-
Neelameghan, A.: Classification, theory of (1971)
0.08
0.07513429 = product of:
0.15026858 = sum of:
0.15026858 = product of:
0.30053717 = sum of:
0.30053717 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 1988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30053717 = score(doc=1988,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.9407812 = fieldWeight in 1988, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1988)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.5
-
Foskett, D.J.: Facet analysis (2009)
0.04
0.037567146 = product of:
0.07513429 = sum of:
0.07513429 = product of:
0.15026858 = sum of:
0.15026858 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 3754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15026858 = score(doc=3754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.4703906 = fieldWeight in 3754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Körner, S.: Classification theory (1976)
0.03
0.032871254 = product of:
0.06574251 = sum of:
0.06574251 = product of:
0.13148502 = sum of:
0.13148502 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 1761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13148502 = score(doc=1761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.41159177 = fieldWeight in 1761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Wiederabdruch aus: Encyclopedia Britannica: Macropedia. 15th ed. Vol.4.
-
Grove, A.: Taxonomy (2009)
0.03
0.032871254 = product of:
0.06574251 = sum of:
0.06574251 = product of:
0.13148502 = sum of:
0.13148502 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13148502 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.41159177 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Beghtol, C.: Classification theory (2010)
0.03
0.02817536 = product of:
0.05635072 = sum of:
0.05635072 = product of:
0.11270144 = sum of:
0.11270144 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 3761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11270144 = score(doc=3761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.35279295 = fieldWeight in 3761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.02
0.02439845 = product of:
0.0487969 = sum of:
0.0487969 = product of:
0.0975938 = sum of:
0.0975938 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0975938 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.02
0.02439845 = product of:
0.0487969 = sum of:
0.0487969 = product of:
0.0975938 = sum of:
0.0975938 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0975938 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.02
0.02439845 = product of:
0.0487969 = sum of:
0.0487969 = product of:
0.0975938 = sum of:
0.0975938 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0975938 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
-
Frické, M.: Logical division (2016)
0.02
0.023479467 = product of:
0.046958935 = sum of:
0.046958935 = product of:
0.09391787 = sum of:
0.09391787 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09391787 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.29399413 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, ed. by B. Hjoerland. [http://www.isko.org/cyclo/logical_division]
-
Parrochia, D.: Mathematical theory of classification (2018)
0.02
0.022080194 = product of:
0.04416039 = sum of:
0.04416039 = product of:
0.13248116 = sum of:
0.13248116 = weight(_text_:objects in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13248116 = score(doc=4308,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- One of the main topics of scientific research, classification is the operation consisting of distributing objects in classes or groups which are, in general, less numerous than them. From Antiquity to the Classical Age, it has a long history where philosophers (Aristotle), and natural scientists (Linnaeus), took a great part. But from the nineteenth century (with the growth of chemistry and information science) and the twentieth century (with the arrival of mathematical models and computer science), mathematics (especially theory of orders and theory of graphs or hypergraphs) allows us to compute all the possible partitions, chains of partitions, covers, hypergraphs or systems of classes we can construct on a domain. In spite of these advances, most of classifications are still based on the evaluation of ressemblances between objects that constitute the empirical data. However, all these classifications remain, for technical and epistemological reasons we detail below, very unstable ones. We lack a real algebra of classifications, which could explain their properties and the relations existing between them. Though the aim of a general theory of classifications is surely a wishful thought, some recent conjecture gives the hope that the existence of a metaclassification (or classification of all classification schemes) is possible
-
Zackland, M.; Fontaine, D.: Systematic building of conceptual classification systems with C-KAT (1996)
0.02
0.021858275 = product of:
0.04371655 = sum of:
0.04371655 = product of:
0.13114965 = sum of:
0.13114965 = weight(_text_:objects in 5145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13114965 = score(doc=5145,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 5145, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5145)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- C-KAT is a method and a tool which supports the design of feature oriented classification systems for knowlegde based systems. It uses a specialized Heuristic Classification conceptual model named 'classification by structural shift' which sees the classification process as the matching of different classifications of the same set of objects or situations organized around different structural principles. To manage the complexity induced by the cross-product, C-KAT supports the use of a leastcommittment strategy which applies in a context of constraint-directed reasoning. Presents this method using an example from the field of industrial fire insurance
-
Olson, H.; Nielsen, J.; Dippie, S.R.: Encyclopaedist rivalry, classificatory commonality, illusory universality (2003)
0.02
0.018783573 = product of:
0.037567146 = sum of:
0.037567146 = product of:
0.07513429 = sum of:
0.07513429 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07513429 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.2351953 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the cultural construction of classification as exemplified by the French Encyclopòudists, Jean d'Alembert and Denis Diderot, and the encyclopaedism of Samuel Taylor Coleridge analysing original texts digitized and encoded using XML and an adaptation of TEI. 1. Introduction This paper, focusing an encyclopaedism, is part of a larger study exploring the cultural construction of classification. The larger study explores possible foundations for bias in the structure of classifications with a view to more equitable practice. Bias in classification has been documented relative to race, ethnicity, gender, religion, sexuality and other factors. Analyses and proposed solutions have addressed only acute biases in particular systems, not the systems themselves. The project tentatively identifies the systemic roots of bias are culturally specific and reflected in the structure of conventional classifcatory practices. A wide range of western cultural texts from classic Greek philosophy to twentieth-century ethnography is being analysed. The consistency with which certain presumptions are revealed, no matter how different the philosophical and social views of the authors, indicates their ubiquity in western thought, though it is not mirrored in many other cultures. We hope that an understanding of these fundamental cultural presumptions will make space for development of alternative approaches to knowledge organization that can work alongside conventional methods. This paper describes an example of the first phase of the project, which is a deconstruction developed from relevant texts. In the context of encyclopaedism the key texts used in this paper are Jean d'Alembert's Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedie, selections from Denis Diderot's contributions to the Encyclopedie, and Samuel Taylor Coleridge's Treatise an Method and Prospectus of the Encyclopedia Metropolitana. We are analysing these texts in digital form using Extensible Markup Language (XML) implemented via a document type definition (DTD) created for the purpose including elements of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI). We will first explain the encoding methodology; then define the differences between the French Encyclopaedists and the English Coleridge; deconstruct these differences by allowing the commonalities between the texts to emerge; and, finally, examine their cultural specificity.
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multidimensional knowledge structures (2003)
0.02
0.018735666 = product of:
0.03747133 = sum of:
0.03747133 = product of:
0.11241399 = sum of:
0.11241399 = weight(_text_:objects in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11241399 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper examines the way in which classification schemes can be applied to the organization of digital resources. The case is argued for the particular suitability of schemes based an faceted principles for the organization of complex digital objects. Details are given of a co-operative project between the School of Library Archive & Information Studies, University College London, and the United Kingdom Higher Education gateways Arts and Humanities Data Service and Humbul, in which a faceted knowledge structure is being developed for the indexing and display of digital materials within a new combined humanities portal.
-
Tennis, J.T.: Foundational, first-order, and second-order classification theory (2015)
0.02
0.018735666 = product of:
0.03747133 = sum of:
0.03747133 = product of:
0.11241399 = sum of:
0.11241399 = weight(_text_:objects in 2204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11241399 = score(doc=2204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2204)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Both basic and applied research on the construction, implementation, maintenance, and evaluation of classification schemes is called classification theory. If we employ Ritzer's metatheoretical method of analysis on the over one-hundred year-old body of literature, we can se categories of theory emerge. This paper looks at one particular part of knowledge organization work, namely classification theory, and asks 1) what are the contours of this intellectual space, and, 2) what have we produced in the theoretical reflection on constructing, implementing, and evaluating classification schemes? The preliminary findings from this work are that classification theory can be separated into three kinds: foundational classification theory, first-order classification theory, and second-order classification theory, each with its own concerns and objects of study.
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.02
0.016265634 = product of:
0.03253127 = sum of:
0.03253127 = product of:
0.06506254 = sum of:
0.06506254 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06506254 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.02
0.016265634 = product of:
0.03253127 = sum of:
0.03253127 = product of:
0.06506254 = sum of:
0.06506254 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06506254 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.02
0.016265634 = product of:
0.03253127 = sum of:
0.03253127 = product of:
0.06506254 = sum of:
0.06506254 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06506254 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.02
0.016265634 = product of:
0.03253127 = sum of:
0.03253127 = product of:
0.06506254 = sum of:
0.06506254 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06506254 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.1-22
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001)
0.02
0.015613055 = product of:
0.03122611 = sum of:
0.03122611 = product of:
0.093678325 = sum of:
0.093678325 = weight(_text_:objects in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093678325 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
-
Howarth, L.C.: Creating pathways to memory : enhancing life histories through category clusters (2008)
0.02
0.015613055 = product of:
0.03122611 = sum of:
0.03122611 = product of:
0.093678325 = sum of:
0.093678325 = weight(_text_:objects in 2281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093678325 = score(doc=2281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 2281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2281)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- For individuals whose memory and language are intact, making sense of unfamiliar information or objects is a process of matching what is unknown, to what is known through previous learning or experience. The unfamiliar is linked to clusters or categories of the familiar, identifying what is "like" or "nearly like" and excluding all others (De Mey 1982). Most commonly, these are categories on which there is general agreement, sometimes collocated under established terms, labels, or shared naming devices. Classification systems are built on the basis of shared understandings of human knowledge and culture. When memory and/or language are impaired, how does such contextualizing and categorizing occur? Since perception is individual, can a person with cognitive impairment "make sense" of information, an object, a situation, using alternative modes of expression that are less or not language-dependent? This paper reports on preliminary results from a pilot study undertaken as part of exploratory mixed methods research examining the sense-making, sorting, categorization, and recall strategies of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) resulting from early stage dementia.
