-
Gnoli, C.: Classificazione a facette (2004)
0.01
0.014902794 = product of:
0.029805588 = sum of:
0.029805588 = product of:
0.059611175 = sum of:
0.059611175 = weight(_text_:4 in 3746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059611175 = score(doc=3746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.4197538 = fieldWeight in 3746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Isbn
- 88-7812-080-4
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.01
0.014180663 = product of:
0.028361326 = sum of:
0.028361326 = product of:
0.056722652 = sum of:
0.056722652 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056722652 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001)
0.01
0.01240808 = product of:
0.02481616 = sum of:
0.02481616 = product of:
0.04963232 = sum of:
0.04963232 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04963232 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Szostak, R.: ¬A schema for unifying human science : interdisciplinary perspectives on culture (2003)
0.01
0.011062456 = product of:
0.022124913 = sum of:
0.022124913 = product of:
0.044249825 = sum of:
0.044249825 = weight(_text_:4 in 803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044249825 = score(doc=803,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.3115864 = fieldWeight in 803, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=803)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 39(2012) no.4, S.300-303 (M.J. Fox) Vgl. auch: Szostak, R.: Speaking truth to power in classification: response to Fox's review of my work; KO 39:4, 300. In: Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.1, S.76-77.
- Isbn
- 978-1-575-91060-4
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.01
0.010635497 = product of:
0.021270994 = sum of:
0.021270994 = product of:
0.04254199 = sum of:
0.04254199 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04254199 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
-
Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004)
0.01
0.0088629145 = product of:
0.017725829 = sum of:
0.017725829 = product of:
0.035451658 = sum of:
0.035451658 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035451658 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.19-22
-
Keilty, P.: Tabulating queer : space, perversion, and belonging (2009)
0.01
0.008515882 = product of:
0.017031765 = sum of:
0.017031765 = product of:
0.03406353 = sum of:
0.03406353 = weight(_text_:4 in 3253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03406353 = score(doc=3253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 3253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3253)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 36(2009) no.4, S.240-248
-
Satija, M.P.: Library classification : an essay in terminology (2000)
0.01
0.007451397 = product of:
0.014902794 = sum of:
0.014902794 = product of:
0.029805588 = sum of:
0.029805588 = weight(_text_:4 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029805588 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 27(2000) no.4, S.221-229
-
Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003)
0.01
0.0070903315 = product of:
0.014180663 = sum of:
0.014180663 = product of:
0.028361326 = sum of:
0.028361326 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028361326 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 17:22:35
-
Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008)
0.01
0.0070903315 = product of:
0.014180663 = sum of:
0.014180663 = product of:
0.028361326 = sum of:
0.028361326 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028361326 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7.11.2008 15:22:04
-
Albrechtsen, H.; Pejtersen, A.M.: Cognitive work analysis and work centered design of classification schemes (2003)
0.01
0.0063869115 = product of:
0.012773823 = sum of:
0.012773823 = product of:
0.025547646 = sum of:
0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025547646 = score(doc=3005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 30(2003) nos.3/4, S.213-227
-
Kublik, A.; Clevette, V.; Ward, D.; Olson, H.A.: Adapting dominant classifications to particular contexts (2003)
0.01
0.0063869115 = product of:
0.012773823 = sum of:
0.012773823 = product of:
0.025547646 = sum of:
0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025547646 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper addresses the process of adapting to a particular culture or context a classification that has grown out of western culture to become a global standard. The authors use a project that adapts DDC for use in a feminist/women's issues context to demonstrate an approach that works. The project is particularly useful as an interdisciplinary example. Discussion consists of four parts: (1) definition of the problem indicating the need for adaptation and efforts to date; (2) description of the methodology developed for creating an expansion; (3) description of the interface developed for actually doing the work, with its potential for a distributed group to work on it together (could even be internationally distributed); and (4) generalization of how the methodology could be used for particular contexts by country, ethnicity, perspective or other defining factors.
-
Mai, J.-E.: Is classification theory possible? : Rethinking classification research (2003)
0.01
0.0060216384 = product of:
0.012043277 = sum of:
0.012043277 = product of:
0.024086554 = sum of:
0.024086554 = weight(_text_:4 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024086554 = score(doc=2759,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.16960615 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- 1. Introduction Theoretical context independent explanations of classification could enhance the universality of classification research and make knowledge about classification available to settings other than traditional libraries. There is a tremendous need for constructing classificatory structures in a range of settings many of which are far removed from the environment in which classification theory and research has been practiced in the last century and a half. The construction of classificatory structures an the Internet, intranets, and in knowledge management systems has received some attention lately. The question examined here is whether it is possible to create a single theory of classification that applies to the range of contexts in which classificatory structures are applied. The object of this paper is to question the assumption that bibliographic classification theory can resemble scientific theories. It is argued that the context of any classification influences the use and understanding of the classification to such a degree that the classification cannot be understood separate from its context. Furthermore, the development from being a novice classifier or classificationist to becoming an expert is explored. lt is assumed scientific theories must relate as much to the activity of novices as to the activity of experts and that scientific theories explain both what it is that novices do and what experts do. It is argued that expertise is achieved not through a correct application of a classification theory but through experiences and adjustment to a particular context and that the activities of novices are quite distinct from the activities of experts in that experts draws an the context of the situation and that novices do not. 2. Theory of Classification Langridge (1976) provides an account of the principles of constructing knowledge organization systems and the theoretical underpinnings of different approaches. He identifies four principles that have guided construction of knowledge organization systems: 1) ideological, 2) social purpose, 3) scientific, and 4) the disciplines. The ideological principle organizes knowledge according to an ideology that the knowledge organization system serves. Langridge gives the examples of "the Christian schemes of the Middle Ages and the Soviet scheme which substitutes for the Bible and Christianity the works of Marx and Lenin and the 'religion' of communism" (Langridge, 1976, p. 4-5).
-
Ereshefsky, M.: ¬The poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy : a philosophical study of biological taxonomy (2007)
0.01
0.0060216384 = product of:
0.012043277 = sum of:
0.012043277 = product of:
0.024086554 = sum of:
0.024086554 = weight(_text_:4 in 2493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024086554 = score(doc=2493,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.16960615 = fieldWeight in 2493, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2493)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Part I: The historical turn 1. The philosophy of classification 2. A primer of biological taxonomy 3. History and classification Part II: The multiplicity of nature 4. Species pluralism 5. How to be a discerning pluralist Part III: Hierarchies and nomenclature 6. The evolution of the Linnaean hierarchy 7. Post-Linnaean taxonomy 8. The future of biological nomenclature
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 35(2008) no.4, S.255-259 (B. Hjoerland): "This book was published in 2000 simultaneously in hardback and as an electronic resource, and, in 2007, as a paperback. The author is a professor of philosophy at the University of Calgary, Canada. He has an impressive list of contributions, mostly addressing issues in biological taxonomy such as units of evolution, natural kinds and the species concept. The book is a scholarly criticism of the famous classification system developed by the Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778). This system consists of both a set of rules for the naming of living organisms (biological nomenclature) and principles of classification. Linné's system has been used and adapted by biologists over a period of almost 250 years. Under the current system of codes, it is now applied to more than two million species of organisms. Inherent in the Linnaean system is the indication of hierarchic relationships. The Linnaean system has been justified primarily on the basis of stability. Although it has been criticized and alternatives have been suggested, it still has its advocates (e.g., Schuh, 2003). One of the alternatives being developed is The International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature, known as the PhyloCode for short, a system that radically alters the current nomenclatural rules. The new proposals have provoked hot debate on nomenclatural issues in biology. . . ."
-
Gnoli, C.: ¬The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications (2006)
0.01
0.0053224266 = product of:
0.010644853 = sum of:
0.010644853 = product of:
0.021289706 = sum of:
0.021289706 = weight(_text_:4 in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021289706 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Gnoli, C.: Progress in synthetic classification : towards unique definition of concepts (2007)
0.01
0.0053224266 = product of:
0.010644853 = sum of:
0.010644853 = product of:
0.021289706 = sum of:
0.021289706 = weight(_text_:4 in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021289706 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Beitrag anlässlich: Proceedings of the International Seminar "Information access for the global community", 4-5 June 2007, The Hague. - Vgl.: http://www.udcc.org/seminar07/presentations/gnoli.pdf.
-
Szostak, R.: Classifying science : phenomena, data, theory, method, practice (2004)
0.00
0.0045162286 = product of:
0.009032457 = sum of:
0.009032457 = product of:
0.018064914 = sum of:
0.018064914 = weight(_text_:4 in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018064914 = score(doc=325,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.12720461 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Inhalt: - Chapter 1: Classifying Science: 1.1. A Simple Classificatory Guideline - 1.2. The First "Cut" (and Plan of Work) - 1.3. Some Preliminaries - Chapter 2: Classifying Phenomena and Data: 2.1. Classifying Phenomena - 2.2. Classifying Data - Chapter 3: Classifying Theory: 3.1. Typology of Theory - 3.2. What Is a Theory? - 3.3. Evaluating Theories - 3.4. Types of Theory and the Five Types of Causation - 3.5. Classifying Individual Theories - 3.6. Advantages of a Typology of Theory - Chapter 4: Classifying Method: 4.1. Classifying Methods - 4.2. Typology of Strengths and Weaknesses of Methods - 4.3. Qualitative Versus Quantitative Analysis Revisited - 4.4. Evaluating Methods - 4.5. Classifying Particular Methods Within The Typology - 4.6. Advantages of a Typology of Methods - Chapter 5: Classifying Practice: 5.1. Errors and Biases in ScienceChapter - 5.2. Typology of (Critiques of) Scientific Practice - 5.3. Utilizing This Classification - 5.4. The Five Types of Ethical Analysis - Chapter 6: Drawing Connections Across These Classifications: 6.1. Theory and Method - 6.2. Theory (Method) and Phenomena (Data) - 6.3. Better Paradigms - 6.4. Critiques of Scientific Practice: Are They Correlated with Other Classifications? - Chapter 7: Classifying Scientific Documents: 7.1. Faceted or Enumerative? - 7.2. Classifying By Phenomena Studied - 7.3. Classifying By Theory Used - 7.4. Classifying By Method Used - 7.5 Links Among Subjects - 7.6. Type of Work, Language, and More - 7.7. Critiques of Scientific Practice - 7.8. Classifying Philosophy - 7.9. Evaluating the System - Chapter 8: Concluding Remarks: 8.1. The Classifications - 8.2. Advantages of These Various Classifications - 8.3. Drawing Connections Across Classifications - 8.4. Golden Mean Arguments - 8.5. Why Should Science Be Believed? - 8.6. How Can Science Be Improved? - 8.7. How Should Science Be Taught?
- Footnote
- Weitere Rez. in: JASIST 57(2006) no.14, S.1977-1978 (Y. Su); KO 39(2012) no.4, S.300-303 (M.J. Fox)
-
Scerri, E.R.: ¬The periodic table : its story and its significance (2007)
0.00
0.0031934557 = product of:
0.0063869115 = sum of:
0.0063869115 = product of:
0.012773823 = sum of:
0.012773823 = weight(_text_:4 in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012773823 = score(doc=2492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.08994724 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 35(2008) no.4, S.251-254 (B. Hjoerland): "The book is about the classification of chemical elements known as the periodical system. It is described as "one of the most potent icons in science [.] One sees periodic tables everywhere: in industrial labs, workshops, academic labs, and of course, lecture halls" (p. xiii). Among all taxonomies in all domains, there is probably none more respected and more useful than this one. As Scerri states (p. 25): The periodic table ranks as one of the most fruitful and unifying ideas in the whole of modern science, comparable perhaps with Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. Unlike such theories as Newtonian mechanics, the periodic table has not been falsified by developments in modern physics but has evolved while remaining essentially unchanged. After evolving for nearly 150 years through the work of numerous individuals, the periodic table remains at the heart of chemistry. This is mainly because it is of immense practical benefit for making predictions about all manner of chemical and physical properties of the elements and possibilities for bond formation. The periodic system provides the basic criteria for organizing knowledge about all the material stuff in the entire universe. It is thus a model that anybody with interests in knowledge organization (KO) should know. Knowledge about the history, philosophy and status of the periodic system also provides important insight for knowledge organization in general. . . . Scerri's book demonstrates how one of the most important classification systems has evolved and what kinds of conceptualizations and classification criteria are at work in it. It is probably the best book about the best classification system ever constructed. It should belong to any library supporting teaching and research in knowledge organization."
