Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.10 
    0.09741347 = product of:
  0.2922404 = sum of:
    0.25448862 = weight(_text_:themes in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25448862 = score(doc=4152,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.29856348 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.8523769 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
    0.037751794 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037751794 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This is the fourth in a series of papers on classification based on phenomena instead of disciplines. Together with types, levels and facets that have been discussed in the previous parts, themes and rhemes are further structural components of such a classification. In a statement or in a longer document, a base theme and several particular themes can be identified. Base theme should be cited first in a classmark, followed by particular themes, each with its own facets. In some cases, rhemes can also be expressed, that is new information provided about a theme, converting an abstract statement ("wolves, affected by cervids") into a claim that some thing actually occurs ("wolves are affected by cervids"). In the Integrative Levels Classification rhemes can be expressed by special deictic classes, including those for actual specimens, anaphoras, unknown values, conjunctions and spans, whole universe, anthropocentric favoured classes, and favoured host classes. These features, together with rules for pronounciation, make a classification of phenomena a true language, that may be suitable for many uses.
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  2. Blake, J.: Some issues in the classification of zoology (2011) 0.02 
    0.01767282 = product of:
  0.10603692 = sum of:
    0.10603692 = weight(_text_:themes in 4845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10603692 = score(doc=4845,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29856348 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 4845, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4845)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This paper identifies and discusses features of the classification of mammals that are relevant to the bibliographic classification of the subject. The tendency of zoological classifications to change, the differing sizes of groups of species, the use zoologists make of groupings other than taxa, and the links in zoology between classification and nomenclature, are identified as key themes the bibliographic classificationist needs to be aware of. The impact of cladistics, a novel classificatory method and philosophy adopted by zoologists in the last few decades, is identified as the defining feature of the current, rather turbulent, state of zoological classification. However because zoologists still employ some non-cladistic classifications, because cladistic classifications are in some way unsuited to optimal information storage and retrieval, and because some of their consequences for zoological classification are as yet unknown, bibliographic classifications cannot be modelled entirely on them.
  3. Campbell, G.: ¬A queer eye for the faceted guy : how a universal classification principle can be applied to a distinct subculture (2004) 0.01 
    0.014138257 = product of:
  0.08482954 = sum of:
    0.08482954 = weight(_text_:themes in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08482954 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29856348 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.28412563 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The results of a small qualitative study of gay and lesbian information users suggest that facet analysis as it is increasingly practised in the field of information architecture provides a promising avenue for improving information access to gay and lesbian information resources. Findings indicated that gay and lesbian information users have an acute sense of categorization grounded in the need to identify gay-positive physical and social spaces, and in their finely-honed practices of detecting gay "facets" to general information themes. They are also, however, very flexible and adaptable in their application of gay-related facet values, which suggests that browsing systems will have to be designed with considerable care.
  4. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01 
    0.012583932 = product of:
  0.07550359 = sum of:
    0.07550359 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07550359 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  5. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01 
    0.012583932 = product of:
  0.07550359 = sum of:
    0.07550359 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07550359 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  6. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.01 
    0.012583932 = product of:
  0.07550359 = sum of:
    0.07550359 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07550359 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  7. Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008) 0.01 
    0.00883641 = product of:
  0.05301846 = sum of:
    0.05301846 = weight(_text_:themes in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05301846 = score(doc=3262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29856348 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.17757851 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Several of the papers are clearly written as primers and neatly address the second agenda item: attracting others to the study and use of facet analysis. The most valuable papers are written in clear, approachable language. Vickery's paper (p. 145-160) is a clarion call for faceted classification and facet analysis. The heart of the paper is a primer for central concepts and techniques. Vickery explains the value of using faceted classification in document retrieval. Also provided are potential solutions to thorny interface and display issues with facets. Vickery looks to complementary themes in knowledge organization, such as thesauri and ontologies as potential areas for extending the facet concept. Broughton (p. 193-210) describes a rigorous approach to the application of facet analysis in the creation of a compatible thesaurus from the schedules of the 2nd edition of the Bliss Classification (BC2). This discussion of exemplary faceted thesauri, recent standards work, and difficulties encountered in the project will provide valuable guidance for future research in this area. Slavic (p. 257-271) provides a challenge to make faceted classification come 'alive' through promoting the use of machine-readable formats for use and exchange in applications such as Topic Maps and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization Systems), and as supported by the standard BS8723 (2005) Structured Vocabulary for Information Retrieval. She also urges designers of faceted classifications to get involved in standards work. Cheti and Paradisi (p. 223-241) outline a basic approach to converting an existing subject indexing tool, the Nuovo Soggetario, into a faceted thesaurus through the use of facet analysis. This discussion, well grounded in the canonical literature, may well serve as a primer for future efforts. Also useful for those who wish to construct faceted thesauri is the article by Tudhope and Binding (p. 211-222). This contains an outline of basic elements to be found in exemplar faceted thesauri, and a discussion of project FACET (Faceted Access to Cultural heritage Terminology) with algorithmically-based semantic query expansion in a dataset composed of items from the National Museum of Science and Industry indexed with AAT (Art and Architecture Thesaurus). This paper looks to the future hybridization of ontologies and facets through standards developments such as SKOS because of the "lightweight semantics" inherent in facets.
  8. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01 
    0.008389289 = product of:
  0.050335728 = sum of:
    0.050335728 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050335728 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  9. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01 
    0.008389289 = product of:
  0.050335728 = sum of:
    0.050335728 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050335728 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  10. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01 
    0.008389289 = product of:
  0.050335728 = sum of:
    0.050335728 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050335728 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  11. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.01 
    0.008389289 = product of:
  0.050335728 = sum of:
    0.050335728 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050335728 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Pages
    S.1-22
  12. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01 
    0.007340627 = product of:
  0.04404376 = sum of:
    0.04404376 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04404376 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  13. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01 
    0.007340627 = product of:
  0.04404376 = sum of:
    0.04404376 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04404376 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01 
    0.007340627 = product of:
  0.04404376 = sum of:
    0.04404376 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04404376 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Pages
    S.22-36
  15. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01 
    0.006291966 = product of:
  0.037751794 = sum of:
    0.037751794 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037751794 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  16. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01 
    0.006291966 = product of:
  0.037751794 = sum of:
    0.037751794 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037751794 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  17. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01 
    0.006291966 = product of:
  0.037751794 = sum of:
    0.037751794 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037751794 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
  18. Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014) 0.01 
    0.006291966 = product of:
  0.037751794 = sum of:
    0.037751794 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037751794 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  19. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.01 
    0.006291966 = product of:
  0.037751794 = sum of:
    0.037751794 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037751794 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  20. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.01 
    0.005243305 = product of:
  0.03145983 = sum of:
    0.03145983 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03145983 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16262463 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046439905 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 22
  • f 3
  • chi 1
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 26
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes