-
Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014)
0.04
0.039561242 = sum of:
0.018146584 = product of:
0.072586335 = sum of:
0.072586335 = weight(_text_:authors in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072586335 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021414658 = product of:
0.042829316 = sum of:
0.042829316 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042829316 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Cordeiro, M.I.; Slavic, A.: Data models for knowledge organization tools : evolution and perspectives (2003)
0.04
0.03647695 = sum of:
0.025663147 = product of:
0.10265259 = sum of:
0.10265259 = weight(_text_:authors in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10265259 = score(doc=2632,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.010813803 = product of:
0.021627607 = sum of:
0.021627607 = weight(_text_:m in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021627607 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the need for knowledge organization (KO) tools, such as library classifications, thesauri and subject heading systems, to be fully disclosed and available in the open network environment. The authors look at the place and value of traditional library knowledge organization tools in relation to the technical environment and expectations of the Semantic Web. Future requirements in this context are explored, stressing the need for KO systems to support semantic interoperability. In order to be fully shareable KO tools need to be reframed and reshaped in terms of conceptual and data models. The authors suggest that some useful approaches to this already exist in methodological and technical developments within the fields of ontology modelling and lexicographic and terminological data interchange.
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Karamuftuoglu, M.: Need for a systemic theory of classification in information science (2007)
0.03
0.028960388 = sum of:
0.018146584 = product of:
0.072586335 = sum of:
0.072586335 = weight(_text_:authors in 615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072586335 = score(doc=615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=615)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.010813803 = product of:
0.021627607 = sum of:
0.021627607 = weight(_text_:m in 615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021627607 = score(doc=615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=615)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the article, the author aims to clarify some of the issues surrounding the discussion regarding the usefulness of a substantive classification theory in information science (IS) by means of a broad perspective. By utilizing a concrete example from the High Accuracy Retrieval from Documents (HARD) track of a Text REtrieval Conference (TREC), the author suggests that the bag of words approach to information retrieval (IR) and techniques such as relevance feedback have significant limitations in expressing and resolving complex user information needs. He argues that a comprehensive analysis of information needs involves explicating often-implicit assumptions made by the authors of scholarly documents, as well as everyday texts such as news articles. He also argues that progress in IS can be furthered by developing general theories that are applicable to multiple domains. The concrete example of application of the domain-analytic approach to subject analysis in IS to the aesthetic evaluation of works of information arts is used to support this argument.
-
Machado, L.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Barcellos Almeida, M.; Borges, M.M.: Towards a moderate realistic foundation for ontological knowledge organization systems : the question of the naturalness of classifications (2023)
0.03
0.028960388 = sum of:
0.018146584 = product of:
0.072586335 = sum of:
0.072586335 = weight(_text_:authors in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072586335 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.010813803 = product of:
0.021627607 = sum of:
0.021627607 = weight(_text_:m in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021627607 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Several authors emphasize the need for a change in classification theory due to the influence of a dogmatic and monistic ontology supported by an outdated essentialism. These claims tend to focus on the fallibility of knowledge, the need for a pluralistic view, and the theoretical burden of observations. Regardless of the legitimacy of these concerns, there is the risk, when not moderate, to fall into the opposite relativistic extreme. Based on a narrative review of the literature, we aim to reflectively discuss the theoretical foundations that can serve as a basis for a realist position supporting pluralistic ontological classifications. The goal is to show that, against rather conventional solutions, objective scientific-based approaches to natural classifications are presented to be viable, allowing a proper distinction between ontological and taxonomic questions. Supported by critical scientific realism, we consider that such an approach is suitable for the development of ontological Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). We believe that ontological perspectivism can provide the necessary adaptation to the different granularities of reality.
-
Bowker, G.C.; Star, S.L.: Sorting things out : classification and its consequences (1999)
0.03
0.028163075 = sum of:
0.020953873 = product of:
0.08381549 = sum of:
0.08381549 = weight(_text_:authors in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08381549 = score(doc=733,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.34896153 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0072092023 = product of:
0.014418405 = sum of:
0.014418405 = weight(_text_:m in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014418405 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Is this book sociology, anthropology, or taxonomy? Sorting Things Out, by communications theorists Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star, covers a lot of conceptual ground in its effort to sort out exactly how and why we classify and categorize the things and concepts we encounter day to day. But the analysis doesn't stop there; the authors go on to explore what happens to our thinking as a result of our classifications. With great insight and precise academic language, they pick apart our information systems and language structures that lie deeper than the everyday categories we use. The authors focus first on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), a widely used scheme used by health professionals worldwide, but also look at other health information systems, racial classifications used by South Africa during apartheid, and more. Though it comes off as a bit too academic at times (by the end of the 20th century, most writers should be able to get the spelling of McDonald's restaurant right), the book has a clever charm that thoughtful readers will surely appreciate. A sly sense of humor sneaks into the writing, giving rise to the chapter title "The Kindness of Strangers," for example. After arguing that categorization is both strongly influenced by and a powerful reinforcer of ideology, it follows that revolutions (political or scientific) must change the way things are sorted in order to throw over the old system. Who knew that such simple, basic elements of thought could have such far-reaching consequences? Whether you ultimately place it with social science, linguistics, or (as the authors fear) fantasy, make sure you put Sorting Things Out in your reading pile.
- Type
- m
-
Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003)
0.02
0.021485642 = product of:
0.042971283 = sum of:
0.042971283 = sum of:
0.014418405 = weight(_text_:m in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014418405 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.028552879 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028552879 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 17:22:35
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.02
0.021414658 = product of:
0.042829316 = sum of:
0.042829316 = product of:
0.08565863 = sum of:
0.08565863 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08565863 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.02
0.021414658 = product of:
0.042829316 = sum of:
0.042829316 = product of:
0.08565863 = sum of:
0.08565863 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08565863 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.02
0.021414658 = product of:
0.042829316 = sum of:
0.042829316 = product of:
0.08565863 = sum of:
0.08565863 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08565863 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
-
Olson, H.; Nielsen, J.; Dippie, S.R.: Encyclopaedist rivalry, classificatory commonality, illusory universality (2003)
0.02
0.019306924 = sum of:
0.012097723 = product of:
0.04839089 = sum of:
0.04839089 = weight(_text_:authors in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04839089 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0072092023 = product of:
0.014418405 = sum of:
0.014418405 = weight(_text_:m in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014418405 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the cultural construction of classification as exemplified by the French Encyclopòudists, Jean d'Alembert and Denis Diderot, and the encyclopaedism of Samuel Taylor Coleridge analysing original texts digitized and encoded using XML and an adaptation of TEI. 1. Introduction This paper, focusing an encyclopaedism, is part of a larger study exploring the cultural construction of classification. The larger study explores possible foundations for bias in the structure of classifications with a view to more equitable practice. Bias in classification has been documented relative to race, ethnicity, gender, religion, sexuality and other factors. Analyses and proposed solutions have addressed only acute biases in particular systems, not the systems themselves. The project tentatively identifies the systemic roots of bias are culturally specific and reflected in the structure of conventional classifcatory practices. A wide range of western cultural texts from classic Greek philosophy to twentieth-century ethnography is being analysed. The consistency with which certain presumptions are revealed, no matter how different the philosophical and social views of the authors, indicates their ubiquity in western thought, though it is not mirrored in many other cultures. We hope that an understanding of these fundamental cultural presumptions will make space for development of alternative approaches to knowledge organization that can work alongside conventional methods. This paper describes an example of the first phase of the project, which is a deconstruction developed from relevant texts. In the context of encyclopaedism the key texts used in this paper are Jean d'Alembert's Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedie, selections from Denis Diderot's contributions to the Encyclopedie, and Samuel Taylor Coleridge's Treatise an Method and Prospectus of the Encyclopedia Metropolitana. We are analysing these texts in digital form using Extensible Markup Language (XML) implemented via a document type definition (DTD) created for the purpose including elements of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI). We will first explain the encoding methodology; then define the differences between the French Encyclopaedists and the English Coleridge; deconstruct these differences by allowing the commonalities between the texts to emerge; and, finally, examine their cultural specificity.
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Broadfield, A.: ¬The philosophy of classification (1956)
0.02
0.018023007 = product of:
0.036046013 = sum of:
0.036046013 = product of:
0.07209203 = sum of:
0.07209203 = weight(_text_:m in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07209203 = score(doc=1256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.54987466 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- m
-
Burkart, M.: Dokumentationssprachen (1990)
0.02
0.015293028 = product of:
0.030586056 = sum of:
0.030586056 = product of:
0.061172113 = sum of:
0.061172113 = weight(_text_:m in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061172113 = score(doc=4301,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.46658412 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
-
Grolier, E. de: ¬A study of general categories applicable to classification and coding in documentation (1962)
0.01
0.014418405 = product of:
0.02883681 = sum of:
0.02883681 = product of:
0.05767362 = sum of:
0.05767362 = weight(_text_:m in 3388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05767362 = score(doc=3388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 3388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3388)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- m
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.01
0.014276439 = product of:
0.028552879 = sum of:
0.028552879 = product of:
0.057105757 = sum of:
0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057105757 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.01
0.014276439 = product of:
0.028552879 = sum of:
0.028552879 = product of:
0.057105757 = sum of:
0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057105757 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.01
0.014276439 = product of:
0.028552879 = sum of:
0.028552879 = product of:
0.057105757 = sum of:
0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057105757 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.01
0.014276439 = product of:
0.028552879 = sum of:
0.028552879 = product of:
0.057105757 = sum of:
0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057105757 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.1-22
-
Kwasnik, B.H.; Rubin, V.L.: Stretching conceptual structures in classifications across languages and cultures (2003)
0.01
0.012831573 = product of:
0.025663147 = sum of:
0.025663147 = product of:
0.10265259 = sum of:
0.10265259 = weight(_text_:authors in 5517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10265259 = score(doc=5517,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5517, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5517)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors describe the difficulties of translating classifications from a source language and culture to another language and culture. To demonstrate these problems, kinship terms and concepts from native speakers of fourteen languages were collected and analyzed to find differences between their terms and structures and those used in English. Using the representations of kinship terms in the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) as examples, the authors identified the source of possible lack of mapping between the domain of kinship in the fourteen languages studied and the LCC and DDC. Finally, some preliminary suggestions for how to make translated classifications more linguistically and culturally hospitable are offered.
-
Srivastava, A.P.: Theory of knowledge classification in libraries (1964)
0.01
0.012616104 = product of:
0.025232209 = sum of:
0.025232209 = product of:
0.050464418 = sum of:
0.050464418 = weight(_text_:m in 6250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050464418 = score(doc=6250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 6250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6250)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- m
-
Gnoli, C.: Classificazione a facette (2004)
0.01
0.012616104 = product of:
0.025232209 = sum of:
0.025232209 = product of:
0.050464418 = sum of:
0.050464418 = weight(_text_:m in 3746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050464418 = score(doc=3746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 3746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- m
