Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Gnoli, C.: Progress in synthetic classification : towards unique definition of concepts (2007) 0.02
    0.024815073 = product of:
      0.09926029 = sum of:
        0.09926029 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09926029 = score(doc=2527,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.5067985 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The evolution of bibliographic classification schemes, from the end of the 19th century to our time, shows a trend of increasing possibilities to combine concepts in a classmark. While the early schemes, like DDC and LCC, were largely enumerative, more and more synthetic devices have appeared with common auxiliaries, facets, and phase relationships. The last editions of UDC and the UDC-derived FATKS project follow this evolution, by introducing more specific phase relationships and more common auxiliaries, like those for general properties and processes. This agrees with the Farradane's principle that each concept should have a place of unique definition, instead of being re-notated in each context where it occurs. This evolution appears to be unfinished, as even in most synthetic schemes many concepts have a different notation according to the disciplinary main classes where they occur. To overcome this limitation, main classes should be defined in terms of phenomena rather than disciplines: the Integrative Level Classification (ILC) research project is currently exploring this possibility. Examples with UDC, FATKS, and ILC notations are discussed.
  2. Cordeiro, M.I.; Slavic, A.: Data models for knowledge organization tools : evolution and perspectives (2003) 0.02
    0.017192384 = product of:
      0.06876954 = sum of:
        0.06876954 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06876954 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  3. Gnoli, C.: Phylogenetic classification (2006) 0.02
    0.017192384 = product of:
      0.06876954 = sum of:
        0.06876954 = weight(_text_:evolution in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06876954 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    One general principle in the construction of classification schemes is that of grouping phenomena to be classified according to their shared origin in evolution or history (phylogenesis). In general schemes, this idea has been applied by several classificationists in identifying a series of integrative levels, each originated from the previous ones, and using them as the main classes. In special schemes, common origin is a key principle in many domains: examples are given from the classification of climates, of organisms, and of musical instruments. Experience from these domains, however, suggests that using common origin alone, as done in cladistic taxonomy, can produce weird results, like having birds as a subclass of reptiles; while the most satisfying classifications use a well balanced mix of common origin and similarity. It is discussed how this could be applied to the development of a general classification of phenomena in an emergentist perspective, and how the resulting classification tree could be structured. Charles Bennett's notion of logical depth appears to be a promising conceptual tool for this purpose.
  4. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.00
    0.0033399842 = product of:
      0.013359937 = sum of:
        0.013359937 = product of:
          0.04007981 = sum of:
            0.04007981 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04007981 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  5. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.00
    0.0029224863 = product of:
      0.011689945 = sum of:
        0.011689945 = product of:
          0.035069834 = sum of:
            0.035069834 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035069834 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.00
    0.002504988 = product of:
      0.010019952 = sum of:
        0.010019952 = product of:
          0.030059857 = sum of:
            0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030059857 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  7. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.00
    0.0020874902 = product of:
      0.008349961 = sum of:
        0.008349961 = product of:
          0.025049882 = sum of:
            0.025049882 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025049882 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.19-22
  8. Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003) 0.00
    0.0016699921 = product of:
      0.0066799684 = sum of:
        0.0066799684 = product of:
          0.020039905 = sum of:
            0.020039905 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020039905 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    12. 9.2004 17:22:35
  9. Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008) 0.00
    0.0016699921 = product of:
      0.0066799684 = sum of:
        0.0066799684 = product of:
          0.020039905 = sum of:
            0.020039905 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020039905 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 15:22:04