Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.03
```
0.02553383 = product of:
  0.10213532 = sum of:
    0.10213532 = weight(_text_:objects in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10213532 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34784988 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06544595 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users

Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01

0.013300534 = product of:
  0.053202137 = sum of:
    0.053202137 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053202137 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22918057 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06544595 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47

Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01

0.013300534 = product of:
  0.053202137 = sum of:
    0.053202137 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053202137 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22918057 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06544595 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 22.12.2007 17:22:31

Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years