Search (63 results, page 1 of 4)

0.09248682 = product of:
  0.18497364 = sum of:
    0.18497364 = sum of:
      0.100288466 = weight(_text_:w in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.100288466 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.5052462 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
      0.08468518 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08468518 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

8.10.2000 14:22:27

0.07707235 = product of:
  0.1541447 = sum of:
    0.1541447 = sum of:
      0.08357372 = weight(_text_:w in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08357372 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
      0.07057098 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07057098 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 4.2020 20:22:29

0.047881093 = sum of:
  0.01794036 = product of:
    0.07176144 = sum of:
      0.07176144 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07176144 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.029940734 = product of:
    0.059881467 = sum of:
      0.059881467 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059881467 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28

0.04624341 = product of:
  0.09248682 = sum of:
    0.09248682 = sum of:
      0.050144233 = weight(_text_:w in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050144233 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.04234259 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04234259 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2008 12:40:17

0.04563026 = sum of:
  0.020930419 = product of:
    0.083721675 = sum of:
      0.083721675 = weight(_text_:authors in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083721675 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024699843 = product of:
    0.049399685 = sum of:
      0.049399685 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049399685 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Theses and dissertations as electronic files transferred from the student author to the Graduate School to the Library may well be the first major source of electronic texts that many libraries encounter. To prepare for this potential influx of electronic texts, an ad hoc task force considered work flow and cataloging guidelines. The author suggests expanding current theses cataloging and taking advantage of online information prepared by authors so that the bibliographic records provide OPACS with much more valuable information than does traditional theses cataloging. This should not require a lot of extra work.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125

0.03584373 = sum of:
  0.0149503 = product of:
    0.0598012 = sum of:
      0.0598012 = weight(_text_:authors in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0598012 = score(doc=2939,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02089343 = product of:
    0.04178686 = sum of:
      0.04178686 = weight(_text_:w in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04178686 = score(doc=2939,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Libraries, private and public, offer valuable resources to library patrons. As of today, the only way to locate information archived exclusively in libraries is through their catalogs. Library patrons, however, often find it difficult to formulate a proper query, which requires using specific keywords assigned to different fields of desired library catalog records, to obtain relevant results. These improperly formulated queries often yield irrelevant results or no results at all. This negative experience in dealing with existing library systems turns library patrons away from directly querying library catalogs; instead, they rely on Web search engines to perform their searches first, and upon obtaining the initial information (e.g., titles, subject headings, or authors) on the desired library materials, they query library catalogs. This searching strategy is an evidence of failure of today's library systems. In solving this problem, we propose an enhanced library system, which allows partial, similarity matching of (a) tags defined by ordinary users at a folksonomy site that describe the content of books and (b) unrestricted keywords specified by an ordinary library patron in a query to search for relevant library catalog records. The proposed library system allows patrons posting a query Q using commonly used words and ranks the retrieved results according to their degrees of resemblance with Q while maintaining the query processing time comparable with that achieved by current library search engines.

0.029250802 = product of:
  0.058501605 = sum of:
    0.058501605 = product of:
      0.11700321 = sum of:
        0.11700321 = weight(_text_:w in 3382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11700321 = score(doc=3382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.58945394 = fieldWeight in 3382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3382)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.028228393 = product of:
  0.056456786 = sum of:
    0.056456786 = product of:
      0.11291357 = sum of:
        0.11291357 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11291357 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

3.10.2000 20:48:22

0.028228393 = product of:
  0.056456786 = sum of:
    0.056456786 = product of:
      0.11291357 = sum of:
        0.11291357 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11291357 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24

0.02359526 = product of:
  0.04719052 = sum of:
    0.04719052 = sum of:
      0.029547775 = weight(_text_:w in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029547775 = score(doc=4880,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.1488596 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
      0.017642746 = weight(_text_:22 in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017642746 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Lesen hat mit Bildung zunächst nichts zu tun, es kommt darauf an, was man liest, und das wird nicht zuletzt von Katalogen beeinflusst. Wenn hier von Bibliotheken und Katalogen die Rede ist, mag der Leser und die Leserin bei Ersterem unwillkürlich an konkrete papierene Objekte denken, nämlich Bücher. Die Zahl derer hingegen, die mit «Katalog» Karteikarten verbinden, wird schon viel bescheidener ausfallen, denn wir benutzen heute selbstverständlich elektronische Datenbanken als Kataloge. Aber ebenso selbstverständlich gibt es nicht den geringsten systematischen Grund, im Folgenden digitale Bibliotheken auszuschließen. Im einfachsten Fall liegen zu den bibliographischen Informationen in einer Datenbank zugleich die zugehörigen Buchtexte vor, in welcher konkreten Form auch immer. Die Bibliothekare von heute haben es mit einer Vielzahl von Katalogen in Form von Bandkatalogen, Datenbanken, Karteien, Mikrofiches oder Multimedialen Katalogen zu tun, wobei sie immer mehr Datenbanken weltweit online erreichen. So wie wir in der Bibliotheksverwaltung (Ewert, G. und Umstätter, W. 1997) von einer Verwaltung im engeren und im erweiterten Sinne sprechen können, so müssen wir zwischen Katalogen unterscheiden, die den eigenen Besitz und solchen, die das verfügbare Wissen und die publizierte Information weiterer Einrichtungen oder sogar der ganzen Welt erschließen. Im ersten Fall sprechen wir von den Katalogen im engeren Sinne. Im zweiten Fall haben wir es einerseits mit der Zusammenführung von verschiedenen Bibliothekskatalogen zu tun, z.B. in Katalogisierungsverbünden oder sogenannten Internetportalen, und andererseits mit den meist thematisch ausgerichteten Datenbanken, die nicht selten aus den früheren Bibliographien hervorgegangen sind. Bei ihnen eine sogenannte Verlinkung mit den eigentlichen Quellen herzustellen ist oft leicht möglich. Die heutige Datenbanktechnik, die hinter modernen Katalogen steht, ergänzt stärker als je zuvor unser Gedächtnis, weil wir aus Volltext- und Multimediadatenbanken jederzeit gezielt all das abrufen können, was uns momentan nicht präsent ist. Wir können dies allerdings nur dann abrufen, wenn wir Wissen darüber besitzen, was abrufbar und wie es abrufbar ist. Zu dieser Grundlage will das vorliegende Buch beitragen. Schon die Griechen erkannten die fundamentale Bedeutung des geschriebenen Wortes als ein Langzeitgedächtnis, das unsere Erinnerung ins scheinbar Unendliche erweitert. Der Mythos von Theut beschäftigte sich mit der damit verbundenen Problematik. Aber erst die Daten- und Wissensbanken unserer Zeit schaffen die Möglichkeit, sich auch ganz gezielt zu erinnern. Sie bieten uns nicht nur die Möglichkeit bestimmte Bücher, sondern auch Aufsätze in Zeitschriften und inzwischen sogar einzelne Sätze bzw. Zitate zu finden.

Date

22. 1.2006 19:45:49

0.021171294 = product of:
  0.04234259 = sum of:
    0.04234259 = product of:
      0.08468518 = sum of:
        0.08468518 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08468518 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

6. 1.2007 14:49:22

0.021171294 = product of:
  0.04234259 = sum of:
    0.04234259 = product of:
      0.08468518 = sum of:
        0.08468518 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08468518 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)

0.02089343 = product of:
  0.04178686 = sum of:
    0.04178686 = product of:
      0.08357372 = sum of:
        0.08357372 = weight(_text_:w in 277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08357372 = score(doc=277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=277)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.02089343 = product of:
  0.04178686 = sum of:
    0.04178686 = product of:
      0.08357372 = sum of:
        0.08357372 = weight(_text_:w in 2860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08357372 = score(doc=2860,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 2860, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2860)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.017642746 = product of:
  0.03528549 = sum of:
    0.03528549 = product of:
      0.07057098 = sum of:
        0.07057098 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07057098 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243

0.017642746 = product of:
  0.03528549 = sum of:
    0.03528549 = product of:
      0.07057098 = sum of:
        0.07057098 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07057098 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.016714744 = product of:
  0.03342949 = sum of:
    0.03342949 = product of:
      0.06685898 = sum of:
        0.06685898 = weight(_text_:w in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06685898 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.014800041 = product of:
  0.029600082 = sum of:
    0.029600082 = product of:
      0.11840033 = sum of:
        0.11840033 = weight(_text_:authors in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11840033 = score(doc=1891,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Kent State University Libraries' ETD cataloging process features contributions by authors, by the ETDcat application, and by catalogers. Who is doing what, and how much of it is findable in the library catalog? An empirical analysis is performed featuring simple frequencies within the KentLINK catalog, articulated by the use of a newly devised rubric. The researchers sought the degree to which the ETD authors, the applications, and the catalogers can supply accurate, findable metadata. Further development of combinatory cataloging processes is suggested. The method of examining the data and the rubric are provided as a framework for other metadata analysis.

0.014625401 = product of:
  0.029250802 = sum of:
    0.029250802 = product of:
      0.058501605 = sum of:
        0.058501605 = weight(_text_:w in 606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058501605 = score(doc=606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.014114196 = product of:
  0.028228393 = sum of:
    0.028228393 = product of:
      0.056456786 = sum of:
        0.056456786 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056456786 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.1999 20:40:57