Search (247 results, page 13 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Beghtol, C.: Response to Hjoerland and Nicolaisen (2004) 0.00 
    8.531166E-4 = product of:
  0.004265583 = sum of:
    0.004265583 = weight(_text_:a in 3536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004265583 = score(doc=3536,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.04783308 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04148407 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3536, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3536)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Second, the paper posits that these different reasons for creating classification systems strongly influence the content and extent of the two kinds of classifications, but not necessarily their structures. By definition, naïve classifications for new knowledge have been developed for discrete areas of disciplinary inquiry in new areas of knowledge. These classifications do not attempt to classify the whole of that disciplinary area. That is, naïve classifications have a explicit purpose that is significantly different from the purpose of the major disciplinary classifications Hjoer-land and Nicolaisen provide as examples of classifications they think I discuss under the rubric of "naïve classifications" (e.g., classifications for the entire field of archaeology, biology, linguistics, music, psychology, etc.). My paper is not concerned with these important classifications for major disciplinary areas. Instead, it is concerned solely and specifically with scholarly classifications for small areas of new knowledge within these major disciplines (e.g., cloth of aresta, double harpsichords, child-rearing practices, anomalous phenomena, etc.). Thus, I have nowhere suggested or implied that the broad disciplinary classifications mentioned by Hjoerland and Nicolaisen are appropriately categorized as "naïve classifications." For example, I have not associated the Periodic System of the Elements with naïve classifications, as Hjoerland and Nicolaisen state that I have done. Indeed, broad classifications of this type fall well outside the definition of naïve classifications set out in my paper. In this case, too, 1 believe that Hjorland and Nicolaisen have misunderstood an important point in my paper. I agree with a number of points made in Hjorland and Nicolaisen's paper. In particular, I agree that researchers in the knowledge organization field should adhere to the highest standards of scholarly and scientific precision. For that reason, I am glad to have had the opportunity to respond to their paper.
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Hjoerland, B., J. Nicolaisen: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve": a comment to Beghtol (2003). In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61. - Vgl. die Erwiderung von Nicolaisen und Hjoerland in KO 31(2004) no.3, S.199-201.
    Type
    a
  2. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.00 
    8.531166E-4 = product of:
  0.004265583 = sum of:
    0.004265583 = weight(_text_:a in 3617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004265583 = score(doc=3617,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04783308 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04148407 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3617, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3617)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  3. Kleineberg, M.: Klassifikation (2023) 0.00 
    8.531166E-4 = product of:
  0.004265583 = sum of:
    0.004265583 = weight(_text_:a in 783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004265583 = score(doc=783,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04783308 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04148407 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 783, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=783)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  4. Khanna, J.K.: Analytico-synthetic classification : (a study in CC-7) (1994) 0.00 
    8.4436656E-4 = product of:
  0.004221833 = sum of:
    0.004221833 = weight(_text_:a in 1471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004221833 = score(doc=1471,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04783308 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04148407 = queryNorm
        0.088261776 = fieldWeight in 1471, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1471)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    ANALYTICO-SYNTHETIC CLASSIFICATION- the brain-child of S.R. Ranganathan has brought about an intellectual revolution in the theory and methodology of library classification by generating new ideas. By his vast erudition and deeper research in the Universe of Subjects, Ranganathan applied a postulation approach to classification based on the concept of facet analysis, Phase Analysis, Sector Analysis and Zone Analysis. His enquiry into the concept of fundamental Categories as well as the Analytico-Synthetic quality associated with it, the use of different connecting symbols as in the Meccano apparatus for constructing expressive class numbers for subjects of any depth, the versality of Notation, the analysis of Rounds and Levels, the formation and sharpening of Isolates through various devices, the introduction of the novel concepts of Specals, Systems, Speciators, and Environment Constituents has systematized the whole study of classification into principles, rules and canons. These new methodologies in classification invented as a part of Colon Classification have not only lifted practical classification form mere guess work to scientific methodology but also form an important theme in international conferences. The present work discusses in details the unique methodologies of Ranganathan as used in CC-7. The concepts of Primary Basic Subjects and Non -Primary Basic Subjects have also been discussed at length.
  5. Advances in classification research. Vol.10 : Proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, held at the 62nd ASIS Annual Meeting Nov 1-5, 1999, Washington (2001) 0.00 
    7.312428E-4 = product of:
  0.003656214 = sum of:
    0.003656214 = weight(_text_:a in 1586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003656214 = score(doc=1586,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04783308 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04148407 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1586, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1586)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: DAVENPORT, E.: Implicit orders: documentary genres and organizational practice; ANDERSEN, J. u. F.S. CHRISTENSEN: Wittgenstein and indexing theory; OLSON, H.A.: Cultural discourses of classification: indigeous alternatives to the tradition of Aristotle, Dürkheim, and Foucault; FRÂNCU, V.: A universal classification system going through changes; JACOB, E.K. u. U. PRISS: Nontraditional indexing structures for the management of electronic resources; BROOKS, T.A.: Relevance auras: macro patterns and micro scatter; RUIZ, M.E. u. SRINIVASAN, P.: Combining machine learning and hierarchical indexing structures for text categorization; WEEDMAN, J.: Local practice and the growth of knowledge: decisions in subject access to digitized images
  6. Dousa, T.M.: Empirical observation, rational structures, and pragmatist aims : epistemology and method in Julius Otto Kaiser's theory of systematic indexing (2008) 0.00 
    7.312428E-4 = product of:
  0.003656214 = sum of:
    0.003656214 = weight(_text_:a in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003656214 = score(doc=2508,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04783308 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04148407 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  7. Tennis, J.T.: Foundational, first-order, and second-order classification theory (2015) 0.00 
    7.312428E-4 = product of:
  0.003656214 = sum of:
    0.003656214 = weight(_text_:a in 2204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003656214 = score(doc=2204,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04783308 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04148407 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2204, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2204)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 221
  • m 20
  • el 10
  • s 4
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications