Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. ¬The Computer Science Ontology (CSO) (2018) 0.01
    0.00689649 = product of:
      0.05517192 = sum of:
        0.05517192 = weight(_text_:semantics in 4429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05517192 = score(doc=4429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18210563 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033205014 = queryNorm
            0.3029666 = fieldWeight in 4429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4429)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The Computer Science Ontology (CSO) is a large-scale ontology of research areas that was automatically generated using the Klink-2 algorithm on the Rexplore dataset, which consists of about 16 million publications, mainly in the field of Computer Science. The Klink-2 algorithm combines semantic technologies, machine learning, and knowledge from external sources to automatically generate a fully populated ontology of research areas. Some relationships were also revised manually by experts during the preparation of two ontology-assisted surveys in the field of Semantic Web and Software Architecture. The main root of CSO is Computer Science, however, the ontology includes also a few secondary roots, such as Linguistics, Geometry, Semantics, and so on. CSO presents two main advantages over manually crafted categorisations used in Computer Science (e.g., 2012 ACM Classification, Microsoft Academic Search Classification). First, it can characterise higher-level research areas by means of hundreds of sub-topics and related terms, which enables to map very specific terms to higher-level research areas. Secondly, it can be easily updated by running Klink-2 on a set of new publications. A more comprehensive discussion of the advantages of adopting an automatically generated ontology in the scholarly domain can be found in.
  2. Frey, J.; Streitmatter, D.; Götz, F.; Hellmann, S.; Arndt, N.: DBpedia Archivo (2020) 0.00
    0.004827543 = product of:
      0.038620345 = sum of:
        0.038620345 = weight(_text_:semantics in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038620345 = score(doc=53,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18210563 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033205014 = queryNorm
            0.21207662 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    # Community action on all ontologies (quality, FAIRness, conformity) Archivo is extensible and allows contributions to give consumers a central place to encode their requirements. We envision fostering adherence to standards and strengthening incentives for publishers to build a better (FAIRer) web of ontologies. 1. SHACL (https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/, co-edited by DBpedia's CTO D. Kontokostas) enables easy testing of ontologies. Archivo offers free SHACL continuous integration testing for ontologies. Anyone can implement their SHACL tests and add them to the SHACL library on Github. We believe that there are many synergies, i.e. SHACL tests for your ontology are helpful for others as well. 2. We are looking for ontology experts to join DBpedia and discuss further validation (e.g. stars) to increase FAIRness and quality of ontologies. We are forming a steering committee and also a PC for the upcoming Vocarnival at SEMANTiCS 2021. Please message hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de <mailto:hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>if you would like to join. We would like to extend the Archivo platform with relevant visualisations, tests, editing aides, mapping management tools and quality checks.
  3. Electronic Dewey (1993) 0.00
    0.001499607 = product of:
      0.011996856 = sum of:
        0.011996856 = product of:
          0.035990566 = sum of:
            0.035990566 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035990566 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1162783 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033205014 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 19(1994) no.1, S.134-137 (M. Carpenter). - Inzwischen existiert auch eine Windows-Version: 'Electronic Dewey for Windows', vgl. Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.17