Search (58 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Hider, P.; Tan, K.-C.: Constructing record quality measures based on catalog use (2008) 0.04
    0.041918732 = product of:
      0.12575619 = sum of:
        0.12575619 = weight(_text_:systematic in 2724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12575619 = score(doc=2724,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 2724, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2724)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Approaches to the measurement of catalog record quality are discussed. The systematic application of specific evaluation criteria may be more reliable than expert opinion, if not necessarily more accurate, and the construction of an error weightings table based on empirical investigation into catalog use is described. Although this process proved to be complex, and involved significant methodological problems, it was shown to be readily achievable. As catalog use may in many cases be insufficiently uniform across libraries to allow for generic evaluation criteria, it is proposed that cataloging managers construct their own set by studying the impact that record quality has on the particular use of their own catalogs. Thus more empirical research into catalog use is advocated, in order to supplement expert opinion and to build toward a practice of evidence-based cataloging.
  2. Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004) 0.03
    0.026602281 = product of:
      0.03990342 = sum of:
        0.02416744 = product of:
          0.07250232 = sum of:
            0.07250232 = weight(_text_:objects in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07250232 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3086582 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.01573598 = product of:
          0.03147196 = sum of:
            0.03147196 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03147196 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction With the diversification of the material available in library collections such as: music, film, 3D objects, cartographic material and electronic resources like CD-ROMS and Web sites, the existing cataloguing principles and codes are no longer adequate to enable the user to find, identify, select and obtain a particular entity. The problem is not only that material fails to be appropriately represented in the catalogue records but also access to such material, or parts of it, is difficult if possible at all. Consequently, the need emerged to develop new rules and build up a new conceptual model able to cope with all the requirements demanded by the existing library material. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records developed by an IFLA Study Group from 1992 through 1997 present a generalised view of the bibliographic universe and are intended to be independent of any cataloguing code or implementation (Tillett, 2002). Outstanding scholars like Antonio Panizzi, Charles A. Cutter and Seymour Lubetzky formulated the basic cataloguing principles of which some can be retrieved, as Denton (2003) argues as updated versions, between the basic lines of the FRBR model: - the relation work-author groups all the works of an author - all the editions, translations, adaptations of a work are clearly separated (as expressions and manifestations) - all the expressions and manifestations of a work are collocated with their related works in bibliographic families - any document (manifestation and item) can be found if the author, title or subject of that document is known - the author is authorised by the authority control - the title is an intrinsic part of the work + authority control entity
    Date
    17. 6.2015 14:40:22
  3. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.02
    0.020981308 = product of:
      0.06294392 = sum of:
        0.06294392 = product of:
          0.12588784 = sum of:
            0.12588784 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12588784 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  4. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.02
    0.020981308 = product of:
      0.06294392 = sum of:
        0.06294392 = product of:
          0.12588784 = sum of:
            0.12588784 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12588784 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  5. Albrechtsen, H.: ¬The order of catalogues : towards democratic classification and indexing in public libraries (1998) 0.02
    0.018997438 = product of:
      0.056992315 = sum of:
        0.056992315 = product of:
          0.11398463 = sum of:
            0.11398463 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11398463 = score(doc=2099,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.22229293 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.5127677 = fieldWeight in 2099, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2099)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses how classification systems have developed to perform the work of articulation in electronic libraries as exemplified by projects involving cooperative design of classificatory structures and democratic classification and indexing. Delineates the stages in this evolution and focuses on the mutual design activity of libraries and users which took place in the development of an enriched multimedia catalogue on the WWW at Ballerup public library in Denmark and on research in england into the democratic indexing of images and fiction. Although recent projects are promising it is important to avoid a mechanistic concept of knowledge and maintain a social view
  6. Lancaster, F.W.: Do indexing and abstracting have a future? (2003) 0.02
    0.018802589 = product of:
      0.056407765 = sum of:
        0.056407765 = product of:
          0.11281553 = sum of:
            0.11281553 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11281553 = score(doc=3761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22229293 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.5075084 = fieldWeight in 3761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.02
    0.01573598 = product of:
      0.047207937 = sum of:
        0.047207937 = product of:
          0.09441587 = sum of:
            0.09441587 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09441587 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
  8. Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982) 0.02
    0.01573598 = product of:
      0.047207937 = sum of:
        0.047207937 = product of:
          0.09441587 = sum of:
            0.09441587 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09441587 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:49:22
  9. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.02
    0.01573598 = product of:
      0.047207937 = sum of:
        0.047207937 = product of:
          0.09441587 = sum of:
            0.09441587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09441587 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  10. Miksa, S.D.: Educators: what are the cataloging issues students get excited about? : professional and intellectual appeals of cataloging and students' misconceptions of cataloging (2008) 0.01
    0.014097675 = product of:
      0.042293023 = sum of:
        0.042293023 = product of:
          0.12687907 = sum of:
            0.12687907 = weight(_text_:objects in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12687907 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3086582 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the professional and intellectual appeals demonstrated by cataloging students, as well as some common misconceptions. Given the current digital environment and the "Amazoogle" effect, students face many challenges when striving to complete a basic course in descriptive and subject cataloging. In the process, they face issues of varieties of information objects, how to tame tools such as AACR2 and LCSH, and how MARC encoding fits into the overall process of cataloging. They also must learn to re-conceptualize their ideas of copy cataloging and learn to appreciate the authoritative power that comes with using and applying cataloger's judgment.
  11. Buckland, M.: Document theory (2018) 0.01
    0.014097675 = product of:
      0.042293023 = sum of:
        0.042293023 = product of:
          0.12687907 = sum of:
            0.12687907 = weight(_text_:objects in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12687907 = score(doc=4536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3086582 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Document theory examines the concept of a document and how it can serve with other concepts to understand communication, documentation, information, and knowledge. Knowledge organization itself is in practice based on the arrangement of documents representing concepts and knowledge. The word "document" commonly refers to a text or graphic record, but, in a semiotic perspective, non-graphic objects can also be regarded as signifying and, therefore, as documents. The steady increase in the variety and number of documents since prehistoric times enables the development of communities, the division of labor, and reduction of the constraints of space and time. Documents are related to data, facts, texts, works, information, knowledge, signs, and other documents. Documents have physical (material), cognitive, and social aspects.
  12. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.01
    0.013113318 = product of:
      0.039339952 = sum of:
        0.039339952 = product of:
          0.078679904 = sum of:
            0.078679904 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078679904 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  13. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.01
    0.013113318 = product of:
      0.039339952 = sum of:
        0.039339952 = product of:
          0.078679904 = sum of:
            0.078679904 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078679904 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994) 0.01
    0.013113318 = product of:
      0.039339952 = sum of:
        0.039339952 = product of:
          0.078679904 = sum of:
            0.078679904 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078679904 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 4.2020 20:22:29
  15. Miksa, F.: ¬The legacy of the library catalogue for the present (2012) 0.01
    0.012083722 = product of:
      0.036251165 = sum of:
        0.036251165 = product of:
          0.10875349 = sum of:
            0.10875349 = weight(_text_:objects in 5556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10875349 = score(doc=5556,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3086582 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 5556, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5556)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The specter of impending change in library catalogues is strong but not very clear. In an attempt to help the clarification process, the first part of the present report discusses historical themes from the modern library catalogue legacy that has developed since the mid-nineteenth century-the origins and subsequent dominance of the dictionary catalogue for more than a century, considerations of library catalogue users and use over the same period, developments apart from the library catalogue during the twentieth century that have affected it, and aspects of the idea of the objects of a catalogue. In a second part, the general environment for the most recent period of library catalogue development is described, after which aspects of the historical legacy are used as a basis for raising questions relevant to impending library catalogue change.
  16. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.01
    0.011127019 = product of:
      0.033381056 = sum of:
        0.033381056 = product of:
          0.06676211 = sum of:
            0.06676211 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06676211 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  17. Tyckoson, D.: State of the catalog : Part 2: changes at the Middletown University Library (1997) 0.01
    0.010968177 = product of:
      0.032904528 = sum of:
        0.032904528 = product of:
          0.065809056 = sum of:
            0.065809056 = weight(_text_:indexing in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065809056 = score(doc=700,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22229293 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    2nd in a series focusing on the catalogue as an index to the materials in the library collection. Reviews changes in the Middletown University Library, Louisiana, USA, library collection 1987-97. Covers: collection growth, catalogue expansion, and the results of linking databases to the online catalogue. Although integrating electronic databases has helped in solving the problem of the catalogue as an index to the collection it has also created new problems as today's catalogues use records that have not been reviewed by local library staff and add indexing for materials that are not part of the catalogue
  18. Fattahi, R.: Library cataloguing and abstracting and indexing services : reconciliation of principles in the online environment (1998) 0.01
    0.010968177 = product of:
      0.032904528 = sum of:
        0.032904528 = product of:
          0.065809056 = sum of:
            0.065809056 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065809056 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22229293 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Biagetti, M.T.: Pertinence perspective and OPAC enhancement 0.01
    0.010968177 = product of:
      0.032904528 = sum of:
        0.032904528 = product of:
          0.065809056 = sum of:
            0.065809056 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065809056 = score(doc=3549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22229293 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The starting-point of the paper is the debate recently developed in LIS literature about OPAC enhancement and the necessity to design OPACs based on search engines features. Supposed improving tools as relevance ranking and relevance feedback devices are examinated. Possible OPAC development lines, based on theoretical examination of relevance and pertinence concepts, according to Sarácevic view, and following semantics perspectives, are presented. Finally, enhancement of OPACs starting from their inner characteristics is proposed, and a plan to improve semantic search functions while maintaining existing indexing methodologies, that is document conceptual analysis, is outlined.
  20. Altenhöner, R.; Frodl, C.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Pfeifer, B.; Oehlschläger, S.; Svensson, L.G.: Libraries beyond libraries : Integration, Innovation and Information for all Aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen Bibliografie, Katalogisierung, Klassifikation und Indexierung, Knowledge Management und Informationstechnologie sowie der Core Activity ICADS der IFLA Division III (Library Services) beim Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 77. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in San Juan, Puerto Rico (2011) 0.01
    0.010968177 = product of:
      0.032904528 = sum of:
        0.032904528 = product of:
          0.065809056 = sum of:
            0.065809056 = weight(_text_:indexing in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065809056 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22229293 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Darin u.a. Bericht über 'Cataloguing Section' (S.871), 'ISBD Review Group' (S.872-873), 'FRBR Review Group' (S.873-874), 'Virtual International authoriy File (VIAF)' (S.875-876), 'Satellite conference on RDA' (S.876-879), 'Classification and Indexing Section' (S.879-882).

Years

Languages

  • e 41
  • d 14
  • a 1
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 53
  • m 4
  • b 3
  • el 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…