Search (36 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Mandel, C.: ¬A computer age classification : implications for library practice (1989) 0.02
    0.016313914 = product of:
      0.114197396 = sum of:
        0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057098698 = score(doc=969,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 969, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=969)
        0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057098698 = score(doc=969,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 969, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=969)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
  2. Svenonius, E.: Use of classification in online retrieval (1983) 0.02
    0.015380906 = product of:
      0.107666336 = sum of:
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  3. Markey, K.: Class number searching in an experimental online catalog (1986) 0.02
    0.015380906 = product of:
      0.107666336 = sum of:
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    International classification. 13(1986), S.142-150
  4. Huestis, J.C.: Clustering LC Classification numbers in an online catalog for improved browsability (1988) 0.02
    0.015380906 = product of:
      0.107666336 = sum of:
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  5. Williamson, N.J.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification : problems and prospects in online retrieval (1986) 0.02
    0.015380906 = product of:
      0.107666336 = sum of:
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=1905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=1905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  6. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Classification as an online retrieval tool : potentials and limitations (1986) 0.01
    0.013458293 = product of:
      0.09420805 = sum of:
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=1145,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=1145,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  7. Williamson, N.J.: Classification in online systems : research and the North American perspective (1985) 0.01
    0.013458293 = product of:
      0.09420805 = sum of:
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 1906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=1906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 1906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1906)
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 1906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=1906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 1906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1906)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  8. Cochrane, P.A.; Markey, K.: Preparing for the use of classification in online cataloging systems and in online catalogs (1985) 0.01
    0.013458293 = product of:
      0.09420805 = sum of:
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 2087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=2087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 2087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2087)
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 2087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=2087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 2087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2087)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  9. Williamson, N.J.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification in the computer age (1989) 0.01
    0.012897282 = product of:
      0.09028097 = sum of:
        0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045140486 = score(doc=2074,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
        0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045140486 = score(doc=2074,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Research leading to a detailed content analysis and profile of the Library of Congress Classification schedules. A description of the design, methodology, and preliminary findings of research in progress. Final results of the study are expected to aid the Library of Congress in the development of a MARC format for its classification schedules and in the conversion of the schedules into machine-readable form. LC's ultimate goal is the design of an integrated system which will permit on-line editing, maintenance, and control of the schedules, on-line classification and shelflisting procedures, the production of the schedules in two or more physical formats, and the use of LCC to enhance search capabilities in on-line catalogues.
    Source
    Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
  10. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing and classification : file organization and display for information retrieval (1989) 0.01
    0.009613066 = product of:
      0.06729146 = sum of:
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  11. Oberhauser, O.: Klassifikation in Online-Informationssystemen (1986) 0.01
    0.00576784 = product of:
      0.04037488 = sum of:
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=588)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=588)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    International classification. 13(1986), S.79-87
  12. Richmond, P.A.: Futuristic aspects of subject access (1983) 0.00
    0.004849789 = product of:
      0.067897044 = sum of:
        0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067897044 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  13. Markey, K.: Subject searching in library catalogs : Before and after the introduction of online catalogs (1984) 0.00
    0.004849789 = product of:
      0.067897044 = sum of:
        0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067897044 = score(doc=2284,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  14. Duncan, E.B.: Structuring knowledge bases for designers of learning materials (1989) 0.00
    0.004806533 = product of:
      0.03364573 = sum of:
        0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016822865 = score(doc=2478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
        0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016822865 = score(doc=2478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  15. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A faceted approach to hypertext (1989) 0.00
    0.004806533 = product of:
      0.03364573 = sum of:
        0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016822865 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
        0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016822865 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  16. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress class numbers in online catalog searching (1989) 0.00
    0.0034293185 = product of:
      0.048010457 = sum of:
        0.048010457 = weight(_text_:subject in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048010457 = score(doc=1146,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    In addition to using title keywords and subject headings for searching in the online catalog, the searcher may also use class numbers as access points. Library of Congress class or call numbers are particular effective in certain kinds of specific-item subject searching and serve as supplements to keywords and descriptors, improving precision and recall. Class number searching in the database can produce unique results because these numbers collect citations in ways that differ from those of keywords and descriptors