Search (63 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. McGarry, D.: Displays of bibliographic records in call number order : functions of the displays and data elements needed (1992) 0.06
    0.059158873 = product of:
      0.18930839 = sum of:
        0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04126692 = score(doc=2384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
        0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022109302 = score(doc=2384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
        0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035046037 = score(doc=2384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
        0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035046037 = score(doc=2384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
        0.055840094 = weight(_text_:2nd in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055840094 = score(doc=2384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31004354 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Abstract
    Online displays of bibliographic records in call number order can serve various functions. A literature search showed no papers or books discussing this topic directly. Various displays from online catalogues available via the Internet were examined, as were displays sent to the author by colleagues. A number of the displays were uninformative to the extent that the identification of works associated with call numbers was difficult or impossible without follow-up searching of the individual bibliographic records. Other displays provided information where further searching of the database would not be required for most purposes. Displays noted ranged from displays with call numbers alone, with no bibliographic information, to records including main entry, title, statement of responsibility, place, publisher, and date. Suggestions of useful data elements to be included in displays of bibliographic records in call number order are made for the following functions: shelflisting, cataloguing, catalogue maintenance, reference, public searches, acquisition and collection development, and inventory control. Recommendations are made that the following data elements should be present in call number displays: entire call number as a sequencing element; main entry; entire title proper, and the date. Concern is expressed that the call number filing arrangement be that followed in traditional shelflists, and a suggestion is made that possible consensus on the placement of the data elements within a display be considered in the future
    Source
    Cognitive paradigms in knowledge organisation. 2nd Int. ISKO Conf., Madras, 26.-28.8.1992
  2. Liu, S.: Decomposing DDC synthesized numbers (1997) 0.03
    0.029338298 = product of:
      0.15647092 = sum of:
        0.037520733 = weight(_text_:26 in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037520733 = score(doc=5968,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.33108035 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
        0.059475098 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059475098 = score(doc=5968,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4168361 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
        0.059475098 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059475098 = score(doc=5968,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4168361 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Some empirical studies have explored the direct use of traditional classification schemes in the online environment; none has manipulated these manual classifications in such a way as to take full advantage of the power of both the classification and computer. It has been suggested that this power could be realized if the individual components of synthesized DDC numbers could be identified and indexed. Looks at the feasibility of automatically decomposing DDC synthesized numbers and the implications of such decompositions for informational retrieval. 1.701 sythesized numbers were decomposed by a computer system called DND (Dewey Number Decomposer). 600 were randomly selected for examination by 3 judges, each evaluating 200 numbers. The decomposition success rate was 100% and it was concluded that synthesized DDC numbers can be accurately decomposed automatically. The study has implications for information retrieval, expert systems for assigning DDC numbers, automatic indexing, switching language development and other important areas of cataloguing and classification
    Date
    1. 7.1996 21:26:02
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 26(1997) no.3, S.58-62
  3. Guenther, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme : implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1996) 0.03
    0.028537598 = product of:
      0.15220052 = sum of:
        0.05777369 = weight(_text_:author in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05777369 = score(doc=5578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3731459 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
        0.031475607 = product of:
          0.062951215 = sum of:
            0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062951215 = score(doc=5578,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=5578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Potential uses for classification data in machine readable form and reasons for the development of a standard, the USMARC Format for Classification Data, which allows for classification data to interact with other USMARC bibliographic and authority data are discussed. The development, structure, content, and use of the standard is reviewed with implementation decisions for the Library of Congress Classification scheme noted. The author examines the implementation of USMARC classification at LC, the conversion of the schedules, and the functionality of the software being used. Problems in the effort are explored, and enhancements desired for the online classification system are considered.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
  4. Robbins, F.: ¬An exploration of the application of classification systems as a method for resource delivery on the World Wide Web (1999) 0.02
    0.021027623 = product of:
      0.16822098 = sum of:
        0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411049 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411049 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 25(1999) nos.1/4, S.60-65
  5. Pollitt, A.S.: ¬The key role of classification and indexing in view-based searching (1998) 0.02
    0.020745311 = product of:
      0.11064166 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 4429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=4429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 4429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4429)
        0.042055245 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042055245 = score(doc=4429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.29474765 = fieldWeight in 4429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4429)
        0.042055245 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042055245 = score(doc=4429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.29474765 = fieldWeight in 4429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4429)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Date
    1. 7.1996 21:26:02
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 27(1998) no.2, S.37-40
  6. Pocock, H.: Classification schemes : development and survival (1997) 0.02
    0.017523019 = product of:
      0.14018415 = sum of:
        0.070092075 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070092075 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.49124604 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
        0.070092075 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070092075 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.49124604 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.10-16
  7. Gowtham, M.S.; Kamat, S.K.: ¬An expert system as a tool to classification (1995) 0.01
    0.01011716 = product of:
      0.08093728 = sum of:
        0.026979093 = product of:
          0.053958185 = sum of:
            0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053958185 = score(doc=3735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053958185 = score(doc=3735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3735)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the development by the Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Hyderabad, India, of an expert system for classification of technical documents using the UDC schedule for metallurgy as knowledge base and the UDC classification rules as rule base. The scheme was modified from its enumerative structure to an analytico-synthetic structure which is best suited to such an expert system. Some benefits of the expert system are that: it interacts with the classifier making them conform to the route suggested by the classification scheme; it alerts the classifier to the minor variations in the scheme thus avoiding overlooking them; it leads to consistency in class number generation; and it ensures that the classifier has incorporated als the concepts of the subject in the class number, by leading him or her through all the groups, which is not possible in the manual scheme
  8. Spiteri, L.: ¬A simplified model for facet analysis : Ranganathan 101 (1998) 0.01
    0.01011716 = product of:
      0.08093728 = sum of:
        0.026979093 = product of:
          0.053958185 = sum of:
            0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053958185 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053958185 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Ranganathan's canons, principles, and postulates can easily confuse readers, especially because he revised and added to them in various editions of his many books. The Classification Research Group, who drew on Ranganathan's work as their basis for classification theory but developed it in their own way, has never clearly organized all their equivalent canons and principles. In this article Spiteri gathers the fundamental rules from both systems and compares and contrasts them. She makes her own clearer set of principles for constructing facets, stating the subject of a document, and designing notation. Spiteri's "simplified model" is clear and understandable, but certainly not simplistic. The model does not include methods for making a faceted system, but will serve as a very useful guide in how to turn initial work into a rigorous classification. Highly recommended
  9. Guenther, R.S.: Bringing the Library of Congress into the computer age : converting LCC to machine-readable form (1996) 0.01
    0.008329412 = product of:
      0.066635296 = sum of:
        0.044218604 = weight(_text_:26 in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044218604 = score(doc=4578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3901819 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
        0.022416692 = product of:
          0.044833384 = sum of:
            0.044833384 = weight(_text_:ed in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044833384 = score(doc=4578,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.39288494 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Pages
    S.26-32
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
  10. Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998) 0.01
    0.007820468 = product of:
      0.06256375 = sum of:
        0.049520306 = weight(_text_:author in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049520306 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31983936 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.013043438 = product of:
          0.026086876 = sum of:
            0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026086876 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Creates an open, metadata aware system for distributed, collaborative WWW indexing. The system has 3 main components: a harvester (for collecting information), a database (for making the collection searchable), and a user interface (for making the information available). all components can be distributed across networked computers, thus supporting scalability. The system is metadata aware and thus allows searches on several fields including title, document author and URL. Nordic Web Index (NWI) is an application using this system to create a regional Nordic Web-indexing service. NWI is built using 5 collaborating service points within the Nordic countries. The NWI databases can be used to build additional services
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  11. Chan, L.M.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification System in an online environment (1990) 0.01
    0.0055840095 = product of:
      0.08934415 = sum of:
        0.08934415 = weight(_text_:2nd in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08934415 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.49606967 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium on Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment, held at the School of Library and Information Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
  12. Frost, C.O.; Janes, J.: ¬An empirical test of gopher searching using three organizational schemes : background and methods (1994) 0.01
    0.005567532 = product of:
      0.044540256 = sum of:
        0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 3031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028848568 = score(doc=3031,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 3031, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3031)
        0.015691686 = product of:
          0.031383373 = sum of:
            0.031383373 = weight(_text_:ed in 3031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031383373 = score(doc=3031,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 3031, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3031)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
  13. McAllister-Harper, D.: Dewey Decimal Classification in the online environment : a study of libraries in North Carolina (1990) 0.00
    0.004886008 = product of:
      0.078176126 = sum of:
        0.078176126 = weight(_text_:2nd in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078176126 = score(doc=3574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.43406096 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3574)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium on Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment, held at the School of Library and Information Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
  14. High, W.H.: Library of Congress Classification numbers as subject access points in computer-based retrieval (1990) 0.00
    0.004886008 = product of:
      0.078176126 = sum of:
        0.078176126 = weight(_text_:2nd in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078176126 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.43406096 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium on Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment, held at the School of Library and Information Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
  15. Saye, J.D.: ¬"The Library of Congress Classification System in an online environment" : a reaction (1990) 0.00
    0.0041880067 = product of:
      0.06700811 = sum of:
        0.06700811 = weight(_text_:2nd in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06700811 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.37205225 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium on Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment, held at the School of Library and Information sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
  16. Hill, J.S.: Things are taking a little longer than that : a response to Dewey Decimal Classification in the online environment (1990) 0.00
    0.0041880067 = product of:
      0.06700811 = sum of:
        0.06700811 = weight(_text_:2nd in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06700811 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.37205225 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium on Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment, held at the School of Library and Information Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
  17. Speller, B.F.: Access to information in an online environment : editor's introduction (1990) 0.00
    0.0041880067 = product of:
      0.06700811 = sum of:
        0.06700811 = weight(_text_:2nd in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06700811 = score(doc=497,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.37205225 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented as an introduction to the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium on Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment, held at the School of Library and Information Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
  18. Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998) 0.00
    0.003863629 = product of:
      0.061818063 = sum of:
        0.061818063 = sum of:
          0.031383373 = weight(_text_:ed in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031383373 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
          0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030434689 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  19. Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998) 0.00
    0.003863629 = product of:
      0.061818063 = sum of:
        0.061818063 = sum of:
          0.031383373 = weight(_text_:ed in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031383373 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030434689 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    30.12.2001 16:22:41
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  20. Gödert, W.: Facet classification in online retrieval (1991) 0.00
    0.0034900059 = product of:
      0.055840094 = sum of:
        0.055840094 = weight(_text_:2nd in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055840094 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31004354 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    The study of faceted classification systems has primarily been directed towards application for precombined catalogues or bibliographies, not so much for use in post coordinated retrieval systems. Argues that faceted classification systems in some respects are superior to other techniques of on-line retrieval as far as facet and concept analysis is combined with an expressive notational system in order to guide a form of retrieval which will use Boolean operators (for combining the facets regardless of one special citation order) and truncation for retrieving hierarchically different sets of documents. This point of view is demonstrated by 2 examples. The 1st one uses a short classification system derived from B. Buchanan and the 2nd is built upon the classification system used by Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Further discussion is concerned with some possible consequences which could be derived from a retrieval with PRECIS strings