Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.042295776 = product of:
  0.1691831 = sum of:
    0.1691831 = weight(_text_:themes in 5556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1691831 = score(doc=5556,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 5556, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5556)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The specter of impending change in library catalogues is strong but not very clear. In an attempt to help the clarification process, the first part of the present report discusses historical themes from the modern library catalogue legacy that has developed since the mid-nineteenth century-the origins and subsequent dominance of the dictionary catalogue for more than a century, considerations of library catalogue users and use over the same period, developments apart from the library catalogue during the twentieth century that have affected it, and aspects of the idea of the objects of a catalogue. In a second part, the general environment for the most recent period of library catalogue development is described, after which aspects of the historical legacy are used as a basis for raising questions relevant to impending library catalogue change.

0.035246477 = product of:
  0.1409859 = sum of:
    0.1409859 = weight(_text_:themes in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1409859 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This study presents preliminary themes surfaced from an ongoing ethnographic study. The research question is: how and where do cultures influence the cataloging practices of using U.S. standards to catalog Chinese materials? The author applies warrant as a lens for evaluating knowledge representation systems, and extends the application from examining classificatory decisions to cataloging decisions. Semantic warrant as a conceptual tool allows us to recognize and name the various rationales behind cataloging decisions, grants us explanatory power, and the language to "visualize" and reflect on the conflicting priorities in cataloging practices. Through participatory observation, the author recorded the cataloging practices of two Chinese catalogers working on the same cataloging project. One of the catalogers is U.S. trained, and another cataloger is a professor of Library and Information Science from China, who is also a subject expert and a cataloger of Chinese special collections. The study shows how the catalogers describe Chinese special collections using many U.S. cataloging and classification standards but from different approaches. The author presents particular cases derived from the fieldwork, with an emphasis on the many layers presented by cultures, principles, standards, and practices of different scope, each of which may represent conflicting warrants. From this, it is made clear that the conflicts of warrants influence cataloging practice. We may view the conflicting warrants as an interpretation of the tension between different semantic warrants and the globalization and localization of cataloging standards.

0.014640065 = product of:
  0.05856026 = sum of:
    0.05856026 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05856026 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a

0.014640065 = product of:
  0.05856026 = sum of:
    0.05856026 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05856026 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

29. 5.2015 11:08:22

0.012548626 = product of:
  0.050194506 = sum of:
    0.050194506 = weight(_text_:22 in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050194506 = score(doc=5188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

30. 5.2019 19:14:22

0.01045719 = product of:
  0.04182876 = sum of:
    0.04182876 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04182876 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

27. 9.2012 14:22:00