Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.00
    0.0021279112 = product of:
      0.0042558224 = sum of:
        0.0042558224 = product of:
          0.008511645 = sum of:
            0.008511645 = weight(_text_:a in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008511645 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Lima, G.A. de; Castro, I.R.: Uso da classificacao decimal universal para a recuperacao da informacao em ambientes digitas : uma revisao sistematica da literatura (2021) 0.00
    0.0020106873 = product of:
      0.0040213745 = sum of:
        0.0040213745 = product of:
          0.008042749 = sum of:
            0.008042749 = weight(_text_:a in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008042749 = score(doc=760,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge Organization Systems, even traditional ones, such as the Universal Decimal Classification, have been studied to improve the retrieval of information online, although the potential of using knowledge structures in the user interface has not yet been widespread. Objective: This study presents a mapping of scientific production on information retrieval methodologies, which make use of the Universal Decimal Classification. Methodology: Systematic Literature Review, conducted in two stages, with a selection of 44 publications, resulting in the time interval from 1964 to 2017, whose categories analyzed were: most productive authors, languages of publications, types of document, year of publication, most cited work, major impact journal, and thematic categories covered in the publications. Results: A total of nine more productive authors and co-authors were found; predominance of the English language (42 publications); works published in the format of journal articles (33); and highlight to the year 2007 (eight publications). In addition, it was identified that the most cited work was by Mcilwaine (1997), with 61 citations, and the journal Extensions & Corrections to the UDC was the one with the largest number of publications, in addition to the incidence of the theme Universal Automation linked to a thesaurus for information retrieval, present in 19 works. Conclusions: Shortage of studies that explore the potential of the Decimal Classification, especially in Brazilian literature, which highlights the need for further study on the topic, involving research at the national and international levels.
    Footnote
    Englischer Titel: Use of the Universal Decimal Classification for the recoery of information in digital environments: a systematic review of literature.
    Type
    a
  3. Fagan, J.C.: Usability studies of faceted browsing : a literature review (2010) 0.00
    0.0018428253 = product of:
      0.0036856506 = sum of:
        0.0036856506 = product of:
          0.0073713013 = sum of:
            0.0073713013 = weight(_text_:a in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0073713013 = score(doc=4396,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted browsing is a common feature of new library catalog interfaces. But to what extent does it improve user performance in searching within today's library catalog systems? This article reviews the literature for user studies involving faceted browsing and user studies of "next-generation" library catalogs that incorporate faceted browsing. Both the results and the methods of these studies are analyzed by asking, What do we currently know about faceted browsing? How can we design better studies of faceted browsing in library catalogs? The article proposes methodological considerations for practicing librarians and provides examples of goals, tasks, and measurements for user studies of faceted browsing in library catalogs.
    Type
    a