement for successful organizations. Libraries, like all organizations, need to produce and utilize new ideas to improve user service and experiences. With changes in cataloging such as Resource Description and Access (RDA), the opportunity to rethink cataloging practices is here now. Everyone has creative potential, although catalogers may have both a personality and work environment that make it more difficult. To be able to maximize creative capacity, catalogers need the proper work environment, support from their organization, and a plan for accomplishing creative goals. Given that environment, catalogers may create ideas that will shape the future. (RDA).
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.8, S.894-902
    Type
    a
  18. Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century (2011) 0.01 
    0.0059954417 = product of:
  0.016487464 = sum of:
    0.0027194852 = product of:
      0.0054389704 = sum of:
        0.0054389704 = weight(_text_:h in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054389704 = score(doc=4530,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08234863 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0020291358 = weight(_text_:a in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020291358 = score(doc=4530,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.06619633 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
    0.009655623 = weight(_text_:r in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009655623 = score(doc=4530,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1097206 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=4530,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Abstract
    Library specialists in the cataloging and metadata professions have a greater purpose than simply managing information and connecting users to resources. There is a deeper and more profound impact that comes of their work: preservation of the human record. Conversations with Catalogers in the 21st Century contains four chapters addressing broad categories of issues that catalogers and metadata librarians are currently facing. Every important topic is covered, such as changing metadata practices, standards, data record structures, data platforms, and user expectations, providing both theoretical and practical information. Guidelines for dealing with present challenges are based on fundamentals from the past. Recommendations on training staff, building new information platforms of digital library resources, documenting new cataloging and metadata competencies, and establishing new workflows enable a real-world game plan for improvement.
    Footnote
    Rez. in Mitt VÖB 64(2011) H.1, S.151-153 (S. Breitling): "Wie sieht die Rolle der Katalogisierung im 21. Jahrhundert aus? In diversen Blogs und Mailinglisten wird darüber seit geraumer Zeit diskutiert. Der Bereich Katalogisierung befindet sich in einer Phase tiefgreifenden Wandels, ausgelöst durch eine Vielzahl von Faktoren, von denen veränderte Nutzererwartungen bei der Recherche und die wachsende Menge an neuen zu katalogisierenden Materialien (e-Books, Web-Ressourcen etc.) und Formaten nur zwei Aspekte darstellen. Das technische Umfeld wird nicht zuletzt durch fortgeschrittene Möglichkeiten im Bereich Retrieval und Präsentation geprägt. Wie schafft man es, dass Katalogisierung als Teil des gesamten Bibliothekswesens relevant und zeitgemäß bleibt? Welche der in Jahrzehnten Katalogisierungspraxis erarbeiteten Standards sind erhaltenswert, und welche sind im Hinblick auf den Fortschritt der IT und ein mögliches Semantic Web vielleicht gar nicht mehr nötig oder müssen an die Gegebenheiten angepasst werden? Mit diesen und anderen Fragen beschäftigt sich die Aufsatzsammlung "Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century". In der Community bekannte Personen wie Martha Yee, Christine Schwartz oder James Weinheimer kommen zu Wort, aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum Bernhard Eversberg, Entwickler des Bibliothekssystems Allegro.
    Ein großes Thema ist erwartungsgemäß das neue Regelwerk RDA, das, um es vorwegzunehmen, bei den drei Autoren, die sich ausschließlich diesem Gesichtspunkt widmen, vorwiegend auf Kritik stößt. Erstmals publiziert wird an dieser Stelle eine Studie der Herausgeberin Elaine R. Sanchez, die ein Meinungsbild der einschlägig tätigen Bibliothekarinnen (wie z.B. Titelaufnehmerinnen, Systembibliothekarinnen) zum Umstieg auf RDA zeichnet. Wie in den anderen Kapiteln liegt auch hier der Schwerpunkt auf dem US- bzw. anglo-amerikanischen Raum, was einen Blick über den eigenen Tellerrand ermöglicht und eine Grundstimmung einfängt, der man auch in Europa und hierzulande angesichts internationaler Kooperationen und zunehmend globaler Ausrichtung bei Standards und Regelwerken Beachtung schenken sollte. Andere Beiträge setzen sich mit Themen auseinander, die ebenfalls die Rolle der Katalogisierung unter sich ständig und rasant verändernden Bedingungen betreffen: die Bedeutung von bibliographischen Standards (und Qualitätsstandards im besonderen) im Zeitalter von Google Books, das Titeldaten aus Bibliotheken "nur noch" in einem Mashup mit anderen algorithmisch aufbereiteten Daten verarbeitet; das sich wandelnde Berufsbild von Titelaufnehmerinnen, die mit traditionellen Materialien und Datenformaten arbeiten, hin zu Metadaten-Spezialisten, die sich durch Kenntnisse digitaler Objekte und der entsprechenden Formate wie etwa Dublin Core auszeichnen; Anpassung von Workflows an die technischen Möglichkeiten der Automatisierung und Digitalisierung; Anforderungen an Ausbildung und berufliche Weiterbildung von Katalogisierungsexpertinnen etc. Eine chronologische Bibliographie von Literatur mit Bezug auf Bibliotheken und Katalogisierung von 1800 bis heute beschließt den Band.
    Pages
    xii, 283 S
    Type
    s
  19. McGrath, K.; Kules, B.; Fitzpatrick, C.: FRBR and facets provide flexible, work-centric access to items in library collections (2011) 0.01 
    0.005981214 = product of:
  0.032896675 = sum of:
    0.006695806 = weight(_text_:a in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006695806 = score(doc=2430,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
    0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02620087 = score(doc=2430,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    This paper explores a technique to improve searcher access to library collections by providing a faceted search interface built on a data model based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). The prototype provides a Workcentric view of a moving image collection that is integrated with bibliographic and holdings data. Two sets of facets address important user needs: "what do you want?" and "how/where do you want it?" enabling patrons to narrow, broaden and pivot across facet values instead of limiting them to the tree-structured hierarchy common with existing FRBR applications. The data model illustrates how FRBR is being adapted and applied beyond the traditional library catalog.
    Type
    a
  20. Majors, R.: Comparative user experiences of next-generation catalogue interfaces (2012) 0.01 
    0.005784713 = product of:
  0.021210615 = sum of:
    0.0033818933 = weight(_text_:a in 5571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033818933 = score(doc=5571,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 5571, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5571)
    0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 5571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016092705 = score(doc=5571,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 5571, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5571)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 5571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=5571,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5571, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5571)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    One of the presumed advantages of next-generation library catalogue interfaces is that the user experience is improved-that it is both richer and more intuitive. Often the interfaces come with little or no user-facing documentation or imbedded "help" for patrons based on an assumption of ease of use and familiarity of the experience, having followed best practices in use on the Web. While there has been much gray literature (published on library Web sites, etc.) interrogating these implicit claims and contrasting the new interfaces to traditional Web-based catalogues, this article details a consistent and formal comparison of whether users can actually accomplish common library tasks, unassisted, using these interfaces. The author has undertaken a task-based usability test of vendor-provided next-generation catalogue interfaces and Web-scale discovery tools (Encore Synergy, Summon, WorldCat Local, Primo Central, EBSCO Discovery Service). Testing was done with undergraduates across all academic disciplines. The resulting qualitative data, noting any demonstrated trouble using the software as well as feedback or suggested improvements that the users may have about the software, will assist academic libraries in making or validating purchase and subscription decisions for these interfaces as well as help vendors make data-driven decisions about interface and experience enhancements.
    Source
    Library trends. 61(2012) no.1, S.186-207
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

  • e 51
  • d 40

Types

  • a 85
  • el 13
  • m 2
  • x 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications