Search (117 results, page 6 of 6)

6.301059E-4 = product of:
  0.009451588 = sum of:
    0.009451588 = weight(_text_:in in 3123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009451588 = score(doc=3123,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 3123, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3123)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Presents a version of the UDC specifically revised and adapted for use in libraries focusing on Polar subjects. The schedules do not derive from the master reference file

6.2377297E-4 = product of:
  0.009356594 = sum of:
    0.009356594 = weight(_text_:in in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009356594 = score(doc=3086,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Footnote

Übers. des Titels: Universal Decimal Classification: international medium edition in Romanian language

6.173752E-4 = product of:
  0.009260627 = sum of:
    0.009260627 = weight(_text_:in in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009260627 = score(doc=1998,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

The 5th ed. includes revisions to selected schedules in need of updating and also integrates into the classification's index MeSH descriptors used in cataloging but not yet represented in the index to the 4th ed. It comprises close to 4.000 notations and 18.000 index terms for both, entries and cross references

6.173752E-4 = product of:
  0.009260627 = sum of:
    0.009260627 = weight(_text_:in in 6814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009260627 = score(doc=6814,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 6814, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6814)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

This edition supersedes the first edition published between 1985 and 1988 and includes approximately 60.000 entries. it is taken directly from the Master Reference File (MRF), the UDC database maintained by the UDC consortium. This edition includes modifications authorized in 'Extensions and corrections to the UDC'

Footnote

Rez. in: Annals of library science and documentation 42(1995) no.3, S.101-105 (A.K. Singh). - Vgl. auch die Notiz in Knowledge Organization 21(1994) no.2, S.103-104

5.8941013E-4 = product of:
  0.008841151 = sum of:
    0.008841151 = weight(_text_:in in 6401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008841151 = score(doc=6401,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 6401, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6401)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

The Classification System for Knowledge Organization Literature is originally compiled by Dr. Ingetraut Dahlberg for the "Classification Literature" section of the journal International Classification which was started with the first issue of the journal in 1974. The last time this classification was published by Dr. Dahlberg - with an introduction - was in Knowledge Organization 20(1993)4, p. 211-222. Many classes of this classification can be subdivided according to scientific disciplines or subject fields. For this subdivision the Information Coding Classification, also compiled by Dr. Ingetraut Dahlberg, is used. The ICC was published in International Classification and Indexing Bibliography: Vol. I Classification Systems and Thesauri, 1950-1982. - FrankfurtlMain : Indeks Verlag, 1982. - p. 107-139. The classes subdivided with the ICC are marked with a ". In most cases the codes of the ICC are combined with the codes of the classification for Knowledge Organization with a -, but in the classes 5 and 6 the subdivision is direct. Examples: 048-51/4 Thesauri for the medical sciences, but 651/4 Literature about Thesauri for the medical sciences. Here the Classification System for Knowledge Organization Literature is printed as it is used by the present Literature editor of Knowledge Organization, including some small changes made with a view of changes in the literature in the field of knowledge organization. An outline of the ICC is added

5.6358386E-4 = product of:
  0.0084537575 = sum of:
    0.0084537575 = weight(_text_:in in 1474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0084537575 = score(doc=1474,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.19010136 = fieldWeight in 1474, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1474)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

THE COLON CLASSIFICATION is the latest scheme in the field of classification. It has revolutionised thinking in classification and stimulated research in it. This new method is suited to small and large, general and special libraries and can be used in classifying whole books as well as individual articles in a periodical or sections in a book.. It is being taught in all schools o Library Science all over the world, not only as a means of arranging books on shelves but also as a means of finding out the focus of a book in systematic way and finding the requirements of a reader while doing reference service. The new methodologies in classification invented as part of the Colon Classification-the Facet Analysis, the Phase Analysis and the Zone Analysis--have lifted Practical Classification from guesswork to scientific method. They are forming an important theme in international conferences on information retrieval.

5.4020324E-4 = product of:
  0.008103048 = sum of:
    0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 52) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008103048 = score(doc=52,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 52, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=52)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

While thousands of ontologies exist on the web, a unified sys-tem for handling online ontologies - in particular with respect to discov-ery, versioning, access, quality-control, mappings - has not yet surfacedand users of ontologies struggle with many challenges. In this paper, wepresent an online ontology interface and augmented archive called DB-pedia Archivo, that discovers, crawls, versions and archives ontologies onthe DBpedia Databus. Based on this versioned crawl, different features,quality measures and, if possible, fixes are deployed to handle and sta-bilize the changes in the found ontologies at web-scale. A comparison toexisting approaches and ontology repositories is given.

5.346625E-4 = product of:
  0.008019937 = sum of:
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

5.346625E-4 = product of:
  0.008019937 = sum of:
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 6092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=6092,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 6092, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6092)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

The model places Islam at the centre of the scheme, avoiding the twists and turns invilved in any adaptation of western schemes

5.346625E-4 = product of:
  0.008019937 = sum of:
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=38,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge Organization 27(2000) nos.1/2, S.71-76 (M. Hudon)

5.346625E-4 = product of:
  0.008019937 = sum of:
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 2902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=2902,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2902, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2902)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Footnote

Rez. in: Catalog & index 1995, no.116, S.8 (D. Brunt)

5.346625E-4 = product of:
  0.008019937 = sum of:
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 1568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=1568,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1568, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1568)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Footnote

Rez. in: Australian library journal 46(1997) no.4, S.432-424 (S.W. Davis)

4.4555214E-4 = product of:
  0.0066832816 = sum of:
    0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066832816 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

4.4555214E-4 = product of:
  0.0066832816 = sum of:
    0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066832816 = score(doc=11,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Footnote

Rez. in: Managing information 8(2001) no.8, S.61 (M.J. Steer)

4.4555214E-4 = product of:
  0.0066832816 = sum of:
    0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 5755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066832816 = score(doc=5755,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 5755, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5755)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

This paper discusses the Hornbostel-Sachs Classification of Musical Instruments. This classification system was originally designed for musical instruments and books about instruments, and was first published in German in 1914. Hornbostel-Sachs has dominated organological discourse and practice since its creation, and this article analyses the scheme's context, background, versions and impact. The position of Hornbostel-Sachs in the history and development of instrument classification is explored. This is followed by a detailed analysis of the mechanics of the scheme, including its decimal notation, the influential broad categories of the scheme, its warrant and its typographical layout. The version history of the scheme is outlined and the relationships between versions is visualised, including its translations, the introduction of the electrophones category and the Musical Instruments Museums Online (MIMO) version designed for a digital environment. The reception of Hornbostel-Sachs is analysed, and its usage, criticism and impact are all considered. As well as dominating organological research and practice for over a century, it is shown that Hornbostel-Sachs also had a significant influence on the bibliographic classification of music.

Footnote

Derived from the article of similar title in the ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization Version 1.1 (= 1.0 plus details on electrophones and Wikipedia); version 1.0 published 2019-01-17, this version 2019-05-29. Article category: KOS, specific (domain specific). The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments, as well as the editor, Professor Birger Hjørland, for all of his insightful comments and ideas.

3.7806356E-4 = product of:
  0.005670953 = sum of:
    0.005670953 = weight(_text_:in in 1119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005670953 = score(doc=1119,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 1119, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1119)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Auguste Comte is ostensibly the world's most famous classifier of the sciences in modern history. His whole life was dedicated to establishing a classification that conformed to the 'positivist' (non-theological and non-metaphysical) principles he settled on after working with early nineteenth-century French social reformer Henri de Saint-Simon. This article first probes the background to Comte's classifying of the sciences, discussing French and German influences, and the effect of the phrenological movement on his special attitude to psychology and social life. Central sections of the article concern the basic and most mature ordering of the sciences according to his fundamental Course of lectures on classification (1830-42), the development of a tableau to cover psychological issues, and attempts at tables to synthesize his ordering and draw out their implications for socio-political reform and the Church of Humanity he founded. Concluding sections cover key binding principles of his classificatory work, as well as matters of reception, influence, and critical response.

Series

Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization

1.5594324E-4 = product of:
  0.0023391484 = sum of:
    0.0023391484 = weight(_text_:in in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0023391484 = score(doc=53,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.052600905 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Content

# How does Archivo work? Each week Archivo runs several discovery algorithms to scan for new ontologies. Once discovered Archivo checks them every 8 hours. When changes are detected, Archivo downloads and rates and archives the latest snapshot persistently on the DBpedia Databus. # Archivo's mission Archivo's mission is to improve FAIRness (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability) of all available ontologies on the Semantic Web. Archivo is not a guideline, it is fully automated, machine-readable and enforces interoperability with its star rating. - Ontology developers can implement against Archivo until they reach more stars. The stars and tests are designed to guarantee the interoperability and fitness of the ontology. - Ontology users can better find, access and re-use ontologies. Snapshots are persisted in case the original is not reachable anymore adding a layer of reliability to the decentral web of ontologies.