Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Perreault, J.: Categories and relators : a new schema (1994) 0.05 
    0.0516103 = product of:
  0.1032206 = sum of:
    0.1032206 = product of:
      0.2064412 = sum of:
        0.2064412 = weight(_text_:j.c in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2064412 = score(doc=8863,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3322337 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.6213734 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Based on the works of Aristotle, Ramon Lull, I. Kant and the experiences with relationships published in the works of S.R. Ranganathan, E.de Grolier, J. Mills, J.C. Costello, E. Wall, R. Pagès, A. Leroy, P. Braffort, M. Kervégant, J.C. Gardin and J. Farradane, categories and relationships were collected, analyzed, grouped and classified in a triadic way so that a scheme resulted by which 120 relationships could be defined and identified by their positions and their codes. The exercise was meant to create and supply a tool for the replacement of the non-significant relation symbol, the colon, in the UDC by a letter code which could express the actual relationship contained in a classificatory statement. Examples for their application illustrate different cases occuring
  2. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.04 
    0.03763894 = sum of:
  0.017264832 = product of:
    0.06905933 = sum of:
      0.06905933 = weight(_text_:authors in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06905933 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22851472 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05012591 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.020374106 = product of:
    0.040748212 = sum of:
      0.040748212 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040748212 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05012591 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.02 
    0.020374106 = product of:
  0.040748212 = sum of:
    0.040748212 = product of:
      0.081496425 = sum of:
        0.081496425 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081496425 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  4. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.02 
    0.020374106 = product of:
  0.040748212 = sum of:
    0.040748212 = product of:
      0.081496425 = sum of:
        0.081496425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081496425 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  5. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.02 
    0.020374106 = product of:
  0.040748212 = sum of:
    0.040748212 = product of:
      0.081496425 = sum of:
        0.081496425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081496425 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  6. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01 
    0.013582738 = product of:
  0.027165476 = sum of:
    0.027165476 = product of:
      0.054330952 = sum of:
        0.054330952 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054330952 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  7. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01 
    0.013582738 = product of:
  0.027165476 = sum of:
    0.027165476 = product of:
      0.054330952 = sum of:
        0.054330952 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054330952 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  8. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01 
    0.013582738 = product of:
  0.027165476 = sum of:
    0.027165476 = product of:
      0.054330952 = sum of:
        0.054330952 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054330952 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  9. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.01 
    0.013582738 = product of:
  0.027165476 = sum of:
    0.027165476 = product of:
      0.054330952 = sum of:
        0.054330952 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054330952 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.1-22
  10. Cordeiro, M.I.; Slavic, A.: Data models for knowledge organization tools : evolution and perspectives (2003) 0.01 
    0.012208079 = product of:
  0.024416158 = sum of:
    0.024416158 = product of:
      0.09766463 = sum of:
        0.09766463 = weight(_text_:authors in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09766463 = score(doc=2632,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22851472 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper focuses on the need for knowledge organization (KO) tools, such as library classifications, thesauri and subject heading systems, to be fully disclosed and available in the open network environment. The authors look at the place and value of traditional library knowledge organization tools in relation to the technical environment and expectations of the Semantic Web. Future requirements in this context are explored, stressing the need for KO systems to support semantic interoperability. In order to be fully shareable KO tools need to be reframed and reshaped in terms of conceptual and data models. The authors suggest that some useful approaches to this already exist in methodological and technical developments within the fields of ontology modelling and lexicographic and terminological data interchange.
  11. Kwasnik, B.H.; Rubin, V.L.: Stretching conceptual structures in classifications across languages and cultures (2003) 0.01 
    0.012208079 = product of:
  0.024416158 = sum of:
    0.024416158 = product of:
      0.09766463 = sum of:
        0.09766463 = weight(_text_:authors in 5517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09766463 = score(doc=5517,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22851472 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5517, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5517)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The authors describe the difficulties of translating classifications from a source language and culture to another language and culture. To demonstrate these problems, kinship terms and concepts from native speakers of fourteen languages were collected and analyzed to find differences between their terms and structures and those used in English. Using the representations of kinship terms in the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) as examples, the authors identified the source of possible lack of mapping between the domain of kinship in the fourteen languages studied and the LCC and DDC. Finally, some preliminary suggestions for how to make translated classifications more linguistically and culturally hospitable are offered.
  12. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01 
    0.011884895 = product of:
  0.02376979 = sum of:
    0.02376979 = product of:
      0.04753958 = sum of:
        0.04753958 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04753958 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  13. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01 
    0.011884895 = product of:
  0.02376979 = sum of:
    0.02376979 = product of:
      0.04753958 = sum of:
        0.04753958 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04753958 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01 
    0.011884895 = product of:
  0.02376979 = sum of:
    0.02376979 = product of:
      0.04753958 = sum of:
        0.04753958 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04753958 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.22-36
  15. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01 
    0.010187053 = product of:
  0.020374106 = sum of:
    0.020374106 = product of:
      0.040748212 = sum of:
        0.040748212 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040748212 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  16. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01 
    0.010187053 = product of:
  0.020374106 = sum of:
    0.020374106 = product of:
      0.040748212 = sum of:
        0.040748212 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040748212 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  17. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01 
    0.010187053 = product of:
  0.020374106 = sum of:
    0.020374106 = product of:
      0.040748212 = sum of:
        0.040748212 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040748212 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
  18. Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014) 0.01 
    0.010187053 = product of:
  0.020374106 = sum of:
    0.020374106 = product of:
      0.040748212 = sum of:
        0.040748212 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040748212 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  19. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.01 
    0.010187053 = product of:
  0.020374106 = sum of:
    0.020374106 = product of:
      0.040748212 = sum of:
        0.040748212 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040748212 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  20. Smiraglia, R.P.; Heuvel, C. van den: Classifications and concepts : towards an elementary theory of knowledge interaction (2013) 0.01 
    0.0101734 = product of:
  0.0203468 = sum of:
    0.0203468 = product of:
      0.0813872 = sum of:
        0.0813872 = weight(_text_:authors in 1758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0813872 = score(doc=1758,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22851472 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 1758, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1758)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper seeks to outline the central role of concepts in the knowledge universe, and the intertwining roles of works, instantiations, and documents. In particular the authors are interested in ontological and epistemological aspects of concepts and in the question to which extent there is a need for natural languages to link concepts to create meaningful patterns. Design/methodology/approach - The authors describe the quest for the smallest elements of knowledge from a historical perspective. They focus on the metaphor of the universe of knowledge and its impact on classification and retrieval of concepts. They outline the major components of an elementary theory of knowledge interaction. Findings - The paper outlines the major components of an elementary theory of knowledge interaction that is based on the structure of knowledge rather than on the content of documents, in which semantics becomes not a matter of synonymous concepts, but rather of coordinating knowledge structures. The evidence is derived from existing empirical research. Originality/value - The paper shifts the bases for knowledge organization from a search for a universal order to an understanding of a universal structure within which many context-dependent orders are possible.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 36
  • f 3
  • chi 1
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 39
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications