Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.02
    0.017166806 = product of:
      0.034333613 = sum of:
        0.034333613 = product of:
          0.068667226 = sum of:
            0.068667226 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068667226 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17748001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068208 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  2. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.01
    0.012016764 = product of:
      0.024033528 = sum of:
        0.024033528 = product of:
          0.048067056 = sum of:
            0.048067056 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048067056 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17748001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068208 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  3. Fischer, D.H.: Converting a thesaurus to OWL : Notes on the paper "The National Cancer Institute's Thesaurus and Ontology" (2004) 0.01
    0.011040968 = product of:
      0.022081936 = sum of:
        0.022081936 = product of:
          0.08832774 = sum of:
            0.08832774 = weight(_text_:editors in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08832774 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.340243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068208 = queryNorm
                0.25960192 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper analysed here is a kind of position paper. In order to get a better under-standing of the reported work I used the retrieval interface of the thesaurus, the so-called NCI DTS Browser accessible via the Web3, and I perused the cited OWL file4 with numerous "Find" and "Find next" string searches. In addition the file was im-ported into Protégé 2000, Release 2.0, with OWL Plugin 1.0 and Racer Plugin 1.7.14. At the end of the paper's introduction the authors say: "In the following sections, this paper will describe the terminology development process at NCI, and the issues associated with converting a description logic based nomenclature to a semantically rich OWL ontology." While I will not deal with the first part, i.e. the terminology development process at NCI, I do not see the thesaurus as a description logic based nomenclature, or its cur-rent state and conversion already result in a "rich" OWL ontology. What does "rich" mean here? According to my view there is a great quantity of concepts and links but a very poor description logic structure which enables inferences. And what does the fol-lowing really mean, which is said a few lines previously: "Although editors have defined a number of named ontologic relations to support the description-logic based structure of the Thesaurus, additional relation-ships are considered for inclusion as required to support dependent applications."
  4. Bandholtz, T.; Schulte-Coerne, T.; Glaser, R.; Fock, J.; Keller, T.: iQvoc - open source SKOS(XL) maintenance and publishing tool (2010) 0.01
    0.010737947 = product of:
      0.021475894 = sum of:
        0.021475894 = product of:
          0.04295179 = sum of:
            0.04295179 = weight(_text_:r in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04295179 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16777077 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068208 = queryNorm
                0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008) 0.01
    0.0092039555 = product of:
      0.018407911 = sum of:
        0.018407911 = product of:
          0.036815822 = sum of:
            0.036815822 = weight(_text_:r in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036815822 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16777077 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068208 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    r
  6. Müller, T.: Wissensrepräsentation mit semantischen Netzen im Bereich Luftfahrt (2006) 0.01
    0.008583403 = product of:
      0.017166806 = sum of:
        0.017166806 = product of:
          0.034333613 = sum of:
            0.034333613 = weight(_text_:22 in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034333613 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17748001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068208 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 9.2006 21:00:22