-
Gnoli, C.: Progress in synthetic classification : towards unique definition of concepts (2007)
0.01
0.007484829 = product of:
0.014969658 = sum of:
0.014969658 = product of:
0.029939316 = sum of:
0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029939316 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Beghtol, C.: Semantic validity : concepts of warrants in bibliographic classification systems (1986)
0.01
0.007484829 = product of:
0.014969658 = sum of:
0.014969658 = product of:
0.029939316 = sum of:
0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029939316 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gnoli, C.: Metadata about what? : distinguishing between ontic, epistemic, and documental dimensions in knowledge organization (2012)
0.01
0.007484829 = product of:
0.014969658 = sum of:
0.014969658 = product of:
0.029939316 = sum of:
0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029939316 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Smiraglia, R.P.; Heuvel, C. van den: Classifications and concepts : towards an elementary theory of knowledge interaction (2013)
0.01
0.007484829 = product of:
0.014969658 = sum of:
0.014969658 = product of:
0.029939316 = sum of:
0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 1758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029939316 = score(doc=1758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1758)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : Part 1: dimensions (2016)
0.01
0.007484829 = product of:
0.014969658 = sum of:
0.014969658 = product of:
0.029939316 = sum of:
0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 3417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029939316 = score(doc=3417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 3417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003)
0.01
0.006171255 = product of:
0.01234251 = sum of:
0.01234251 = product of:
0.02468502 = sum of:
0.02468502 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02468502 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 17:22:35
-
Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008)
0.01
0.006171255 = product of:
0.01234251 = sum of:
0.01234251 = product of:
0.02468502 = sum of:
0.02468502 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02468502 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7.11.2008 15:22:04
-
Vickery, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing (1985)
0.01
0.0059878635 = product of:
0.011975727 = sum of:
0.011975727 = product of:
0.023951454 = sum of:
0.023951454 = weight(_text_:c in 3636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023951454 = score(doc=3636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 3636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3636)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Brian C. Vickery, Director and Professor, School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, is a prolific writer on classification and information retrieval. This paper was one of the earliest to present initial efforts by the Classification Research Group (q.v.). In it he clearly outlined the need for classification in subject indexing, which, at the time he wrote, was not a commonplace understanding. In fact, some indexing systems were made in the first place specifically to avoid general classification systems which were out of date in all fast-moving disciplines, especially in the "hard" sciences. Vickery picked up Julia Pettee's work (q.v.) an the concealed classification in subject headings (1947) and added to it, mainly adopting concepts from the work of S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.). He had already published a paper an notation in classification, pointing out connections between notation, words, and the concepts which they represent. He was especially concerned about the structure of notational symbols as such symbols represented relationships among subjects. Vickery also emphasized that index terms cover all aspects of a subject so that, in addition to having a basis in classification, the ideal index system should also have standardized nomenclature, as weIl as show evidence of a systematic classing of elementary terms. The necessary linkage between system and terms should be one of a number of methods, notably:
-
Beghtol, C.: Response to Hjoerland and Nicolaisen (2004)
0.01
0.00523938 = product of:
0.01047876 = sum of:
0.01047876 = product of:
0.02095752 = sum of:
0.02095752 = weight(_text_:c in 3536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02095752 = score(doc=3536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 3536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3536)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
