Search (71 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.05 
    0.051636603 = product of:
  0.103273205 = sum of:
    0.103273205 = sum of:
      0.02348528 = weight(_text_:d in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02348528 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.093236335 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.079787925 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079787925 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: From classification to thesauri: making good use of facets
  2. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.05 
    0.051636603 = product of:
  0.103273205 = sum of:
    0.103273205 = sum of:
      0.02348528 = weight(_text_:d in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02348528 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.093236335 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.079787925 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079787925 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: The good use of facets: from classifications to thesauri
  3. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.03 
    0.0344244 = product of:
  0.0688488 = sum of:
    0.0688488 = sum of:
      0.015656855 = weight(_text_:d in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015656855 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.093236335 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
      0.05319195 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05319195 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Pages
    S.1-22
  4. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.03 
    0.03346929 = sum of:
  0.013522309 = product of:
    0.067611545 = sum of:
      0.067611545 = weight(_text_:authors in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.067611545 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22372408 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.019946981 = product of:
    0.039893962 = sum of:
      0.039893962 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039893962 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992) 0.02 
    0.021657322 = sum of:
  0.01872166 = product of:
    0.093608305 = sum of:
      0.093608305 = weight(_text_:goetz in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.093608305 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37228408 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.5860133 = idf(docFreq=60, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.2514432 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.5860133 = idf(docFreq=60, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.00293566 = product of:
    0.00587132 = sum of:
      0.00587132 = weight(_text_:d in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.00587132 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.093236335 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.06297245 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
  6. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.02 
    0.019946981 = product of:
  0.039893962 = sum of:
    0.039893962 = product of:
      0.079787925 = sum of:
        0.079787925 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079787925 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  7. Kublik, A.; Clevette, V.; Ward, D.; Olson, H.A.: Adapting dominant classifications to particular contexts (2003) 0.02 
    0.01939363 = sum of:
  0.013522309 = product of:
    0.067611545 = sum of:
      0.067611545 = weight(_text_:authors in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.067611545 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22372408 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.00587132 = product of:
    0.01174264 = sum of:
      0.01174264 = weight(_text_:d in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01174264 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.093236335 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper addresses the process of adapting to a particular culture or context a classification that has grown out of western culture to become a global standard. The authors use a project that adapts DDC for use in a feminist/women's issues context to demonstrate an approach that works. The project is particularly useful as an interdisciplinary example. Discussion consists of four parts: (1) definition of the problem indicating the need for adaptation and efforts to date; (2) description of the methodology developed for creating an expansion; (3) description of the interface developed for actually doing the work, with its potential for a distributed group to work on it together (could even be internationally distributed); and (4) generalization of how the methodology could be used for particular contexts by country, ethnicity, perspective or other defining factors.
  8. Machado, L.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Barcellos Almeida, M.; Borges, M.M.: Towards a moderate realistic foundation for ontological knowledge organization systems : the question of the naturalness of classifications (2023) 0.02 
    0.01939363 = sum of:
  0.013522309 = product of:
    0.067611545 = sum of:
      0.067611545 = weight(_text_:authors in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.067611545 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22372408 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.00587132 = product of:
    0.01174264 = sum of:
      0.01174264 = weight(_text_:d in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01174264 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.093236335 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049075063 = queryNorm
          0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Several authors emphasize the need for a change in classification theory due to the influence of a dogmatic and monistic ontology supported by an outdated essentialism. These claims tend to focus on the fallibility of knowledge, the need for a pluralistic view, and the theoretical burden of observations. Regardless of the legitimacy of these concerns, there is the risk, when not moderate, to fall into the opposite relativistic extreme. Based on a narrative review of the literature, we aim to reflectively discuss the theoretical foundations that can serve as a basis for a realist position supporting pluralistic ontological classifications. The goal is to show that, against rather conventional solutions, objective scientific-based approaches to natural classifications are presented to be viable, allowing a proper distinction between ontological and taxonomic questions. Supported by critical scientific realism, we consider that such an approach is suitable for the development of ontological Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). We believe that ontological perspectivism can provide the necessary adaptation to the different granularities of reality.
  9. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01 
    0.013297987 = product of:
  0.026595974 = sum of:
    0.026595974 = product of:
      0.05319195 = sum of:
        0.05319195 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05319195 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  10. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01 
    0.013297987 = product of:
  0.026595974 = sum of:
    0.026595974 = product of:
      0.05319195 = sum of:
        0.05319195 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05319195 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  11. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01 
    0.013297987 = product of:
  0.026595974 = sum of:
    0.026595974 = product of:
      0.05319195 = sum of:
        0.05319195 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05319195 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  12. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01 
    0.011635739 = product of:
  0.023271479 = sum of:
    0.023271479 = product of:
      0.046542957 = sum of:
        0.046542957 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046542957 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  13. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01 
    0.011635739 = product of:
  0.023271479 = sum of:
    0.023271479 = product of:
      0.046542957 = sum of:
        0.046542957 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046542957 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01 
    0.011635739 = product of:
  0.023271479 = sum of:
    0.023271479 = product of:
      0.046542957 = sum of:
        0.046542957 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046542957 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.22-36
  15. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01 
    0.009973491 = product of:
  0.019946981 = sum of:
    0.019946981 = product of:
      0.039893962 = sum of:
        0.039893962 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039893962 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  16. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01 
    0.009973491 = product of:
  0.019946981 = sum of:
    0.019946981 = product of:
      0.039893962 = sum of:
        0.039893962 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039893962 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  17. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01 
    0.009973491 = product of:
  0.019946981 = sum of:
    0.019946981 = product of:
      0.039893962 = sum of:
        0.039893962 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039893962 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
  18. Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014) 0.01 
    0.009973491 = product of:
  0.019946981 = sum of:
    0.019946981 = product of:
      0.039893962 = sum of:
        0.039893962 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039893962 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  19. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.01 
    0.009973491 = product of:
  0.019946981 = sum of:
    0.019946981 = product of:
      0.039893962 = sum of:
        0.039893962 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039893962 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17185251 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  20. Dahlberg, I.: Einteilungsprinzipien von Klassifikationssystemen (1974) 0.01 
    0.009785534 = product of:
  0.019571068 = sum of:
    0.019571068 = product of:
      0.039142136 = sum of:
        0.039142136 = weight(_text_:d in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039142136 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093236335 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049075063 = queryNorm
            0.41981634 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 47
  • d 19
  • f 3
  • chi 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 60
  • m 7
  • el 2
  • n 2
  • s 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications