-
Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014)
0.04
0.039302155 = sum of:
0.018027741 = product of:
0.072110966 = sum of:
0.072110966 = weight(_text_:authors in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072110966 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021274412 = product of:
0.042548824 = sum of:
0.042548824 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042548824 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015)
0.03
0.03357068 = product of:
0.06714136 = sum of:
0.06714136 = sum of:
0.031684007 = weight(_text_:r in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031684007 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.035457354 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035457354 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.11.2015 21:27:22
-
Maltby, A.; Marcella, R.: Organizing knowledge : the need for system and unity (2000)
0.03
0.031365566 = product of:
0.06273113 = sum of:
0.06273113 = product of:
0.12546226 = sum of:
0.12546226 = weight(_text_:r in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12546226 = score(doc=181,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.724119 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- The future of classification. Ed. R. Marcella u. A. Maltby
-
Kluth, R.: Schlagwortindex und Schlagwortkatalog (1957)
0.02
0.022178805 = product of:
0.04435761 = sum of:
0.04435761 = product of:
0.08871522 = sum of:
0.08871522 = weight(_text_:r in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08871522 = score(doc=273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Thiele, R.: ¬Ein Lehrbuch für die Klassifikationstheorie? : Ein Besprechungsaufsatz zu: Brian Buchanan: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationstheorie. München: Saur 1989. (1992)
0.02
0.022178805 = product of:
0.04435761 = sum of:
0.04435761 = product of:
0.08871522 = sum of:
0.08871522 = weight(_text_:r in 452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08871522 = score(doc=452,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 452, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=452)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Foskett, A.C.: ¬The future of facetted classification (2000)
0.02
0.022178805 = product of:
0.04435761 = sum of:
0.04435761 = product of:
0.08871522 = sum of:
0.08871522 = weight(_text_:r in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08871522 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- The future of classification. Ed. R. Marcella u. A. Maltby
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.02
0.021274412 = product of:
0.042548824 = sum of:
0.042548824 = product of:
0.08509765 = sum of:
0.08509765 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08509765 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.02
0.021274412 = product of:
0.042548824 = sum of:
0.042548824 = product of:
0.08509765 = sum of:
0.08509765 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08509765 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.02
0.021274412 = product of:
0.042548824 = sum of:
0.042548824 = product of:
0.08509765 = sum of:
0.08509765 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08509765 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
-
Szostak, R.: Facet analysis without facet indicators (2017)
0.02
0.019010404 = product of:
0.03802081 = sum of:
0.03802081 = product of:
0.07604162 = sum of:
0.07604162 = weight(_text_:r in 4159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07604162 = score(doc=4159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 4159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Classification Research Group: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (1985)
0.02
0.018519074 = sum of:
0.009013871 = product of:
0.036055483 = sum of:
0.036055483 = weight(_text_:authors in 3640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036055483 = score(doc=3640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.15110476 = fieldWeight in 3640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3640)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.009505202 = product of:
0.019010404 = sum of:
0.019010404 = weight(_text_:r in 3640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019010404 = score(doc=3640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.1097206 = fieldWeight in 3640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The technique chosen was S. R. Ranganathan's facet analysis (q.v.). This method works from the bottom up: a term is categorized according to its parent class, as a kind, state, property, action, operation upon something, result of an Operation, agent, and so on. These modes of definition represent characteristics of division. Following the publication of this paper, the group worked for over ten years developing systems following this general pattern with various changes and experimental arrangements. Ranganathan's Colon Classification was the original of this type of method, but the Group rejected his contention that there are only five fundamental categories to be found in the knowledge base. They did, in fact, end up with varying numbers of categories in the experimental systems which they ultimately were to make. Notation was also recognized as a problem, being complex, illogical, lengthy, obscure and hard to understand. The Group tried to develop a rationale for notation, both as an ordering and as a finding device. To describe and represent a class, a notation could be long, but as a finding device, brevity would be preferable. The Group was to experiment with this aspect of classification and produce a number of interesting results. The Classification Research Group began meeting informally to discuss classification matters in 1952 and continues to meet, usually in London, to the present day. Most of the British authors whose work is presented in these pages have been members for most of the Group's life and continue in it. The Group maintains the basic position outlined in this paper to the present day. Its experimental approach has resulted in much more information about the nature and functions of classification systems. The ideal system has yet to be found. Classification research is still a promising area. The future calls for more experimentation based an reasoned approaches, following the example set by the Classification Research Group.
-
Triska, R.: Artificial intelligence, classification theory and the uncertainty reduction process (2007)
0.02
0.015842004 = product of:
0.031684007 = sum of:
0.031684007 = product of:
0.063368015 = sum of:
0.063368015 = weight(_text_:r in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063368015 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.01
0.014182941 = product of:
0.028365882 = sum of:
0.028365882 = product of:
0.056731764 = sum of:
0.056731764 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056731764 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.01
0.014182941 = product of:
0.028365882 = sum of:
0.028365882 = product of:
0.056731764 = sum of:
0.056731764 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056731764 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.01
0.014182941 = product of:
0.028365882 = sum of:
0.028365882 = product of:
0.056731764 = sum of:
0.056731764 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056731764 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.01
0.014182941 = product of:
0.028365882 = sum of:
0.028365882 = product of:
0.056731764 = sum of:
0.056731764 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056731764 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.1-22
-
Szostak, R.: ¬A schema for unifying human science : interdisciplinary perspectives on culture (2003)
0.01
0.013442385 = product of:
0.02688477 = sum of:
0.02688477 = product of:
0.05376954 = sum of:
0.05376954 = weight(_text_:r in 803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05376954 = score(doc=803,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 803, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=803)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 39(2012) no.4, S.300-303 (M.J. Fox) Vgl. auch: Szostak, R.: Speaking truth to power in classification: response to Fox's review of my work; KO 39:4, 300. In: Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.1, S.76-77.
-
Cordeiro, M.I.; Slavic, A.: Data models for knowledge organization tools : evolution and perspectives (2003)
0.01
0.012747538 = product of:
0.025495077 = sum of:
0.025495077 = product of:
0.101980306 = sum of:
0.101980306 = weight(_text_:authors in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101980306 = score(doc=2632,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the need for knowledge organization (KO) tools, such as library classifications, thesauri and subject heading systems, to be fully disclosed and available in the open network environment. The authors look at the place and value of traditional library knowledge organization tools in relation to the technical environment and expectations of the Semantic Web. Future requirements in this context are explored, stressing the need for KO systems to support semantic interoperability. In order to be fully shareable KO tools need to be reframed and reshaped in terms of conceptual and data models. The authors suggest that some useful approaches to this already exist in methodological and technical developments within the fields of ontology modelling and lexicographic and terminological data interchange.
-
Kwasnik, B.H.; Rubin, V.L.: Stretching conceptual structures in classifications across languages and cultures (2003)
0.01
0.012747538 = product of:
0.025495077 = sum of:
0.025495077 = product of:
0.101980306 = sum of:
0.101980306 = weight(_text_:authors in 5517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101980306 = score(doc=5517,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5517, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5517)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors describe the difficulties of translating classifications from a source language and culture to another language and culture. To demonstrate these problems, kinship terms and concepts from native speakers of fourteen languages were collected and analyzed to find differences between their terms and structures and those used in English. Using the representations of kinship terms in the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) as examples, the authors identified the source of possible lack of mapping between the domain of kinship in the fourteen languages studied and the LCC and DDC. Finally, some preliminary suggestions for how to make translated classifications more linguistically and culturally hospitable are offered.
-
Moss, R.: Categories and relations : Origins of two classification theories (1964)
0.01
0.012673602 = product of:
0.025347205 = sum of:
0.025347205 = product of:
0.05069441 = sum of:
0.05069441 = weight(_text_:r in 1816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05069441 = score(doc=1816,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 1816, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1816)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
