Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006) 0.05
    0.051662654 = product of:
      0.10332531 = sum of:
        0.10332531 = sum of:
          0.054103423 = weight(_text_:services in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054103423 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
          0.04922188 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04922188 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.2, S.129-137
  2. Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998) 0.04
    0.044282272 = product of:
      0.088564545 = sum of:
        0.088564545 = sum of:
          0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04637436 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042190183 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Creates an open, metadata aware system for distributed, collaborative WWW indexing. The system has 3 main components: a harvester (for collecting information), a database (for making the collection searchable), and a user interface (for making the information available). all components can be distributed across networked computers, thus supporting scalability. The system is metadata aware and thus allows searches on several fields including title, document author and URL. Nordic Web Index (NWI) is an application using this system to create a regional Nordic Web-indexing service. NWI is built using 5 collaborating service points within the Nordic countries. The NWI databases can be used to build additional services
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  3. Chandler, A.; LeBlanc, J.: Exploring the potential of a virtual undergraduate library collection based on the hierarchical interface to LC Classification (2006) 0.04
    0.044282272 = product of:
      0.088564545 = sum of:
        0.088564545 = sum of:
          0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04637436 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
          0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042190183 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.3, S.157-165
  4. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.04
    0.044282272 = product of:
      0.088564545 = sum of:
        0.088564545 = sum of:
          0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04637436 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042190183 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  5. Richmond, P.A.: Futuristic aspects of subject access (1983) 0.03
    0.03091624 = product of:
      0.06183248 = sum of:
        0.06183248 = product of:
          0.12366496 = sum of:
            0.12366496 = weight(_text_:services in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12366496 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.6490128 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 27(1983), S.88-93
  6. Svenonius, E.: Use of classification in online retrieval (1983) 0.03
    0.03091624 = product of:
      0.06183248 = sum of:
        0.06183248 = product of:
          0.12366496 = sum of:
            0.12366496 = weight(_text_:services in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12366496 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.6490128 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 27(1983), S.76-80
  7. Concise UNIMARC Classification Format : Draft 5 (20000125) (2000) 0.03
    0.03091624 = product of:
      0.06183248 = sum of:
        0.06183248 = product of:
          0.12366496 = sum of:
            0.12366496 = weight(_text_:services in 4421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12366496 = score(doc=4421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.6490128 = fieldWeight in 4421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.bl.uk/services/bsds/marc/unimarc.html
  8. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.03
    0.02812679 = product of:
      0.05625358 = sum of:
        0.05625358 = product of:
          0.11250716 = sum of:
            0.11250716 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11250716 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  9. Oberhauser, O.: Implementierung und Parametrisierung klassifikatorischer Recherchekomponenten im OPAC (2005) 0.03
    0.025831327 = product of:
      0.051662654 = sum of:
        0.051662654 = sum of:
          0.027051711 = weight(_text_:services in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027051711 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.14197156 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
          0.02461094 = weight(_text_:22 in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02461094 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Das in den letzten Jahren wiedererwachte Interesse an der klassifikatorischen Erschließung und Recherche hat sich allem Anschein nach noch nicht ausreichend bis zu den Herstellern integrierter Bibliothekssysteme herumgesprochen. Wie wäre es sonst zu erklären, dass im OPAC-Modul eines führenden Systems wie Aleph 500 so gut wie keine Features für klassifikationsbasierte Recherchen zu erblicken sind? Tatsächlich finden wir heute einen im Vergleich zum einstigen System Bibos kaum veränderten Zustand vor: Notationen eines oder mehrerer Klassifikationssysteme können in einer durch MAB dafür bestimmten Kategorie (700, nebst Indikatoren) katalogisiert und dann recherchiert bzw. angezeigt werden. Doch welcher Benutzer weiß schon, was diese Notationen im einzelnen bedeuten? Wer macht sich die Mühe, dies selbst herauszufinden, um dann danach zu recherchieren? Hier liegt im wesentlich dasselbe Problem vor, das schon dem systematischen Zettelkatalog anhaftete und ihn zu einem zwar mühevoll erstellten, aber wenig genutzten Rechercheinstrument machte, das nur dann (zwangsläufig) angenommen wurde, wenn ein verbaler Sachkatalog fehlte. Nun könnte eingewandt werden, dass im Vergleich zu früher unter Aleph 500 wenigstens das Aufblättern von Indizes möglich sei, sodass im OPAC ein Index für die vergebenen Notationen angeboten werden kann (bzw. mehrere solche Indizes bei Verwendung von mehr als nur einem Klassifikationssystem). Gewiss, doch was bringt dem Uneingeweihten das Aufblättern des Notationsindex - außer einer alphabetischen Liste von kryptischen Codes? Weiter könnte man einwenden, dass es im Aleph-500-OPAC die so genannten Suchdienste ("services") gibt, mithilfe derer von bestimmten Elementen einer Vollanzeige hypertextuell weiternavigiert werden kann. Richtig, doch damit kann man bloß wiederum den Index aufblättern oder alle anderen Werke anzeigen lassen, die dieselbe Notationen - also einen Code, dessen Bedeutung meist unbekannt ist - aufweisen. Wie populär mag dieses Feature beim Publikum wohl sein? Ein anderer Einwand wäre der Hinweis auf das inzwischen vom Hersteller angebotene Thesaurus-Modul, das vermutlich auch für Klassifikationssysteme eingesetzt werden könnte. Doch wie viele Bibliotheken unseres Verbundes waren bisher bereit, für dieses Modul, das man eigentlich als Bestandteil des Basissystems erwarten könnte, gesondert zu bezahlen? Schließlich mag man noch einwenden, dass es im Gegensatz zur Bibos-Zeit nun die Möglichkeit gibt, Systematiken und Klassifikationen als Normdateien zu implementieren und diese beim Retrieval für verbale Einstiege in die klassifikatorische Recherche oder zumindest für die Veranschaulichung der Klassenbenennungen in der Vollanzeige zu nutzen. Korrekt - dies ist möglich und wurde sogar einst für die MSC (Mathematics Subject Classification, auch bekannt als "AMS-Klassifikation") versucht. Dieses Projekt, das noch unter der Systemversion 11.5 begonnen wurde, geriet jedoch nach einiger Zeit ins Stocken und fand bedauerlicherweise nie seinen Weg in die folgende Version (14.2). Mag auch zu hoffen sein, dass es unter der neuen Version 16 wieder weitergeführt werden kann, so weist dieses Beispiel doch auf die grundsätzliche Problematik des Normdatei-Ansatzes (zusätzlicher Aufwand, Kontinuität) hin. Zudem lohnt sich die Implementierung einer eigenen Normdatei 4 wohl nur bei einem größeren bzw. komplexen Klassifikationssystem, wogegen man im Falle kleinerer Systematiken kaum daran denken würde.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.1, S.22-37
  10. Dunsire, G.: Digital decimals : Dewey and online libraries (2008) 0.02
    0.021861082 = product of:
      0.043722164 = sum of:
        0.043722164 = product of:
          0.08744433 = sum of:
            0.08744433 = weight(_text_:services in 2164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08744433 = score(doc=2164,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 2164, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper discusses practical methods of apply DDC to digital library services arising from recent technical developments. These include the use of DDC summaries to create hierarchical browsing and tag cloud interfaces, the utility of DDC as a switching language between different subject heading and classification schemes, and the development of terminology servers for interoperability with digital libraries. The focus is on services based in Europe.
  11. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.02
    0.021095091 = product of:
      0.042190183 = sum of:
        0.042190183 = product of:
          0.084380366 = sum of:
            0.084380366 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084380366 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  12. Panzer, M.: Towards the "webification" of controlled subject vocabulary : a case study involving the Dewey Decimal Classification (2007) 0.02
    0.019128447 = product of:
      0.038256895 = sum of:
        0.038256895 = product of:
          0.07651379 = sum of:
            0.07651379 = weight(_text_:services in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07651379 = score(doc=538,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The presentation will briefly introduce a series of major principles for bringing subject terminology to the network level. A closer look at one KOS in particular, the Dewey Decimal Classification, should help to gain more insight into the perceived difficulties and potential benefits of building taxonomy services out and on top of classic large-scale vocabularies or taxonomies.
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
  13. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.02
    0.017579244 = product of:
      0.03515849 = sum of:
        0.03515849 = product of:
          0.07031698 = sum of:
            0.07031698 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07031698 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
  14. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.02
    0.017579244 = product of:
      0.03515849 = sum of:
        0.03515849 = product of:
          0.07031698 = sum of:
            0.07031698 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07031698 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  15. Liu, S.; Svenonius, E.: DORS: DDC online retrieval system (1991) 0.02
    0.01545812 = product of:
      0.03091624 = sum of:
        0.03091624 = product of:
          0.06183248 = sum of:
            0.06183248 = weight(_text_:services in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06183248 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 35(1991), S.359-375
  16. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.01
    0.014916483 = product of:
      0.029832967 = sum of:
        0.029832967 = product of:
          0.059665933 = sum of:
            0.059665933 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059665933 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  17. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.01
    0.014063395 = product of:
      0.02812679 = sum of:
        0.02812679 = product of:
          0.05625358 = sum of:
            0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05625358 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  18. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01
    0.014063395 = product of:
      0.02812679 = sum of:
        0.02812679 = product of:
          0.05625358 = sum of:
            0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05625358 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  19. Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003) 0.01
    0.014063395 = product of:
      0.02812679 = sum of:
        0.02812679 = product of:
          0.05625358 = sum of:
            0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05625358 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
  20. Aluri, R.D.; Kemp, A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (1991) 0.01
    0.013525856 = product of:
      0.027051711 = sum of:
        0.027051711 = product of:
          0.054103423 = sum of:
            0.054103423 = weight(_text_:services in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054103423 = score(doc=863,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technical services quarterly. 9(1992) no.3, S.87-88 (H.L. Hoerman); Knowledge organization 20(1993) no.3, S.165-166 (O. Oberhauser); JASIS 44(1993) S.593 (D. Vizine-Goetz)

Years

Languages

  • e 36
  • d 6

Types

  • a 32
  • el 6
  • m 3
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…