Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.01324502 = product of:
  0.02649004 = sum of:
    0.02649004 = product of:
      0.05298008 = sum of:
        0.05298008 = weight(_text_:i in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05298008 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18162222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04815356 = queryNorm
            0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper examines some traditional information searching methods and their role in Hungarian OPACs. What challenges are there in the digital and online environment? How do users work with them and do they give users satisfactory results? What kinds of techniques are users employing? In this paper I examine the user interfaces of UDC, thesauri, subject headings etc. in the Hungarian library. The key question of the paper is whether a universal system or local solutions is the best approach for searching in the digital environment.

0.011352874 = product of:
  0.022705749 = sum of:
    0.022705749 = product of:
      0.045411497 = sum of:
        0.045411497 = weight(_text_:i in 4252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045411497 = score(doc=4252,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18162222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04815356 = queryNorm
            0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4252, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4252)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.011352874 = product of:
  0.022705749 = sum of:
    0.022705749 = product of:
      0.045411497 = sum of:
        0.045411497 = weight(_text_:i in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045411497 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18162222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04815356 = queryNorm
            0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Location

I

0.007818478 = product of:
  0.015636956 = sum of:
    0.015636956 = product of:
      0.078184776 = sum of:
        0.078184776 = weight(_text_:authors in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078184776 = score(doc=5555,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21952313 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04815356 = queryNorm
            0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

As librarians increasingly try to use their online catalogues to do what used to be done with their card shelflists, they are realizing that some catalogue sedigners and vendors have not paid enough attention to online shelf order classification access. Compares the call number searching abilities of 8 prominent, mature library systems: VTLS, Inlex, Innovative Interfaces, Inc., Data Research Associates (DRA), Geac Advance, Dynix, SIRSI, and NOTIS. Using 5 criteria that are important to cataloguers, each system was tested and rated for its suitability as an online shelflist. *** Special note from the authors: "[We've] become aware of a new version of SIRSI's Unicorn library system-- version 7.0 that changes our rating of SIRSI in a major way. We had rated SIRSI Unicorn a "C" in the paper, but now we would rate version 7.0 an "A". This is indeed a major change. Fortunately, we identified version numbers for each system in the article: we had tested version 6.1 of SIRSI. Thus, version 7.0 of SIRSI Unicorn, available in early 1995, has improved to the point that it meets every criteria used in the article for suitability as an online shelflist. The authors have evaluated version 7.0 with an "A" rating." ***

0.0057086246 = product of:
  0.011417249 = sum of:
    0.011417249 = product of:
      0.022834498 = sum of:
        0.022834498 = weight(_text_:22 in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022834498 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16862556 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04815356 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.1, S.22-37