Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.06
    0.05711641 = product of:
      0.11423282 = sum of:
        0.11423282 = sum of:
          0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054454714 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05199731 = queryNorm
              0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.059778113 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059778113 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05199731 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  2. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.05
    0.04646246 = sum of:
      0.02532771 = product of:
        0.10131084 = sum of:
          0.10131084 = weight(_text_:authors in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10131084 = score(doc=3697,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05199731 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021134753 = product of:
        0.042269506 = sum of:
          0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042269506 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05199731 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
  3. Chandler, A.; LeBlanc, J.: Exploring the potential of a virtual undergraduate library collection based on the hierarchical interface to LC Classification (2006) 0.04
    0.03904415 = sum of:
      0.017909396 = product of:
        0.071637586 = sum of:
          0.071637586 = weight(_text_:authors in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.071637586 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05199731 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021134753 = product of:
        0.042269506 = sum of:
          0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042269506 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05199731 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Hierarchical Interface to Library of Congress Classification (HILCC) is a system developed by the Columbia University Library to leverage call number data from the MARC holdings records in Columbia's online catalog to create a structured, hierarchical menuing system that provides subject access to the library's electronic resources. In this paper, the authors describe a research initiative at the Cornell University Library to discover if the Columbia HILCC scheme can be used as developed or in modified form to create a virtual undergraduate print collection outside the context of the traditional online catalog. Their results indicate that, with certain adjustments, an HILCC model can indeed, be used to represent the holdings of a large research library's undergraduate collection of approximately 150,000 titles, but that such a model is not infinitely scalable and may require a new approach to browsing such a large information space.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Satyapal, B.G.; Satyapal, N.S.: SATSAN AUTOMATRIX Version 1 : a computer programme for synthesis of Colon class number according to the postulational approach (2006) 0.04
    0.03761396 = sum of:
      0.014924496 = product of:
        0.059697986 = sum of:
          0.059697986 = weight(_text_:authors in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059697986 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05199731 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.022689465 = product of:
        0.04537893 = sum of:
          0.04537893 = weight(_text_:l in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04537893 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05199731 = queryNorm
              0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the features und capabilities of the software SATSAN AUTOMATRIX version 1 for semi-automatic synthesis of Colon Class number (CCN) for a given subject according to the Postulational Approach formulated by S.R. Ranganathan. The present Auto-Matrix version l gives the user more facilities to carry out facet analysis of a subject (simple, compound. or complex) preparatory to synthesizing the corresponding CCN. The software also enables searching for and using previously constructed class numbers automatically, maintenance and use of databases of CC Index, facet formulae and CC schedules for subjects going with different Basic Subjects. The paper begins with a brief account of the authors' consultations with und directions received from. Prof A. Neelameghan in the course of developing the software. Oracle 8 and VB6 have been used in writing the programmes. But for operating SATSAN it is not necessary for users to he proficient in VB6 and Oracle 8 languages. Any computer literate with the basic knowledge of Microsoft Word will he able to use this application software.
  5. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.03
    0.031765252 = product of:
      0.063530505 = sum of:
        0.063530505 = product of:
          0.12706101 = sum of:
            0.12706101 = weight(_text_:l in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12706101 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.6147977 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.03
    0.028179672 = product of:
      0.056359343 = sum of:
        0.056359343 = product of:
          0.11271869 = sum of:
            0.11271869 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11271869 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  7. Schwaninger, L.: Hierarchiebildung bei numerischer Indexierung : schnellerer Zugang zum Wissen mit einer online abfragbaren DK (1996) 0.02
    0.022689465 = product of:
      0.04537893 = sum of:
        0.04537893 = product of:
          0.09075786 = sum of:
            0.09075786 = weight(_text_:l in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09075786 = score(doc=298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.02
    0.021134753 = product of:
      0.042269506 = sum of:
        0.042269506 = product of:
          0.08453901 = sum of:
            0.08453901 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08453901 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  9. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.02
    0.017612295 = product of:
      0.03522459 = sum of:
        0.03522459 = product of:
          0.07044918 = sum of:
            0.07044918 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07044918 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
  10. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.02
    0.017612295 = product of:
      0.03522459 = sum of:
        0.03522459 = product of:
          0.07044918 = sum of:
            0.07044918 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07044918 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  11. Adcock, L.: Building a virtual music library : towards a convergence of classification within Internet-based catalogues (2001) 0.02
    0.015882626 = product of:
      0.031765252 = sum of:
        0.031765252 = product of:
          0.063530505 = sum of:
            0.063530505 = weight(_text_:l in 6955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063530505 = score(doc=6955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 6955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6955)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001) 0.02
    0.015487488 = sum of:
      0.00844257 = product of:
        0.03377028 = sum of:
          0.03377028 = weight(_text_:authors in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03377028 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05199731 = queryNorm
              0.14246294 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.007044918 = product of:
        0.014089836 = sum of:
          0.014089836 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014089836 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05199731 = queryNorm
              0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 1.2004 10:35:22
    Footnote
    AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
    Discussion The proceedings of the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment give some insights. However, the depth of analysis and discussion is very uneven across the papers. Some of the papers have substantive research content while others appear to be notes used in the oral presentation. The treatments of the topics are very general in nature. Some papers have a very limited list of references while others have no bibliography. No index has been provided. The transfer of bibliographic knowledge organization theory to the digital environment is an important topic. However, as the papers at this conference have shown, it is also a difficult task. Of the 18 papers presented at this seminar an classification in the digital environment, only 4-5 papers actually deal directly with this important topic. The remaining papers deal with issues that are more or less relevant to classification in the digital environment without explicitly discussing the relation. The reason could be that the authors take up issues in knowledge organization that still need to be investigated and clarified before their application in the digital environment can be considered. Nonetheless, one wishes that the knowledge organization community would discuss the application of classification theory in the digital environment in greater detail. It is obvious from the comparisons of the classificatory structures of bibliographic classification systems and Web directories that these are different and that they probably should be different, since they serve different purposes. Interesting questions in the transformation of bibliographic classification theories to the digital environment are: "Given the existing principles in bibliographic knowledge organization, what are the optimum principles for organization of information, irrespectively of context?" and "What are the fundamental theoretical and practical principles for the construction of Web directories?" Unfortunately, the papers presented at this seminar do not attempt to answer or discuss these questions."
  13. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.01
    0.014089836 = product of:
      0.028179672 = sum of:
        0.028179672 = product of:
          0.056359343 = sum of:
            0.056359343 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056359343 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  14. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01
    0.014089836 = product of:
      0.028179672 = sum of:
        0.028179672 = product of:
          0.056359343 = sum of:
            0.056359343 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056359343 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  15. Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003) 0.01
    0.014089836 = product of:
      0.028179672 = sum of:
        0.028179672 = product of:
          0.056359343 = sum of:
            0.056359343 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056359343 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
  16. Spiteri, L.: ¬A simplified model for facet analysis : Ranganathan 101 (1998) 0.01
    0.0136136785 = product of:
      0.027227357 = sum of:
        0.027227357 = product of:
          0.054454714 = sum of:
            0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054454714 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Lee, H.-L.; Olson, H.A.: Hierarchical navigation : an exploration of Yahoo! directories (2005) 0.01
    0.0136136785 = product of:
      0.027227357 = sum of:
        0.027227357 = product of:
          0.054454714 = sum of:
            0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054454714 = score(doc=3991,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Gnoli, C.; Pusterla, L.; Bendiscioli, A.; Recinella, C.: Classification for collections mapping and query expansion (2016) 0.01
    0.0136136785 = product of:
      0.027227357 = sum of:
        0.027227357 = product of:
          0.054454714 = sum of:
            0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054454714 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Lima, G.A. de; Castro, I.R.: Uso da classificacao decimal universal para a recuperacao da informacao em ambientes digitas : uma revisao sistematica da literatura (2021) 0.01
    0.012924994 = product of:
      0.025849989 = sum of:
        0.025849989 = product of:
          0.103399955 = sum of:
            0.103399955 = weight(_text_:authors in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.103399955 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge Organization Systems, even traditional ones, such as the Universal Decimal Classification, have been studied to improve the retrieval of information online, although the potential of using knowledge structures in the user interface has not yet been widespread. Objective: This study presents a mapping of scientific production on information retrieval methodologies, which make use of the Universal Decimal Classification. Methodology: Systematic Literature Review, conducted in two stages, with a selection of 44 publications, resulting in the time interval from 1964 to 2017, whose categories analyzed were: most productive authors, languages of publications, types of document, year of publication, most cited work, major impact journal, and thematic categories covered in the publications. Results: A total of nine more productive authors and co-authors were found; predominance of the English language (42 publications); works published in the format of journal articles (33); and highlight to the year 2007 (eight publications). In addition, it was identified that the most cited work was by Mcilwaine (1997), with 61 citations, and the journal Extensions & Corrections to the UDC was the one with the largest number of publications, in addition to the incidence of the theme Universal Automation linked to a thesaurus for information retrieval, present in 19 works. Conclusions: Shortage of studies that explore the potential of the Decimal Classification, especially in Brazilian literature, which highlights the need for further study on the topic, involving research at the national and international levels.
  20. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.01
    0.012328606 = product of:
      0.024657212 = sum of:
        0.024657212 = product of:
          0.049314424 = sum of:
            0.049314424 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049314424 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05199731 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22

Years

Languages

  • e 35
  • d 7
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 37
  • el 5
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Classifications