Search (103 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.10 
    0.101165846 = product of:
  0.20233169 = sum of:
    0.20233169 = sum of:
      0.118381366 = weight(_text_:theory in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.118381366 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05163523 = queryNorm
          0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.08395033 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08395033 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18081778 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05163523 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  2. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.06 
    0.059013415 = product of:
  0.11802683 = sum of:
    0.11802683 = sum of:
      0.0690558 = weight(_text_:theory in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0690558 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05163523 = queryNorm
          0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.048971027 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048971027 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18081778 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05163523 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.22-36
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  3. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.05 
    0.050582923 = product of:
  0.101165846 = sum of:
    0.101165846 = sum of:
      0.059190683 = weight(_text_:theory in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059190683 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05163523 = queryNorm
          0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
      0.041975167 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041975167 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18081778 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05163523 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  4. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.04 
    0.042152442 = product of:
  0.084304884 = sum of:
    0.084304884 = sum of:
      0.049325574 = weight(_text_:theory in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049325574 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05163523 = queryNorm
          0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
      0.034979306 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034979306 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18081778 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05163523 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Classification is an activity that transcends time and space and that bridges the divisions between different languages and cultures, including the divisions between academic disciplines. Classificatory activity, however, serves different purposes in different situations. Classifications for infonnation retrieval can be called "professional" classifications and classifications in other fields can be called "naïve" classifications because they are developed by people who have no particular interest in classificatory issues. The general purpose of naïve classification systems is to discover new knowledge. In contrast, the general purpose of information retrieval classifications is to classify pre-existing knowledge. Different classificatory purposes may thus inform systems that are intended to span the cultural specifics of the globalized information society. This paper builds an previous research into the purposes and characteristics of naïve classifications. It describes some of the relationships between the purpose and context of a naive classification, the units of analysis used in it, and the theory that the context and the units of analysis imply.
    Pages
    S.19-22
  5. Tennis, J.T.: Foundational, first-order, and second-order classification theory (2015) 0.04 
    0.041854136 = product of:
  0.08370827 = sum of:
    0.08370827 = product of:
      0.16741654 = sum of:
        0.16741654 = weight(_text_:theory in 2204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16741654 = score(doc=2204,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.7796986 = fieldWeight in 2204, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Both basic and applied research on the construction, implementation, maintenance, and evaluation of classification schemes is called classification theory. If we employ Ritzer's metatheoretical method of analysis on the over one-hundred year-old body of literature, we can se categories of theory emerge. This paper looks at one particular part of knowledge organization work, namely classification theory, and asks 1) what are the contours of this intellectual space, and, 2) what have we produced in the theoretical reflection on constructing, implementing, and evaluating classification schemes? The preliminary findings from this work are that classification theory can be separated into three kinds: foundational classification theory, first-order classification theory, and second-order classification theory, each with its own concerns and objects of study.
  6. Neelameghan, A.: Classification, theory of (1971) 0.04 
    0.039460458 = product of:
  0.078920916 = sum of:
    0.078920916 = product of:
      0.15784183 = sum of:
        0.15784183 = weight(_text_:theory in 1988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15784183 = score(doc=1988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.7351069 = fieldWeight in 1988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1988)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Gopinath, M.A.: Ranganathan's theory of facet analysis and knowledge representation (1992) 0.04 
    0.039460458 = product of:
  0.078920916 = sum of:
    0.078920916 = product of:
      0.15784183 = sum of:
        0.15784183 = weight(_text_:theory in 6133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15784183 = score(doc=6133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.7351069 = fieldWeight in 6133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6133)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Farradane, J.E.L.: ¬A scientific theory of classification and indexing : further considerations (1952) 0.03 
    0.0345279 = product of:
  0.0690558 = sum of:
    0.0690558 = product of:
      0.1381116 = sum of:
        0.1381116 = weight(_text_:theory in 1655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1381116 = score(doc=1655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.6432185 = fieldWeight in 1655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1655)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. McLachlan, H.V.: Buchanan, Locke and Wittgenstein on classification (1981) 0.03 
    0.0345279 = product of:
  0.0690558 = sum of:
    0.0690558 = product of:
      0.1381116 = sum of:
        0.1381116 = weight(_text_:theory in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1381116 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.6432185 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rezensionsbeitrag zu Buchanan, B.: Theory of library classification
  10. Srivastava, A.P.: Theory of knowledge classification in libraries (1964) 0.03 
    0.0345279 = product of:
  0.0690558 = sum of:
    0.0690558 = product of:
      0.1381116 = sum of:
        0.1381116 = weight(_text_:theory in 6250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1381116 = score(doc=6250,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.6432185 = fieldWeight in 6250, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6250)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Garcia Marco, F.J.; Esteban Navarro, M.A.: On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification (1993) 0.03 
    0.0330886 = product of:
  0.0661772 = sum of:
    0.0661772 = product of:
      0.1323544 = sum of:
        0.1323544 = weight(_text_:theory in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1323544 = score(doc=5876,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.61640584 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Intended is first of all a preliminary review of the implications that the new approaches to the theory of classification, mainly from cognitive psychology and epistemology may have for information work and research. As a secondary topic the scientific relations existing among information science, epistemology and the cognitive sciences are discussed. Classification is seen as a central activity in all daily and scientific activities, and, of course, of knowledge organization in information services. There is a mutual implication between classification and conceptualization, as the former moves in a natural way to the latter and the best result elaborated for classification is the concept. Research in concept theory is a need for a theory of classification. In this direction it is of outstanding importance to integrate the achievements of 'natural concept formation theory' (NCFT) as an alternative approach to conceptualization different from the traditional one of logicians and problem solving researchers. In conclusion both approaches are seen as being complementary: the NCFT approach being closer to the user and the logical one being more suitable for experts, including 'expert systems'
  12. Raju, A.A.N.: Colon Classification: theory and practice : a self instructional manual (2001) 0.03 
    0.030205619 = product of:
  0.060411237 = sum of:
    0.060411237 = product of:
      0.120822474 = sum of:
        0.120822474 = weight(_text_:theory in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.120822474 = score(doc=1482,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.56269896 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Colon Classification (CC) is truly the first freely faceted scheme for library classification devised and propagated by Dr. S.R. Ranganathan. The scheme is being taught in theory and practice to the students in most of the LIS schools in India and abroad also. Many manuals, Guide books and Introductory works have been published on CC in the past. But the present work tread a new path in presenting CC to the student, teaching and professional community. The present work Colon Classification: Theory and Practice; A Self Instructional Manual is the result of author's twenty-five years experience of teaching theory and practice of CC to the students of LIS. For the first ime concerted and systematic attempt has been made to present theory and practice of CC in self-instructional mode, keeping in view the requirements of students learners of Open Universities/ Distance Education Institutions in particular. The other singificant and novel features introduced in this manual are: Presenting the scope of each block consisting certain units bollowed by objectives, introduction, sections, sub-sections, self check exercises, glossary and assignment of each unit. It is hoped that all these features will help the users/readers of this manual to understand and grasp quickly, the intricacies involved in theory and practice of CC(6th Edition). The manual is presented in three blocks and twelve units.
  13. Körner, S.: Classification theory (1976) 0.03 
    0.029902037 = product of:
  0.059804074 = sum of:
    0.059804074 = product of:
      0.11960815 = sum of:
        0.11960815 = weight(_text_:theory in 1761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11960815 = score(doc=1761,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.55704355 = fieldWeight in 1761, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1761)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Some theory of classification underlies most practical activities, whether individual or social. It is involved in most attempt to understand the structure or reality on a metaphysical level and it is presupposed in the formulation of scientific laws. The logical and meterial principles of classification are covered as well as various general problems and criteria of classification. Differing classification principles in particular domains such as the natural sciences and medicine and in information are discussed as well as the place and role of classification in scientific method, its relation to and dependence on theory, scientific nomenclature and the philosophical issues through the heritage of Plato and Aristotle
  14. Star, S.L.: Grounded classification : grounded theory and faceted classification (1998) 0.03 
    0.029902037 = product of:
  0.059804074 = sum of:
    0.059804074 = product of:
      0.11960815 = sum of:
        0.11960815 = weight(_text_:theory in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11960815 = score(doc=851,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.55704355 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Comparison between grounded theory (a qualitative social science research methodology of Glaser and Strauss) and facet classification (Ranganathan)
    Content
    This article compares the qualitative method of grounded theory (GT) with Ranganathan's construction of faceted classifications (FC) in library and information science. Both struggle with a core problem-i.e., the representation of vernacular words and processes, empirically discovered, which will, although ethnographically faithful, be powerful beyond the single instance or case study. The article compares Glaser and Strauss's (1967) work with that of Ranganathan(1950).
  15. Mai, J.-E.: ¬The modernity of classification (2011) 0.03 
    0.029902037 = product of:
  0.059804074 = sum of:
    0.059804074 = product of:
      0.11960815 = sum of:
        0.11960815 = weight(_text_:theory in 293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11960815 = score(doc=293,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.55704355 = fieldWeight in 293, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=293)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the modernity of current classification theory and work, and outline a foundation for moving classification toward a late-modern conception. Design/methodology/approach - The paper examines the conceptual foundation for current modern classification work, provides critical analysis of that approach, and outlines three conflicts with modernity that shape the path out of the consequences of modernity. Findings - The paper presents an understanding of classification that establishes classification on a late-modern epistemology, and it lays the contours of how to reclaim the intellectual core of classification theory and work. Originality/value - The paper establishes a foundation for rethinking classification work, outlines consequences of current mainstream work, and provides concept for developing late-modern classification theory and practice.
  16. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.03 
    0.029902037 = product of:
  0.059804074 = sum of:
    0.059804074 = product of:
      0.11960815 = sum of:
        0.11960815 = weight(_text_:theory in 3617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11960815 = score(doc=3617,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.55704355 = fieldWeight in 3617, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3617)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In view of the impact of systems theory for the construction of classification systems the two major contributions of Dewey are summarized as well as the new methods of facet analysis and organization brought into classification by Ranganathan. With the latter's "canonical" solution for the contents and arrangement of main classes, however, contemporary philosophical thought regarding the organization of knowledge seems to have been neglected. The work of the Classification Research Group and elsewhere considering integrative level theory will improve the science of classification systems construction. Besides this the influence from psychology and linguistics on the recognition of relationships between concepts is outlined as well as some practical implications of the systems approach on classification. (I.C.)
  17. Kumar, K.: Theory of classification (1985) 0.03 
    0.029595342 = product of:
  0.059190683 = sum of:
    0.059190683 = product of:
      0.118381366 = sum of:
        0.118381366 = weight(_text_:theory in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118381366 = score(doc=2069,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This book provides a coherent account of the theory of classification. It discusses the contributions made by theoreticians like E.C. Richardson, J.B. Brown, W. Hulme, W.C. Berwick Sayers, H.E. Bliss and S.R. Ranganathan. However, the theory put forward by S.R. Ranganathan predominates the whole book because his contribution is far more than anybody else's. Five major schemes - DDC, UDC, LCC, CC, and BC - have also been discussed. Library classification is a specialized area of study. In recent years, library classification has become a vast and complicated field of study using highly technical terminology. A special attempt has been made to provide descriptions as simple and direct as could be possible. To illustrate the theory of classification, large number of examples have been given from all major schemes so that an average student ould also grasp the concepts easily. This book has been especially written to meet the requirements of students, preparing for their library science, documentation, information science diplomas and degrees.
  18. LaBarre, K.: Interrogating facet theory : decolonizing knowledge organization (2017) 0.03 
    0.029595342 = product of:
  0.059190683 = sum of:
    0.059190683 = product of:
      0.118381366 = sum of:
        0.118381366 = weight(_text_:theory in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118381366 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  19. Garcia Marco, F.J.; Esteban Navarro, M.A.: On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification (1995) 0.03 
    0.027902756 = product of:
  0.05580551 = sum of:
    0.05580551 = product of:
      0.11161102 = sum of:
        0.11161102 = weight(_text_:theory in 5559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11161102 = score(doc=5559,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 5559, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5559)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discusses classification as a central resource of human informational activity and as a central aspect of research for many sciences. Argues that thinking about the background of classification can help improve, or at least clarify, the practical tasks of documentary workers and librarians. Discusses the relationship and gaps between cognitive science and information science, and considers the contributions of epistemology and cognitive psychology; in particular, focuses on the role of the latter in the development of an integrative theory of classification
  20. Tennis, J.T.: Structure of classification theory : on foundational and the higher layers of classification theory (2016) 0.03 
    0.027902756 = product of:
  0.05580551 = sum of:
    0.05580551 = product of:
      0.11161102 = sum of:
        0.11161102 = weight(_text_:theory in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11161102 = score(doc=4889,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05163523 = queryNorm
            0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 96
  • f 3
  • chi 1
  • d 1
  • i 1
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 87
  • m 14
  • s 4
  • el 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications