Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.06
    0.059043027 = product of:
      0.118086055 = sum of:
        0.118086055 = sum of:
          0.06183248 = weight(_text_:services in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06183248 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05625358 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of faceted classification has its long history and importance in the human civilization. Recently, more and more consumer Web sites adopt the idea of facet analysis to organize and display their products or services. The aim of this article is to review the origin and develpment of faceted classification, as well as its concepts, essence, advantage and limitation. Further, the applications of faceted classification in various domians have been explored.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  2. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.05
    0.051662654 = product of:
      0.10332531 = sum of:
        0.10332531 = sum of:
          0.054103423 = weight(_text_:services in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054103423 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.04922188 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04922188 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 45(2001) no.3, S.115-122
  3. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.04
    0.044282272 = product of:
      0.088564545 = sum of:
        0.088564545 = sum of:
          0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04637436 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042190183 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  4. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.02
    0.021095091 = product of:
      0.042190183 = sum of:
        0.042190183 = product of:
          0.084380366 = sum of:
            0.084380366 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084380366 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  5. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.02
    0.021095091 = product of:
      0.042190183 = sum of:
        0.042190183 = product of:
          0.084380366 = sum of:
            0.084380366 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084380366 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  6. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.02
    0.021095091 = product of:
      0.042190183 = sum of:
        0.042190183 = product of:
          0.084380366 = sum of:
            0.084380366 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084380366 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  7. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.014063395 = product of:
      0.02812679 = sum of:
        0.02812679 = product of:
          0.05625358 = sum of:
            0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05625358 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  8. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.014063395 = product of:
      0.02812679 = sum of:
        0.02812679 = product of:
          0.05625358 = sum of:
            0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05625358 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  9. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.01
    0.014063395 = product of:
      0.02812679 = sum of:
        0.02812679 = product of:
          0.05625358 = sum of:
            0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05625358 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  10. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.01230547 = product of:
      0.02461094 = sum of:
        0.02461094 = product of:
          0.04922188 = sum of:
            0.04922188 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04922188 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  11. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.01230547 = product of:
      0.02461094 = sum of:
        0.02461094 = product of:
          0.04922188 = sum of:
            0.04922188 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04922188 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
  12. Garcia Marco, F.J.; Esteban Navarro, M.A.: On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification (1993) 0.01
    0.01159359 = product of:
      0.02318718 = sum of:
        0.02318718 = product of:
          0.04637436 = sum of:
            0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04637436 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Intended is first of all a preliminary review of the implications that the new approaches to the theory of classification, mainly from cognitive psychology and epistemology may have for information work and research. As a secondary topic the scientific relations existing among information science, epistemology and the cognitive sciences are discussed. Classification is seen as a central activity in all daily and scientific activities, and, of course, of knowledge organization in information services. There is a mutual implication between classification and conceptualization, as the former moves in a natural way to the latter and the best result elaborated for classification is the concept. Research in concept theory is a need for a theory of classification. In this direction it is of outstanding importance to integrate the achievements of 'natural concept formation theory' (NCFT) as an alternative approach to conceptualization different from the traditional one of logicians and problem solving researchers. In conclusion both approaches are seen as being complementary: the NCFT approach being closer to the user and the logical one being more suitable for experts, including 'expert systems'
  13. Gnoli, C.; Mei, H.: Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval (2006) 0.01
    0.01159359 = product of:
      0.02318718 = sum of:
        0.02318718 = product of:
          0.04637436 = sum of:
            0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04637436 = score(doc=534,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization systems and services"
  14. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.010547546 = product of:
      0.021095091 = sum of:
        0.021095091 = product of:
          0.042190183 = sum of:
            0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042190183 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  15. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01
    0.010547546 = product of:
      0.021095091 = sum of:
        0.021095091 = product of:
          0.042190183 = sum of:
            0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042190183 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
  16. Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014) 0.01
    0.010547546 = product of:
      0.021095091 = sum of:
        0.021095091 = product of:
          0.042190183 = sum of:
            0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042190183 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  17. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.01
    0.010547546 = product of:
      0.021095091 = sum of:
        0.021095091 = product of:
          0.042190183 = sum of:
            0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042190183 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  18. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.01
    0.010547546 = product of:
      0.021095091 = sum of:
        0.021095091 = product of:
          0.042190183 = sum of:
            0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042190183 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  19. Beghtol, C.: Semantic validity : concepts of warrants in bibliographic classification systems (1986) 0.01
    0.009661325 = product of:
      0.01932265 = sum of:
        0.01932265 = product of:
          0.0386453 = sum of:
            0.0386453 = weight(_text_:services in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0386453 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 30(1986), S.109-125
  20. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.01
    0.008789622 = product of:
      0.017579244 = sum of:
        0.017579244 = product of:
          0.03515849 = sum of:
            0.03515849 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03515849 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22

Years

Languages

  • e 25
  • f 3
  • chi 1
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 28
  • m 2