Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Fischer, D.H.: Converting a thesaurus to OWL : Notes on the paper "The National Cancer Institute's Thesaurus and Ontology" (2004) 0.01 
    0.010526544 = product of:
  0.05263272 = sum of:
    0.05263272 = weight(_text_:great in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05263272 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24172091 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042928502 = queryNorm
        0.21774168 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The paper analysed here is a kind of position paper. In order to get a better under-standing of the reported work I used the retrieval interface of the thesaurus, the so-called NCI DTS Browser accessible via the Web3, and I perused the cited OWL file4 with numerous "Find" and "Find next" string searches. In addition the file was im-ported into Protégé 2000, Release 2.0, with OWL Plugin 1.0 and Racer Plugin 1.7.14. At the end of the paper's introduction the authors say: "In the following sections, this paper will describe the terminology development process at NCI, and the issues associated with converting a description logic based nomenclature to a semantically rich OWL ontology." While I will not deal with the first part, i.e. the terminology development process at NCI, I do not see the thesaurus as a description logic based nomenclature, or its cur-rent state and conversion already result in a "rich" OWL ontology. What does "rich" mean here? According to my view there is a great quantity of concepts and links but a very poor description logic structure which enables inferences. And what does the fol-lowing really mean, which is said a few lines previously: "Although editors have defined a number of named ontologic relations to support the description-logic based structure of the Thesaurus, additional relation-ships are considered for inclusion as required to support dependent applications."
  2. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.01 
    0.0058162194 = product of:
  0.029081097 = sum of:
    0.029081097 = product of:
      0.058162194 = sum of:
        0.058162194 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058162194 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  3. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.00 
    0.0040713535 = product of:
  0.020356767 = sum of:
    0.020356767 = product of:
      0.040713534 = sum of:
        0.040713534 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040713534 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  4. Müller, T.: Wissensrepräsentation mit semantischen Netzen im Bereich Luftfahrt (2006) 0.00 
    0.0029081097 = product of:
  0.014540548 = sum of:
    0.014540548 = product of:
      0.029081097 = sum of:
        0.029081097 = weight(_text_:22 in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029081097 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26. 9.2006 21:00:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Types