Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Gödert, W.: Strukturierung von Klassifikationssystemen und Online-Retrieval (1995) 0.01
    0.007897554 = product of:
      0.04738532 = sum of:
        0.04738532 = weight(_text_:und in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04738532 = score(doc=922,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Imprint
    Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem
    Source
    Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
  2. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.0076993788 = product of:
      0.023098135 = sum of:
        0.005354538 = weight(_text_:in in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005354538 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
        0.017743597 = product of:
          0.035487194 = sum of:
            0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035487194 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  3. Pocock, H.: Classification schemes : development and survival (1997) 0.00
    0.0021034614 = product of:
      0.012620768 = sum of:
        0.012620768 = weight(_text_:in in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012620768 = score(doc=762,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the development of classification schemes and their ability to adapt to and accomodate changes in the information world in order to survive. Examines the revision plans for the major classification schemes and the future use of classification search facilities for OPACs
  4. Spiteri, L.: ¬A simplified model for facet analysis : Ranganathan 101 (1998) 0.00
    0.0017848461 = product of:
      0.010709076 = sum of:
        0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010709076 = score(doc=3842,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Ranganathan's canons, principles, and postulates can easily confuse readers, especially because he revised and added to them in various editions of his many books. The Classification Research Group, who drew on Ranganathan's work as their basis for classification theory but developed it in their own way, has never clearly organized all their equivalent canons and principles. In this article Spiteri gathers the fundamental rules from both systems and compares and contrasts them. She makes her own clearer set of principles for constructing facets, stating the subject of a document, and designing notation. Spiteri's "simplified model" is clear and understandable, but certainly not simplistic. The model does not include methods for making a faceted system, but will serve as a very useful guide in how to turn initial work into a rigorous classification. Highly recommended
  5. Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: Ranganathan and the Net : using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web (1999) 0.00
    0.0012620769 = product of:
      0.0075724614 = sum of:
        0.0075724614 = weight(_text_:in in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0075724614 = score(doc=726,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper documents the continuing relevance of facet analysis as a technique for searching and organising WWW based materials. The 2 approaches underlying WWW searching and indexing - word and concept based indexing - are outlined. It is argued that facet analysis as an a posteriori approach to classification using words from the subject field as the concept terms in the classification derived represents an excellent approach to searching and organising the results of WWW searches using either search engines or search directories. Finally it is argued that the underlying philosophy of facet analysis is better suited to the disparate nature of WWW resources and searchers than the assumptions of contemporaray IR research.
    This article gives a cheerfully brief and undetailed account of how to make a faceted classification system, then describes information retrieval and searching on the web. It concludes by saying that facets would be excellent in helping users search and browse the web, but offers no real clues as to how this can be done.