Search (75 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.04
    0.04326073 = product of:
      0.16439077 = sum of:
        0.018205952 = weight(_text_:web in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018205952 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
        0.018205952 = weight(_text_:web in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018205952 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
        0.07048718 = weight(_text_:semantische in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07048718 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.50622916 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
        0.042669293 = weight(_text_:suche in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042669293 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12883182 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.3312015 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
        0.014822397 = product of:
          0.029644795 = sum of:
            0.029644795 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029644795 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2631579 = coord(5/19)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
    Theme
    Semantische Interoperabilität
  2. Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006) 0.03
    0.02612001 = product of:
      0.12407005 = sum of:
        0.04248056 = weight(_text_:web in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04248056 = score(doc=88,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
        0.04248056 = weight(_text_:web in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04248056 = score(doc=88,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
        0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026881078 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
        0.012227853 = product of:
          0.024455706 = sum of:
            0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024455706 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21052632 = coord(4/19)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a study conducted at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU-Boulder) to assess the extent to which its catalogers were using Classification Web (Class Web), the subscription-based, online cataloging documentation resource provided by the Library of Congress. In addition, this paper will explore assumptions made by management regarding CU-Boulder catalogers' use of the product, possible reasons for the lower-than-expected use, and recommendations for promoting a more efficient and cost-effective use of Class Web at other institutions similar to CU-Boulder.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.2, S.129-137
  3. Hanke, M.: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme im semantischen Web : zu Chancen und Problemen von Linked-data-Repräsentationen ausgewählter Klassifikationssysteme (2014) 0.02
    0.023985263 = product of:
      0.15190667 = sum of:
        0.04070975 = weight(_text_:web in 2463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04070975 = score(doc=2463,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 2463, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2463)
        0.04070975 = weight(_text_:web in 2463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04070975 = score(doc=2463,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 2463, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2463)
        0.07048718 = weight(_text_:semantische in 2463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07048718 = score(doc=2463,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.50622916 = fieldWeight in 2463, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2463)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    Pflege und Anwendung von Klassifikationssystemen für Informationsressourcen sind traditionell eine Kernkompetenz von Bibliotheken. Diese Systeme sind häufig historisch gewachsen und die Veröffentlichung verschiedener Systeme ist in der Vergangenheit typischerweise durch gedruckte Regelwerke oder proprietäre Datenbanken erfolgt. Die Technologien des semantischen Web erlauben es, Klassifikationssysteme in einer standardisierten und maschinenlesbaren Weise zu repräsentieren, sowie als Linked (Open) Data für die Nachnutzung zugänglich zu machen. Anhand ausgewählter Beispiele von Klassifikationssystemen, die bereits als Linked (Open) Data publiziert wurden, werden in diesem Artikel zentrale semantische und technische Fragen erörtert, sowie mögliche Einsatzgebiete und Chancen dargestellt. So kann beispielsweise die für die Maschinenlesbarkeit erforderliche starke Strukturierung von Daten im semantischen Web zum besseren Verständnis der Klassifikationssysteme beitragen und möglicherweise positive Impulse für ihre Weiterentwicklung liefern. Für das semantische Web aufbereitete Repräsentationen von Klassifikationssystemen können unter anderem zur Kataloganreicherung oder für die anwendungsbezogene Erstellung von Konkordanzen zwischen verschiedenen Klassifikations- bzw. Begriffssystemen genutzt werden..
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  4. Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998) 0.02
    0.022388577 = product of:
      0.10634574 = sum of:
        0.036411904 = weight(_text_:web in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036411904 = score(doc=4190,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.036411904 = weight(_text_:web in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036411904 = score(doc=4190,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.023040922 = weight(_text_:services in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023040922 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.010481017 = product of:
          0.020962033 = sum of:
            0.020962033 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020962033 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21052632 = coord(4/19)
    
    Abstract
    Creates an open, metadata aware system for distributed, collaborative WWW indexing. The system has 3 main components: a harvester (for collecting information), a database (for making the collection searchable), and a user interface (for making the information available). all components can be distributed across networked computers, thus supporting scalability. The system is metadata aware and thus allows searches on several fields including title, document author and URL. Nordic Web Index (NWI) is an application using this system to create a regional Nordic Web-indexing service. NWI is built using 5 collaborating service points within the Nordic countries. The NWI databases can be used to build additional services
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
    Object
    Nordic Web Index
  5. Koch, T.; Golub, K.; Ardö, A.: Users browsing behaviour in a DDC-based Web service : a log analysis (2006) 0.02
    0.015136535 = product of:
      0.09586473 = sum of:
        0.036411904 = weight(_text_:web in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036411904 = score(doc=2234,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
        0.036411904 = weight(_text_:web in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036411904 = score(doc=2234,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
        0.023040922 = weight(_text_:services in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023040922 = score(doc=2234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    This study explores the navigation behaviour of all users of a large web service, Renardus, using web log analysis. Renardus provides integrated searching and browsing access to quality-controlled web resources from major individual subject gateway services. The main navigation feature is subject browsing through the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) based on mapping of classes of resources from the distributed gateways to the DDC structure. Among the more surprising results are the hugely dominant share of browsing activities, the good use of browsing support features like the graphical fish-eye overviews, rather long and varied navigation sequences, as well as extensive hierarchical directory-style browsing through the large DDC system.
  6. Slavic, A.: Classification revisited : a web of knowledge (2011) 0.01
    0.013744791 = product of:
      0.08705035 = sum of:
        0.033924792 = weight(_text_:web in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033924792 = score(doc=12,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
        0.033924792 = weight(_text_:web in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033924792 = score(doc=12,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
        0.019200768 = weight(_text_:services in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019200768 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    The vision of the semantic web is gradually unfolding and taking shape through a web of linked data, a part of which is built by capturing semantics stored in existing knowledge organization systems (KOS), subject metadata and resource metadata. The content of vast bibliographic collections is currently categorized by some widely used bibliographic classification and we may soon see them being mined for information and linked in a meaningful way across the web. Bibliographic classifications are designed for knowledge mediation, which offers both a rich terminology and different ways in which concepts can be categorized and related to each other in the universe of knowledge. From 1990 to 2010 they have been used in various resource discovery services on the web, and they continue to be used to support information integration in a number of international digital library projects. In this chapter we will revisit some of the ways in which universal classifications, as language-independent concept schemes, can assist humans and computers in structuring and presenting information and formulating queries. Most importantly, we will highlight issues important to understanding bibliographic classifications, identifying both their unused potential and their technical limitations.
  7. Dodd, D.G.: Grass-roots cataloging and classification : food for thought from World Wide Web subject-oriented hierarchical lists (1996) 0.01
    0.013730155 = product of:
      0.086957656 = sum of:
        0.03003829 = weight(_text_:web in 7270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03003829 = score(doc=7270,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 7270, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7270)
        0.03003829 = weight(_text_:web in 7270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03003829 = score(doc=7270,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 7270, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7270)
        0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 7270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026881078 = score(doc=7270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 7270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7270)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    The explosion of the use of the Internet by the genral public, particularly via the WWW, has given rise to the proliferation of semiprofessional attempts to give some subject based access to Internet resources via hierarchical guides (hotlists) on Web search engines such as Yahoo and Magellan. Examines the structure and principles of various hierachical lists, and compares them, when possible, to broad LCC and DDC schemes, and to LCSH. Explores the approaches taken by non librarians in their efforts to organize and provide access to materials on the Internet. Focuses on the dichotomy between the hierarchical 'browse' and the analytical 'search' approaches to finding materials, as exemplified by these various attempts to organize the Internet
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 40(1996) no.3, S.275-286
  8. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.01
    0.013548369 = product of:
      0.08580634 = sum of:
        0.036789242 = weight(_text_:web in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036789242 = score(doc=1673,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
        0.036789242 = weight(_text_:web in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036789242 = score(doc=1673,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
        0.012227853 = product of:
          0.024455706 = sum of:
            0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024455706 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    The Wolverhampton Web Library (WWLib) is a WWW search engine that provides access to UK based information. The experimental version developed in 1995, was a success but highlighted the need for a much higher degree of automation. An interesting feature of the experimental WWLib was that it organised information according to DDC. Discusses the advantages of classification and describes the automatic classifier that is being developed in Java as part of the new, fully automated WWLib
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia; vgl. auch: http://www7.scu.edu.au/programme/posters/1846/com1846.htm.
  9. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.01
    0.013047416 = product of:
      0.08263364 = sum of:
        0.034329474 = weight(_text_:web in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034329474 = score(doc=2871,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
        0.034329474 = weight(_text_:web in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034329474 = score(doc=2871,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
        0.013974689 = product of:
          0.027949378 = sum of:
            0.027949378 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027949378 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    This is a report on how Doyle and others made a faceted classification scheme for content management systems and made it browsable on the web (see CMS Review in Example Web Sites, below). They discuss why they did it, how, their use of OPML and XFML, how they did research to find terms and categories, and they also include their taxonomy. It is interesting to see facets used in a business environment.
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  10. Gnoli, C.; Mei, H.: Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval (2006) 0.01
    0.011768704 = product of:
      0.07453513 = sum of:
        0.025747105 = weight(_text_:web in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025747105 = score(doc=534,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
        0.025747105 = weight(_text_:web in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025747105 = score(doc=534,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
        0.023040922 = weight(_text_:services in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023040922 = score(doc=534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    In free classification, each concept is expressed by a constant notation, and classmarks are formed by free combinations of them, allowing the retrieval of records from a database by searching any of the component concepts. A refinement of free classification is freely faceted classification, where notation can include facets, expressing the kind of relations held between the concepts. The Integrative Level Classification project aims at testing free and freely faceted classification by applying them to small bibliographical samples in various domains. A sample, called the Dandelion Bibliography of Facet Analysis, is described here. Experience was gained using this system to classify 300 specialized papers dealing with facet analysis itself recorded on a MySQL database and building a Web interface exploiting freely faceted notation. The interface is written in PHP and uses string functions to process the queries and to yield relevant results selected and ordered according to the principles of integrative levels.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization systems and services"
  11. Ferris, A.M.: Results of an expanded survey on the use of Classification Web : they will use it, if you buy it! (2009) 0.01
    0.009998886 = product of:
      0.09498941 = sum of:
        0.047494706 = weight(_text_:web in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047494706 = score(doc=2991,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.5643819 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
        0.047494706 = weight(_text_:web in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047494706 = score(doc=2991,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.5643819 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a survey examining the extent to which working catalogers use Classification Web, the Library of Congress' online resource for subject heading and classification documentation. An earlier survey analyzed Class Web's usefulness on an institutional level. This broader survey expands on that analysis and provides information on such questions as: what types of institutions subscribe to Class Web; what are the reasons for using Class Web when performing original or copy cataloging; and what other resources do catalogers use for classification/subject heading analysis?
    Object
    Classification Web
  12. Peereboom, M.: Dwerg tussen reuzen? : het Nederlandse basisclassificatie Web (1997) 0.01
    0.008943276 = product of:
      0.08496112 = sum of:
        0.04248056 = weight(_text_:web in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04248056 = score(doc=515,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
        0.04248056 = weight(_text_:web in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04248056 = score(doc=515,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    Developments in electronic communication technology have meda online databases a normal part of library collections. To provide users with direct access to Internet resources the Dutch Royal Library has cooperated with several university libraries in the Netherlands to develop the Nederlandse Basisclassificatie Web. Subject specialists select sources, add English summaries and NBW code, and input them to the online database. A Web desk and training workshops have been provided to assist users, and improvements to the system will simplify search procedures
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: A dwarf amongst giants?: the Dutch Basic classification of Web resources
  13. Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996) 0.01
    0.008570474 = product of:
      0.0814195 = sum of:
        0.04070975 = weight(_text_:web in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04070975 = score(doc=5698,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
        0.04070975 = weight(_text_:web in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04070975 = score(doc=5698,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the shortcomings of search engines for the WWW comparing their current capabilities to those of the first generation CD-ROM products. Some allow phrase searching and most are improving their Boolean searching. Few allow truncation, wild cards or nested logic. They are stateless, losing previous search criteria. Unlike the indexing and classification systems for today's CD-ROMs, those for Web pages are random, unstructured and of variable quality. Considers that at best Web search engines can only offer free text searching. Discusses whether automatic data classification systems such as Infoseek Ultra can overcome the haphazard nature of the Web with neural network technology, and whether Boolean search techniques may be redundant when replaced by technology such as the Euroferret search engine. However, artificial intelligence is rarely successful on huge, varied databases. Relevance ranking and automatic query expansion still use the same simple inverted indexes. Most Web search engines do nothing more than word counting. Further complications arise with foreign languages
  14. Lin, Z.Y.: Classification practice and implications for subject directories of the Chinese language Web-based digital library (2000) 0.01
    0.007665664 = product of:
      0.07282381 = sum of:
        0.036411904 = weight(_text_:web in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036411904 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
        0.036411904 = weight(_text_:web in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036411904 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
  15. Saeed, H.; Chaudry, A.S.: Potential of bibliographic tools to organize knowledge on the Internet : the use of Dewey Decimal classification scheme for organizing Web-based information resources (2001) 0.01
    0.007665664 = product of:
      0.07282381 = sum of:
        0.036411904 = weight(_text_:web in 6739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036411904 = score(doc=6739,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 6739, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6739)
        0.036411904 = weight(_text_:web in 6739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036411904 = score(doc=6739,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 6739, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6739)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    Possibilities are being explored to use traditional bibliographic tools, like Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), Library of Congress Classification (LCC), Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), to improve the organization of information resources on the Internet. The most recent edition of DDC, with its enhanced features, has greater potential than other traditional approaches. A review of selected Web sites that use DDC to organize Web resources indicates, however, that the full potential of the DDC scheme for this purpose has not been realized. While the review found that the DDC classification structure was more effective when compared with other knowledge organization systems, we conclude that DDC needs to be further enhanced to make it more suitable for this application. As widely reported in the professional literature, OCLC has conducted research on the potential of DDC for organizing Web resources. Such research, however, is experimental and should be supplemented by empirical studies with user participation.
  16. Robbins, F.: ¬An exploration of the application of classification systems as a method for resource delivery on the World Wide Web (1999) 0.01
    0.007665664 = product of:
      0.07282381 = sum of:
        0.036411904 = weight(_text_:web in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036411904 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.036411904 = weight(_text_:web in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036411904 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
  17. Dumais, S.; Chen, H.: Hierarchical classification of Web content (2000) 0.01
    0.007665664 = product of:
      0.07282381 = sum of:
        0.036411904 = weight(_text_:web in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036411904 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
        0.036411904 = weight(_text_:web in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036411904 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
  18. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.007404145 = product of:
      0.04689292 = sum of:
        0.018205952 = weight(_text_:web in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018205952 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
        0.018205952 = weight(_text_:web in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018205952 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
        0.010481017 = product of:
          0.020962033 = sum of:
            0.020962033 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020962033 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  19. Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: Ranganathan and the Net : using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web (1999) 0.01
    0.00663866 = product of:
      0.06306727 = sum of:
        0.031533636 = weight(_text_:web in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031533636 = score(doc=726,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
        0.031533636 = weight(_text_:web in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031533636 = score(doc=726,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives a cheerfully brief and undetailed account of how to make a faceted classification system, then describes information retrieval and searching on the web. It concludes by saying that facets would be excellent in helping users search and browse the web, but offers no real clues as to how this can be done.
  20. Vizine-Goetz, D.: NetLab / OCLC collaboration seeks to improve Web searching (1999) 0.01
    0.0063880538 = product of:
      0.06068651 = sum of:
        0.030343255 = weight(_text_:web in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030343255 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
        0.030343255 = weight(_text_:web in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030343255 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    

Languages

  • e 60
  • d 14
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…