Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996) 0.01
    0.011466719 = product of:
      0.022933438 = sum of:
        0.022933438 = product of:
          0.034400158 = sum of:
            0.009001859 = weight(_text_:e in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009001859 = score(doc=6050,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.06545277 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04553648 = queryNorm
                0.13753214 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
            0.0253983 = weight(_text_:j in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0253983 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.144692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04553648 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
    Language
    e
  2. Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990) 0.00
    0.0034299945 = product of:
      0.006859989 = sum of:
        0.006859989 = product of:
          0.020579966 = sum of:
            0.020579966 = weight(_text_:e in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020579966 = score(doc=1271,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06545277 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04553648 = queryNorm
                0.31442466 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  3. Michel, D.: Taxonomy of Subject Relationships (1997) 0.00
    0.0017324088 = product of:
      0.0034648175 = sum of:
        0.0034648175 = product of:
          0.010394452 = sum of:
            0.010394452 = weight(_text_:e in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010394452 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06545277 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04553648 = queryNorm
                0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  4. Hudon, M.: ¬A preliminary investigation of the usefulness of semantic relations and of standardized definitions for the purpose of specifying meaning in a thesaurus (1998) 0.00
    0.0010394452 = product of:
      0.0020788903 = sum of:
        0.0020788903 = product of:
          0.006236671 = sum of:
            0.006236671 = weight(_text_:e in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006236671 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06545277 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04553648 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  5. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.00
    8.574986E-4 = product of:
      0.0017149972 = sum of:
        0.0017149972 = product of:
          0.0051449914 = sum of:
            0.0051449914 = weight(_text_:e in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0051449914 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06545277 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04553648 = queryNorm
                0.078606166 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
    Language
    e