-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.007291071 = product of:
0.021873213 = sum of:
0.012374603 = product of:
0.024749206 = sum of:
0.024749206 = weight(_text_:web in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024749206 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03505379 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009498609 = product of:
0.028495826 = sum of:
0.028495826 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028495826 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03505379 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
-
Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: Ranganathan and the Net : using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web (1999)
0.00
0.0035722405 = product of:
0.021433443 = sum of:
0.021433443 = product of:
0.042866886 = sum of:
0.042866886 = weight(_text_:web in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042866886 = score(doc=726,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03505379 = queryNorm
0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This article gives a cheerfully brief and undetailed account of how to make a faceted classification system, then describes information retrieval and searching on the web. It concludes by saying that facets would be excellent in helping users search and browse the web, but offers no real clues as to how this can be done.
-
Gnoli, C.; Mei, H.: Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval (2006)
0.00
0.002916722 = product of:
0.017500332 = sum of:
0.017500332 = product of:
0.035000663 = sum of:
0.035000663 = weight(_text_:web in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035000663 = score(doc=534,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03505379 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- In free classification, each concept is expressed by a constant notation, and classmarks are formed by free combinations of them, allowing the retrieval of records from a database by searching any of the component concepts. A refinement of free classification is freely faceted classification, where notation can include facets, expressing the kind of relations held between the concepts. The Integrative Level Classification project aims at testing free and freely faceted classification by applying them to small bibliographical samples in various domains. A sample, called the Dandelion Bibliography of Facet Analysis, is described here. Experience was gained using this system to classify 300 specialized papers dealing with facet analysis itself recorded on a MySQL database and building a Web interface exploiting freely faceted notation. The interface is written in PHP and uses string functions to process the queries and to yield relevant results selected and ordered according to the principles of integrative levels.
-
Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004)
0.00
0.0015974719 = product of:
0.009584831 = sum of:
0.009584831 = product of:
0.028754493 = sum of:
0.028754493 = weight(_text_:29 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028754493 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03505379 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 14:20:40
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.00
0.0015831016 = product of:
0.009498609 = sum of:
0.009498609 = product of:
0.028495826 = sum of:
0.028495826 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028495826 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03505379 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001)
0.00
0.0013312267 = product of:
0.00798736 = sum of:
0.00798736 = product of:
0.023962079 = sum of:
0.023962079 = weight(_text_:29 in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023962079 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03505379 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 6.2014 17:31:49
