-
Mills, J.; Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification : Introduction and auxiliary schedules (1992)
0.10
0.09717044 = product of:
0.19434088 = sum of:
0.19434088 = product of:
0.58302265 = sum of:
0.58302265 = weight(_text_:bliss in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.58302265 = score(doc=821,freq=14.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
1.6728933 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- LCSH
- Bliss Bibliographic classification
- PRECIS
- Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
- Subject
- Bliss Bibliographic classification
Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
-
Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996)
0.09
0.09121552 = sum of:
0.073453955 = product of:
0.22036186 = sum of:
0.22036186 = weight(_text_:bliss in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22036186 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.017761566 = product of:
0.053284694 = sum of:
0.053284694 = weight(_text_:29 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053284694 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In relation to indexing, one of the chief implications of cognitive epistemology is the necessity for redefining knowledge representation concepts for information filing and retrieval purposes. Such a redefinition involves abandoning the traditional, hierarchical, closed-structure classification model. Considers the following in detail: a semiotic critique of classification principles; Ranganathan's classification theory; Ranganathan and cognitive epistemology; and some reflections on the DDC and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification
- Date
- 14. 7.1996 13:29:45
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001)
0.08
0.07602572 = sum of:
0.06492474 = product of:
0.19477421 = sum of:
0.19477421 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19477421 = score(doc=5895,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0111009795 = product of:
0.033302937 = sum of:
0.033302937 = weight(_text_:29 in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033302937 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
- Date
- 29. 6.2014 17:31:49
-
Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004)
0.07
0.06841164 = sum of:
0.05509047 = product of:
0.1652714 = sum of:
0.1652714 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1652714 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.013321174 = product of:
0.03996352 = sum of:
0.03996352 = weight(_text_:29 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03996352 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The paper analyses the importance of data presentation and modelling and its role in improving the management, use and exchange of analytico-synthetic classifications in automated systems. Inefficiencies, in this respect, hinder the automation of classification systems that offer the possibility of building compound index/search terms. The lack of machine readable data expressing the semantics and structure of a classification vocabulary has negative effects on information management and retrieval, thus restricting the potential of both automated systems and classifications themselves. The authors analysed the data representation structure of three general analytico-synthetic classification systems (BC2-Bliss Bibliographic Classification; BSO-Broad System of Ordering; UDC-Universal Decimal Classification) and put forward some core requirements for classification data representation
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 14:20:40
-
Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014)
0.07
0.06829181 = sum of:
0.05509047 = product of:
0.1652714 = sum of:
0.1652714 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1652714 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.013201341 = product of:
0.039604023 = sum of:
0.039604023 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039604023 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Bliss, H.E.: ¬A bibliographic classification : principles and definitions (1985)
0.06
0.06090481 = product of:
0.12180962 = sum of:
0.12180962 = product of:
0.36542884 = sum of:
0.36542884 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36542884 = score(doc=3621,freq=22.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
1.0485414 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Henry Evelyn Bliss (1870-1955) devoted several decades of his life to the study of classification and the development of the Bibliographic Classification scheme while serving as a librarian in the College of the City of New York. In the course of the development of the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss developed a body of classification theory published in a number of articles and books, among which the best known are The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences (1929), Organization of Knowledge in Libraries and the Subject Approach to Books (1933; 2nd ed., 1939), and the lengthy preface to A Bibliographic Classification (Volumes 1-2, 1940; 2nd ed., 1952). In developing the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss carefully established its philosophical and theoretical basis, more so than was attempted by the makers of other classification schemes, with the possible exception of S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.) and his Colon Classification. The basic principles established by Bliss for the Bibliographic Classification are: consensus, collocation of related subjects, subordination of special to general and gradation in specialty, and the relativity of classes and of classification (hence alternative location and alternative treatment). In the preface to the schedules of A Bibliographic Classification, Bliss spells out the general principles of classification as weIl as principles specifically related to his scheme. The first volume of the schedules appeared in 1940. In 1952, he issued a second edition of the volume with a rewritten preface, from which the following excerpt is taken, and with the addition of a "Concise Synopsis," which is also included here to illustrate the principles of classificatory structure. In the excerpt reprinted below, Bliss discusses the correlation between classes, concepts, and terms, as weIl as the hierarchical structure basic to his classification scheme. In his discussion of cross-classification, Bliss recognizes the "polydimensional" nature of classification and the difficulties inherent in the two-dimensional approach which is characteristic of linear classification. This is one of the earliest works in which the multidimensional nature of classification is recognized. The Bibliographic Classification did not meet with great success in the United States because the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Library of Congress Classification were already weIl ensconced in American libraries by then. Nonetheless, it attracted considerable attention in the British Commonwealth and elsewhere in the world. A committee was formed in Britain which later became the Bliss Classification Association. A faceted edition of the scheme has been in preparation under the direction of J. Mills and V. Broughton. Several parts of this new edition, entitled Bliss Bibliographic Classification, have been published.
- Footnote
- Original in: Bliss, H.E.: A bibliographic classification extended by systematic auxuliary schedules for composite specification and notation. vols 1-2. 2nd ed. New York: Wilson 1952. S.3-11.
-
Campbell, G.: ¬A queer eye for the faceted guy : how a universal classification principle can be applied to a distinct subculture (2004)
0.05
0.04560776 = sum of:
0.036726978 = product of:
0.11018093 = sum of:
0.11018093 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11018093 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.31614712 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.008880783 = product of:
0.026642347 = sum of:
0.026642347 = weight(_text_:29 in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026642347 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- 1. Introduction The title of this paper is taken from a TV show which has gained considerable popularity in North America: A Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, in which a group of gay men subject a helpless straight male to a complete fashion makeover. In facet analysis, this would probably be seen as an "operation upon" something, and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification would place it roughly two-thirds of the way along its facet order, after "types" and "materials," but before "space" and "time." But the link between gay communities and facet analysis extends beyond the facetious title. As Web-based information resources for gay and lesbian users continue to grow, Web sites that cater to, or at least refrain from discriminating against gay and lesbian users are faced with a daunting challenge when trying to organize these diverse resources in a way that facilitates congenial browsing. And principles of faceted classification, with their emphasis an clear and consistent principles of subdivision and their care in defining the order of subdivisions, offer an important opportunity to use time-honoured classification principles to serve the growing needs of these communities. If faceted organization schemes are to work, however, we need to know more about gay and lesbian users, and how they categorize themselves and their information sources. This paper presents the results of an effort to learn more.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 10:25:18
-
Bury, S.: Comparison of classification schedules for libraries (1980)
0.04
0.036726978 = product of:
0.073453955 = sum of:
0.073453955 = product of:
0.22036186 = sum of:
0.22036186 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22036186 = score(doc=1603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the basic criteria for comparison of classification for libraries. Identifies a set of intellectual criteria, derived from the general theory of library classification as expounded by Dewey, Bliss, and Ranganathan. Compares LC, DC, and BC in relation criteria namely - order, university, hospitality, adaptability, terminology, relationship, synthesis, notational features - simplicity, brevity, expressiveness, specifity, synonymity, flexibility, correlation, case of use, revision and practical use. Highlights the value of comparative studies among classification schemes
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.04
0.035363354 = product of:
0.07072671 = sum of:
0.07072671 = product of:
0.10609006 = sum of:
0.053284694 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053284694 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.052805368 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052805368 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 16:50:24
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.03
0.030942935 = product of:
0.06188587 = sum of:
0.06188587 = product of:
0.0928288 = sum of:
0.046624105 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046624105 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.046204697 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046204697 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multidimensional knowledge structures (2003)
0.03
0.027545234 = product of:
0.05509047 = sum of:
0.05509047 = product of:
0.1652714 = sum of:
0.1652714 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1652714 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004)
0.03
0.027545234 = product of:
0.05509047 = sum of:
0.05509047 = product of:
0.1652714 = sum of:
0.1652714 = weight(_text_:bliss in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1652714 = score(doc=831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
-
Olson, H.A.: Wind and rain and dark of night : classification in scientific discourse communities (2008)
0.03
0.027545234 = product of:
0.05509047 = sum of:
0.05509047 = product of:
0.1652714 = sum of:
0.1652714 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1652714 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Classifications of natural phenomena demonstrate the applicability of discourse analysis in finding the importance of concepts such as warrant for categorization and classification. Temperature scales provide a body of official literature for close consideration. Official documents of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) reveal the reasoning behind choices affecting these standards. A more cursory scrutiny of the Saffir-Simpson Scale through scholarly publications and documentation from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (KIST) indicates the potential of this form of analysis. The same holds true for an examination of the definition of what is a planet as determined by the International Astronomical Union. As Sayers, Richardson, and Bliss have indicated, there seem to be principles and a reliance on context that bridge the differences between natural and artificial, scientific and bibliographic classifications.
-
Kumar, K.: Theory of classification (1985)
0.03
0.027545234 = product of:
0.05509047 = sum of:
0.05509047 = product of:
0.1652714 = sum of:
0.1652714 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1652714 = score(doc=2069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This book provides a coherent account of the theory of classification. It discusses the contributions made by theoreticians like E.C. Richardson, J.B. Brown, W. Hulme, W.C. Berwick Sayers, H.E. Bliss and S.R. Ranganathan. However, the theory put forward by S.R. Ranganathan predominates the whole book because his contribution is far more than anybody else's. Five major schemes - DDC, UDC, LCC, CC, and BC - have also been discussed. Library classification is a specialized area of study. In recent years, library classification has become a vast and complicated field of study using highly technical terminology. A special attempt has been made to provide descriptions as simple and direct as could be possible. To illustrate the theory of classification, large number of examples have been given from all major schemes so that an average student ould also grasp the concepts easily. This book has been especially written to meet the requirements of students, preparing for their library science, documentation, information science diplomas and degrees.
-
Hjoerland, B.: Facet analysis : the logical approach to knowledge organization (2013)
0.02
0.02295436 = product of:
0.04590872 = sum of:
0.04590872 = product of:
0.13772616 = sum of:
0.13772616 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13772616 = score(doc=2720,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 2720, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2720)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The facet-analytic paradigm is probably the most distinct approach to knowledge organization within Library and Information Science, and in many ways it has dominated what has be termed "modern classification theory". It was mainly developed by S.R. Ranganathan and the British Classification Research Group, but it is mostly based on principles of logical division developed more than two millennia ago. Colon Classification (CC) and Bliss 2 (BC2) are among the most important systems developed on this theoretical basis, but it has also influenced the development of other systems, such as the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and is also applied in many websites. It still has a strong position in the field and it is the most explicit and "pure" theoretical approach to knowledge organization (KO) (but it is not by implication necessarily also the most important one). The strength of this approach is its logical principles and the way it provides structures in knowledge organization systems (KOS). The main weaknesses are (1) its lack of empirical basis and (2) its speculative ordering of knowledge without basis in the development or influence of theories and socio-historical studies. It seems to be based on the problematic assumption that relations between concepts are a priori and not established by the development of models, theories and laws.
-
Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015)
0.02
0.022102099 = product of:
0.044204198 = sum of:
0.044204198 = product of:
0.06630629 = sum of:
0.033302937 = weight(_text_:29 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033302937 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.033003356 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033003356 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.11.2015 21:27:22
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories (1985)
0.02
0.016068053 = product of:
0.032136105 = sum of:
0.032136105 = product of:
0.096408315 = sum of:
0.096408315 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096408315 = score(doc=3631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.27662873 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Colon Classification has not been widely adopted; however, the theory of facet analysis and synthesis Ranganathan developed has proved to be most influential. Although many theorists of subject analysis do not totally agree with his fundamental categories or citation order, Ranganathan's concept of facet analysis and synthesis has provided a viable method and a framework for approaching subject analysis and has become the foundation of subject analysis in the twentieth century. In this sense, his theory laid the groundwork for later investigations and inquiries into the nature of subject and classificatory categories and citation order. His influence is felt in all modern classification schemes and indexing systems. This is attested to by the citations to his ideas and works in numerous papers included in this collection and by the fact that other modern classification systems such as the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification have become increasingly faceted in recent editions. The following chapter from Elements of Library Classification represents one of Ranganathan's many expositions of facet analysis and fundamental categories. It is chosen because of its clarity of expression and comprehensibility (many readers find the majority of his writings difficult to understand).
-
Foskett, A.C.: ¬The future of facetted classification (2000)
0.02
0.015541369 = product of:
0.031082738 = sum of:
0.031082738 = product of:
0.09324821 = sum of:
0.09324821 = weight(_text_:29 in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09324821 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.2002 19:30:29
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.01
0.013201341 = product of:
0.026402682 = sum of:
0.026402682 = product of:
0.079208046 = sum of:
0.079208046 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079208046 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.01
0.013201341 = product of:
0.026402682 = sum of:
0.026402682 = product of:
0.079208046 = sum of:
0.079208046 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079208046 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0487184 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
