Search (54 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.05
    0.046561513 = sum of:
      0.025381705 = product of:
        0.10152682 = sum of:
          0.10152682 = weight(_text_:authors in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10152682 = score(doc=3697,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021179808 = product of:
        0.042359617 = sum of:
          0.042359617 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042359617 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
  2. Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017) 0.05
    0.04575026 = product of:
      0.09150052 = sum of:
        0.09150052 = sum of:
          0.049140904 = weight(_text_:i in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049140904 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
          0.042359617 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042359617 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
    Location
    I
  3. Travis, I.: Faceted classification in an online environment (1982) 0.04
    0.042557273 = product of:
      0.085114546 = sum of:
        0.085114546 = product of:
          0.17022909 = sum of:
            0.17022909 = weight(_text_:i in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17022909 = score(doc=40,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.86613876 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  4. Chandler, A.; LeBlanc, J.: Exploring the potential of a virtual undergraduate library collection based on the hierarchical interface to LC Classification (2006) 0.04
    0.039127383 = sum of:
      0.017947575 = product of:
        0.0717903 = sum of:
          0.0717903 = weight(_text_:authors in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0717903 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021179808 = product of:
        0.042359617 = sum of:
          0.042359617 = weight(_text_:22 in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042359617 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Hierarchical Interface to Library of Congress Classification (HILCC) is a system developed by the Columbia University Library to leverage call number data from the MARC holdings records in Columbia's online catalog to create a structured, hierarchical menuing system that provides subject access to the library's electronic resources. In this paper, the authors describe a research initiative at the Cornell University Library to discover if the Columbia HILCC scheme can be used as developed or in modified form to create a virtual undergraduate print collection outside the context of the traditional online catalog. Their results indicate that, with certain adjustments, an HILCC model can indeed, be used to represent the holdings of a large research library's undergraduate collection of approximately 150,000 titles, but that such a model is not infinitely scalable and may require a new approach to browsing such a large information space.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001) 0.04
    0.03896074 = sum of:
      0.008460568 = product of:
        0.033842273 = sum of:
          0.033842273 = weight(_text_:authors in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033842273 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.14246294 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.030500174 = sum of:
        0.0163803 = weight(_text_:i in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0163803 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05210816 = queryNorm
            0.083344236 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.014119873 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014119873 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05210816 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
    
    Date
    2. 1.2004 10:35:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.1, S.40-42 (J.-E. Mai): "Introduction: This is a collection of papers presented at the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment held in Bangalore, India, an August 9-11 2001. The collection contains 18 papers dealing with various issues related to knowledge organization and classification theory. The issue of transferring the knowledge, traditions, and theories of bibliographic classification to the digital environment is an important one, and I was excited to learn that proceedings from this seminar were available. Many of us experience frustration an a daily basis due to poorly constructed Web search mechanisms and Web directories. As a community devoted to making information easily accessible we have something to offer the Web community and a seminar an the topic was indeed much needed. Below are brief summaries of the 18 papers presented at the seminar. The order of the summaries follows the order of the papers in the proceedings. The titles of the paper are given in parentheses after the author's name. AHUJA and WESLEY (From "Subject" to "Need": Shift in Approach to Classifying Information an the Internet/Web) argue that traditional bibliographic classification systems fall in the digital environment. One problem is that bibliographic classification systems have been developed to organize library books an shelves and as such are unidimensional and tied to the paper-based environment. Another problem is that they are "subject" oriented in the sense that they assume a relatively stable universe of knowledge containing basic and fixed compartments of knowledge that can be identified and represented. Ahuja and Wesley suggest that classification in the digital environment should be need-oriented instead of subjectoriented ("One important link that binds knowledge and human being is his societal need. ... Hence, it will be ideal to organise knowledge based upon need instead of subject." (p. 10)).
    AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
    Discussion The proceedings of the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment give some insights. However, the depth of analysis and discussion is very uneven across the papers. Some of the papers have substantive research content while others appear to be notes used in the oral presentation. The treatments of the topics are very general in nature. Some papers have a very limited list of references while others have no bibliography. No index has been provided. The transfer of bibliographic knowledge organization theory to the digital environment is an important topic. However, as the papers at this conference have shown, it is also a difficult task. Of the 18 papers presented at this seminar an classification in the digital environment, only 4-5 papers actually deal directly with this important topic. The remaining papers deal with issues that are more or less relevant to classification in the digital environment without explicitly discussing the relation. The reason could be that the authors take up issues in knowledge organization that still need to be investigated and clarified before their application in the digital environment can be considered. Nonetheless, one wishes that the knowledge organization community would discuss the application of classification theory in the digital environment in greater detail. It is obvious from the comparisons of the classificatory structures of bibliographic classification systems and Web directories that these are different and that they probably should be different, since they serve different purposes. Interesting questions in the transformation of bibliographic classification theories to the digital environment are: "Given the existing principles in bibliographic knowledge organization, what are the optimum principles for organization of information, irrespectively of context?" and "What are the fundamental theoretical and practical principles for the construction of Web directories?" Unfortunately, the papers presented at this seminar do not attempt to answer or discuss these questions."
  6. Sandner, M.; Jahns, Y.: Kurzbericht zum DDC-Übersetzer- und Anwendertreffen bei der IFLA-Konferenz 2005 in Oslo, Norwegen (2005) 0.04
    0.03573206 = product of:
      0.07146412 = sum of:
        0.07146412 = sum of:
          0.028665528 = weight(_text_:i in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028665528 = score(doc=4406,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.14585242 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
          0.04279859 = weight(_text_:22 in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04279859 = score(doc=4406,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.23454636 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Am 16. August 2005 fand in Oslo im Rahmen der heurigen IFLA-Konferenz das alljährliche Treffen der DDC-Übersetzer und der weltweiten DeweyAnwender-Institutionen (Nationalbibliotheken, Ersteller von Nationalbibliografien) statt. Die im Sommer 2005 bereits abgeschlossene deutsche Übersetzung wird in der Druckfassung Ende des Jahres in 4 Bänden vorliegen, beim K. G. Saur Verlag in München erscheinen (ISBN 3-598-11651-9) und 2006 vom ebenfalls erstmals ins Deutsche übersetzten DDC-Lehrbuch (ISBN 3-598-11748-5) begleitet. Pläne für neu startende Übersetzungen der DDC 22 gibt es für folgende Sprachen: Arabisch (mit der wachsenden Notwendigkeit, Klasse 200 Religion zu revidieren), Französisch (es erschien zuletzt eine neue Kurzausgabe 14, nun werden eine vierbändige Druckausgabe und eine frz. Webversion anvisiert), Schwedisch, Vietnamesisch (hierfür wird eine an die Sprache und Schrift angepasste Version des deutschen Übersetzungstools zum Einsatz kommen).
    Das Neueste zuerst Die Herausgeber der DDC präsentierten eine neue Informationsplattform "025.431: The Dewey blog"; seit Anfang Juli erreichbar unter http://ddc.typepad.com/. Neu ist auch der fünfsprachige, mit einem Farbleitsystem ausgestattete "DeweyBrowser" von OCLC; der Protoyp führt bereits in einen Katalog von 125.000 e-books und kann unter http://ddcresearch.oclc.org ,i ebooks/fileServer erprobt werden. OCLC bietet seit April 2005 eine neue Current Awareness-Schiene zur DDC mit unterschiedlichen Schwerpunkten an: Dewey Mappings, Dewey News, DeweyTips, Dewey Updates, Deweyjournal (letzteres fängt Themen aus allen 4 Teilbereichen auf); zu subskribieren unter http://www.oclc.org/dewey/syndicated/rss.htm. Wichtig für Freihandaufstellungen Die Segmentierung von Dewey-Notationen wurde reduziert! Ab September 2005 vergibt LoC nur noch ein einziges Segmentierungszeichen, und zwar an der Stelle, an der die jeweilige Notation in der englischen Kurzausgabe endet. Der Beginn einer Teilnotation aus Hilfstafel 1: Standardunterteilungen, wird also nun nicht mehr markiert. Für die Bildung von Standortsignaturen bietet sich das Dewey Cutter Programm an; Downloaden unter www.oclc.org/dewey/support/program.
    Allgemein DDC 22 ist im Gegensatz zu den früheren Neuauflagen der Standard Edition eine Ausgabe ohne generelle Überarbeitung einer gesamten Klasse. Sie enthält jedoch zahlreiche Änderungen und Expansionen in fast allen Disziplinen und in vielen Hilfstafeln. Es erschien auch eine Sonderausgabe der Klasse 200, Religion. In der aktuellen Kurzausgabe der DDC 22 (14, aus 2004) sind all diese Neuerungen berücksichtigt. Auch die elektronische Version exisitiert in einer vollständigen (WebDewey) und in einer KurzVariante (Abridged WebDewey) und ist immer auf dem jüngsten Stand der Klassifikation. Ein Tutorial für die Nutzung von WebDewey steht unter www.oclc.org /dewey/ resourcesitutorial zur Verfügung. Der Index enthält in dieser elektronischen Fassung weit mehr zusammengesetzte Notationen und verbale Sucheinstiege (resultierend aus den Titeldaten des "WorldCat") als die Druckausgabe, sowie Mappings zu den aktuellsten Normdatensätzen aus LCSH und McSH. Aktuell Die personelle Zusammensetzung des EPC (Editorial Policy Committee) hat sich im letzten Jahr verändert. Dieses oberste Gremium der DDC hat Prioritäten für den aktuellen Arbeitsplan festgelegt. Es wurde vereinbart, größere Änderungsvorhaben via Dewey-Website künftig wie in einem Stellungnahmeverfahren zur fachlichen Diskussion zu stellen. www.oclc.org/dewey/discussion/."
  7. Cochrane, P.A.: Classification as a user's tool in online public access catalogs (1982) 0.03
    0.03474787 = product of:
      0.06949574 = sum of:
        0.06949574 = product of:
          0.13899148 = sum of:
            0.13899148 = weight(_text_:i in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13899148 = score(doc=11,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.70719934 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6. - 2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  8. Borko, H.: ¬The role of classification in online retrieval systems and automated libraries (1982) 0.03
    0.03474787 = product of:
      0.06949574 = sum of:
        0.06949574 = product of:
          0.13899148 = sum of:
            0.13899148 = weight(_text_:i in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13899148 = score(doc=37,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.70719934 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  9. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.03
    0.028239746 = product of:
      0.05647949 = sum of:
        0.05647949 = product of:
          0.11295898 = sum of:
            0.11295898 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11295898 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  10. Yu, N.: Readings & Web resources for faceted classification 0.02
    0.021278637 = product of:
      0.042557273 = sum of:
        0.042557273 = product of:
          0.085114546 = sum of:
            0.085114546 = weight(_text_:i in 4394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085114546 = score(doc=4394,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.43306938 = fieldWeight in 4394, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4394)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The term "facet" has been used in various places, while in most cases it is just a buzz word to replace what is indeed "aspect" or "category". The references below either define and explain the original concept of facet or provide guidelines for building 'real' faceted search/browse. I was interested in faceted classification because it seems to be a natural and efficient way for organizing and browsing Web collections. However, to automatically generate facets and their isolates is extremely difficult since it involves concept extraction and concept grouping, both of which are difficult problems by themselves. And it is almost impossible to achieve mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive 'true' facets without human judgment. Nowadays, faceted search/browse widely exists, implicitly or explicitly, on a majority of retail websites due to the multi-aspects nature of the data. However, it is still rarely seen on any digital library sites. (I could be wrong since I haven't kept myself updated with this field for a while.)
  11. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.02
    0.021179808 = product of:
      0.042359617 = sum of:
        0.042359617 = product of:
          0.08471923 = sum of:
            0.08471923 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08471923 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  12. Zimmermann, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment (1996) 0.02
    0.020475375 = product of:
      0.04095075 = sum of:
        0.04095075 = product of:
          0.0819015 = sum of:
            0.0819015 = weight(_text_:i in 1243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0819015 = score(doc=1243,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 1243, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1243)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Propozycje i Materialy; 6
  13. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.02
    0.01764984 = product of:
      0.03529968 = sum of:
        0.03529968 = product of:
          0.07059936 = sum of:
            0.07059936 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07059936 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
  14. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.02
    0.01764984 = product of:
      0.03529968 = sum of:
        0.03529968 = product of:
          0.07059936 = sum of:
            0.07059936 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07059936 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  15. König, G.: Online-Retrieval mit der Dezimalklassifikation? (1986) 0.02
    0.0163803 = product of:
      0.0327606 = sum of:
        0.0327606 = product of:
          0.0655212 = sum of:
            0.0655212 = weight(_text_:i in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0655212 = score(doc=670,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Klassifikation als Werkzeug der Lehre und Forschung. Hrsg.: I. Dahlberg
  16. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.01
    0.014976388 = product of:
      0.029952776 = sum of:
        0.029952776 = product of:
          0.05990555 = sum of:
            0.05990555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05990555 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  17. New roles for classification in libraries and information networks : presentations and reports from the 36th Allerton Institute, Oct. 23-25, 1994 (1995) 0.01
    0.014478277 = product of:
      0.028956555 = sum of:
        0.028956555 = product of:
          0.05791311 = sum of:
            0.05791311 = weight(_text_:i in 6049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05791311 = score(doc=6049,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 6049, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge; COCHRANE, P.A.: New roles for classification in libraries and information networks; CHAN, L.M.: Classification, present and future; MOLHOLP, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the information superhighway; DAHLBERG, I.: The future of classification in libraries and networks: a theoretical point of view; MITCHELL, J.: DDC21 and beyond: the Dewey Decimal Classification prepares for the future; McILWAINE, I.: Preparing traditional classifications for the future: Universal Decimal Classification; COATES, E.J.: BC2 and BSO: presentation at the 36th Allerton Institue, 1994 Session of preparing traditional classifications for the future; HILL, J.S.: Calssification: an administrative perspective; WYLY, B.: What lies ahead for classification in information networks? Report of a panel discussion; ZIADIE, A.M.: Classification in libraries and networks abroad: report of a panel discussion; LINCICUM, S.: Critical appraisal of the use of classification in the future - non-traditional uses of classification: report of a panel discussion; THOMAS, A.R.S.: New roles for classification in libraries and information networks: an excerpt bibliography; BROADBENT, E.: Classification access in the online catalog
  18. Santoro, M.; Spinelli, S.: Non solo numeri (1995) 0.01
    0.014332764 = product of:
      0.028665528 = sum of:
        0.028665528 = product of:
          0.057331055 = sum of:
            0.057331055 = weight(_text_:i in 3124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057331055 = score(doc=3124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 3124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    i
  19. Olson, H.A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (2001) 0.01
    0.014332764 = product of:
      0.028665528 = sum of:
        0.028665528 = product of:
          0.057331055 = sum of:
            0.057331055 = weight(_text_:i in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057331055 = score(doc=6113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.4, S.206-208 (C. Arsenault):"Overall, this is an excellent work, on an ever increasingly pertinent topic. This long-awaited second edition provides a thorough and comprehensive update of an already important text. I very highly recommend it to professionals and academics alike ; both neophytes and veterans will find it valuable. It is a fundamental work that cannot be ignored in the field of subject analysis and retrieval for all bibliographic systems, including online catalogs."
  20. ¬The UDC : Essays for a new decade (1990) 0.01
    0.014332764 = product of:
      0.028665528 = sum of:
        0.028665528 = product of:
          0.057331055 = sum of:
            0.057331055 = weight(_text_:i in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057331055 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: STRACHAN, P.D.: UDC revision work in FID; SCIBOR, E. u. I.S. SHCHERBINA-SAMOJLOVA: A strategic approach to to revising the UDC; MCILWAINE, I.: The work of the system development task force; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: The UDC: its future; HAARALA, A.-R.: FID pre-conference seminar on computer applications of the UDC; LOTH, K. u. H. FUNK: Subject search on ETHICS on the basis of the UDC; KURHULA, P.: Use and usability of the UDC in classification practice and online retrieval; RINNE, B.: HELECON system: economics databases; NAKAMURA, Y. u. T. ISHIKAWA: Expert systems for automatic UDC number assignment; RIESTHUIS, G.J.A. u. S. BLIEDUNG: Thesaurification of UDC: preliminary report

Years

Languages

  • e 44
  • d 8
  • i 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types