Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.026911039 = product of:
  0.053822078 = sum of:
    0.053822078 = product of:
      0.16146623 = sum of:
        0.16146623 = weight(_text_:objects in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16146623 = score(doc=688,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32404202 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060966637 = queryNorm
            0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

At the end of 2005, impending digitization efforts and several developments related to the creation of access and discovery tools for informational and cultural objects resulted in a series of responses that continue to ripple throughout the library, museum and archive communities. These developments have broad implications for all three communities because of the goals shared by each in the creation of description, control and enhanced access to informational and cultural objects. This position paper will consider new implementations of faceted navigation and browsing features in online catalogs. It is also a response to challenges to develop interwoven approaches to the study of information seeking and the design and implementation of search and discovery systems. Urgently needed during this time of experimentation, development and implementation is a framework for system evaluation and critical analysis of needed and missing features that is grounded in traditional principles, borne out by practice. Such a framework could extend feature analysis protocols established during the early years of online catalog development.

0.016698817 = product of:
  0.033397634 = sum of:
    0.033397634 = product of:
      0.06679527 = sum of:
        0.06679527 = weight(_text_:network in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06679527 = score(doc=4307,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27150726 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060966637 = queryNorm
            0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The construction and updating of indexing languages depend on the organization of their hierarchical structures in order to determine the classification of related terms and, above all, to allow a constant updating of vocabulary, a condition for knowledge evolution. The elaboration of an indexing language for online catalogs of libraries' networks is important considering the diversity and specificity of knowledge areas. From this perspective, the present paper reports on the work of a team of catalogers and researchers engaged in the construction of a hierarchical structure of an indexing language for an online catalog of a university library's network. The work on hierarchical structures began by defining the categories and subcategories that form the indexing language macrostructure by using the parameters of the Library of Congress Subject Headings , the National Library Terminology and the Vocabulary of the University of São Paulo Library's system. Throughout the stages of the elaboration process of the macrostructure, difficulties and improvements were observed and discussed. The results enabled the assessment of the hierarchical structures of the languages used in the organization of the superordinate and subordinate terms, which has contributed to the systematization of operational procedures contained in an indexing language manual for online catalogs of libraries.

0.0072276206 = product of:
  0.014455241 = sum of:
    0.014455241 = product of:
      0.028910482 = sum of:
        0.028910482 = weight(_text_:22 in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028910482 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21349478 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060966637 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.1, S.22-37