Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Pollitt, A.S.; Tinker, A.J.; Braekevelt, P.A.J.: Improving access to online information using dynamic faceted classification (1998) 0.02
    0.015062177 = product of:
      0.030124353 = sum of:
        0.030124353 = product of:
          0.060248706 = sum of:
            0.060248706 = weight(_text_:n in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060248706 = score(doc=4427,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18067603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041904088 = queryNorm
                0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The human natural ability to store and process images and speech provides clues for improving access to online information. The principles underpinning the maps people use in their minds can be applied to maps that can be presented at the user interface to online systems. Traditional classification organizes information into structured hierarchies and simplifies the search problem, but has serious limitations. Discusses the prospects for improving access to online information through the application of dynamic faceted classification. Presents a glimpse into the navigation of n-dimensional information space for future library OPACs using a modified DDC
  2. Kniesner, D.L.; Willman, C.: But is it an online shelflist? : classification access in eight OPACs (1995) 0.01
    0.0056698164 = product of:
      0.011339633 = sum of:
        0.011339633 = product of:
          0.06803779 = sum of:
            0.06803779 = weight(_text_:authors in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06803779 = score(doc=5555,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19103295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041904088 = queryNorm
                0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
          0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As librarians increasingly try to use their online catalogues to do what used to be done with their card shelflists, they are realizing that some catalogue sedigners and vendors have not paid enough attention to online shelf order classification access. Compares the call number searching abilities of 8 prominent, mature library systems: VTLS, Inlex, Innovative Interfaces, Inc., Data Research Associates (DRA), Geac Advance, Dynix, SIRSI, and NOTIS. Using 5 criteria that are important to cataloguers, each system was tested and rated for its suitability as an online shelflist. *** Special note from the authors: "[We've] become aware of a new version of SIRSI's Unicorn library system-- version 7.0 that changes our rating of SIRSI in a major way. We had rated SIRSI Unicorn a "C" in the paper, but now we would rate version 7.0 an "A". This is indeed a major change. Fortunately, we identified version numbers for each system in the article: we had tested version 6.1 of SIRSI. Thus, version 7.0 of SIRSI Unicorn, available in early 1995, has improved to the point that it meets every criteria used in the article for suitability as an online shelflist. The authors have evaluated version 7.0 with an "A" rating." ***
  3. Oberhauser, O.: Implementierung und Parametrisierung klassifikatorischer Recherchekomponenten im OPAC (2005) 0.00
    0.0049677473 = product of:
      0.0099354945 = sum of:
        0.0099354945 = product of:
          0.019870989 = sum of:
            0.019870989 = weight(_text_:22 in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019870989 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14674097 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041904088 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.1, S.22-37