-
Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996)
0.02
0.023567071 = product of:
0.094268285 = sum of:
0.094268285 = weight(_text_:logic in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094268285 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.3997668 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the shortcomings of search engines for the WWW comparing their current capabilities to those of the first generation CD-ROM products. Some allow phrase searching and most are improving their Boolean searching. Few allow truncation, wild cards or nested logic. They are stateless, losing previous search criteria. Unlike the indexing and classification systems for today's CD-ROMs, those for Web pages are random, unstructured and of variable quality. Considers that at best Web search engines can only offer free text searching. Discusses whether automatic data classification systems such as Infoseek Ultra can overcome the haphazard nature of the Web with neural network technology, and whether Boolean search techniques may be redundant when replaced by technology such as the Euroferret search engine. However, artificial intelligence is rarely successful on huge, varied databases. Relevance ranking and automatic query expansion still use the same simple inverted indexes. Most Web search engines do nothing more than word counting. Further complications arise with foreign languages
-
Gödert, W.: Facet classification in online retrieval (1991)
0.02
0.019639226 = product of:
0.0785569 = sum of:
0.0785569 = weight(_text_:logic in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0785569 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.333139 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- "Online retrieval" conjures up a very different mental image now than in 1991, the year this article was written, and the year Tim Berners-Lee first revealed the new hypertext system he called the World Wide Web. Gödert shows that truncation and Boolean logic, combined with notation from a faceted classification system, will be a powerful way of searching for information. It undoubtedly is, but no system built now would require a user searching for material on "nervous systems of bone fish" to enter "Fdd$ and Leaa$". This is worth reading for someone interested in seeing how searching and facets can go together, but the web has made this article quite out of date.
-
Broughton, V.: Finding Bliss on the Web : some problems of representing faceted terminologies in digital environments
0.02
0.015633164 = product of:
0.062532656 = sum of:
0.062532656 = product of:
0.18759796 = sum of:
0.18759796 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18759796 = score(doc=3532,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27972588 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.6706493 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The Bliss Bibliographic Classification is the only example of a fully faceted general classification scheme in the Western world. Although it is the object of much interest as a model for other tools it suffers from the lack of a web presence, and remedying this is an immediate objective for its editors. Understanding how this might be done presents some challenges, as the scheme is semantically very rich and complex in the range and nature of the relationships it contains. The automatic management of these is already in place using local software, but exporting this to a common data format needs careful thought and planning. Various encoding schemes, both for traditional classifications, and for digital materials, represent variously: the concepts; their functional roles; and the relationships between them. Integrating these aspects in a coherent and interchangeable manner appears to be achievable, but the most appropriate format is as yet unclear.
-
Broughton, V.; Lane, H.: ¬The Bliss Bibliographic Classification in action : moving from a special to a universal faceted classification via a digital platform (2004)
0.01
0.013027637 = product of:
0.05211055 = sum of:
0.05211055 = product of:
0.15633164 = sum of:
0.15633164 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15633164 = score(doc=2633,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27972588 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 2633, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2633)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the differences in the functional requirements of a faceted classification system when used in a conventional print-based environment (where the emphasis is on the browse function of the classification) as compared to its application to digital collections (where the retrieval function is paramount). The use of the second edition of Bliss's Bibliographic Classification (BC2) as a general classification for the physical organization of undergraduate collections in the University of Cambridge is described. The development of an online tool for indexing of digital resources using the Bliss terminologies is also described, and the advantages of facet analysis for data structuring and system syntax within the prototype tool are discussed. The move from the print-based environment to the digital makes different demands an both the content and the syntax of the classification, and while the conceptual structure remains similar, manipulation of the scheme and the process of content description can be markedly different.
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001)
0.01
0.013027637 = product of:
0.05211055 = sum of:
0.05211055 = product of:
0.15633164 = sum of:
0.15633164 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15633164 = score(doc=5895,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27972588 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
-
Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992)
0.01
0.011783536 = product of:
0.047134142 = sum of:
0.047134142 = weight(_text_:logic in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047134142 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.1998834 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This volume deals with both theoretical and empirical research in classification and encompasses universal classification systems, special classification systems, thesauri and the place of classification in a broad spectrum of document and information systems. Papers fall into one or three major areas as follows: 1) general principles and policies 2) structure and logic in classification; and empirical investigation; classification in the design of various types of document/information systems. The papers originate from the ISCCR '91 conference and have been selected according to the following criteria: relevance to the conference theme; importance of the topic in the representation and organization of knowledge; quality; and originality in terms of potential contribution to research and new knowledge.
-
Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004)
0.01
0.0110543175 = product of:
0.04421727 = sum of:
0.04421727 = product of:
0.1326518 = sum of:
0.1326518 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1326518 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27972588 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The paper analyses the importance of data presentation and modelling and its role in improving the management, use and exchange of analytico-synthetic classifications in automated systems. Inefficiencies, in this respect, hinder the automation of classification systems that offer the possibility of building compound index/search terms. The lack of machine readable data expressing the semantics and structure of a classification vocabulary has negative effects on information management and retrieval, thus restricting the potential of both automated systems and classifications themselves. The authors analysed the data representation structure of three general analytico-synthetic classification systems (BC2-Bliss Bibliographic Classification; BSO-Broad System of Ordering; UDC-Universal Decimal Classification) and put forward some core requirements for classification data representation
-
Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004)
0.01
0.0110543175 = product of:
0.04421727 = sum of:
0.04421727 = product of:
0.1326518 = sum of:
0.1326518 = weight(_text_:bliss in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1326518 = score(doc=831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27972588 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
-
Broughton, V.; Lane, H.: Classification schemes revisited : applications to Web indexing and searching (2000)
0.01
0.00921193 = product of:
0.03684772 = sum of:
0.03684772 = product of:
0.11054316 = sum of:
0.11054316 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11054316 = score(doc=2476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27972588 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Basic skills of classification and subject indexing have been little taught in British library schools since automation was introduced into libraries. However, development of the Internet as a major medium of publication has stretched the capability of search engines to cope with retrieval. Consequently, there has been interest in applying existing systems of knowledge organization to electronic resources. Unfortunately, the classification systems have been adopted without a full understanding of modern classification principles. Analytico-synthetic schemes have been used crudely, as in the case of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). The fully faceted Bliss Bibliographical Classification, 2nd edition (BC2) with its potential as a tool for electronic resource retrieval is virtually unknown outside academic libraries
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.01
0.007063862 = product of:
0.028255448 = sum of:
0.028255448 = product of:
0.08476634 = sum of:
0.08476634 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08476634 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.01
0.0052978965 = product of:
0.021191586 = sum of:
0.021191586 = product of:
0.06357475 = sum of:
0.06357475 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06357475 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
-
Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990)
0.00
0.004414914 = product of:
0.017659657 = sum of:
0.017659657 = product of:
0.052978966 = sum of:
0.052978966 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052978966 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 12:22:40
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009)
0.00
0.004414914 = product of:
0.017659657 = sum of:
0.017659657 = product of:
0.052978966 = sum of:
0.052978966 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052978966 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:54:24
-
Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010)
0.00
0.003746179 = product of:
0.014984716 = sum of:
0.014984716 = product of:
0.044954147 = sum of:
0.044954147 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044954147 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
- Date
- 22. 1.2010 15:06:54
-
Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003)
0.00
0.003531931 = product of:
0.014127724 = sum of:
0.014127724 = product of:
0.04238317 = sum of:
0.04238317 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238317 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 12:22:52
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.00
0.003531931 = product of:
0.014127724 = sum of:
0.014127724 = product of:
0.04238317 = sum of:
0.04238317 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238317 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
-
Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003)
0.00
0.003531931 = product of:
0.014127724 = sum of:
0.014127724 = product of:
0.04238317 = sum of:
0.04238317 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238317 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.00
0.0030904398 = product of:
0.012361759 = sum of:
0.012361759 = product of:
0.037085276 = sum of:
0.037085276 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037085276 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
-
Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998)
0.00
0.0030904398 = product of:
0.012361759 = sum of:
0.012361759 = product of:
0.037085276 = sum of:
0.037085276 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037085276 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998)
0.00
0.0030904398 = product of:
0.012361759 = sum of:
0.012361759 = product of:
0.037085276 = sum of:
0.037085276 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037085276 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 30.12.2001 16:22:41
