Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004) 0.02 
    0.02074813 = product of:
  0.051870324 = sum of:
    0.04127435 = weight(_text_:management in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04127435 = score(doc=2651,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
    0.010595973 = product of:
      0.031787917 = sum of:
        0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031787917 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The paper analyses the importance of data presentation and modelling and its role in improving the management, use and exchange of analytico-synthetic classifications in automated systems. Inefficiencies, in this respect, hinder the automation of classification systems that offer the possibility of building compound index/search terms. The lack of machine readable data expressing the semantics and structure of a classification vocabulary has negative effects on information management and retrieval, thus restricting the potential of both automated systems and classifications themselves. The authors analysed the data representation structure of three general analytico-synthetic classification systems (BC2-Bliss Bibliographic Classification; BSO-Broad System of Ordering; UDC-Universal Decimal Classification) and put forward some core requirements for classification data representation
    Date
    29. 8.2004 14:20:40
  2. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.01 
    0.013260448 = product of:
  0.03315112 = sum of:
    0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02432114 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
    0.008829977 = product of:
      0.02648993 = sum of:
        0.02648993 = weight(_text_:29 in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02648993 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    29. 6.2014 17:31:49
  3. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01 
    0.011251533 = product of:
  0.056257665 = sum of:
    0.056257665 = product of:
      0.0843865 = sum of:
        0.042383887 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042383887 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.042002615 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042002615 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  4. Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003) 0.01 
    0.010582941 = product of:
  0.02645735 = sum of:
    0.019456914 = weight(_text_:management in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019456914 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
    0.007000436 = product of:
      0.021001307 = sum of:
        0.021001307 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021001307 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The different points of views an knowledge representation and organization from various research communities reflect underlying philosophies and paradigms in these communities. This paper reviews differences and relations in knowledge representation and organization and generalizes four paradigms-integrative and disintegrative pragmatism and integrative and disintegrative epistemologism. Examples such as classification, XML schemas, and ontologies are compared based an how they specify concepts, build data models, and encode knowledge organization structures. 1. Introduction Knowledge representation (KR) is a term that several research communities use to refer to somewhat different aspects of the same research area. The artificial intelligence (AI) community considers KR as simply "something to do with writing down, in some language or communications medium, descriptions or pictures that correspond in some salient way to the world or a state of the world" (Duce & Ringland, 1988, p. 3). It emphasizes the ways in which knowledge can be encoded in a computer program (Bench-Capon, 1990). For the library and information science (LIS) community, KR is literally the synonym of knowledge organization, i.e., KR is referred to as the process of organizing knowledge into classifications, thesauri, or subject heading lists. KR has another meaning in LIS: it "encompasses every type and method of indexing, abstracting, cataloguing, classification, records management, bibliography and the creation of textual or bibliographic databases for information retrieval" (Anderson, 1996, p. 336). Adding the social dimension to knowledge organization, Hjoerland (1997) states that knowledge is a part of human activities and tied to the division of labor in society, which should be the primary organization of knowledge. Knowledge organization in LIS is secondary or derived, because knowledge is organized in learned institutions and publications. These different points of views an KR suggest that an essential difference in the understanding of KR between both AI and LIS lies in the source of representationwhether KR targets human activities or derivatives (knowledge produced) from human activities. This difference also decides their difference in purpose-in AI KR is mainly computer-application oriented or pragmatic and the result of representation is used to support decisions an human activities, while in LIS KR is conceptually oriented or abstract and the result of representation is used for access to derivatives from human activities.
    Date
    12. 9.2004 17:22:35
  5. Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008) 0.01 
    0.010582941 = product of:
  0.02645735 = sum of:
    0.019456914 = weight(_text_:management in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019456914 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
    0.007000436 = product of:
      0.021001307 = sum of:
        0.021001307 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021001307 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    7.11.2008 15:22:04
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  6. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01 
    0.009845092 = product of:
  0.04922546 = sum of:
    0.04922546 = product of:
      0.07383819 = sum of:
        0.037085902 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037085902 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
        0.036752287 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036752287 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.22-36
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  7. Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015) 0.01 
    0.007032209 = product of:
  0.035161044 = sum of:
    0.035161044 = product of:
      0.052741565 = sum of:
        0.02648993 = weight(_text_:29 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02648993 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
        0.026251635 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026251635 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8.11.2015 21:27:22
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
  8. Satija, M.P.: Relationships in Ranganathan's Colon Classification (2001) 0.01 
    0.0068099196 = product of:
  0.034049597 = sum of:
    0.034049597 = weight(_text_:management in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034049597 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
  9. Ullah, A.; Khusro, S.; Ullah, I.: Bibliographic classification in the digital age : current trends & future directions (2017) 0.01 
    0.0068099196 = product of:
  0.034049597 = sum of:
    0.034049597 = weight(_text_:management in 5717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034049597 = score(doc=5717,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5717, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5717)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic classification is among the core activities of Library & Information Science that brings order and proper management to the holdings of a library. Compared to printed media, digital collections present numerous challenges regarding their preservation, curation, organization and resource discovery & access. Therefore, true native perspective is needed to be adopted for bibliographic classification in digital environments. In this research article, we have investigated and reported different approaches to bibliographic classification of digital collections. The article also contributes two evaluation frameworks that evaluate the existing classification schemes and systems. The article presents a bird's-eye view for researchers in reaching a generalized and holistic approach towards bibliographic classification research, where new research avenues have been identified.
  10. Beghtol, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning (2001) 0.01 
    0.005837074 = product of:
  0.02918537 = sum of:
    0.02918537 = weight(_text_:management in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02918537 = score(doc=1138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
  11. Advances in classification research. Vol.10 : Proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, held at the 62nd ASIS Annual Meeting Nov 1-5, 1999, Washington (2001) 0.01 
    0.005837074 = product of:
  0.02918537 = sum of:
    0.02918537 = weight(_text_:management in 1586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02918537 = score(doc=1586,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1586, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1586)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: DAVENPORT, E.: Implicit orders: documentary genres and organizational practice; ANDERSEN, J. u. F.S. CHRISTENSEN: Wittgenstein and indexing theory; OLSON, H.A.: Cultural discourses of classification: indigeous alternatives to the tradition of Aristotle, Dürkheim, and Foucault; FRÂNCU, V.: A universal classification system going through changes; JACOB, E.K. u. U. PRISS: Nontraditional indexing structures for the management of electronic resources; BROOKS, T.A.: Relevance auras: macro patterns and micro scatter; RUIZ, M.E. u. SRINIVASAN, P.: Combining machine learning and hierarchical indexing structures for text categorization; WEEDMAN, J.: Local practice and the growth of knowledge: decisions in subject access to digitized images
  12. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multidimensional knowledge structures (2003) 0.01 
    0.005837074 = product of:
  0.02918537 = sum of:
    0.02918537 = weight(_text_:management in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02918537 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  13. Broughton, V.; Slavic, A.: Building a faceted classification for the humanities : principles and procedures (2007) 0.01 
    0.005503246 = product of:
  0.027516231 = sum of:
    0.027516231 = weight(_text_:management in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027516231 = score(doc=2875,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.21066327 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to provide an overview of principles and procedures involved in creating a faceted classification scheme for use in resource discovery in an online environment. Design/methodology/approach - Facet analysis provides an established rigorous methodology for the conceptual organization of a subject field, and the structuring of an associated classification or controlled vocabulary. This paper explains how that methodology was applied to the humanities in the FATKS project, where the objective was to explore the potential of facet analytical theory for creating a controlled vocabulary for the humanities, and to establish the requirements of a faceted classification appropriate to an online environment. A detailed faceted vocabulary was developed for two areas of the humanities within a broader facet framework for the whole of knowledge. Research issues included how to create a data model which made the faceted structure explicit and machine-readable and provided for its further development and use. Findings - In order to support easy facet combination in indexing, and facet searching and browsing on the interface, faceted classification requires a formalized data structure and an appropriate tool for its management. The conceptual framework of a faceted system proper can be applied satisfactorily to humanities, and fully integrated within a vocabulary management system. Research limitations/implications - The procedures described in this paper are concerned only with the structuring of the classification, and do not extend to indexing, retrieval and application issues. Practical implications - Many stakeholders in the domain of resource discovery consider developing their own classification system and supporting tools. The methods described in this paper may clarify the process of building a faceted classification and may provide some useful ideas with respect to the vocabulary maintenance tool. Originality/value - As far as the authors are aware there is no comparable research in this area.
  14. Foskett, A.C.: ¬The future of facetted classification (2000) 0.00 
    0.0049447874 = product of:
  0.024723936 = sum of:
    0.024723936 = product of:
      0.074171804 = sum of:
        0.074171804 = weight(_text_:29 in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074171804 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27. 1.2002 19:30:29
  15. Jacob, E.K.: ¬The everyday world of work : two approaches to the investigation of classification in context (2001) 0.00 
    0.0048642284 = product of:
  0.02432114 = sum of:
    0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02432114 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    One major aspect of T.D. Wilson's research has been his insistence on situating the investigation of information behaviour within the context of its occurrence - within the everyday world of work. The significance of this approach is reviewed in light of the notion of embodied cognition that characterises the evolving theoretical episteme in cognitive science research. Embodied cognition employs complex external props such as stigmergic structures and cognitive scaffoldings to reduce the cognitive burden on the individual and to augment human problem-solving activities. The cognitive function of the classification scheme is described as exemplifying both stigmergic structures and cognitive scaffoldings. Two different but complementary approaches to the investigation of situated cognition are presented: cognition-as-scaffolding and cognition-as-infrastructure. Classification-as-scaffolding views the classification scheme as a knowledge storage device supporting and promoting cognitive economy. Classification-as-infrastructure views the classification system as a social convention that, when integrated with technological structures and organisational practices, supports knowledge management work. Both approaches are shown to build upon and extend Wilson's contention that research is most productive when it attends to the social and organisational contexts of cognitive activity by focusing on the everyday world of work.
  16. Hjoerland, B.: Facet analysis : the logical approach to knowledge organization (2013) 0.00 
    0.0048642284 = product of:
  0.02432114 = sum of:
    0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 2720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02432114 = score(doc=2720,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2720, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2720)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 49(2013) no.2, S.545-557
  17. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.00 
    0.0042002616 = product of:
  0.021001307 = sum of:
    0.021001307 = product of:
      0.06300392 = sum of:
        0.06300392 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06300392 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  18. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.00 
    0.0042002616 = product of:
  0.021001307 = sum of:
    0.021001307 = product of:
      0.06300392 = sum of:
        0.06300392 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06300392 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  19. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.00 
    0.0042002616 = product of:
  0.021001307 = sum of:
    0.021001307 = product of:
      0.06300392 = sum of:
        0.06300392 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06300392 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  20. Szostak, R.: Classifying science : phenomena, data, theory, method, practice (2004) 0.00 
    0.004127435 = product of:
  0.020637175 = sum of:
    0.020637175 = weight(_text_:management in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020637175 = score(doc=325,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.15799746 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Despite its methodological flaws and lack of empirical foundation, the book could potentially bring new ideas to current discussions within the practices of curriculum development and knowledge management as weIl as design of information systems, an classification schemes as tools for knowledge sharing, decision-making and knowledge exploration. I hesitate to recommend the book to students, except to students at advanced levels of study, because of its biased presentation of the new ideas and its basis an secondary literature."
    Series
    Information Science & Knowledge Management ; 7

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 52
  • f 3
  • i 3
  • chi 1
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 54
  • m 5
  • s 3
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications