Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Gnoli, C.; Mei, H.: Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval (2006) 0.02
    0.020727625 = product of:
      0.0829105 = sum of:
        0.044094343 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044094343 = score(doc=534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14343803 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.30741042 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
        0.0063190092 = weight(_text_:information in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063190092 = score(doc=534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
        0.03249715 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03249715 = score(doc=534,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
      0.25 = coord(3/12)
    
    Abstract
    In free classification, each concept is expressed by a constant notation, and classmarks are formed by free combinations of them, allowing the retrieval of records from a database by searching any of the component concepts. A refinement of free classification is freely faceted classification, where notation can include facets, expressing the kind of relations held between the concepts. The Integrative Level Classification project aims at testing free and freely faceted classification by applying them to small bibliographical samples in various domains. A sample, called the Dandelion Bibliography of Facet Analysis, is described here. Experience was gained using this system to classify 300 specialized papers dealing with facet analysis itself recorded on a MySQL database and building a Web interface exploiting freely faceted notation. The interface is written in PHP and uses string functions to process the queries and to yield relevant results selected and ordered according to the principles of integrative levels.
    Source
    New review of hypermedia and multimedia. 12(2006) no.1, S.63-81
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  2. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.01
    0.008730081 = product of:
      0.052380484 = sum of:
        0.036745287 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036745287 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14343803 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.25617537 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.015635196 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015635196 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Source
    New review of hypermedia and multimedia. 7(2001) no.1, S.67-102
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01
    0.008365711 = product of:
      0.033462845 = sum of:
        0.0063190092 = weight(_text_:information in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063190092 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
        0.018762236 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018762236 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
        0.008381601 = product of:
          0.025144802 = sum of:
            0.025144802 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025144802 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108317085 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03093157 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(3/12)
    
    Abstract
    Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  4. Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.0077711474 = product of:
      0.046626884 = sum of:
        0.014129735 = weight(_text_:information in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129735 = score(doc=831,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
        0.03249715 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03249715 = score(doc=831,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
    Footnote
    Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  5. Pocock, H.: Classification schemes : development and survival (1997) 0.01
    0.006967013 = product of:
      0.041802075 = sum of:
        0.010531682 = weight(_text_:information in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010531682 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
        0.031270392 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031270392 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the development of classification schemes and their ability to adapt to and accomodate changes in the information world in order to survive. Examines the revision plans for the major classification schemes and the future use of classification search facilities for OPACs
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  6. Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004) 0.01
    0.005911706 = product of:
      0.035470236 = sum of:
        0.008936428 = weight(_text_:information in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008936428 = score(doc=2651,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
        0.026533809 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026533809 = score(doc=2651,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    The paper analyses the importance of data presentation and modelling and its role in improving the management, use and exchange of analytico-synthetic classifications in automated systems. Inefficiencies, in this respect, hinder the automation of classification systems that offer the possibility of building compound index/search terms. The lack of machine readable data expressing the semantics and structure of a classification vocabulary has negative effects on information management and retrieval, thus restricting the potential of both automated systems and classifications themselves. The authors analysed the data representation structure of three general analytico-synthetic classification systems (BC2-Bliss Bibliographic Classification; BSO-Broad System of Ordering; UDC-Universal Decimal Classification) and put forward some core requirements for classification data representation
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  7. Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: Ranganathan and the Net : using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web (1999) 0.01
    0.00547547 = product of:
      0.032852817 = sum of:
        0.0063190092 = weight(_text_:information in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063190092 = score(doc=726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
        0.026533809 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026533809 = score(doc=726,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives a cheerfully brief and undetailed account of how to make a faceted classification system, then describes information retrieval and searching on the web. It concludes by saying that facets would be excellent in helping users search and browse the web, but offers no real clues as to how this can be done.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  8. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.00
    0.004523973 = product of:
      0.027143838 = sum of:
        0.018762236 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018762236 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
        0.008381601 = product of:
          0.025144802 = sum of:
            0.025144802 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025144802 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108317085 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03093157 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  9. Spiteri, L.: ¬A simplified model for facet analysis : Ranganathan 101 (1998) 0.00
    0.004180208 = product of:
      0.025081245 = sum of:
        0.0063190092 = weight(_text_:information in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063190092 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
        0.018762236 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018762236 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 23(1998) nos.1/2, S.1-30
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  10. Gödert, W.: Strukturierung von Klassifikationssystemen und Online-Retrieval (1995) 0.00
    0.0036852509 = product of:
      0.04422301 = sum of:
        0.04422301 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04422301 = score(doc=922,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  11. Broughton, V.; Slavic, A.: Building a faceted classification for the humanities : principles and procedures (2007) 0.00
    0.0014741005 = product of:
      0.017689206 = sum of:
        0.017689206 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017689206 = score(doc=2875,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to provide an overview of principles and procedures involved in creating a faceted classification scheme for use in resource discovery in an online environment. Design/methodology/approach - Facet analysis provides an established rigorous methodology for the conceptual organization of a subject field, and the structuring of an associated classification or controlled vocabulary. This paper explains how that methodology was applied to the humanities in the FATKS project, where the objective was to explore the potential of facet analytical theory for creating a controlled vocabulary for the humanities, and to establish the requirements of a faceted classification appropriate to an online environment. A detailed faceted vocabulary was developed for two areas of the humanities within a broader facet framework for the whole of knowledge. Research issues included how to create a data model which made the faceted structure explicit and machine-readable and provided for its further development and use. Findings - In order to support easy facet combination in indexing, and facet searching and browsing on the interface, faceted classification requires a formalized data structure and an appropriate tool for its management. The conceptual framework of a faceted system proper can be applied satisfactorily to humanities, and fully integrated within a vocabulary management system. Research limitations/implications - The procedures described in this paper are concerned only with the structuring of the classification, and do not extend to indexing, retrieval and application issues. Practical implications - Many stakeholders in the domain of resource discovery consider developing their own classification system and supporting tools. The methods described in this paper may clarify the process of building a faceted classification and may provide some useful ideas with respect to the vocabulary maintenance tool. Originality/value - As far as the authors are aware there is no comparable research in this area.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval