Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Watanabe, T.: ¬An experimental OPAC system using NDC8 to improve subject access (1994) 0.00
    0.0042405236 = product of:
      0.029683663 = sum of:
        0.029683663 = product of:
          0.07420915 = sum of:
            0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029295133 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
            0.044914022 = weight(_text_:system in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044914022 = score(doc=403,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Description of an attempt to improve OPAC subject access at Kobe University Library using Nippon Decimal Classification, 8th ed. (NDC8). Examines the theoretical aspects of using a classification for subject searching, then explains the Kobe system. Using the NDC8 machine-readable data file, a database was created for the OPAC, incorporating class numbers and subject headings. Difficulties arise from subdivisions and the structure of NDC8 itself, but it is an important area for development
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  2. Pasanen-Tuomainen, I.: Analysis of subject searching in the TENTTU books database (1992) 0.00
    0.004099487 = product of:
      0.028696407 = sum of:
        0.028696407 = product of:
          0.071741015 = sum of:
            0.0380555 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0380555 = score(doc=4252,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 4252, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4252)
            0.033685513 = weight(_text_:system in 4252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033685513 = score(doc=4252,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 4252, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4252)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a pilot study for an Internordic project to monitor the use of online catalogues in the Nordic technological university libraries. Focuses on the use of classification in subject searching, how the UDC is used and the extent of its use. Studies user interaction with the OPACs and improvements to information retrieval in the catalogues using the transaction log method to gather data. The pilot study examnines the TENTTU Books database which is the online union catalogue of the Helsinki Univ. of Technology Library, a multilingual database with true information retrieval. The Internordic study itself will make comparisons between the TENTTU system and the new Virginia Tech Library System. Discusses the users monitored, method of analysis, subject searching in the database, results and how the UDC codes were used. Compares this to other studies conducted in Finland and evaluates the project
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Kniesner, D.L.; Willman, C.: But is it an online shelflist? : classification access in eight OPACs (1995) 0.00
    0.003010834 = product of:
      0.021075837 = sum of:
        0.021075837 = product of:
          0.052689593 = sum of:
            0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01830946 = score(doc=5555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
            0.034380134 = weight(_text_:system in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034380134 = score(doc=5555,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30135927 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    As librarians increasingly try to use their online catalogues to do what used to be done with their card shelflists, they are realizing that some catalogue sedigners and vendors have not paid enough attention to online shelf order classification access. Compares the call number searching abilities of 8 prominent, mature library systems: VTLS, Inlex, Innovative Interfaces, Inc., Data Research Associates (DRA), Geac Advance, Dynix, SIRSI, and NOTIS. Using 5 criteria that are important to cataloguers, each system was tested and rated for its suitability as an online shelflist. *** Special note from the authors: "[We've] become aware of a new version of SIRSI's Unicorn library system-- version 7.0 that changes our rating of SIRSI in a major way. We had rated SIRSI Unicorn a "C" in the paper, but now we would rate version 7.0 an "A". This is indeed a major change. Fortunately, we identified version numbers for each system in the article: we had tested version 6.1 of SIRSI. Thus, version 7.0 of SIRSI Unicorn, available in early 1995, has improved to the point that it meets every criteria used in the article for suitability as an online shelflist. The authors have evaluated version 7.0 with an "A" rating." ***
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  4. Tinker, A.J.; Pollitt, A.S.; O'Brien, A.; Braekevelt, P.A.: ¬The Dewey Decimal Classification and the transition from physical to electronic knowledge organisation (1999) 0.00
    0.0017444041 = product of:
      0.012210828 = sum of:
        0.012210828 = product of:
          0.03052707 = sum of:
            0.014647567 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014647567 = score(doc=4468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
            0.015879504 = weight(_text_:system in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015879504 = score(doc=4468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The physical organisation of items on library shelves using any classification scheme is inevitable a compromise. The best efforts to achieve an arrangement that is helpful to users will be thwarted by the multifaceted nature of these items and the specific needs of the user and the library. Items on a particular subject will be scattered throughout the library building(s) across disciplines, by physical form, by frequency of use and whether and for how long they may be borrowed. Even thought he rich information content of multifaceted items may be represented in the notation, the items required by a user will be scattered across library shelves when the item is placed in a single relative location. This paper explores these issues uisng examples from a University Library classified using the DDC. The electronic context of the library OPAC can transcend the constraints imposed by the predominantly physical nature of library collections, yet the current use of classification schemes in on-line systems retains many of these limitations. Examples of such systems applying DDC on the WWW are discussed and compared with a system that seeks to use DDC in what is called view-based searching. The interface and the resulting browsing and searching capability of a view-based OPAC are described. Ways in which subject access to library collections can be improved and disciplinary scatter resolved by assigning multiple class number to items and exploiting the rich Dewey structure in a faceted form are discussed. It is suggested that the informative power of visual classificatory structures at the search interface will be beneficial to the broader learning experience of the user. The paper concludes that the application of classification schemes in electronic interfaces should not be bound by the the physical constraints that no longer apply in an electronic context but be exploited to provide a complete, flexible and individual interface as determined by the needs of each user
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  5. Kowalk, W.: ¬Der OPAC der Universitätsbibliothek Saarbrücken (1991) 0.00
    0.0014647568 = product of:
      0.010253297 = sum of:
        0.010253297 = product of:
          0.051266484 = sum of:
            0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051266484 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  6. Erdei, K.: Systematik im Online-Katalog der UB Kiel : Ein Werkstattbericht (1999) 0.00
    0.0012555057 = product of:
      0.00878854 = sum of:
        0.00878854 = product of:
          0.0439427 = sum of:
            0.0439427 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0439427 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  7. Pollitt, A.S.; Tinker, A.J.; Braekevelt, P.A.J.: Improving access to online information using dynamic faceted classification (1998) 0.00
    7.323784E-4 = product of:
      0.0051266486 = sum of:
        0.0051266486 = product of:
          0.025633242 = sum of:
            0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025633242 = score(doc=4427,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  8. McGarry, D.: Displays of bibliographic records in call number order : functions of the displays and data elements needed (1992) 0.00
    5.2312744E-4 = product of:
      0.003661892 = sum of:
        0.003661892 = product of:
          0.01830946 = sum of:
            0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01830946 = score(doc=2384,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval