Search (75 results, page 1 of 4)

0.14402573 = product of:
  0.43207717 = sum of:
    0.43207717 = weight(_text_:systematik in 4354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.43207717 = score(doc=4354,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        1.3500013 = fieldWeight in 4354, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4354)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Object

GHB-Systematik

0.12345062 = product of:
  0.37035185 = sum of:
    0.37035185 = weight(_text_:systematik in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37035185 = score(doc=4088,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        1.157144 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Die Systematik im OPAC: über das Instrumentarium zum Ordnen und Wiederfinden. Vorträge aus den bibliothekarischen Arbeitsgruppen der 16. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Dortmund 1992. Hrsg.: H.-J. Hermes u. H. Havekost

0.12345062 = product of:
  0.37035185 = sum of:
    0.37035185 = weight(_text_:systematik in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37035185 = score(doc=4772,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        1.157144 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

http://www.uni-kiel.de/ub/Faecher/Systematik/rotuli.html

0.10079702 = product of:
  0.30239105 = sum of:
    0.30239105 = weight(_text_:systematik in 1277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30239105 = score(doc=1277,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        0.94480413 = fieldWeight in 1277, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1277)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Die in ihren Grundzügen hierarchisch angelegte Aufstellungssystematik der Bibliothek der Universität Konstanz ist im Laufe der Zeit durch zahlreiche nicht-hierarchische Strukturen ergänzt worden, so dass ein heterogenes Gebilde entstanden ist. Außerdem kam der Wunsch nach Austauschbarkeit der Konstanzer Klassifikation mit anderen bibliothekarischen Einrichtungen auf. Aus diesen Gründen soll die Systematik nun bereinigt werden. Dazu wird als zentrales Werkzeug ein Diagnosealgorithmus benötigt, welcher sichtbar macht, wie weit die aktuelle Systematik von einem vorher zu definierenden, möglichst baumförmigen Idealzustand entfernt ist. In diesem Projekt ist ein solcher Algorithmus entwickelt und implementiert worden.

0.087292776 = product of:
  0.2618783 = sum of:
    0.2618783 = weight(_text_:systematik in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2618783 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        0.8182243 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Beschreibung der Möglichkeiten, die bei entsprechender Aufbereitung der Systematik für ein Retrieval im OPAC bereitgestellt werden könnten

0.087292776 = product of:
  0.2618783 = sum of:
    0.2618783 = weight(_text_:systematik in 6445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2618783 = score(doc=6445,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        0.8182243 = fieldWeight in 6445, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6445)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.072743975 = product of:
  0.21823192 = sum of:
    0.21823192 = weight(_text_:systematik in 6027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21823192 = score(doc=6027,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        0.6818536 = fieldWeight in 6027, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6027)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Object

HJV-Systematik

0.06172531 = product of:
  0.18517593 = sum of:
    0.18517593 = weight(_text_:systematik in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18517593 = score(doc=8,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        0.578572 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: LISCHEWSKY-WEISER, B.: Die Systematik im OPAC; GREINER, G.: Facettensysteme; LORENZ, B.: Überlegungen zur Aufstellungsklassifikation; HERMES, H.-J.: Dezimalklassifikation: zum gegenwärtigen Stand der UDK; TRAISER, W.: Die Deutsche Bibliothek: Schlagwort-Klassifikation und Conspectus; BIES, W.: Inhaltserschließung: Versuch einer bibliothekswissenschaftlichen Didaktik; RECKER-KOTULLA, I.: Die niederländische Basisklassifikation als Instrument der kooperativen Sacherschließung; JEDWABSKI, B. u. K. SCHRÖDER: UBOK: Der Dortmunder Universitätsbibliotheks-Online-Katalog; KOWALK, W.: Der Saarbrücker Sachkatalog nach der Methode Eppelsheimer im OPAC; NOHR, H.: Präkombination klassifikatorischer und verbaler Sacherschließungsdaten und ihr Potential im Information Retrieval

0.06172531 = product of:
  0.18517593 = sum of:
    0.18517593 = weight(_text_:systematik in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18517593 = score(doc=724,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        0.578572 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Der Beitrag berichtet über die Erstellung eines hierarchischen Browse- und Abfrage-Interfaces für die lokale Systematik der Bibliothek der Sigmund Freud Privatstiftung (Wien), deren Online-Katalog an der Zentrale des Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbundes (OBVSG) unter Aleph 500 geführt wird. Da dieses System selbst keinerlei Features für die klassifikatorische Recherche vorsieht, wurden 25 HTLM-Seiten in den OPAC integriert, die eine hierarchische Navigation auf den drei Ebenen der Systematik ermöglichen. Mittels eines wöchentlich automatisch eingesetzten Perl-Programms wird dabei auch angezeigt, mit welchen Treffermengen in der jeweiligen Klasse bzw. den zugehörigen Unterklassen (in etwa) zu rechnen ist; diese Anzeige ist ausserdem mit der unmittelbaren Suche nach den betreffenden Titeln verlinkt. Da vonseiten der Bibliothek lediglich die Notationen katalogisiert werden, erfolgt bei der Titel-Vollanzeige mittels einer JavaScript-basierten Umnutzung der Aleph-Funktion "Suchdienste" ebenfalls ein Link auf das hierarchische Interface, um die Bedeutung der jeweiligen Notation im systematischen Kontext zu veranschaulichen.

0.05092078 = product of:
  0.15276234 = sum of:
    0.15276234 = weight(_text_:systematik in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15276234 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        0.4772975 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Die ersten automatisierten Dokumentationsrecherchen basierten auf dem Vorhandensein von Suchwörtern in den bibliographischen Notizen. Um die Arbeit der Benutzer zu vereinfachen, wurden die Synonyme durch ein linguistisches Verfahren, und die benachbarten Begriffe durch eine Systematik verknüpft. So enstanden Thesauri, die die Suche nach Begriffen und nicht mehr nach Wörtern erlauben. Die Grundklassifikation sollte dezimal sein, um den Entscheidungsprozep vor dem Bildschirm zu erlauben. Die UDC als möglich Lösung könnte die heterogenen Systematiken der verschiedenen Thesauri vereinheitlichen. Dabei würde der Benutzer nur die linguistische Seite, der Computer aber den systematischen Teil gebrauchen

0.05092078 = product of:
  0.15276234 = sum of:
    0.15276234 = weight(_text_:systematik in 5982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15276234 = score(doc=5982,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        0.4772975 = fieldWeight in 5982, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5982)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Im Rahmen der vorliegenden Magisterarbeit wurde ein virtuelles Bibliotheksregal für die Informationswissenschaft entwickelt. Es ermöglicht den BenutzerInnen den Browsing-Zugang zum informationswissenschaftlichen Literaturbestand der Universitätsbibliothek Hildesheim über drei verschiedene hierarchische Ordnungssystematiken. Die BenutzerInnen können eine Systematik auswählen, nach der sich der Bestand entsprechend anordnet. Die vorliegende Arbeit beschreibt die einzelnen Schritte der Realisierung des virtuellen Bibliotheksregals sowie seine anschließende Evaluierung durch einen Benutzertest, der mit Studierenden der Universität Hildesheim durchgeführt wurde.

0.043646388 = product of:
  0.13093916 = sum of:
    0.13093916 = weight(_text_:systematik in 1402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13093916 = score(doc=1402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 1402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1402)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Im letzten Heft der VÖB-Mitteilungen wurde über die Erstellung eines hie-rarchischen Browse- und Abfrage-Interfaces für die lokale Systematik im Online-Katalog der Bibliothek der Sigmund Freud Privatstiftung, der im Rahmen eines Aleph-Sharing-Lokalsystems an der Verbundzentrale OBVSG betrieben wird, berichtet. Im Hinblick auf die Darstellung der den Titeldatensätzen jeweils zugeordneten Systematikgruppen in der Vollanzeige des OPACs galt damals noch (sinngemäß): Da vonseiten der Bibliothek lediglich die Notationen katalogisiert werden, wird bei der Titel-Vollanzeige mittels einer JavaScript-basierten Umnutzung der Aleph-Funktion "Suchdienste" ein Link auf das hierarchische Interface generiert, um die Bedeutung der jeweiligen Notation im systematischen Kontext zu veranschaulichen. Diese Lösung, die zwar durchaus besser als das kommentarlose Display einzelner "nackter" Notationen war, ist nunmehr obsolet geworden. Ein vor kurzem implementierter, einfacher Automatismus aus der "Werkstatt" der Verbundzentrale bewirkt die Einspielung der Klassennamen bereits im Katalogisierungsprozess und macht so die Anzeige dieser Benennungen im Katalog (OPAC bzw. Bearbeitungs-GUI) möglich.

0.043136656 = product of:
  0.12940997 = sum of:
    0.12940997 = sum of:
      0.08725127 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08725127 = score(doc=4190,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.1985171 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051861014 = queryNorm
          0.4395151 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
      0.042158708 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042158708 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18160844 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051861014 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Creates an open, metadata aware system for distributed, collaborative WWW indexing. The system has 3 main components: a harvester (for collecting information), a database (for making the collection searchable), and a user interface (for making the information available). all components can be distributed across networked computers, thus supporting scalability. The system is metadata aware and thus allows searches on several fields including title, document author and URL. Nordic Web Index (NWI) is an application using this system to create a regional Nordic Web-indexing service. NWI is built using 5 collaborating service points within the Nordic countries. The NWI databases can be used to build additional services

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

0.036006432 = product of:
  0.10801929 = sum of:
    0.10801929 = weight(_text_:systematik in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10801929 = score(doc=3701,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32005686 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051861014 = queryNorm
        0.33750033 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Dieser Beitrag referiert und dokumentiert die klassifikationsbasierten Anzeige- und Recherchemöglichkeiten, die 2005 anlässlich einer Versionsumstellung erstmals im OPAC des Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbundes implementiert wurden. Dazu wird einleitend ein kurzer Statusbericht über die im Titeldatenmaterial des Zentralkatologes vorhandenen Notationen gegeben. Danach werden die auf den Notationen der ZDB-Systematik, der Regensburger Verbundklassifikotion (RVK) und der Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC) aufbauenden OPAC-Features vorgestellt. Des weiteren wird ein bereits vorliegendes, aber noch nicht realisiertes Konzept zur Implementierung der MSC als Normdatei präsentiert, auf dem auch die künftige Verwendung der Basisklassifikation (BK) aufsetzen könnte.

Object

ZDB-Systematik

0.023746789 = product of:
  0.071240366 = sum of:
    0.071240366 = product of:
      0.14248073 = sum of:
        0.14248073 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14248073 = score(doc=3008,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1985171 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051861014 = queryNorm
            0.7177252 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.019788992 = product of:
  0.05936697 = sum of:
    0.05936697 = product of:
      0.11873394 = sum of:
        0.11873394 = weight(_text_:indexing in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11873394 = score(doc=873,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1985171 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051861014 = queryNorm
            0.59810436 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Indexing: the state of our knowledge and the state of our ignorance. Proc. of the 20th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, New York, 13.5.1988. Ed.: B.H. Weinberg

0.018737204 = product of:
  0.056211613 = sum of:
    0.056211613 = product of:
      0.112423226 = sum of:
        0.112423226 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112423226 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160844 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051861014 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22

0.018394515 = product of:
  0.055183545 = sum of:
    0.055183545 = sum of:
      0.04113064 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04113064 = score(doc=2047,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.1985171 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051861014 = queryNorm
          0.20718941 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
      0.014052903 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014052903 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18160844 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051861014 = queryNorm
          0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

2. 1.2004 10:35:22

Footnote

AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
SELVI (Knowledge Classification of Digital Information Materials with Special Reference to Clustering Technique) finds that it is essential to classify digital material since the amount of material that is becoming available is growing. Selvi suggests using automated classification to "group together those digital information materials or documents that are "most similar" (p. 65). This can be attained by using Cluster analysis methods. PRADHAN and THULASI (A Study of the Use of Classification and Indexing Systems by Web Resource Directories) compare and contrast the classificatory structures of Google, Yahoo, and Looksmart's directories and compare the directories to Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification and Colon Classification's classificatory structures. They find differentes between the directories' and the bibliographic classification systems' classificatory structures and principles. These differentes stem from the fact that bibliographic classification systems are used to "classify academic resources for the research community" (p. 83) and directories "aim to categorize a wider breath of information groups, entertainment, recreation, govt. information, commercial information" (p. 83). NEELAMEGHAN (Hierarchy, Hierarchical Relation and Hierarchical Arrangement) reviews the concept of hierarchy and the formation of hierarchical structures across a variety of domains. NEELAMEGHAN and PRADAD (Digitized Schemes for Subject Classification and Thesauri: Complementary Roles) demonstrate how thesaural relationships (NT, BT, and RT) can be applied to a classification scheme, the Colon Classification in this Gase. NEELAMEGHAN and ASUNDI (Metadata Framework for Describing Embodied Knowledge and Subject Content) propose to use the Generalized Facet Structure framework which is based an Ranganathan's General Theory of Knowledge Classification as a framework for describing the content of documents in a metadata element set for the representation of web documents. CHUDAMANI (Classified Catalogue as a Tool for Subject Based Information Retrieval in both Traditional and Electronic Library Environment) explains why the classified catalogue is superior to the alphabetic cata logue and argues that the same is true in the digital environment.
PARAMESWARAN (Classification and Indexing: Impact of Classification Theory an PRECIS) reviews the PRECIS system and finds that "it Gould not escape from the impact of the theory of classification" (p. 131). The author further argues that the purpose of classification and subject indexing is the same and that both approaches depends an syntax. This leads to the conclusion that "there is an absolute syntax as the Indian theory of classification points out" (p. 131). SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 1. SA TSAN- A Computer Based Learning Package) and SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 2. Semi-Automatic Synthesis of CC Numbers) present an application to automate classification using a facet classification system, in this Gase, the Colon Classification system. GAIKAIWARI (An Interactive Application for Faceted Classification Systems) presents an application, called SRR, for managing and using a faceted classification scheme in a digital environment. IYER (Use of Instructional Technology to Support Traditional Classroom Learning: A Case Study) describes a course an "Information and Knowledge Organization" that she teaches at the University at Albany (SUNY). The course is a conceptual course that introduces the student to various aspects of knowledge organization. GOPINATH (Universal Classification: How can it be used?) lists fifteen uses of universal classifications and discusses the entities of a number of disciplines. GOPINATH (Knowledge Classification: The Theory of Classification) briefly reviews the foundations for research in automatic classification, summarizes the history of classification, and places Ranganathan's thought in the history of classification.

0.017137768 = product of:
  0.0514133 = sum of:
    0.0514133 = product of:
      0.1028266 = sum of:
        0.1028266 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1028266 = score(doc=4307,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1985171 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051861014 = queryNorm
            0.51797354 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The construction and updating of indexing languages depend on the organization of their hierarchical structures in order to determine the classification of related terms and, above all, to allow a constant updating of vocabulary, a condition for knowledge evolution. The elaboration of an indexing language for online catalogs of libraries' networks is important considering the diversity and specificity of knowledge areas. From this perspective, the present paper reports on the work of a team of catalogers and researchers engaged in the construction of a hierarchical structure of an indexing language for an online catalog of a university library's network. The work on hierarchical structures began by defining the categories and subcategories that form the indexing language macrostructure by using the parameters of the Library of Congress Subject Headings , the National Library Terminology and the Vocabulary of the University of São Paulo Library's system. Throughout the stages of the elaboration process of the macrostructure, difficulties and improvements were observed and discussed. The results enabled the assessment of the hierarchical structures of the languages used in the organization of the superordinate and subordinate terms, which has contributed to the systematization of operational procedures contained in an indexing language manual for online catalogs of libraries.

0.014808725 = product of:
  0.044426173 = sum of:
    0.044426173 = product of:
      0.088852346 = sum of:
        0.088852346 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088852346 = score(doc=3966,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.1985171 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051861014 = queryNorm
            0.4475803 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the WWW. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing System of Ranganathan. A prototype software system has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and URL of the Web document, the record is stored in the system. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The system stores the surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. Search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using chain indexing technique. If a single term is input, the system searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved headings is too large (running into more than a page) then the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The system searches subject headings already retrieved and look for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed under Windows NT environment using ASP and web server is under rigorous testing. The database and indexes management routines need further development.

Source

Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine