Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.010048525 = product of:
  0.0401941 = sum of:
    0.0401941 = weight(_text_:der in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0401941 = score(doc=675,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.101788685 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04556818 = queryNorm
        0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Der multiperspektivische Beitrag analysiert mit einem intersektionalen und qualitativen Ansatz diskriminierende Begriffe, Auslassungen und implizit abwertende Strukturen bibliothekarischer Klassifikationen des Globalen Nordens. Am Beispiel der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) werden rassistische und sexistische Schnitt- sowie Leerstellen in der Repräsentation queerer Lebens-, Liebes- und Lustentwürfe aufgezeigt. Mögliche Lösungen unter Einbeziehung der Communitys runden den Beitrag ab.

0.006217208 = product of:
  0.024868833 = sum of:
    0.024868833 = weight(_text_:der in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024868833 = score(doc=1151,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.101788685 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04556818 = queryNorm
        0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Mit einer Abbildung der Klassen der ILC als Liniendiagramm (von U. Priss)

0.005231671 = product of:
  0.020926684 = sum of:
    0.020926684 = product of:
      0.06278005 = sum of:
        0.06278005 = weight(_text_:authors in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06278005 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20773685 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04556818 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Several authors emphasize the need for a change in classification theory due to the influence of a dogmatic and monistic ontology supported by an outdated essentialism. These claims tend to focus on the fallibility of knowledge, the need for a pluralistic view, and the theoretical burden of observations. Regardless of the legitimacy of these concerns, there is the risk, when not moderate, to fall into the opposite relativistic extreme. Based on a narrative review of the literature, we aim to reflectively discuss the theoretical foundations that can serve as a basis for a realist position supporting pluralistic ontological classifications. The goal is to show that, against rather conventional solutions, objective scientific-based approaches to natural classifications are presented to be viable, allowing a proper distinction between ontological and taxonomic questions. Supported by critical scientific realism, we consider that such an approach is suitable for the development of ontological Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). We believe that ontological perspectivism can provide the necessary adaptation to the different granularities of reality.