-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.02
0.02232386 = product of:
0.1116193 = sum of:
0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018752426 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018752426 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.050708078 = weight(_text_:des in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050708078 = score(doc=6404,freq=6.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.63594294 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.023406371 = product of:
0.046812743 = sum of:
0.046812743 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046812743 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.02
0.02232386 = product of:
0.1116193 = sum of:
0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018752426 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018752426 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.050708078 = weight(_text_:des in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050708078 = score(doc=3773,freq=6.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.63594294 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.023406371 = product of:
0.046812743 = sum of:
0.046812743 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046812743 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Gödert, W.: Strukturierung von Klassifikationssystemen und Online-Retrieval (1995)
0.01
0.012743459 = product of:
0.08495639 = sum of:
0.031254046 = weight(_text_:und in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031254046 = score(doc=922,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
0.022448301 = weight(_text_:der in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022448301 = score(doc=922,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
0.031254046 = weight(_text_:und in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031254046 = score(doc=922,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Imprint
- Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem
- Source
- Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
-
Burkart, M.: Dokumentationssprachen (1990)
0.01
0.012723255 = product of:
0.063616276 = sum of:
0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018752426 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.019048017 = weight(_text_:der in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019048017 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018752426 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00706341 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.01
0.0071872757 = product of:
0.047915168 = sum of:
0.027601978 = weight(_text_:des in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027601978 = score(doc=1171,freq=4.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34616345 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.00470894 = weight(_text_:in in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00470894 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.015604248 = product of:
0.031208497 = sum of:
0.031208497 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031208497 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- All classifications are based on ideologies and Dewey is marked by its author's origins in 19th century North America. Subsequent revisions indicate changed ways of understanding the world. Section 157 (psycho-pathology) is now included with 616.89 (mental troubles), reflecting the move to a genetic-based approach. Table 5 (racial, ethnic and national groups) is however unchanged, despite changing views on such categorisation
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Concerning the Dewey classification
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995)
0.00
0.0048464276 = product of:
0.032309517 = sum of:
0.011111342 = weight(_text_:der in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011111342 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017077852 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.0041203224 = weight(_text_:in in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041203224 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Rethinking UDC
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996)
0.00
0.002767367 = product of:
0.027673671 = sum of:
0.019517547 = weight(_text_:des in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019517547 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.0081561245 = weight(_text_:in in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0081561245 = score(doc=992,freq=6.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- In relation to indexing, one of the chief implications of cognitive epistemology is the necessity for redefining knowledge representation concepts for information filing and retrieval purposes. Such a redefinition involves abandoning the traditional, hierarchical, closed-structure classification model. Considers the following in detail: a semiotic critique of classification principles; Ranganathan's classification theory; Ranganathan and cognitive epistemology; and some reflections on the DDC and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification
- Content
- T.1 in: Bibliotecario 1995, no.1, S.277-301
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Indexing from the cognitive viewpoint (II)
-
Garcia Marco, F.J.: Contexto y determinantes funcionales de la clasificacion documental (1996)
0.00
0.0025318495 = product of:
0.025318496 = sum of:
0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017077852 = score(doc=380,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008240645 = score(doc=380,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- Considers classification in the context of the information retrieval chain, a communication process. Defines classification as an heuristic methodology, which is being improved through scientific methodology. It is also an indexing process, setting each document in a systematic order, in a predictable place and therefore able to be efficiently retrieved. Classification appears to be determined by 4 factors: the structure of the world of documents, a function of the world of knowledge; the classification tools that allow us to codify them; the way in which people create and use classifications; and the features of the information unit
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Functional context and factors of the classification process
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.00
0.002502213 = product of:
0.025022129 = sum of:
0.00941788 = weight(_text_:in in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00941788 = score(doc=7242,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.015604248 = product of:
0.031208497 = sum of:
0.031208497 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031208497 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a comparative study of 3 classification schemes: LCC, DDC and NLM Classification to determine their effectiveness in classifying materials on health insurance. Examined 2 hypotheses: that there would be no differences in the scatter of the 3 classification schemes; and that there would be overlap between all 3 schemes but no difference in the classes into which the subject was placed. There was subject scatter in all 3 classification schemes and litlle overlap between the 3 systems
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
-
Perreault, J.: Categories and relators : a new schema (1994)
0.00
0.002170157 = product of:
0.021701569 = sum of:
0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014638159 = score(doc=8863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00706341 = score(doc=8863,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- Based on the works of Aristotle, Ramon Lull, I. Kant and the experiences with relationships published in the works of S.R. Ranganathan, E.de Grolier, J. Mills, J.C. Costello, E. Wall, R. Pagès, A. Leroy, P. Braffort, M. Kervégant, J.C. Gardin and J. Farradane, categories and relationships were collected, analyzed, grouped and classified in a triadic way so that a scheme resulted by which 120 relationships could be defined and identified by their positions and their codes. The exercise was meant to create and supply a tool for the replacement of the non-significant relation symbol, the colon, in the UDC by a letter code which could express the actual relationship contained in a classificatory statement. Examples for their application illustrate different cases occuring
- Footnote
- Reprint von: Rev. Int. Doc. 32(1965) no.4, S.136-144; dto. als FID/CR report no.4 u. im Buch des Verf.: Towards a theory for UDC. London: Bingley 1969, S.119-148
-
Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996)
0.00
0.0020790326 = product of:
0.020790325 = sum of:
0.0071366085 = weight(_text_:in in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071366085 = score(doc=7241,freq=6.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.013653717 = product of:
0.027307434 = sum of:
0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027307434 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- Discusses the reasons for the decision, taken at Florida International University Library to develop an in house classification system for their local documents collections. Reviews the structures of existing classification systems, noting their strengths and weaknesses in relation to the development of an in house system and describes the 5 components of the new system; geography, subject categories, extensions for population group and/or function, extensions for type of publication, and title/series designator
- Footnote
- Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.00
0.001523489 = product of:
0.01523489 = sum of:
0.003531705 = weight(_text_:in in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003531705 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.011703186 = product of:
0.023406371 = sum of:
0.023406371 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023406371 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
-
Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995)
0.00
0.001391481 = product of:
0.01391481 = sum of:
0.004162154 = weight(_text_:in in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004162154 = score(doc=5562,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.009752655 = product of:
0.01950531 = sum of:
0.01950531 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01950531 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- For my segment of this program I'd like to focus on some basic qualities of classification schemes. These qualities are critical to our ability to truly organize knowledge for access. As I see it, there are at least five qualities of note. The first one of these properties that I want to talk about is "authoritative." By this I mean standardized, but I mean more than standardized with a built in consensus-building process. A classification scheme constructed by a collaborative, consensus-building process carries the approval, and the authority, of the discipline groups that contribute to it and that it affects... The next property of classification systems is "expandable," living, responsive, with a clear locus of responsibility for its continuous upkeep. The worst thing you can do with a thesaurus, or a classification scheme, is to finish it. You can't ever finish it because it reflects ongoing intellectual activity... The third property is "intuitive." That is, the system has to be approachable, it has to be transparent, or at least capable of being transparent. It has to have an underlying logic that supports the classification scheme but doesn't dominate it... The fourth property is "organized and logical." I advocate very strongly, and agree with Lois Chan, that classification must be based on a rule-based structure, on somebody's world-view of the syndetic structure... The fifth property is "universal" by which I mean the classification scheme needs be useable by any specific system or application, and be available as a language for multiple purposes.
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 36th Allerton Institute, 23-25 Oct 94, Allerton Park, Monticello, IL: "New Roles for Classification in Libraries and Information Networks: Presentation and Reports"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
-
Esteban Navarro, M.A.: Fundamentos epistemologicos de la classificacion documental (1995)
0.00
9.7587734E-4 = product of:
0.019517547 = sum of:
0.019517547 = weight(_text_:des in 5547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019517547 = score(doc=5547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 5547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5547)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Epistemological principles of documentary classification
-
Koshman, S.: Categorization and classification revisited : a review of concept in library science and cognitive psychology (1993)
0.00
5.097578E-4 = product of:
0.010195156 = sum of:
0.010195156 = weight(_text_:in in 8349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010195156 = score(doc=8349,freq=6.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.260307 = fieldWeight in 8349, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8349)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Reviews the basic concepts associated with categorization and classification in order to examine the cognitive psychology and library science perspectives toward these processes, to discover if a theoretical affinity exists and to discuss potential applications of cognitive categorization theory to the field of library science
- Source
- Current studies in librarianship. 17(1993) nos.1/2, S.26-41
-
Midorikawa, N.: ¬A discussion of the concepts of facets from the viewpoint of the structures of classification systems (1997)
0.00
4.6720068E-4 = product of:
0.009344013 = sum of:
0.009344013 = weight(_text_:in in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009344013 = score(doc=1806,freq=14.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- 2 concepts of facets have been used in studies of classification systems: one for systems which take hierarchical structure and the other for systems which take multidimensional structure. Both correspond to 'principles of division'. The concepts of facets in multidimensional structure systems is used for addressing a subject from many aspects so should equate to the broadest principle of division in order to grasp a multiplicity of aspects. The concept of facets used in hierarchical systems addresses only the significance of a coherent set of items. This concept is not distinguished from the principle of division and there is no purpose in introducing a concept of facets into hierarchical systems in addition to the principle of division
- Footnote
- [In Japanisch]
-
Garcia Marco, F.J.; Esteban Navarro, M.A.: On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification (1993)
0.00
4.3254378E-4 = product of:
0.008650876 = sum of:
0.008650876 = weight(_text_:in in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008650876 = score(doc=5876,freq=12.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Intended is first of all a preliminary review of the implications that the new approaches to the theory of classification, mainly from cognitive psychology and epistemology may have for information work and research. As a secondary topic the scientific relations existing among information science, epistemology and the cognitive sciences are discussed. Classification is seen as a central activity in all daily and scientific activities, and, of course, of knowledge organization in information services. There is a mutual implication between classification and conceptualization, as the former moves in a natural way to the latter and the best result elaborated for classification is the concept. Research in concept theory is a need for a theory of classification. In this direction it is of outstanding importance to integrate the achievements of 'natural concept formation theory' (NCFT) as an alternative approach to conceptualization different from the traditional one of logicians and problem solving researchers. In conclusion both approaches are seen as being complementary: the NCFT approach being closer to the user and the logical one being more suitable for experts, including 'expert systems'
-
Pocock, H.: Classification schemes : development and survival (1997)
0.00
4.1621542E-4 = product of:
0.008324308 = sum of:
0.008324308 = weight(_text_:in in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008324308 = score(doc=762,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Discusses the development of classification schemes and their ability to adapt to and accomodate changes in the information world in order to survive. Examines the revision plans for the major classification schemes and the future use of classification search facilities for OPACs
-
Malla, N.: Classification of knowledge : a study in the foundations of library science (1991)
0.00
4.1203224E-4 = product of:
0.008240645 = sum of:
0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 3004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008240645 = score(doc=3004,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3004, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3004)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
-
Dahlberg, I.: Classification structure principles : Investigations, experiences, conclusions (1998)
0.00
3.9485664E-4 = product of:
0.007897133 = sum of:
0.007897133 = weight(_text_:in in 47) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007897133 = score(doc=47,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 47, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=47)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- For the purpose of establishing compatibility between the major universal classification systems in use, their structure principles were investigated and crucial points of difficulty for this undertaking were looked for, in order to relate the guiding classes, e.g. of the DDC, UDC, LCC, BC, and CC, to the subject groups of the ICC. With the help of a matrix into whose fields all subject groups of the ICC were inserted, it was not difficult at all to enter the notations of the universal classification systems mentioned. However, differences in terms of level of subdivision were found, as well as differences of occurrences. Most, though not all, of the fields of the ICC matrix could be completely filled with the corresponding notations of the other systems. Through this matrix, a first table of some 81 equivalences was established on which further work regarding the next levels of subject fields can be based
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
