-
Advances in online public access catalogs : Vol.1 (1992)
0.02
0.01912685 = product of:
0.047817122 = sum of:
0.04342097 = weight(_text_:u in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04342097 = score(doc=4653,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.3133093 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
0.0043961513 = weight(_text_:a in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0043961513 = score(doc=4653,freq=4.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: USER INTERFACES: HULSER, R.P.: Overview of graphical user interfaces; TROUTMA, L.: The online public access catalog and music materials: issues for system and interface design; MISCHO, W.H. u. T.W. COLE: The Illinois extended OPAC: library information workstation design and development; BALLARD, T. u. J. SMITH: The human interface: an ongoing study of OPAC usage at Adelphi University; Pt.2: ENHANCING THE TRADITIONAL CATALOG RECORD: WITTENBACH; S.A.: Building a better mousetrap: enhanced cataloging and access for the online catalog; BEATTY, S.: Subject enrichment using contents or index terms: the Australian Defence Force Academy experience; Enhancing USMARC records with table of contents (MARBI discussion paper; no.46); Pt.3: REDEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE OPAC AND MOVING BEYOND THE LIBRARY WALLS: TROLL, D.A.: The Mercury Project: meeting the expectations of electronc library patrons; JAMIESON, R.C.: Oriental language materials in online public access catalogues; JUZNIC, P. u. H. PAAR: Cooperative cataloguing in Yugoslavia and the development of the OPAC; PERRY, A.: The PACLink Project at the State University of New York: leveraging collections for the future
-
Mönnich, M.; Dierolf, U.: 20 Jahre Karlsruher virtueller Katalog (KVK) (2016)
0.02
0.018033698 = product of:
0.045084246 = sum of:
0.04011057 = weight(_text_:u in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04011057 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
0.004973677 = weight(_text_:a in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004973677 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Type
- a
-
Umstätter, W.: Bibliographie, Kataloge, Suchmaschinen : Das Ende der Dokumentation als modernes Bibliothekswesen (2005)
0.02
0.017790262 = product of:
0.044475652 = sum of:
0.040745392 = weight(_text_:w in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040745392 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
0.003730258 = weight(_text_:a in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003730258 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Type
- a
-
Cathro, W.: New frameworks for resource discovery and delivery : the changing role of the catalogue (2006)
0.02
0.016871577 = product of:
0.04217894 = sum of:
0.033954494 = weight(_text_:w in 6107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033954494 = score(doc=6107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 6107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6107)
0.008224445 = weight(_text_:a in 6107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008224445 = score(doc=6107,freq=14.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 6107, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6107)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- There is currently a lively debate about the role of the library catalogue and its relationship to other resource discovery tools. An example of this debate is the recent publication of a report commissioned by the Library of Congress on "the changing nature of the catalogue" As part of this debate, the role of union catalogues is also being re-examined. Some commentators have suggested that union catalogues, by virtue of their size, can aggregate both supply and demand, thus increasing the chance that a relatively little-used resource will be discovered by somebody for whom it is relevant. During the past year, the National Library of Australia (NLA) has been considering the future of its catalogue and its role in the resource discovery and delivery process. The review was prompted, in part, by the redevelopment of the Australian union catalogue and its exposure on the web as a free public service, badged as Libraries Australia. The NLA examined the enablers and inhibitors to proposition "that it replace its catalogue with Libraries Australia, as the primary database to be searched by users". Flowing from this review, the NLA is aiming to undertake a number of tasks to move in the medium to long term towards a scenario in which it could deprecate its local catalogue. Bezug zum Calhoun-Report
- Language
- a
-
Pera, M.S.; Lund, W.; Ng, Y.-K.: ¬A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching (2009)
0.02
0.016871577 = product of:
0.04217894 = sum of:
0.033954494 = weight(_text_:w in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033954494 = score(doc=2939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
0.008224445 = weight(_text_:a in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008224445 = score(doc=2939,freq=14.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Libraries, private and public, offer valuable resources to library patrons. As of today, the only way to locate information archived exclusively in libraries is through their catalogs. Library patrons, however, often find it difficult to formulate a proper query, which requires using specific keywords assigned to different fields of desired library catalog records, to obtain relevant results. These improperly formulated queries often yield irrelevant results or no results at all. This negative experience in dealing with existing library systems turns library patrons away from directly querying library catalogs; instead, they rely on Web search engines to perform their searches first, and upon obtaining the initial information (e.g., titles, subject headings, or authors) on the desired library materials, they query library catalogs. This searching strategy is an evidence of failure of today's library systems. In solving this problem, we propose an enhanced library system, which allows partial, similarity matching of (a) tags defined by ordinary users at a folksonomy site that describe the content of books and (b) unrestricted keywords specified by an ordinary library patron in a query to search for relevant library catalog records. The proposed library system allows patrons posting a query Q using commonly used words and ranks the retrieved results according to their degrees of resemblance with Q while maintaining the query processing time comparable with that achieved by current library search engines.
- Type
- a
-
Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982)
0.02
0.01674663 = product of:
0.041866574 = sum of:
0.007460516 = weight(_text_:a in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007460516 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
0.03440606 = product of:
0.06881212 = sum of:
0.06881212 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06881212 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 14:49:22
- Type
- a
-
Libraries and Google (2005)
0.02
0.01664004 = product of:
0.027733397 = sum of:
0.0135817975 = weight(_text_:w in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0135817975 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.084207706 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
0.010027642 = weight(_text_:u in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010027642 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.07235568 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
0.0041239555 = weight(_text_:a in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041239555 = score(doc=1973,freq=22.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.08450422 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Google[trademark] has become a nearly omnipresent tool of the Internet, with its potential only now beginning to be realised. How can librarians effectively integrate this powerful search engine to provide service to their patrons? "Libraries and Google[trademark]" presents leading authorities discussing the many possibilities of using Google products as effective, user-friendly tools in libraries. Google Scholar and Print are extensively explored with an eye towards offering an expanded view of what is and may be possible for the future, with practical insights on how to make the most of the product's capabilities.
- Content
- Introduction: Libraries and Their Interrelationships with Google - William Miller Disruptive Beneficence: The Google Print Program and the Future of Libraries - Mark Sandler The Google Library Project at Oxford - Ronald Milne The (Uncertain) Future of Libraries in a Google World: Sounding an Alarm - Rick Anderson A Gaggle of Googles: Limitations and Defects of Electronic Access as Panacea - -Mark Y. Herring Using the Google Search Appliance for Federated Searching: A Case Study - Mary Taylor Google's Print and Scholar Initiatives: The Value of and Impact on Libraries and Information Services - Robert J. Lackie Google Scholar vs. Library Scholar: Testing the Performance of Schoogle - Burton Callicott; Debbie Vaughn Google, the Invisible Web, and Librarians: Slaying the Research Goliath - Francine Egger-Sider; Jane Devine Choices in the Paradigm Shift: Where Next for Libraries? - Shelley E. Phipps; Krisellen Maloney Calling the Scholars Home: Google Scholar as a Tool for Rediscovering the Academic Library - Maurice C. York Checking Under the Hood: Evaluating Google Scholar for Reference Use - Janice Adlington; Chris Benda Running with the Devil: Accessing Library-Licensed Full Text Holdings Through Google Scholar - Rebecca Donlan; Rachel Cooke Directing Students to New Information Types: A New Role for Google in Literature Searches? - Mike Thelwall Evaluating Google Scholar as a Tool for Information Literacy Rachael Cathcart - Amanda Roberts Optimising Publications for Google Users - Alan Dawson Google and Privacy - Paul S. Piper Image: Google's Most Important Product - Ron Force Keeping Up with Google: Resources and Strategies for Staying Ahead of the Pack - Michael J. Krasulski; Steven J. Bell
- Editor
- Miller, W. u. R.M. Pellen
- Footnote
- Weitere Rez. in JASIST 59(2008) H.9, S.1531-1533 (J. Satyanesan): "Libraries and Google is an interesting and enlightening compilation of 18 articles on Google and its impact on libraries. The topic is very current, debatable, and thought provoking. Google has profoundly empowered individuals and transformed access to information and librarians are very much concerned about its popularity and visibility. In this book, the leading authorities discuss the usefulness of Google, its influence and potential menace to libraries, and its implications for libraries and the scholarly communication. They offer practical suggestions to cope with the changing situation. The articles are written from different perspective and express all shades of opinion, both hopeful and fearful. One can discern varied moods-apprehension, resignation, encouragement, and motivation-on the part of the librarians. This is an important book providing a wealth of information for the 21st century librarian. There is a section called "Indexing, Abstracting & Website/Internet Coverage," which lists major indexing and abstracting services and other tools for bibliographic access. The format of the articles is uniform with an introduction, key words, and with the exception of two articles the rest have summaries and conclusions. References and notes of varying lengths are included in each article. This book has been copublished simultaneously as Internet Reference Quarterly, 10(3/4), 2005. Although there are single articles written on Google and libraries, this is the first book-length treatment of the topic.
... This book is written by library professionals and aimed at the librarians in particular, but it will be useful to others who may be interested in knowing what libraries are up to in the age of Google. It is intended for library science educators and students, library administrators, publishers and university presses. It is well organized, well researched, and easily readable. Article titles are descriptive, allowing the reader to find what he needs by scanning the table of contents or by consulting the index. The only flaw in this book is the lack of summary or conclusions in a few articles. The book is in paperback and has 240 pages. This book is a significant contribution and I highly recommend it."
-
Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017)
0.02
0.01662754 = product of:
0.041568853 = sum of:
0.033954494 = weight(_text_:w in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033954494 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
0.0076143574 = weight(_text_:a in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0076143574 = score(doc=3871,freq=12.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This study presents preliminary themes surfaced from an ongoing ethnographic study. The research question is: how and where do cultures influence the cataloging practices of using U.S. standards to catalog Chinese materials? The author applies warrant as a lens for evaluating knowledge representation systems, and extends the application from examining classificatory decisions to cataloging decisions. Semantic warrant as a conceptual tool allows us to recognize and name the various rationales behind cataloging decisions, grants us explanatory power, and the language to "visualize" and reflect on the conflicting priorities in cataloging practices. Through participatory observation, the author recorded the cataloging practices of two Chinese catalogers working on the same cataloging project. One of the catalogers is U.S. trained, and another cataloger is a professor of Library and Information Science from China, who is also a subject expert and a cataloger of Chinese special collections. The study shows how the catalogers describe Chinese special collections using many U.S. cataloging and classification standards but from different approaches. The author presents particular cases derived from the fieldwork, with an emphasis on the many layers presented by cultures, principles, standards, and practices of different scope, each of which may represent conflicting warrants. From this, it is made clear that the conflicts of warrants influence cataloging practice. We may view the conflicting warrants as an interpretation of the tension between different semantic warrants and the globalization and localization of cataloging standards.
- Type
- a
-
Altenhöner, R.; Frodl, C.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Pfeifer, B.; Oehlschläger, S.; Svensson, L.G.: Libraries beyond libraries : Integration, Innovation and Information for all Aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen Bibliografie, Katalogisierung, Klassifikation und Indexierung, Knowledge Management und Informationstechnologie sowie der Core Activity ICADS der IFLA Division III (Library Services) beim Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 77. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in San Juan, Puerto Rico (2011)
0.02
0.016500546 = product of:
0.04125136 = sum of:
0.03509675 = weight(_text_:u in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03509675 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.006154612 = weight(_text_:a in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006154612 = score(doc=174,freq=4.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Type
- a
-
Sunckel, B.; Reh, U.; Nienerza, H.: ¬Das HeBIS Discovery System : Kooperative Entwicklung einer neuen Rechercheoberfläche für HeBIS-Bibliotheken (2014)
0.02
0.015779486 = product of:
0.039448716 = sum of:
0.03509675 = weight(_text_:u in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03509675 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
0.0043519675 = weight(_text_:a in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0043519675 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Type
- a
-
Fabian, C.; Holbach, W.: ¬Die Konversion des Quartkatalogs der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek : Schlussstein auf dem langen Weg zu einem vollständigen maschinenlesbaren Bestandskatalog!? (2007)
0.01
0.0148252165 = product of:
0.03706304 = sum of:
0.033954494 = weight(_text_:w in 396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033954494 = score(doc=396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=396)
0.003108548 = weight(_text_:a in 396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003108548 = score(doc=396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=396)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Type
- a
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.01
0.013955525 = product of:
0.03488881 = sum of:
0.006217096 = weight(_text_:a in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006217096 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.028671715 = product of:
0.05734343 = sum of:
0.05734343 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05734343 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Type
- a
-
Dierolf, U.; Mönnich, M.: Einsatz von Recommendersystemen am Beispiel des neuen OPACs der Universitätsbibliothek Karlsruhe (2006)
0.01
0.013525275 = product of:
0.033813186 = sum of:
0.030082928 = weight(_text_:u in 3230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030082928 = score(doc=3230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3230)
0.003730258 = weight(_text_:a in 3230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003730258 = score(doc=3230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3230)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Type
- a
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.01
0.012715709 = product of:
0.031789273 = sum of:
0.007460516 = weight(_text_:a in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007460516 = score(doc=101,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.024328759 = product of:
0.048657518 = sum of:
0.048657518 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048657518 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
- Type
- a
-
Hollender, U.: Heiliger Joseph! : Zu einem Kardinalschreibfehler in deutschen Bibliothekskatalogen (falscher *Guiseppe statt richtigem Giuseppe) (2002)
0.01
0.012339718 = product of:
0.030849295 = sum of:
0.028362457 = weight(_text_:u in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028362457 = score(doc=536,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.20465277 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
0.0024868385 = weight(_text_:a in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024868385 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In schätzungsweise jedem vierten deutschen Zeitungsartikel und InternetDokument, in dem der italienische Vorname Giuseppe enthalten ist, taucht der Fehler auf, sei nun die Rede von Verdi, Arcimboldo oder Garibaldi: Giuseppe wird falsch geschrieben, nämlich als *Guiseppe, als handele sich um eine Variante von Guido, was dem deutschen Auge offensichtlich vertrauter ist. Bemerkenswert ist, dass die Buchstaben "i" und "u° auf der Tastatur direkt nebeneinander liegen, was der Tippfehleranfälligkeit Vorschub leistet. Lässt man die Internet-Suchmaschine Google "Seiten auf deutsch" absuchen, findet sie 61.500 Giuseppes und 15.200 *Guiseppes (über 25%). Google ist übrigens seit neuestem so "intelligent', bei der falschen Eingabe zu fragen: "Meinten Sie Giuseppe?'. Schränkt man die Suchmaschine auf italienisch-sprachige Seiten ein, sinkt der Anteil der falschen Schreibweise auf 0,54 % (426.000 richtige gegen 2.330 falsche). Bei genauerem Hinsehen tauchen die meisten der Falschschreibungen bei offenbar amerikanischen dot-com-Seiten auf, die italienische Genealogien aufschlüsseln. Die genuin aus Italien stammenden Seiten weisen nur in den allerwenigsten Fällen den Fehler auf. Dieses Phänomen fiel mir als Romanistin zunächst auf, dann störte es mich, später belustigte es mich beinahe und schließlich wurde die Suche danach fast zum Spiel. Unter bibliothekarischen Gesichtspunkten ist der Fehler ein Ärgernis, hat sich doch diese falsche Schreibweise massenhaft in bibliothekarische Datenbanken eingeschlichen. Als ich schon vor Jahren eine Düsseldorfer Diplombibliothekarin darauf ansprach, widersprach diese und behauptete, es gebe sehr wohl den Namen in der Schreibweise *Guiseppe neben der - vielleicht üblicheren - Form Giuseppe. Und tatsächlich findet sich die falsche Form in manchen Vornamenbüchern - so oft schon wurde der Fehler tradiert, dass er jetzt schon legitimiert erscheint. Schlägt man hingegen in italienischen Vornamenbüchern nach, zeigt sich, dass man hier vergeblich nach *Guiseppe suchen muss.
- Type
- a
-
Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.01
0.011988486 = product of:
0.029971214 = sum of:
0.007033842 = weight(_text_:a in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007033842 = score(doc=5581,freq=4.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.022937372 = product of:
0.045874745 = sum of:
0.045874745 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045874745 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
- Type
- a
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.01
0.011988486 = product of:
0.029971214 = sum of:
0.007033842 = weight(_text_:a in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007033842 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.022937372 = product of:
0.045874745 = sum of:
0.045874745 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045874745 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Type
- a
-
Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012)
0.01
0.011920598 = product of:
0.029801495 = sum of:
0.0097312955 = weight(_text_:a in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0097312955 = score(doc=1934,freq=10.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.0200702 = product of:
0.0401404 = sum of:
0.0401404 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0401404 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Creativity is now a core requirement for successful organizations. Libraries, like all organizations, need to produce and utilize new ideas to improve user service and experiences. With changes in cataloging such as Resource Description and Access (RDA), the opportunity to rethink cataloging practices is here now. Everyone has creative potential, although catalogers may have both a personality and work environment that make it more difficult. To be able to maximize creative capacity, catalogers need the proper work environment, support from their organization, and a plan for accomplishing creative goals. Given that environment, catalogers may create ideas that will shape the future. (RDA).
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 11:08:22
- Type
- a
-
Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000)
0.01
0.011509654 = product of:
0.028774135 = sum of:
0.008703935 = weight(_text_:a in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008703935 = score(doc=5365,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.0200702 = product of:
0.0401404 = sum of:
0.0401404 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0401404 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
- Type
- a
-
Morgan, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloging services (1996)
0.01
0.011509654 = product of:
0.028774135 = sum of:
0.008703935 = weight(_text_:a in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008703935 = score(doc=600,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.0200702 = product of:
0.0401404 = sum of:
0.0401404 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0401404 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042324185 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article first compares and contrasts the essential, fundamental differences between traditional and digital information mediums. It then reexamines the role of the online public access catalog (OPAC), refines the definition of library's catalog, and advocates the addition of Internet resources within the OPAC. Next, the article describes the building of the Alex Catalog, a catalog of Internet resources in the in the form of MARC records. Finally, this article outlines a process of integrating the futher inclusion of other Internet resources into OPACs as well as some of the obstacles such a process manifests.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170
- Type
- a
